Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of P-POSSUM and CR-POSSUM Scores in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Resection

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive accuracy of P-POSSUM and CR-POSSUM models on patients undergoing colorectal resection.

Methods

P-POSSUM and CR-POSSUM predictor equations for mortality were applied retrospectively to 321 patients who had undergone colorectal resection for cancer. P-POSSUM and CR-POSSUM scores were validated by assessing their calibration and discrimination. Calibration was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and the corresponding calibration curves. Evaluation of the discriminative capability of both models was performed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

Overall, 22 deaths were observed. CR-POSSUM predicted 25 deaths (χ2 = 12.20, P = 0.13), and P-POSSUM predicted 29 deaths (χ2 =18.85, P = 0.002). ROC curves analysis revealed that CR-POSSUM has reasonable discriminatory power for mortality.

Conclusions

These data suggest that CR-POSSUM may provide a better estimate of the risk of mortality for patients who undergoing colorectal resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J. Estimates of worldwide incidence of eighteen major cancers in 1985. Int J Cancer 1993;54:594

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology, 6th edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2001

  3. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 1991;78:355–360

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Midwinter MJ, Tytherleigh M, Ashley S. Estimation of mortality and morbidity risk in vascular surgery using POSSUM and the Portsmouth predictor equation. Br J Surg 1999;86:471–474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tekkis PP, Prytherch DR, Kocher HM, et al. Development of a dedicated risk-adjusment scoring system for colorectal surgery (colorectal POSSUM). Br J Surg 2004;91:1174–1182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lemeshow S, Le Gall JR. Modeling the severity of illness of ICU patients: a systems update. JAMA 1994;272:1049–1055

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW Jr. A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemiol 1982;115:92–106

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and the use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gocmen E, Koc M, Tez M, et al. Evaluation of P-POSSUM and O-POSSUM scores in patients with gastric cancer undergoing resection. Hepatogastroenterology 2004;51:1864–1866

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Prytherch DR, Whiteley MS, Higgins B, et al. POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Br J Surg 1998;85:1217–1220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Senagore AJ, Warmuth AJ, Delaney CP, et al. POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM: implementation issues in a United States health care system for prediction of outcome for colon cancer resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1435–1441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mesut Tez MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tez, M., Yoldaş, Ö., Gocmen, E. et al. Evaluation of P-POSSUM and CR-POSSUM Scores in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Resection. World J. Surg. 30, 2266–2269 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0675-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0675-8

Keywords

Navigation