Skip to main content
Log in

Liver Regeneration and Splenic Enlargement in Donors after Living-Donor Liver Transplantation

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Liver regeneration after donor hepactectomy offers a unique insight into the process of liver regeneration in normal livers. As the liver restores itself, concurrent splenic enlargement occurs. There are many theories about why this phenomenon takes place: some investigators have proposed a relative portal hypertension that leads to splenic congestion or, perhaps, the presence of a common growth factor that induces both the liver and spleen to enlarge. Between the months of June 2001 and May 2004, 112 live donor liver transplants (LDLTs) were performed in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. The total number of donor hepatectomies performed during this period was 113, however, because one of the cases required dual donors. Of our 113 donors, we eventually analyzed the data of 109; 4 patients were lost to follow-up 6 months later and were excluded from our study. The average age of our donor population was 32.32 ± 8.48 years. The mean liver volume at donation was noted to be 1207.72 ± 219.95 cm3, and 6 months later, it was 1027.18 ± 202.41 cm3. Expressed as a percentage of the original volume, the mean liver volume 6 months after hepatectomy was 90.70% ± 12.47% in this series. For right graft donors, mean liver volume after 6 months was 89.68% ± 12.37% of the original liver volume, whereas that for left graft donors was 91.99% ± 12.6%. Only 26 of the 109 (23.85%) donors were able to achieve full regeneration 6 months post-donation. Notably, liver function profiles of all donors were normal when measured 6 months after operation. The average splenic volume at donation as measured by computed tomography (CT) volumetry was 159 ± 58 cm3, and the splenic volume 6 months post-donation was 213 ± 85 cm3. There was a mean increment in splenic volume of 35% ± 28% 6 months after donation. The blood profiles of the donors were monitored; particular attention was given to platelet levels and liver function tests, and these were found to be within normal limits 6 months after operation. Of note, splenic enlargement was significantly greater among right-sided donors than their left-sided counterparts. Greater splenic enlargement was also observed in those donors who achieved full liver regeneration at their evaluation 6 months postoperatively than in those who did not. Although original liver volume was not re-established in most patients 6 months after liver donation, there seemed to have been no untoward effects to the donor. The factors that affect liver regeneration are complex and myriad. Although there is splenic enlargement at 6 months post-donation in donors of LDLT, there are no untoward effects of this enlargement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nakagami M, Morimoto T, Itoh K, et al. Patterns of restoration of remnant liver volume after graft harvesting in donors for living related liver transplantation. Transplant. Proc. 1998;30:195–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nagasue N, Yukaya N, Ogawa Y, et al. Human liver regeneration after major hepatic resection. Ann Surg 1987;206:30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tanaka W, Yamanaka N, Oriyama T, et al. Multivariate analysis of liver regenerative capacity after hepactectomy in humans. J. Hepatobil. Pancreat. Surg. 1997;4:78–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yamanaka N, Okamoto E, Kawamura E, et al. Dynamics of normal and injured liver human liver regeneration after hepactectomy as assessed on the basis of computed tomography and liver function. Hepatology 1993;18:79–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bucher NH. Experimental aspects of hepatic regeneration. N. Engl. J. Med. 1967; 277:686

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fausto N. Liver regeneration: from laboratory to clinic. Liver Transplant. 2001;7:835

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Court FG, Wemyss-Holden SA, Dennison AR, et al. The mystery of liver regeneration. Br. J. Surg. 2002;89:1089

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Olthoff KM. Molecular pathways of regeneration and repair after liver transplantation. World J. Surg. 2002;26:831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marcos A, Fischer RA, Ham JM, et al. Liver regeneration and function in donor and recipient after right lobe adult to adult living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation 2000;69:1375–1379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pomfret EA, Pomposelli JJ, Gordon FD, et al. Liver regeneration and surgical outcome in donors of right lobe liver grafts. Transplantation 2003;76:5–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kawasaki S, Makuuchi M, Matsunami H, et al. Living related liver transplantation in adults. Ann Surg 1998;227–269

  12. Zollinger RM, Zollinger RM Jr. Left hepatic lobectomy. In Zollinger RM, Zollinger RM Jr, (editors), Atlas of Surgical Operations, 4th edition, New York, Macmillian, 1990; 172

    Google Scholar 

  13. Akimaru K, Onda M, Tajiri T, et al. Hypersplenism induced by hepatectomy. Hepato-Gastroenterology 2001;48:1170–1175

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ando H, Nagino M, Arai T, et al. Changes in splenic volume during liver regeneration. World J. Surg. 2004;28:977–981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tanaka W, Yamanaka N, Oriyama T. Multivariate analysis of liver regenerative capacity after hepactectomy in humans. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surg. 1997;4:78–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Miyagawa S, Kawasaki S, Noike T, et al. Liver regeneration after extended right hemihepactectomy in patients with hilar or diffuse bile duct carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 1999;46:364–368

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nagino M, Ando M, Kamiya J, et al. Liver regeneration after major hepactectomy for biliary cancer. Br. J. Surg. 2001;88:1084–1091

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jacob HS, Macdonald RA, Jandl JH. Regulation of spleen growth and sequestering function. J. Clin. Invest. 1963;42:1476–1490

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tavassoli M. Limitation of splenic growth as studied by heterotopic splenic implants. Blood 1975;46:631–635

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen YS, Cheng YF, De Villa VH, et al. Evaluation of living liver donors. Transplantation 2003;75(Suppl 3):S16–S19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen CL, Chen YS, De Villa VH, et al. Minimal blood loss living donor hepatectomy. Transplantation 2000;69:2580–2586

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Greene AK, Wiener S, Puder M, et al. Endothelial directed hepatic regeneration after partial hepactectomy. Ann. Surg. 2002;236:530–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Francavilla A, Polimeno L, Dileo A, et al. The effect of estrogen and tamoxifen on hepatocyte proliferation in vivo and in vitro. Hepatology 1989;9–614

  24. Chiu J, Lin L, Chi W, et al. Estrogen therapy for hepactectomy with poor liver function? Med Hypotheses 2002;58:516

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nagasue N, Yukaya H, Ogawa Y, et al. Portal pressure following partial to extensive hepatic resection in patients with and without cirrhosis of the liver. Ann. Chir. Gynecol. 1983;72:18–22

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ueda S, Yamanoi A, Hishikawa Y, et al. Transforming growth factor beta-1 released from the spleen exerts a growth inhibitory effect on liver regeneration in rats. Lab. Invest. 2003;83:1595–1603

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaido T, Oe H, Yoshikawa A, et al. Expressions of molecules associated with hepatocyte growth factor activation after hepatectomy in liver cirrhosis. Hepato-Gastroenterology 2004;51:547–551

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Charters AC, Oakes DD, Froechlich JP. Effect of hepatectomy on mitotic activity in rat spleen. J. Surg. Res. 1980;29:331–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rosenkranz E, Charters AC, Orloff MJ. Regeneration in rat liver injured by carbon tetrachloride. Surg. Forum 1975;26:411–412

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tomiya T, Tani M, Yamada S, et al. Serum hepatocyte growth factor levels in hepactomised and nonhepactomised surgical patients. Gastroenterology 1992;103:1621–1624

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Nishizaki T, Takenaka K, Yoshizumi T, et al. Alteration in levels of human hepatocyte growth factor following hepactectomy. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 1995;181:6–10

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sato K, Tanaka M, Tanikawa K. The effect of spleen volume on liver regeneration after hepatectomy—a clinical study of liver and spleen volumes by computed tomography. Hepatogastroenterology. 1995;42:961–965

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported in part by program project grant NHRI-EX 93-228SP from the National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao-Long Chen MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ibrahim, S., Chen, CL., Wang, CC. et al. Liver Regeneration and Splenic Enlargement in Donors after Living-Donor Liver Transplantation. World J. Surg. 29, 1658–1666 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0101-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0101-2

Keywords

Navigation