Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ecological Vulnerability of Aquatic Ecosystems—A Review

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The continuous increase of anthropogenic activities reinforces their stress on aquatic ecosystems (from continental to marine ecosystems) that are the most altered ecosystems on Earth. To evaluate the risk of ecosystem decline toward human alterations, the concept of “ecological vulnerability” was developed to help managers to prioritize conservation actions. Various definitions of vulnerability and its components were used, but this concept is often centered on the intersection of three components: sensitivity, exposition, and adaptive capacity. The aim of this study was through a review of the scientific literature of the last 10 years, first to assess the goals of the use of the concept of vulnerability in aquatic ecology: for which pressure (e.g., climate change, predation) and organism, on which level of organization (individuals, species, …). The second objective, was to address the methods developed to assess vulnerability: which components were considered, which metrics were used, the scoring process… Fish were the organisms the most frequently concerned and the number of publications decreased with the increasing complexity of biodiversity studied (from populations to multitrophic organizations). Climate change was the main stressor for which vulnerability was assessed. Vulnerability was commonly defined as being highly sensitive, highly exposed and lowly adaptable even if adaptive capacity was rarely addressed. This study showed an interest in the concept of vulnerability to protect aquatic ecosystems. Nonetheless, to better evaluate their risk of biodiversity loss, we should consider vulnerability at a higher level of organization and encompass the adaptive capacity of the biota.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Barbbara Silva Rocha for her precious help on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ML and CA wrote the main manuscript text, realized the figures. All authors participated to the data analysis (reading of the papers and extraction of the information), to the data curation, to the conceptualization and to the methodology of the study. CA supervized the project, the funding acquisition and the project administration. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maxime Logez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Logez, M., Bouraï, L., Hette-Tronquart, N. et al. Ecological Vulnerability of Aquatic Ecosystems—A Review. Environmental Management 75, 192–204 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-024-02076-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-024-02076-z

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Maxime Logez
  2. Liess Bouraï