Abstract
The ability to adopt novel tools continues to become more important for governments and environmental managers tasked with balancing economic development, social needs and environmental protection. An example of an emerging technology that can enable flexible, cost-effective data collection for conservation and environmental management is Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). It is clear that UAVs are beginning to be adopted for a diversity of purposes, identification of barriers to their use is the first step in increasing their uptake amongst the environmental management community. Identifying the barriers to UAV usage will enable research and management communities to confidently utilise these powerful pieces of technology. However, the implementation of this technology for environmental research has received little overall assessment attention. This systematic literature review has identified 9 barrier categories (namely Technological, Analytical and Processing, Regulatory, Cost, Safety, Social, Wildlife impact, work suitability and others) inhibiting the uptake of UAV technologies. Technological barriers were referenced in the literature most often, with the inability of UAVs to perform in poor weather (such as rain or windy conditions) commonly mentioned. Analytical and Processing and Regulatory barriers were also consistently reported. It is likely that some barriers identified will lessen with time (e.g. technological and analytical barriers) as this technology continues to evolve.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
A protocol was not prepared for registration prior to the review being conducted. All data used in this review can be accessed here: (note the data record is in the process of being published on James Cook University’s publicly accessible institutional repository, a link can be provided once this is complete).
References
Abdalla A, Cen H, Wan L, Rashid R, Weng H, Zhou W, He Y (2019) Fine-tuning convolutional neural network with transfer learning for semantic segmentation of ground-level oilseed rape images in a field with high weed pressure. Comput Electron Agr 167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.105091
Abeysinghe T, Milas AS, Arend K, Hohman B, Reil P, Gregory A, Vázquez-Ortega A (2019) Mapping invasive Phragmites australis in the Old Woman Creek estuary using UAV remote sensing and machine learning classifiers. Remote Sens 11:1380–1403. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11111380
Adams WM (2019) Geographies of conservation II: Technology, surveillance and conservation by algorithm. Prog Hum Geogr 43:337–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517740220
Adão T, Hruška J, Pádua L, Bessa J, Peres E, Morais R, Sousa JJ (2017) Hyperspectral imaging: A review on UAV-based sensors, data processing and applications for agriculture and forestry. Remote Sens 9:1110. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9111110
Almeida DRA, Broadbent EN, Zambrano AMA, Wilkinson BE, Ferreira ME, Chazdon R, Meli P, Gorgens EB, Silva CA, Stark SC, Valbuena R, Papa DA, Brancalion PHS (2019) Monitoring the structure of forest restoration plantations with a drone-lidar system. Int J Appl Earth Obs 79:192–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2019.03.014
Ancin-Murguzur FJ, Munoz L, Monz C, Hausner VH (2020) Drones as a tool to monitor human impacts and vegetation changes in parks and protected areas. Remote Sens Ecol Conserv 6:105–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.127
Araújo RV, Pereira PS, Lino AP, Araújo TM, Gonçalves RM (2021) Morphodynamic study of sandy beaches in a tropical tidal inlet using RPAS. Mar Geol 438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2021.106540
Arts K, van der Wal R, Adams WM (2015) Digital technology and the conservation of nature. Ambio 44:661–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0705-1
Arts K, Ioris AAR, Macleod CJA, Han X, Sripada SG, Braga JRZ, van der Wal R (2016) Environmental communication in the Information Age: Institutional barriers and opportunities in the provision of river data to the general public. Environ Sci Policy 55(1):47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.011
Arts K, Melero Y, Webster G, Sharma N, Tintarev N, Tait E, Mellish C, Sripada S, MacMaster A-M, Sutherland H, Horrill C, Lambin X, van der Wal R (2020) On the merits and pitfalls of introducing a digital platform to aid conservation management: Volunteer data submission and the mediating role of volunteer coordinators. J Environ Manag 265:110497–110497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110497
Australian Transport Safety Bureau (2017) A safety analysis of remotely piloted aircraft systems 2012 to 2016: A rapid growth and safety implications for traditional aviation. https://www.atsb.gov.au/publications/2017/ar-2017-016/ (accessed 19 September 2022)
Aydin B (2019) Public acceptance of drones: Knowledge, attitudes, and practice. Technol Soc 59:101180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101180
Baena S, Boyd DS, Moat J (2018) UAVs in pursuit of plant conservation - Real world experiences. Ecol Inform 47:2–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.11.001
Barbedo JGA, Koenigkan LV (2018) Perspectives on the use of unmanned aerial systems to monitor cattle. Outlook Agric 47:214–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727018781876
Barnas A, Newman R, Felege CJ, Corcoran MP, Hervey SD, Stechmann TJ, Rockwell RF, Ellis-Felege SN (2018a) Evaluating behavioral responses of nesting lesser snow geese to unmanned aircraft surveys. Ecol Evol 8:1328–1338. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3731
Barnas AF, Felege CJ, Rockwell RF, Ellis-Felege SN(2018b) A pilot(less) study on the use of an unmanned aircraft system for studying polar bears (Ursus maritimus) Polar Biol 41:1055–1062 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-018-2270-0
Bennett MK, Younes N, Joyce K (2020) Automating drone image processing to map coral reef substrates using google earth engine. Drones 4:3. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones4030050
Biserkov VY, Lukanov SP (2017) Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for Surveying Freshwater Turtle Populations: Methodology Adjustment. Acta Zool Bulg 10:161–163
Boucher P (2016) ‘You wouldn’t have your granny using them’: Drawing boundaries between acceptable and unacceptable applications of civil drones. Sci Eng Ethics 22:1391–1418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9720-7
Burr PC, Samiappan S, Hathcock LA, Moorhead RJ, Dorr BS (2019) Estimating waterbird abundance on catfish aquaculture ponds using an unmanned aerial system. Hum-Wildl Interact 13:317–330. https://doi.org/10.26077/ahd5-na26
Cardil A, Vepakomma U, Brotons L (2017) Assessing pine processionary moth defoliation using unmanned aerial systems. Forests 8:13. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8100402
Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jäger J, Mitchell RB (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci - PNAS 100:8086–8091. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231332100
Castellanos-Galindo GA, Casella E, Mejia-Renteria JC, Rovere A (2019) Habitat mapping of remote coasts: Evaluating the usefulness of lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles for conservation and monitoring. Biol Conserv 239:10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108282
Chabot D, Bird DM (2016) Wildlife research and management methods in the 21st century: Where do unmanned aircraft fit in? J Unmanned Veh Syst Virtual Issue 01:137–155. https://doi.org/10.1139/juvs-2015-0021
Chabot D, Dillon C, Shemrock A, Weissflog N, Sager EPS (2018) An object-based image analysis workflow for monitoring shallow-water aquatic vegetation in multispectral drone imagery. ISPRS Int J Geo-inf 7:15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7080294
Che YJ, Wang SJ, Yi SH, Wei YQ, Cai YC (2020) Summer mass balance and surface velocity derived by unmanned aerial vehicle on debris-covered region of Baishui River Glacier No. 1, Yulong Snow Mountain. Remote Sens 12:15. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12203280
Cleguer C, Kelly N, Tyne J, Wieser M, Peel D, Hodgson A (2021) A novel method for using small unoccupied aerial vehicles to survey wildlife species and model their density distribution. Front Mar Sci 8:17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.640338
Colefax AP, Butcher PA, Pagendam DE, Kelaher BP (2020) Comparing distributions of white, bull, and tiger sharks near and away from the surf break using three tech-based methods. Ocean Coast Manag 198:7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105366
Cummings AR, Cummings GR, Hamer E, Moses P, Norman Z, Captain V, Bento R, Butler K (2017) Developing a UAV-based monitoring program with indigenous peoples. J Unmanned Veh Syst 5:115–125. https://doi.org/10.1139/juvs-2016-0022
Dale P, Sporne I, Knight J, Sheaves M, Eslami-Andergoli L, Dwyer P (2019) A conceptual model to improve links between science, policy and practice in coastal management. Mar Policy 103:42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.02.029
Department of Agriculture and Fisheries (2021) Precision agriculture technologies in vegetable businesses - Datasets | Publications | Queensland Government. https://www.publications.qld.gov.au/dataset/agtech-vegetables (accessed 19 September 2022)
Department of Industry Tourism and Trade (2019) Legacy mine inventory and current projects – Department of Industry, Tourism and Trade. https://industry.nt.gov.au/industries/mining-and-energy/mine-rehabilitation-projects/legacy-mines/legacy-mine-inventory-and-current-projects (accessed 19th September 2022)
Di Stefano J (2004) The importance of ecological research for ecosystem management: The case of browsing by swamp wallabies (Wallabia bicolor) in commercially harvested native forests. Ecol Manag Restor 5:61–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-8903.2004.00170.x
Druschke CG, Seltzer CE (2012) Failures of engagement: Lessons learned from a citizen science pilot study. Appl Environ Educ Commun 11(3-4):178–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2012.777224
Duffy JP, Cunliffe AM, DeBell L, Sandbrook C, Wich SA, Shutler JD, Myers-Smith IH, Varela MR, Anderson K (2018a) Location, location, location: considerations when using lightweight drones in challenging environments. Remote Sens Ecol Conserv 4:7–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.58
Duffy JP, Pratt L, Anderson K, Land PE, Shutler JD (2018b) Spatial assessment of intertidal seagrass meadows using optical imaging systems and a lightweight drone. Estuar Coast Shelf S 200:169–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2017.11.001
Fischer JW, Greiner K, Lutman MW, Webber BL, Vercauteren KC (2019) Use of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) and multispectral imagery for quantifying agricultural areas damaged by wild pigs. Crop Prot 125:6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2019.104865
Frouin-Mouy H, Tenorio-Halle L, Thode A, Swartz S, Urban J (2020) Using two drones to simultaneously monitor visual and acoustic behaviour of gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus) in Baja California, Mexico. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 525:9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2020.151321
Fu Y, Kinniry M, Kloepper LN (2018) The Chirocopter: A UAV for recording sound and video of bats at altitude. Methods Ecol Evol 9:1531–1535. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12992
Fust P, Loos J (2020) Development perspectives for the application of autonomous, unmanned aerial systems (UASs) in wildlife conservation. Biol Conserv 241:4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108380
Genchi SA, Vitale AJ, Perillo GME, Seitz C, Delrieux CA (2020) Mapping topobathymetry in a shallow tidal environment using low-cost technology. Remote Sens 12:17. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12091394
Giordan D, Hayakawa Y, Nex F, Remondino F, Tarolli P (2018) Review article: The use of remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPASs) for natural hazards monitoring and management. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 18:1079–1096. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1079-2018
Gomez-Pazo A, Perez-Alberti A (2021) The use of UAVs for the characterization and analysis of rocky coasts. Drones-Basel 5:18. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones5010023
Goodrich MA, Morse BS, Gerhardt D, Cooper JL, Quigley M, Adams JA, Humphrey C (2008) Supporting wilderness search and rescue using a camera-equipped mini UAV. J Field Robot 25:89–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.20226
Greenwood F, Nelson EL, Gregg Greenough P (2020) Flying into the hurricane: A case study of UAV use in damage assessment during the 2017 hurricanes in Texas and Florida. PloS one 15:e0227808–e0227808. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227808
Hardin PJ, Lulla V, Jensen RR, Jensen JR (2019) Small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUAS) for environmental remote sensing: challenges and opportunities revisited. Gisci Remote Sens 56:309–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2018.1510088
Harris JM, Nelson JA, Rieucau G, Broussard WP (2019) Use of drones in fishery science. rans. Am Fish Soc (1900) 148:687–697. https://doi.org/10.1002/tafs.10168
Haula K, Agbozo E (2020) A systematic review on unmanned aerial vehicles in Sub-Saharan Africa: A socio-technical perspective. Technol Soc 63:101357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101357
Hill DJ, Tarasoff C, Whitworth GE, Baron J, Bradshaw JL, Church JS (2017) Utility of unmanned aerial vehicles for mapping invasive plant species: A case study on yellow flag iris (Iris pseudacorus L.). Int J Remote Sens 38:2083–2105. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1264030
Hodgson JC, Mott R, Baylis SM, Pham TT, Wotherspoon S, Kilpatrick AD, Raja Segaran R, Reid I, Terauds A, Koh LP (2018) Drones count wildlife more accurately and precisely than humans. Methods Ecol Evol 9:1160–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12974
Hogan SD, Kelly M, Stark B, Chen YQ (2017) Unmanned aerial systems for agriculture and natural resources. Calif Agriculture 71:5–14. https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.2017a0002
Hubbard S, Hubbard B (2020) A Method for Selecting Strategic Deployment Opportunities for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Transportation Agencies. Drones (Basel) 4:29. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones4030029
Isosevic B, Han Y, Cho Y, Kwon O (2021) The use of conservation drones in ecology and wildlife research. J Ecol Environ 38. https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2015.012
Jech JM, Johnson JJ, Lutcavage ME, Vanderlaan ASM, Rzhanov Y, LeRoi DJ (2020) Measurements of juvenile Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) size using an unmanned aerial system. J Unmanned Veh Syst 8:140–160. https://doi.org/10.1139/juvs-2018-0039
Joppa LN (2015) Technology for nature conservation: An industry perspective. Ambio 44:522–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0702-4
Jordan BR (2019) Collecting field data in volcanic landscapes using small UAS (sUAS)/drones. J Volcanol Geoth Res 385:231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2019.07.006
Joyce KE, Duce S, Leahy SM, Leon J, Maier SW (2019) Principles and practice of acquiring drone-based image data in marine environments. Mar Freshw Res 70:952–963. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF17380
Krause DJ, Hinke JT, Goebel ME, Perryman WL (2021) Drones minimize antarctic predator responses relative to ground survey methods: An appeal for context in policy advice. Front Mar Sci 8:15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.648772
Latif MA (2018) An agricultural perspective on flying sensors: State of the art, challenges, and future directions. Ieee Geosci Remote S 6:10–22. https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2018.2865815
Lehmann JRK, Prinz T, Ziller SR, Thiele J, Heringer G, Meira-Neto JAA, Buttschardt TK (2017) Open-source processing and analysis of aerial imagery acquired with a low-cost unmanned aerial system to support invasive plant management. Front Environ Sci 5:16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2017.00044
Levy J, Hunter C, Lukacazyk T, Franklin EC (2018) Assessing the spatial distribution of coral bleaching using small unmanned aerial systems. Coral Reefs 37:373–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-018-1662-5
Lyu P, Malang Y, Liu HHT, Lai J, Liu J, Jiang B, Qu M, Anderson S, Lefebvre DD, Wang Y (2017) Autonomous cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms monitoring using multirotor UAS. Int J Remote Sens 38:2818–2843. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1275058
Macdonald JM, Robinson CJ, Perry J, Lee M, Barrowei R, Coleman B, Markham J, Barrowei A, Markham B, Ford H, Douglas J, Hunter J, Gayoso E, Ahwon T, Cooper D, May K, Setterfield S, Douglas M (2021) Indigenous-led responsible innovation: lessons from co-developed protocols to guide the use of drones to monitor a biocultural landscape in Kakadu National Park, Australia. J Responsible Innov 8:300–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1964321
Maffey G, Homans H, Banks K, Arts K (2015) Digital technology and human development: A charter for nature conservation. Ambio 44:527–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0703-3
Magness DR, Eskelin T, Laker M, Renner HM (2019) Evaluation of small unmanned aerial systems as a census tool for aleutian tern onychoprion aleuticus colonies. Mar Ornithol 47:11–16
Malenovsky Z, Lucieer A, King DH, Turnbull JD, Robinson SA (2017) Unmanned aircraft system advances health mapping of fragile polar vegetation. Methods Ecol Evol 8:1842–1857. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12833
Markowitz EM, Nisbet MC, Danylchuk J, Engelbourg SI (2017) What’s that buzzing noise? Public opinion on the use of drones for conservation science. Bioscience 67:381–384. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix003
Mathur P (2009) Environmental communication in the information society: The Blueprint from Europe. Inf Soc 25:2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.011
Matthews GA (2021) New technology for desert locust control. Agronomy 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061052
Millner N (2020) As the drone flies: Configuring a vertical politics of contestation within forest conservation. Polit Geogr 80:13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102163
Mohan M, Silva CA, Klauberg C, Jat P, Catts G, Cardil A, Hudak AT, Dia M (2017) Individual tree detection from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) derived canopy height model in an open canopy mixed conifer forest. Forests 8:17. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8090340
Oleksyn S, Tosetto L, Raoult V, Joyce KE, Williamson JE (2021) Going batty: The challenges and opportunities of using drones to monitor the behaviour and habitat use of rays. Drones (Basel) 5:12. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones5010012
Nahirnick NK, Hunter P, Costa M, Schroeder S, Sharma A (2019) Benefits and Challenges of UAS Imagery for Eelgrass (Zostera marina) mapping in small estuaries of the Canadian West Coast. J Coast Res 35:673–683. https://doi.org/10.2112/jcoastres-d-18-00079.1
Newman G, Wiggins A, Crall A, Graham E, Newman S, Crowston K (2012) The future of citizen science: Emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Front Ecol Environ 10(6):298–304. https://doi.org/10.1890/110294
Newey S, Davidson P, Nazir S, Fairhurst G, Verdicchio F, Irvine RJ, van der Wal R (2015) Limitations of recreational camera traps for wildlife management and conservation research: A practitioner’s perspective. Ambio 44:624–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0713-1
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Paneque-Galvez J, Vargas-Ramirez N, Napoletano BM, Cummings A (2017) Grassroots innovation using drones for indigenous mapping and monitoring. Land 6:25. https://doi.org/10.3390/land6040086
Pirotta V, Smith A, Ostrowski M, Russell D, Jonsen ID, Grech A, Harcourt R (2017) An economical custom-built drone for assessing Whale Health. Front Mar Sci 4:12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00425
Provost EJ, Butcher PA, Coleman MA, Bloom D, Kelaher BP (2020) Aerial drone technology can assist compliance of trap fisheries. Fish Manag Ecol 27:381–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12420
Pullin AS, Gavin BS (2006) Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management. Conserv Biol 20:1647–1656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00485.x
Queensland Government (2018) Queensland Drones Strategy. https://www.premiers.qld.gov.au/publications/categories/plans/assets/qld-drones-strategy-2018.pdf (Accessed 19 September 19 2022)
Ramos EA, Maloney B, Magnasco MO, Reiss D (2018) Bottlenose dolphins and antillean manatees respond to small multi-rotor unmanned aerial systems. Front Mar Sci 5:15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00316
Räsänen A, Juutinen S, Tuittila ES, Aurela M, Virtanen T (2019) Comparing ultra-high spatial resolution remote-sensing methods in mapping peatland vegetation. J Veg Sci 30:1016–1026. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12769
Robinson CJ, Kong T, Coates R, Watson I, Stokes C, Pert P, McConnell A, Chen C (2021) Caring for indigenous data to evaluate the benefits of indigenous environmental programs. Environ Manag 68:160–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01485-8
Rush GP, Clarke LE, Stone M, Wood MJ (2018) Can drones count gulls? Minimal disturbance and semiautomated image processing with an unmanned aerial vehicle for colony-nesting seabirds. Ecol Evol 8:12322–12334. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4495
Sandbrook C (2015) The social implications of using drones for biodiversity conservation. Ambio 44:S636–S647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0714-0
Shahbazi M, Théau J, Ménard P (2014) Recent applications of unmanned aerial imagery in natural resource management. Gisci Remote Sens 51:339–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2014.926650
Stöcker C, Bennett R, Nex F, Gerke M, Zevenbergen J (2017) Review of the Current State of UAV Regulations. Remote Sens 9:459. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9050459
Tmušić G, Manfreda S, Aasen H, James MR, Gonçalves G, Ben-Dor E, Brook A, Polinova M, Arranz JJ, Mészáros J, Zhuang R, Johansen K, Malbeteau Y, de Lima IP, Davids C, Herban S, McCabe MF (2020) Current Practices in UAS-based Environmental Monitoring. Remote Sens 12:1001. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12061001
Verma A, van der Wal R, Fischer A (2015) Microscope and spectacle: On the complexities of using new visual technologies to communicate about wildlife conservation. Ambio 44:648–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0715-z
Waltham NJ, Sheaves M (2015) Expanding coastal urban and industrial seascape in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area: Critical need for coordinated planning and policy. Mar Policy 57:78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.030
Woodget AS, Austrums R, Maddock IP, Habit E (2017) Drones and digital photogrammetry: From classifications to continuums for monitoring river habitat and hydromorphology. Wiley Interdiscip Rev -Water 4:20. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1222
Wyngaard J, Barbieri L, Thomer A, Adams J, Sullivan D, Crosby C, Parr C, Klump J, Raj Shrestha S, Bell T (2019) Emergent challenges for science sUAS data management: Fairness through community engagement and best practices development. Remote Sens 11:1797. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11151797
Zhang J, Hu JB, Lian JY, Fan ZJ, Ouyang XJ, Ye WH (2016) Seeing the forest from drones: Testing the potential of lightweight drones as a tool for long-term forest monitoring. Biol Conserv 198:60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.03.027
Funding
This study was funded by James Cook University through the Australian Government Research Training Program. This project is supported with funding from the Australian Government under the National Environmental Science Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SW: Methodology, Investigation, Writing -Original Draft, Conceptualisation. MS: Writing Review and Editing, Supervision, Conceptualisation. NW: Writing Review and Editing, Supervision, Conceptualisation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Walker, S.E., Sheaves, M. & Waltham, N.J. Barriers to Using UAVs in Conservation and Environmental Management: A Systematic Review. Environmental Management 71, 1052–1064 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01768-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01768-8