Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Treatment of Bladder Tumors and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with a New TUR System Using Physiological Saline as Perfusate

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents a new transurethral resection (TUR) system for use in endoscopic surgery. By using an electroconductive solution (physiological saline) as the perfusate in lieu of conventional non-electroconductive solution (Uromatic), additional anesthesia (e.g., obturator nerve blocking) is not required. The new TUR is carried out in an electroconductive solution such as saline, and because radiofrequency current flows from the resecting electrode through the perfusate to the outer sheath, no counter-electrode is needed. We have treated both bladder tumor and benign prostatic hyperplasia cases with this new system. Surgery was safely performed in all TUR-bt cases without requiring obturator nerve blocking. During both TUR-bt and transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) using this system, tissue resection and coagulation equivalents were similar to the conventional TUR system. In previous TUR, preoperative obturator nerve blocking was necessary, and in some cases, incomplete blocking or complications occurred. When physiological saline is used as the perfusate, blood electrolyte levels are not greatly changed, even after extensive resection of the bladder wall; as a result, this new system is also cost effective because physiological saline is less expensive than non-electroconductive solutions and requires no counter-electrode. Thus, in comparison with conventional TUR, this new system is both significantly safer and more cost effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wada S, Yoshimura R, Kyo M, et al. Comparative study of transurethral laser prostatectomy versus transurethral electroresection for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Int. J. Urol. 2000;7:2073–2074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mydlo JH, Weinstein R, Shah S, et al. Long-term consequences from bladder perforation and/or violation in the presence of transitional cell carcinoma: results of a small series and a review of the literature. J. Urol. 1999;161:1128–1132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Collado A, Chechile GE, Salvador J, et al. Early complications of endoscopic treatment for superficial bladder tumors. J. Urol. 2000;164:1529–1532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Augspurger RR, Donohue RE. Prevention of obturator nerve stimulation during transurethral surgery. J. Urol. 1980;123:170–172

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hradec E, Soukup F, Novak J, et al. The obturator nerve block. Preventing damage of the bladder wall during transurethral surgery. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 1983;15:149–153

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yazaki T, Ishikawa H, Kanoh S, et al. Accurate obturator nerve block in transurethral surgery. Urology 1985;26:588–589

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Akata T, Murakami J, Yoshinaga A, et al. Life-threatening haemorrhage following obturator artery injury during transurethral bladder surgery: a sequel of an unsuccessful obturator nerve block. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 1999;43:784–788

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hahn RG, Sandfeldt L, Nyman CR. Double-blind randomized study of symptoms associated with absorption of glycine 1.5% or mannitol 3% during transurethral resection of the prostate. J. Urol. 1998;160:397–401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Inman RD, Hussain Z, Elves AW, et al. A comparison of 1.5% glycine and 2.7% sorbitol−0.5% mannitol irrigants during transurethral prostate resection. J. Urol. 2001;166:2216–2220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sebben JE. Electrosurgery principles: cutting current and cutaneous surgery—Part I. J. Dermatol. Surg. Oncol. 1988;14:29–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sebben JE. Electrosurgery principles: cutting current and cutaneous surgery—Part II. J. Dermatol. Surg. Oncol. 1988;14:147–150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Botto H, Lebret T, Barre P, et al. Electrovaporization of the prostate with the Gyrus device. J. Endourol. 2001;15:313–316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rikio Yoshimura MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoshimura, R., Adachi, T., Funao, K. et al. Treatment of Bladder Tumors and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with a New TUR System Using Physiological Saline as Perfusate. World J. Surg. 30, 473–477 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0258-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0258-8

Keywords

Navigation