Skip to main content
Log in

Hepatic Surgery Using the Ligasure Vessel Sealing System

  • Surgical Practice
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Blood loss, a well-known risk factor for morbidity and mortality during liver resection, occurs during parenchymal transection, so many approaches and devices have been developed to limit bleeding. Surgical technique is an important factor in preventing intraoperative and postoperative complications. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the bipolar vessel sealing device allows a safe and careful liver transection, achieving a satisfactory hemostasis thus reducing blood loss and related complications.

A total of 30 consecutive patients (18 male, 12 female with a mean age of 63 years) underwent major and minor hepatic resection in which the bipolar vessel sealing device was used without routine inflow occlusion. A crush technique followed by energy application was used to perform the parenchymal transection. No other devices were applied to achieve hemostasis. The bipolar vessel sealing device was effective in 27 cases of hepatic resection. It failed to achieve hemostasis in three patients, all of whom had a cirrhotic liver. Median blood loss was 250 ml (range: 100-1600 ml), and intraoperative blood transfusions were required in five patients (17%). Mean operative time was 200 minutes (range: 140-360 minutes). There was no clinical evidence of postoperative hemorrhage, bile leak, or intraabdorninal abscess.

The postoperative complication rate was 17%. The bipolar vessel sealing device is a useful tool in standard liver resection in patients with a normal liver parenchyma, but its use should be avoided in cirrhotic livers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M Rees G Plant J Wells et al. (1996) ArticleTitleOne hundred and fifty hepatic resections: evolution of a technique towards bloodless surgery Br. J. Surg. 83 1526–1529

    Google Scholar 

  2. R Doci L Gennari P Bignami et al. (1995) ArticleTitleMorbidity and mortality after hepatic resection of metastases from colorectal cancer Br. L. Surg. 82 377–381

    Google Scholar 

  3. J Belghiti K Hiramatsu S Benoist et al. (2000) ArticleTitleSeven hundred hepatectomies in the 1990s: an update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection J. Am. Coll. Surg. 191 38–46

    Google Scholar 

  4. G Gozetti A Mazziotti L Grazi et al. (1995) ArticleTitleLiver resection without blood transfusion Br. L. Surg. 82 1105–1110

    Google Scholar 

  5. JD Cunningham Y Fong C Shriver et al. (1994) ArticleTitleOne hundred consecutive hepatic resections: blood loss, transfusion and operative technique Arch. Surg. 129 1050–1056

    Google Scholar 

  6. WR Jarnagin M Gonen Y Fong et al. (2002) ArticleTitleImprovement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1803 consecutive cases over the past decade Ann. Surg. 236 397–406

    Google Scholar 

  7. G Navarra D Spalding D Zacharoulis et al. (2002) ArticleTitleBloodless hepatectomy technique HPB Surg. 4 95–97

    Google Scholar 

  8. G Torzilli M Makuuchi Y Midorikawa et al. (2001) ArticleTitleLiver resection without total vascular exclusion: hazardous or beneficial? An analysis of our experience Ann. Surg. 233 167–175

    Google Scholar 

  9. JA Melendez V Arslan ME Fischer et al. (1998) ArticleTitlePerioperative outcomes of major hepatic resections under low central venous pressure anesthesia: blood loss, blood transfusion and the risk of perioperative renal dysfunction J. Am. Coll. Surg. 187 620–625

    Google Scholar 

  10. G Grazi A Mazziotti E Jovine et al. (1997) ArticleTitleTotal vascular exclusion of the liver during hepatic surgery: selective use, estensive use or abuse? Arch. Surg. 132 1104–1109

    Google Scholar 

  11. J Belghiti R Noun R Malafosse et al. (1999) ArticleTitleContinuous versus intermittent portal triad clamping for liver resection: a controlled study Ann. Surg. 229 369–375

    Google Scholar 

  12. PA Clavien S Yadav D Sindram et al. (2000) ArticleTitleProtective effects of ischemic preconditioning for liver resection performed under inflow occlusion in humans Ann. Surg. 232 155–162 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200008000-00001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. KG Tranberg P Rigotti KA Brackett et al. (1998) ArticleTitleLiver resection: a comparison using ND-Yag laser, an ultrasonic surgical aspirator, or blunt dissection Am. J. Surg. 158 368–373

    Google Scholar 

  14. F Romano R Caprotti C Franciosi et al. (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic splenectomy using Ligasure. A preliminary experience Surg. Endosc. 16 1608–1611

    Google Scholar 

  15. InstitutionalAuthorNameThe Brisbane Terminology of Liver Anatomy and Resections. (2000) ArticleTitle. HPB. Surg. 2 333–339

    Google Scholar 

  16. K Takenaka N Kawahara K Yamamoto et al. (1996) ArticleTitleResults of 280 liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma Arch. Surg. 131 71–76

    Google Scholar 

  17. PJ Allen WR Jarnagin (2003) ArticleTitleCurrent status of hepatic resections Adv. Surg. 37 29–49

    Google Scholar 

  18. AA Parikh B Gentner TT Wu et al. (2003) ArticleTitlePerioperative complications in patients undergoing major liver resection with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy J. Gastrointest. Surg. 7 1034–1044

    Google Scholar 

  19. G Nash W Walles (2003) ArticleTitleInfluence of postoperative morbidity on long-term survival following liver resection for colorectal metastasis Br. J. Surg. 90 1131–1136

    Google Scholar 

  20. KR Stephenson SM Steinberg KS Hughes et al. (1988) ArticleTitlePerioperative blood transfusions are associated with decreased time to reccurrence and decreased survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases Ann. Surg. 208 679–687

    Google Scholar 

  21. M Makuuchi T Takayama P Gunven et al. (1989) ArticleTitleRestrictive versus liberal blood transfusion policy for hepatectomies in cirrhotic patients World. J. Surg. 13 644–648

    Google Scholar 

  22. PG Horgan (2001) ArticleTitleA novel technique for parenchymal division during hepatectomy Am. J. Surg. 181 236–237 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00556-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. SM Strasberg JA Drebin D Linehan (2002) ArticleTitleUse of bipolar vessel-sealing device for parenchymal transection during liver surgery J. Gastrointest. Surg. 6 569–574

    Google Scholar 

  24. J Kim SA Ahmad AM Lowy et al. (2003) ArticleTitleIncreased biliary fistulas after liver resection with the harmonic scalpel Am. Surg. 69 815–819

    Google Scholar 

  25. JS Kennedy PL Shanahan KD Taylor et al. (1998) ArticleTitleHigh-burst strength, feed-back controlled bipolar vessel sealing Surg. Endosc. 12 876–878

    Google Scholar 

  26. TB Heniford BD Matthews RF Sing et al. (2001) ArticleTitleInitial results with an elecrothermal bipolar vessel sealer Surg. Endosc. 15 799–801

    Google Scholar 

  27. RP DeMatteo Y Fong WR Jarnagin et al. (2000) ArticleTitleRecent advances in hepatic resections Semin. Surg. Oncol. 19 200–207

    Google Scholar 

  28. G Nuzzo F Giuliante I Giovannini et al. (1996) ArticleTitleHepatic resection in normothermic ischemia Surgery 120 852–858

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrizio Romano M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Romano, F., Franciosi, C., Caprotti, R. et al. Hepatic Surgery Using the Ligasure Vessel Sealing System. World J. Surg. 29, 110–112 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-004-7541-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-004-7541-y

Keywords

Navigation