Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intentions of Landowners towards Active Management of Ecosystem for Deer Habitat

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Active management such as prescribed fire and thinning can restore savanna and prairie ecosystem to maintain a full suite of ecosystem services and create suitable habitat for wildlife species such as white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Active management comes with the cost of management and acceptance of management tools. The south-central transitional ecoregion of the USA, which otherwise was a mixture of forest, savanna, and tallgrass prairie, is increasing in woody plant dominance due to the exclusion of fire and other anthropogenic factors. Deer hunting is a vital source of revenue generation to offset the landowner’s management cost in the region. We studied Oklahoma landowners’ perceptions regarding active and sustainable management of forest and rangeland for deer habitat using two established theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as well as expanded theories adding moral norms. We analyzed mailed survey data using structural equation modeling. We found that subjective norms and perceived behavior control significantly affected deer hunting intention when moral norms were introduced into the model. Attitudes independently significantly affected intentions of deer hunting but have negative relations with the intentions. The study suggested that landowners have positive social pressure and were interested in active management but associated financial burden and risk could be shaping negative attitudes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (2002) Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control and the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 32:665–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (2011) The theory of planned behavior: reactions and reflections. Psychol Health 26:1113–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (2020) The theory of planned behavior: frequently asked questions. Hum Behav Emerg Technol 2:314–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JC, David W, Grebing (1988) Structural Equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103:411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler BJ, Butler SM, Caputo J, Dias J, Robillard A, Sass EM (2020) Family forest ownerships of the United States, 2018: Results from the USDA Forest Service, national woodland owner survey. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-199. US Department of agriculture, forest service, Northern research station, Madison, WI, p 52

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd E, Lee J.G, Widmar NJO (2017) Perceptions of hunting and hunters by U.S. respondents. Animals 7:1–15

  • Clark SL, Hallgren SW, Engle DM, Stahle D (2007) The historic fire regime on the edge of the prairie: a case study from the cross timbers of Oklahoma. In: Masters RE, Galley KEM (eds) 23rd Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference: fire in grassland and shurbland ecosystems. Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, Florida, USA, p 40–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Coon JJ, van Riper CJ, Morton LW, Miller JR (2020) What drives private landowner decisions? Exploring non-native grass management in the eastern Great Plains. J Environ Manag 276:111355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daigle JJ, Hrubes D, Ajzen I (2010) A comparative study of beliefs, attitudes, and values among hunters, wildlife viewers, and other outdoor recreationists. Hum Dimens Wildl 7:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demarais S (1992) The pristine myth: the llandscape of the Americas in 1492. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 82:369–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2014) Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore RD, Bidwell TG, Weir JR (2010) Perceptions of oklahoma residents to prescribed fire. In: Robertson KM, Galley KEM, Masters RE (eds) 24th Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference: the future of prescribed fire: public awareness, health, and safety. Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, Florida, USA, p 55–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Philippines

    Google Scholar 

  • Füssel H-M (2007) Vulnerability: a generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Glob Environ Change 17:155–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallgren SW, DeSantis RD, Burton JA (2012) Fire and vegetation dynamics in the cross timbers forest of South-central North America, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 4th Fire in Eastern Oak Forests Conference, Newtown Square, PA, p 52–66

  • Heidari A, Kolahi M, Behravesh N, Ghorbanyon M, Ehsanmansh F, Hashemolhosini N, Zanganeh F (2018) Youth and sustainable waste management: a SEM approach and extended theory of planned behavior. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20:2041–2053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff D, Will R, Zou C, Lillie N (2018a) Encroachment Dynamics of Juniperus virginiana L. and Mesic Hardwood Species into Cross Timbers Forests of North-Central Oklahoma, USA. Forests 9:1–17

  • Hoff DL, Will RE, Zou CB, Weir JR, Gregory MS, Lillie ND (2018b) Estimating increased fuel loading within the Cross Timbers forest matrix of Oklahoma, USA due to an encroaching conifer, Juniperus virginiana, using leaf-off satellite imagery. For Ecol Manag 409:215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrubes D, Ajzen I, Daigle J (2001) Predicting hunting intentions and behavior: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Leis Sci 23:165–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi O, Poudyal NC, Weir JR, Fuhlendorf SD, Ochuodho TO (2019a) Determinants of perceived risk and liability concerns associated with prescribed burning in the United States. J Environ Manag 230:379–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi O, Will RE, Zou CB, Kharel G (2019b) Sustaining cross-timbers forest resources: current knowledge and future research needs. Sustainability 11:1–12

  • Kaur R, Joshi O, Will RE (2020) The ecological and economic determinants of eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana) encroachment in grassland and forested ecosystems: a case study from Oklahoma. J Environ Manag 254:109815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Mosquera N, Garcia T, Barrena R (2014) An extension of the Theory of planned behavior to predict willingness to pay for the conservation of an urban park. J Environ Manag 135:91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Mosquera N, Sanchez M (2012) Theory of planned behavior and the value belief norm theory explaining willingness to pay for a suburban park. J Environ Manag 113:251–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovell WG, Dobyns HF, Denevan WM, Woods WI, Mann CC (2004) 1491: In search of native america. J Southwest 46:441–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden TJ, Ellen PS, Ajzen I (1992) A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 18:3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann CC (2002) 1491, The Atlantic. The Atlantic Monthly Group, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller ZD (2017) The enduring use of the theory of planned behavior. Hum Dimens Wildl 22:583–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson MN (2004) An approach for demonstrating the social legitimacy of hunting. Wildl Soc Bull 32:310–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poudyal NC, Watkins C, Joshi O (2020) Economic contribution of wildlife management areas to local and state economies. Hum Dimens Wildl 25:291–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi AN, Armstrong JB (1999) Theory of reasoned action vs. theory of planned behavior: Testing the suitability and sufficiency of a popular behavior model using hunting intentions. Hum Dimens Wildl 4:40–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satorra A, Bentler PM (1994) Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber JB (2017) Update to core reporting practices in structural equation modeling. Res Soc Adm Pharm 13:634–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sok J, Borges JR, Schmidt P, Ajzen I (2020) Farmer behaviour as reasoned action: a critical review of research with the theory of planned behaviour. J Agric Econ 72:388–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr M, Joshi O, Will RE, Zou CB (2019a) Perceptions regarding active management of the Cross-timbers forest resources of Oklahoma, Texas, and Kansas: A SWOT-ANP analysis. Land Use Policy 81:523–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr M, Joshi O, Will RE, Zou CB, Parajuli R (2019b) Understanding market opportunities utilizing the forest resources of the cross-timbers ecoregion. J For 117:234–243

    Google Scholar 

  • StataCorp (2017) Stata user’s guide: release 15. StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • USFS (2021) Family forest (10+ acres) ownership characteristics, 2018. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the United States Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA, NIFA) Foundational Knowledge of Agriculture Production Systems [Grant number 2018-67014-27504]. Additional funding was provided by Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, McIntire-Stennis project # OKL0 3151, and the endowment for the Sarkeys Distinguished Professorship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bijesh Mishra.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishra, B., Joshi, O., Chapagain, B.P. et al. Intentions of Landowners towards Active Management of Ecosystem for Deer Habitat. Environmental Management 72, 529–539 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-023-01810-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-023-01810-3

Keywords

Navigation