Abstract
Hazardous waste pollutes the air, soil, and water and adversely affects human health if not disposed of safely. Analysis of the efficiency of hazardous waste disposal is essential to sustainable development. This paper uses the three-stage super-efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis model to measure the efficiency of 28 EU countries from 2004 to 2016. To ensure the reliability of the results, the article utilizes a one-way ANOVA statistical test to verify whether DEA results vary significantly across various EU countries. This article discusses “how inputs and outputs can be adjusted to eliminate inefficiencies” to suggest a targeted improvement. The third stage supper efficiency DEA results shows that the efficiency varies significantly across different EU countries. The main reasons for the low efficiency are high generated hazardous waste, management expenditure, greenhouse gas emissions, and inadequate waste disposal volume. Targeted proposals from three aspects are given for policymakers in EU countries: Build a resource recycling system to reduce hazardous waste. Establish a sound fee management system to reduce expenses. Optimization of disposal technology to improve incineration efficiency.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Shammari M (1999) Optimization modeling for estimating and enhancing relative efficiency with application to industrial companies. Eur J Oper Res 115(3):488–496
Blackman Jr, WC (2016). Basic hazardous waste management: CRC press
Callao C, Martinez-Nunez M, Latorre MP (2019) European Countries: Does common legislation guarantee better hazardous waste performance for European Union member states? Waste Manag 84:147–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.11.014
Castillo-Gimenez J, Montanes A, Picazo-Tadeo AJ (2019a) Performance and convergence in municipal waste treatment in the European Union. Waste Manag 85:222–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.12.025
Castillo-Gimenez J, Montanes A, Picazo-Tadeo AJ (2019b) Performance in the treatment of municipal waste: Are European Union member states so different? Sci Total Environ 687:1305–1314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.016
Castillo-Gimenez J, Montanes A, Picazo-Tadeo AJ (2019c) Performance in the treatment of municipal waste: Are European Union member states so different? Sci Total Environ 687:1305–1314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.016
Chang DS, Liu WR, Yeh LT (2013) Incorporating the learning effect into data envelopment analysis to measure MSW recycling performance. Eur J Oper Res 229(2):496–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.01.026
Chen CC (2010) A performance evaluation of MSW management practice in Taiwan. Resour Conserv Recycl 54(12):1353–1361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.05.003
De Feo G, De Gisi S (2014) Using MCDA and GIS for hazardous waste landfill siting considering land scarcity for waste disposal. Waste Manag 34(11):2225–2238
De Jaeger S, Rogge N (2014) Cost-efficiency in packaging waste management: The case of Belgium. Resour Conserv Recycling 85:106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.08.006
Exposito A, Velasco F (2018) Municipal solid-waste recycling market and the European 2020 Horizon Strategy: A regional efficiency analysis in Spain. J Clean Prod 172:938–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.221
Feng M, Li X (2020) Evaluating the efficiency of industrial environmental regulation in China: A three-stage data envelopment analysis approach. J Clean Prod 242:13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118535
Fried HO, Lovell CK, Schmidt SS, Yaisawarng S (2002) Accounting for environmental effects and statistical noise in data envelopment analysis. J Product Anal 17(1):157–174
Halkos G, Petrou KN (2019) Assessing 28 EU member states’ environmental efficiency in national waste generation with DEA. J Clean Prod 208:509–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.145
He JX, Lin BQ (2019) Assessment of waste incineration power with considerations of subsidies and emissions in China. Energy Policy 126:190–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.025
Higgins, TE (2018). Hazardous waste minimization handbook: CRC Press
Hu Z, Yan S, Yao L, Moudi M (2018) Efficiency evaluation with feedback for regional water use and wastewater treatment. J Hydrol 562:703–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.032
Inglezakis VJ, Moustakas K (2015) Household hazardous waste management: A review. J Environ Manag 150:310–321
Jiang H, Hua M, Zhang J, Cheng PP, Ye Z, Huang M, Jin Q (2020) Sustainability efficiency assessment of wastewater treatment plants in China: A data envelopment analysis based on cluster benchmarking. J Clean Prod 244:10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118729
Jondrow J, Lovell CAK, Materov IS, Schmidt P (1982) On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. J Econ 19(2-3):233–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(82)90004-5
Kao C (1994) Efficiency improvement in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 73(3):487–494
Kwon HB, Marvel JH, Roh JJ (2017) Three-stage performance modeling using DEA-BPNN for better practice benchmarking. Expert Syst Appl 71:429–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.11.009
LaGrega, MD, Buckingham, PL, & Evans, JC (2010). Hazardous waste management: Waveland Press
Lee H-S, Chu C-W, Zhu J (2011) Super-efficiency DEA in the presence of infeasibility. Eur J Oper Res 212(1):141–147
Li K, Lin B (2016) Impact of energy conservation policies on the green productivity in China’ ‘’s manufacturing sector: Evidence from a three-stage DEA model. Appl Energy 168:351–363
Odeck J, Bråthen S (2012) A meta-analysis of DEA and SFA studies of the technical efficiency of seaports: A comparison of fixed and random-effects regression models. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 46(10):1574–1585
Pérez-López G, Prior D, Zafra-Gómez JL (2018) Temporal scale efficiency in DEA panel data estimations. An application to the solid waste disposal service in Spain. Omega 76:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.03.005
Rogge N, De Jaeger S (2013) Measuring and explaining the cost efficiency of municipal solid waste collection and processing services. Omega 41(4):653–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2012.09.006
Rosenfeld PE, Feng L (2011). Risks of hazardous wastes: William Andrew
Sasao T (2016) Cost and efficiency of disaster waste disposal: A case study of the Great East Japan Earthquake. Waste Manag 58:3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.032
Seiford LM, Zhu J (2002) Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. Eur J Oper Res 142(1):16–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00293-4
Simoes P, Carvalho P, Marques RC (2012) Performance assessment of refuse collection services using robust efficiency measures. Resour Conserv Recycl 67:56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.07.006
Tang JX, Wang QW, Choi G (2020) Efficiency assessment of industrial solid waste generation and treatment processes with carry-over in China. Sci Total Environ 726:11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138274
Tone K (2001) A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 130(3):498–509
Yang HC, Zhang S, Ye WF, Qin YZ, Xu M, Han LD (2020) Emission reduction benefits and efficiency of e-waste recycling in China. Waste Manag 102:541–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.11.016
Zhao H, Guo S, Zhao H (2019) Provincial energy efficiency of China quantified by three-stage data envelopment analysis. Energy 166:96–107
Zhou X, Xu Z, Chai J, Yao L, Wang S, Lev B (2019) Efficiency evaluation for banking systems under uncertainty: A multi-period three-stage DEA model. Omega 85:68–82
Funding
This work was supported by the National Key R&D plan “Recycling of solid waste” key special project (2019YFC1907000) and China National Philosophy and Social Science Fund (20BGL268).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ye, M., Liang, X., Lin, S. et al. Efficiency Assessment of Hazardous Waste Disposal in EU Countries: A Three-Stage Super-Efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis Model. Environmental Management 70, 650–665 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01675-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01675-y