Abstract
Dams are a globally important social-ecological issue, and the practice of removing aging or obsolete dams is increasing in many countries where rivers have been used to fuel industrial growth. News media play an important role in providing information and raising awareness about dam-related decision making and patterns in news media coverage can shape public sense-making about potentially controversial dam decisions. This research focuses on spatial patterns of news media references to “dam removal” georeferenced to a New England dams database, the types of dam removal characteristics that contribute to newsworthiness, and specific media framing strategies. We develop a method, known as DAMMDA, that combines a large geodatabase of dam features and corpus of news media articles. We find that spatial patterns of “dam removal” news media coverage do not necessarily coincide with the actual occurrence of removed dams, nor the distribution of extant dams, in the landscape. Instead, a minority of dams with specific characteristics make up the majority of dam media references. Such “newsworthy dams” are capable of generating hydroelectricity, are situated on large rivers, are located in urban areas, or have already been removed. Further, references to newsworthy dams are often used to frame discussions about future dam decisions in other locations in New England and across the United States. We conclude by reflecting on how this approach is relevant for understanding complex and interconnected factors that can shape controversial sustainability issues, such as the relationships between news media and social-ecological characteristics of infrastructures within landscapes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ader CR (1995) A longitudinal study of agenda setting for the issue of environmental pollution. Journalism Mass Commun Q 72:300–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909507200204
Altinbilek D (2002) The role of dams in development. Water Sci Technol 45:169–180
American Rivers (2019) American rivers dam removal database. Raw Dataset— ARDamRemovalList_figshare_June2019. Figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5234068
Aydin NY, Kentel E, Duzgun S (2010) GIS-based environmental assessment of wind energy systems for spatial planning: A case study from Western Turkey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:364–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.023
Bednarek AT (2001) Undamming rivers: A review of the ecological impacts of dam removal. Environ Manag 27:803–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010189
Bernhardt ES, Sudduth EB, Palmer MA et al. (2007) Restoring rivers one reach at a time: results from a survey of U.S. river restoration practitioners. Restor Ecol 15:482–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00244.x
Biswas AK, Tortajada C (2001) Development and large dams: a global perspective. Int J Water Resour Dev 17(1):9–21
Blachly B, Uchida E (2018), Estimating the marginal cost of dam removal. Environmental and Natural Resource Economics Working Paper 2. Available at https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/enre_working_papers/2/
Born SM, Genskow KD, Filbert TL et al. (1998) Socioeconomic and institutional dimensions of dam removals: The Wisconsin experience. Environ Manag 22:359–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002679900111
Brummer M, Rodríguez-Labajos B, Nguyen TT, Jorda-Capdevila D (2017) “They have kidnapped our river”: Dam removal conflicts in Catalonia and their relation to ecosystem services perceptions. Water Alternatives 10:744–768
Campbell JL, Quincy C, Osserman J, Pedersen OK (2013) Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods Res 42:294–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113500475
Carvalho A (2010) Media(ted) discourses and climate change: a focus on political subjectivity and (dis)engagement. WIREs Clim Change 1:172–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.13
Chrysochoou M, Brown K, Dahal G et al. (2012) A GIS and indexing scheme to screen brownfields for area-wide redevelopment planning. Landsc Urban Plan 105:187–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.010
Crane J (2009) “Setting the river free”: The removal of the Edwards dam and the restoration of the Kennebec River. Water Hist 1:131–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12685-009-0007-2
Creswell JW (2014) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Day LR (2006) Restoring native fisheries to Maine’s largest watershed: the Penobscot River Restoration Project. J Contemp Water Res Educ 134:29–33
de Loë RC (1999) Dam the news: newspapers and the Oldman River Dam project in Alberta. J Environ Manag 55:219–237. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1999.0258
De Sousa CA (2003) Turning brownfields into green space in the City of Toronto. Landsc Urban Plan 62:181–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00149-4
Dias BS, Frisk MG, Jordaan A (2019) Opening the tap: increased riverine connectivity strengthens marine food web pathways. Plos One 14:e0217008. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217008
Diessner NL, Ashcraft C, Gardner KH, Hamilton LC (2020) I’ll be dammed! Public preferences regarding damremoval in New Hampshire Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 8(1):003. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.003
Ding L, Chen L, Ding C, Tao J (2019) Global trends in dam removal and related research: A systematic review based on associated datasets and bibliometric analysis. Chin geographical Sci 29.1:1–12
Dodge M (2018) Mapping II: News media mapping, new mediated geovisualities, mapping and verticality. Prog Hum Geogr 42:949–958. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517733086
Doyle MW, Stanley EH, Luebke M A, Harbor JM (2000) Dam removal: physical, biological, and societal considerations. American Society of Civil Engineers Joint Conference on Water Resources Engineering and Water Resources Planning and Management, Minneapolis, MN, July 30 – August 2, 2000 1–10.
Duffy KP, Cipparone HC, Johnson ES et al. (2020) Leveraging spatial dimensions of news media content analysis to explore place-based differences in natural resource issues. J Environ Stud Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-020-00595-9
Fairclough N (1995) Media Discourse. Hodder Arnold, London, UK
Feldpausch-Parker A, Burnham M, Melnik M et al. (2015) News media analysis of carbon capture and storage and biomass: perceptions and possibilities. Energies 8:3058–3074. https://doi.org/10.3390/en8043058
Feldpausch-Parker AM, Ragland CJ, Melnick LL et al. (2013) Spreading the news on carbon capture and storage: a state-level comparison of US media. Environ Commun 7:336–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2013.807859
FERC (2019) Complete list of active and exempt licenses. https://www.ferc.gov/sites/default/files/2020-06/exemptions.xls
Fico F, Freedman E (2001) Setting the news story agenda: candidates and commentators in news coverage of a governor’s race. Journalism Mass Commun Q 78:437–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900107800303
Fischlein M, Feldpausch-Parker AM, Peterson TR et al. (2014) Which way does the wind blow? analysing the state context for renewable energy deployment in the United States: state context for renewable energy deployment in the US. Env Pol Gov 24:169–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1636
Fox CA, Magilligan FJ, Sneddon CS (2016) “You kill the dam, you are killing a part of me”: Dam removal and the environmental politics of river restoration. Geoforum 70:93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.02.013
Fox CA, Reo NJ, Turner DA et al. (2017) “The river is us; the river is in our veins”: re-defining river restoration in three Indigenous communities. Sustainability Sci 12:521–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0421-1
Gold AJ, Addy K, Morrison A, Simpson M (2016) Will dam removal increase nitrogen flux to estuaries? Water 8:522. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8110522
Gosnell H, Kelly EC (2010) Peace on the river? Social-ecological restoration and large dam removal in the Klamath Basin, USA. Water Alternatives 3:361–383
Gregory IN, Hardie A (2011) Visual GISting: bringing together corpus linguistics and geographical information systems. Lit Linguistic Comput 26:297–314. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqr022
Griffin RJ, Dunwoody S (1997) Community structure and science framing of news about local environmental risks. Sci Commun 18:362–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547097018004005
Hall CJ, Jordaan A, Frisk MG (2011) The historic influence of dams on diadromous fish habitat with a focus on river herring and hydrologic longitudinal connectivity. Landsc Ecol 26:95–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9539-1
Hall CJ, Jordaan A, Frisk MG (2012) Centuries of anadromous forage fish loss: consequences for ecosystem connectivity and productivity. BioScience 62:723–731. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.5
Hansen A (2019) Environment, media and communication, 2nd edition. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, London; New York
Hansen A (2011) Communication, media and environment: towards reconnecting research on the production, content and social implications of environmental communication. Int Commun Gaz 73:7–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048510386739
Hansen A, Machin D (2019) Media and communication research methods, 2nd edition. Red Globe Press, London
Hanson TR, Hatch LU, Clonts HC (2002) Reservoir water level impacts on recreation, property, and nonuser values. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 38:1007–1018. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb05541.x
Hopke JE (2012) Water gives life: framing an environmental justice movement in the mainstream and alternative Salvadoran Press. Environ Commun 6:365–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2012.695742
Hunter LC (1979) A History of industrial power in the United States, volume 1: waterpower in the century of the steam engine. University Press of Virginia Charlottesville, Charlottesville VA
Hychka K, Druschke CG (2017) Adaptive management of urban ecosystem restoration: learning from restoration managers in Rhode Island, USA. Soc Nat Resour 30:1358–1373. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2017.1315653
Jiang W, Wang Y, Tsou M-H, Fu X (2015) Using social media to detect outdoor air pollution and monitor air quality index (AQI): a geo-targeted spatiotemporal analysis framework with Sina Weibo (Chinese Twitter). PLoS One 10.10:e0141185. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141185
Jørgensen D, Renöfält BM (2013) Damned if you do, dammed if you don’t: debates on dam removal in the Swedish media. ES 18:art18. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05364-180118
Latinopoulos D, Kechagia K (2015) A GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation for wind farm site selection. A regional scale application in Greece. Renew Energy 78:550–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.01.041
Lejon AGC, Renöfält BM, Nilsson C (2009) Conflicts associated with dam removal in Sweden. Ecology and Society 14:
Lewis LY, Bohlen C, Wilson S (2008) Dams, dam removal, and river restoration: a hedonic property value analysis. Contemp Economic Policy 26:175–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2008.00100.x
Limburg KE, Waldman JR (2009) Dramatic declines in north Atlantic diadromous fishes. BioScience 59:955–965. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.7
Lundberg E, Gottschalk Druschke C, McGreavy B et al. (2017) Communicating about hydropower, dams, and climate change. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. Oxford University Press
Magilligan FJ, Graber BE, Nislow KH et al. (2016) River restoration by dam removal: enhancing connectivity at watershed scales. Elementa: Sci Anthropocene 4:000108. https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000108
Magilligan FJ, Sneddon CS, Fox CA (2017) The social, historical, and institutional contingencies of dam removal. Environ Manag 59:982–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0835-2
Mahabir R, Croitoru A, Crooks A et al. (2018) News coverage, digital activism, and geographical saliency: a case study of refugee camps and volunteered geographical information. PLoS ONE 13:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206825
Martin EH, Apse CD (2011) Northeast aquatic connectivity: an assessment of dams on northeastern rivers. The Nature Conservancy, Eastern Freshwater Program.
NEST (2017) New England dams database, point data
Nisbet MC (2009) Communicating climate change: why frames matter for public engagement. Environ: Sci Policy Sustain Dev 51:12–23. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23
Noda K, Hamada J, Kimura M, Oki K (2018) Debates over dam removal in Japan. Water Environ J 32:446–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12344
O’Connor JE, Duda JJ, Grant GE (2015) 1000 dams down and counting. Science 348:496–497. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa9204
Olivero AP, Anderson MG (2008) Northeast aquatic habitat classification. The Nature Conservancy, Boston, MA
Opperman JJ, Royte J, Banks J et al. (2011) The Penobscot River, Maine, USA: a basin-scale approach to balancing power generation and ecosystem restoration. Ecol Soc 16:04. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04117-160307
Pisaniello JD, Tingey-Holyoak J, Burritt RL (2012) Appropriate small dam management for minimizing catchment-wide safety threats: international benchmarked guidelines and demonstrative cases studies. Water Resour Res 48:W01546. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011155
Pohl MM (2002) Bringing down our dams: trends in American dam removal rationales. J Am Water Resour Assoc 38:1511–1519. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb04361.x
Poole R (2018) Ecolinguistics, GIS, and corpus linguistics for the analysis of the Rosemont Copper Mine debate. Environ Commun 12:525–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1275735
Renner GT (1927) The physiographic interpretation of the fall line. Geographical Rev 17:278–286. https://doi.org/10.2307/208229
Rogers EM, Dearing JW, Bregman D (1993) The anatomy of agenda-setting research. J Commun 43:68–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01263.x
Roy SG, Daigneault A, Zydlewski J et al. (2020) Coordinated river infrastructure decisions improve net social-ecological benefits. Environ Res Lett 15:104054. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abad58
Roy SG, Uchida E, de Souza SP et al. (2018) A multiscale approach to balance trade-offs among dam infrastructure, river restoration, and cost. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115:12069–12074. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807437115
Sampei Y, Aoyagi-Usui M (2009) Mass-media coverage, its influence on public awareness of climate-change issues, and implications for Japan’s national campaign to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Glob Environ Change 19:203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.005
Schulz WF (1982) News structure and people’s awareness of political events. Gaz (Leiden-, Neth) 30:139–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/001654928203000301
Song C, Omalley A, Roy SG et al. (2019) Managing dams for energy and fish tradeoffs: what does a win-win solution take? Sci Total Environ 669:833–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.042
Stanley EH, Doyle MW (2003) Trading off: The ecological effects of dam removal. Front Ecol Environ 1:15. https://doi.org/10.2307/3867960
Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Eos, Trans Am Geophys Union 38:913–920. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR038i006p00913
Suldovsky B, Arbor E, Skillin V, Lindenfeld L (2018) Communicating environmental risks: local newspaper coverage of shellfish bacterial contamination in Maine. Front Commun 3:12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00012
Trinko Lake TR, Ravana KR, Saunders R (2012) Evaluating changes in diadromous species distributions and habitat accessibility following the Penobscot River Restoration Project. Mar Coast Fish 4:284–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/19425120.2012.675971
USDA (2019) Rural America at a glance, Economic Information Bulletin 212
USGS (2019) National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) plus, version 2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Geological Survey
van Zanten BT, van Berkel DB, Meetemeyer RK et al. (2016) Continental scale quantification of landscape values using social media data. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1614158113
Wakefield SEL, Elliott SJ (2003) Constructing the news: the role of local newspapers in environmental risk communication. Professional Geographer 55.2:216–226
Watson JM, Coghlan SM, Zydlewski J et al. (2018) Dam removal and fish passage improvement influence fish assemblages in the Penobscot River, Maine. Trans Am Fish Soc 147:525–540. https://doi.org/10.1002/tafs.10053
Yüksel I (2009) Dams and hydropower for sustainable development. Energy Sources, Part B: Econ, Plan, Policy 4:100–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567240701425808
Acknowledgements
The data used in this paper are available upon request or by accessing our GitHub repository. This paper was supported by NSF- 1539071 to K. Gardner, P. Kirshen, D. Hart, E. Uchida, and A. Gold. B. Benson, K. Raffier, and S. Randall provided research assistance for the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Roy, S.G., McGreavy, B., Quiring, T. et al. Damming news: Geospatial media discourse analysis of dams. Environmental Management 70, 840–854 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01715-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01715-7