Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Blunt Tapered and Standard Needles in Closing Abdominal Fascia

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glove perforation frequently occurs during the course of surgical procedures, introducing risks for both surgeons and patients. The aim of this study was to compare the use of blunt tapered and “sharp” needles during abdominal wall closure with respect to the incidence of glove perforation and the convenience of needle handling. A series of 200 patients undergoing laparotomy in a 6-month period for general surgical disorders were randomized to two groups; in one, the abdominal fascia was closed with a blunt tapered needle; in the other, a sharp needle was used. The main outcome measures were glove perforation and convenience of handling the needle. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. In all, 56 glove perforations occurred during 40 (20%) surgical procedures.

Perforation rates differed significantly: 12% for the blunt (n = 100) tapered needle and 28% (n = 100) for the sharp needle (p = 0.003). Only in 12 cases (21%) was the glove perforation detected at surgery. The type of needle (odds ratio 0.35, p = 0.006) and time taken to close the fascia (odds ratio 1.001, p = 0.05) significantly affected the risk of glove perforation. At multivariate logistic regression analysis the type of needle (odds ratio 0.23, p = 0.004) and the visual analog linear scale (VAS) for ease of needle handling (odds ratio 1.18, p = 0.019) were important predictive factors for glove perforation. With the blunt tapered needle, the VAS was significantly (p = 0.0003) higher at primary laparotomy than at relaparotomy. Use of the blunt tapered needle reduces the incidence of glove perforation. Laborious closure predicts glove perforation. Blunt tapered needles are less convenient in closing a scarred abdominal fascia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WP McKinney MJ Young (1990) ArticleTitleThe cumulative probability of occupationally acquired HIV infection: the risks of repeated exposure during a surgical career Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 11 243–247 Occurrence Handle2351810

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. K Kiyosawa T Sodeyama E Tanaka et al. (1991) ArticleTitleHepatitis C in hospital employees with needlestick injuries Ann. Intern. Med. 115 367–369 Occurrence Handle1907441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. JG Wright A Me Geer (1993) ArticleTitleHuman immunodeficiency virus transmission between surgeons and patients in orthopaedic surgery Clin. Orthopaed. Related Res. 297 272–281

    Google Scholar 

  4. IJB Spijkerman L-J Doorn Particlevan MHW Janssen et al. (2002) ArticleTitleTransmission of hepatitis B virus from a surgeon to his patients during high-risk and low-risk surgical procedures during 4 years Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 23 306–312 Occurrence Handle12083233

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. JL Gerberding C Littell A Tarkington et al. (1990) ArticleTitleRisk of exposure of surgical personnel to patient’s blood during surgery at San Francisco General Hospital N. Eng. J. Med. 322 1788–1793

    Google Scholar 

  6. NG O’Donnell AJ Asbury (1992) ArticleTitleThe occupational hazard of human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B virus infection Anaesthesia 47 923–928 Occurrence Handle1466429

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. WA Muraskin (1995) ArticleTitleThe role of organized labor in combating the hepatitis B and AIDS epidemics: the fight for an OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens Standard Int. J. Health Serv. 25 129–152 Occurrence Handle7729964

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. InstitutionalAuthorNameJoint Working Party of the Hospital Infection Society and the Surgical Infection Study Group. (1992) ArticleTitleRisks to surgeons and patients from HIV and hepatitis: guidelines on precautions and management of exposure to blood or body fluids B.M.J. 305 1337–1343

    Google Scholar 

  9. P Chan AAM Lewis (1989) ArticleTitleInfluence of suture technique on surgical glove perforation Br. J. Surg. 76 1208–1209 Occurrence Handle2688807

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. MK Egglestone JR Wax C Philput et al. (1997) ArticleTitleUse of surgical pass trays to reduce intraoperative glove perforations J. Matern. Fetal Med. 6 245–247 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199707/08)6:4<245::AID-MFM12>3.0.CO;2-D Occurrence Handle9260125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. JM Webb BD Pentlow (1993) ArticleTitleDouble gloving and surgical technique Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 75 291–292 Occurrence Handle8379636

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. MP Corlett DW England NL Kidner et al. (1993) ArticleTitleReduction in incidence of glove perforation during laparotomy wound closure “no touch” technique Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 75 330–332 Occurrence Handle8215148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. EM Beltrami IT Williams CN Shapiro et al. (2000) ArticleTitleRisk and management of blood-borne infections in health care workers CMR 13 385–407

    Google Scholar 

  14. JI Tokars DH Culver MH Mendelson et al. (1995) ArticleTitleSkin and mucous membrane contacts with blood during surgical procedures: risk and prevention Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 16 703–711 Occurrence Handle8683088

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. S Green RHK Gompertz (1992) ArticleTitleGlove perforation during surgery: what are the risks? Ann R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 74 306–308

    Google Scholar 

  16. JD Palmer JWS Rickett (1992) ArticleTitleThe mechanism and risks of surgical glove perforation J. Hosp. Infect. 22 279–286 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0195-6701(92)90013-C Occurrence Handle1363107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. KN Hansen DM Korniewicz DA Hexter et al. (1998) ArticleTitleLoss of glove integrity during emergency department procedures Ann. Emerg. Med. 31 65–72 Occurrence Handle9437344

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. BW Moloughney (2001) ArticleTitleTransmission and postexposure management of bloodborne virus infections in the health care setting CMAJ 165 445–459 Occurrence Handle11531058

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. JMM Patterson CB Novak SE Mackinnon et al. (1998) ArticleTitleSurgeons’ concern and practices of protection against bloodborne pathogens Ann. Surg. 228 266–272 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199808000-00017 Occurrence Handle9712573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. DM Bell CN Shapiro CA Ciesielski et al. (1995) ArticleTitlePreventing bloodborne pathogen transmission from health-care workers to patients: the CDC perspective Surg. Clin. North Am. 75 1189–1203 Occurrence Handle7482144

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. SJ Brought TM Hunt WW Barric (1988) ArticleTitleSurgical glove perforation Br. J. Surg. 75 317 Occurrence Handle2451967

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. M Fell W Hopper J Williams et al. (1989) ArticleTitleSurgical glove failure rate Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 71 7–10 Occurrence Handle2923426

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. JG Wright AJ McGeer D Chyatte et al. (1991) ArticleTitleMechanisms of glove tears and sharp injuries among surgical personnel J.A.M.A. 266 1668 Occurrence Handle1886190

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. T Laine P Aarnio (2001) ArticleTitleHow often does glove perforation occur in surgery? Comparison between single gloves and a double-gloving system Am. J. Surg. 181 564–566 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00626-2 Occurrence Handle11513787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. MO Osman SL Jensen (1999) ArticleTitleSurgical gloves: current problems World J. Surg. 23 630–637 Occurrence Handle10390578

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. JL Caillot C Cote H Abidi et al. (1999) ArticleTitleElectronic evaluation of the value of double gloving Br. J. Surg. 86 1387–1390 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01266.x Occurrence Handle10583283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. IMC Macintyre JS Currie DN Smith et al. (1994) ArticleTitleReducing the risk of viral transmission at operation by electronic monitoring of the surgeon–patient barrier Br. J. Surg. 81 1076–1078 Occurrence Handle7922071

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. JE Hartley S Ahmed R Milkins et al. (1996) ArticleTitleRandomised trial of blunt tipped versus cutting needles to reduce glove puncture during mass closure of the abdomen Br. J. Surg. 83 1156–1157 Occurrence Handle8869333

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. A Mingoli P Sapienza G Sgarzini et al. (1996) ArticleTitleInfluence of blunt needles on surgical glove perforation and safety for the surgeon Am. J. Surg. 172 513–517 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00238-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. KU Wright CG Moran PJ Briggs (1993) ArticleTitleGlove perforations during hip arthroplasty J. Bone Joint Surg. 75B 918–920

    Google Scholar 

  31. JR Smith VS Kitchen (1991) ArticleTitleReducing the risks of infection for obstetricians Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 98 124–126 Occurrence Handle1825924

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. SS Miller A Sabharwal (1994) ArticleTitleSubcuticular skin closure using a “blunt” needle Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 76 281

    Google Scholar 

  33. PS Wong (1994) ArticleTitleComment on: reduction in incidence of glove perforation during laparotomy wound closure by “no touch” technique Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 76 142–143

    Google Scholar 

  34. A McGeer AE Simor DE Low (1990) ArticleTitleEpidemiology of needlestick injuries in house officers J. Infect. Dis. 162 961–964 Occurrence Handle2401794

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. P Nicolai CH Aldam PW Alien (1997) ArticleTitleIncreased awareness of glove perforation in major joint replacement. A prospective, randomised study of Regent Biogel Reveal gloves J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 79 371–373 Occurrence Handle10.1302/0301-620X.79B3.7234 Occurrence Handle9180311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. RE Williams (1994) ArticleTitleThe hydration phenomenon in natural rubber latex gloves and its effect on electronic glove monitors J. Long Term Eff. Med. Implants 4 193–208 Occurrence Handle10155140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. RE Williams (1997) ArticleTitleNatural rubber latex surgical gloves: hydratation, barrier protection, electronic testing Surg. Services Manage. 3 44

    Google Scholar 

  38. H Telatar B Kayhan S Kes et al. (1977) ArticleTitleHb-AG in sweat Am. J. Gastroenterol. 68 492–493 Occurrence Handle415600

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Rob A.G. Nordkam M.D., Simone J. M. Bluyssen B.Sc. & Harry van Goor M.D., Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Rob A.G. Nordkam M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Simone J. M. Bluyssen B.Sc.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Harry van Goor M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harry van Goor M.D., Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nordkam, R.A., Bluyssen, S.J.M. & van Goor, H. Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Blunt Tapered and Standard Needles in Closing Abdominal Fascia. World J. Surg. 29, 441–445 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-004-7586-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-004-7586-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation