Abstract
Beavers are expanding into cities as they recolonize their historic range. While they increase the ecological functioning of urban green areas, human-beaver conflicts occur. Public support to deal with conflicts has shifted from population to forage control. Tree guards are becoming popular with management personnel in North America and Europe to reduce damage to valuable trees. The problem is that this management technique has not been studied. We inventoried the tree guard types in use in natural and manicured river parks in the City of Saskatoon, Canada, determined their adherence to an installation protocol by measuring guard dimensions, and assessed the relative effectiveness of guards in protecting trees from beaver cutting. The inventory revealed that four types of tree guards are in use, ranging from light gauge chicken wire to heavy gauge chain link fencing. Overall, 11% of the trees with guards that we inventoried were cut by beavers, but variation among guard types was observed. Less than 10% of trees with type i and ii guards were beaver cut whereas 17% of trees with types iii and iv guards were beaver cut. Fewer trees were cut when there was adherence to installation protocol, regardless of guard type. Cut trees with guard types i, iii and iv experienced both minor and major damage whereas cut trees with guard type ii experienced only minor damage. The study results have implications for developing effectiveness and implementation monitoring plans for tree guards as part of an overall beaver management plan.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Alvey AA, Wiseman PE, Kane B (2009) Efficacy of conventional tree stabilization systems and their effect on short-term tree development. Arboric J 35(3):157–164
Bailey DR, Dittbrenner BJ, Yocom KP (2019) Reintegrating the North American beaver (Castor canadensis) in the urban landscape. WIREs Water 6(1):e1323. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1323
Baker BW, Hill EP (2003) Wild mammals of North America: biology, management, and conservation. In: Feldhamer GA, Thompson BC, Chapman JA (eds) Wild mammals of North America: biology, management, and conservation. Johns Hopkins, New York, NY, p 288–310
Basey JM, Jenkins SH (1995) Influences of predation risk and energy maximization on food selection by beavers (Castor canadensis). Can J Zool 73:2197–2208. https://doi.org/10.1139/z95-260
Boczoń A, Wróbel M, Syniaiev V (2009) The impact of beaver ponds on tree stand in a river valley. J Water Land Dev 13(1):313–327
Burchsted D, Daniels M, Thorson R, Vokoun J (2010) The river discontinuum: applying beaver modifications to baseline conditions for restoration of forested headwaters. BioSci 60(11):908–922. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.11.7
Butler DR (1991) The reintroduction of beaver into the South. Southeast Geogr 31(1):39–43. https://doi.org/10.1353/sgo.1991.0000
Campbell-Palmer R, Gow D, Campbell R, Dickinson H, Girling S, Gurnell J, Halley D, Jones S, Lisle S, Parker H, Schwab G, Rosell F (2016) The Eurasian beaver handbook: Ecology and management of Castor fiber. Pelagic Publishers, Exeter, England
City of Saskatoon (no date) Urban forestry management plan. https://www.saskatoon.ca/sites/default/files/documents/community-services/parks/urban-forestry/urban_forestry_management_plan_final.pdf, Last accessed 04/09/2022
Donkor NT, Fryxell JM (1999) Impact of beaver foraging on structure of lowland boreal forests of Algonquin Provincial Park, Ontario. Ecol Manag 118:83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00487-3
Drake D (2014) Wildlife damage management in urban landscape. In: McCleery R, Moorman C, Peterson M (eds) Urban wildlife conservation. Springer, New York, NY, p 389–401
Duinker PN, Ordóñez C, Steenberg JWN, Miller KH, Toni SA, Nitoslawski SA (2015) Trees in Canadian cities: indispensable life form for urban sustainability. Sustainability 7(6):7379–7396. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7067379
England K, Westbrook CJ (2021) Beaver lodge distribution and foraging preferences in and protected riparian forests along the South Saskatchewan River. Can J Urban Ecol 7(1):juab021. https://doi.org/10.1093/jue/juab021
Gaywood MJ (2017) Reintroducing the Eurasian beaver Castor fiber to Scotland. Mamm Rev 48(1):48–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12113
Gom LA, Rood SB (1999) Patterns of clonal occurrence in a mature cottonwood grove along the Oldman River, Alberta. Can J Bot 77:1095–1105. https://doi.org/10.1139/b99-152
Hadidian J (2021) Urban wildlife in New York City. WellBeing N. 3(9):3, https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/wbn/vol3/iss9/3
Johnston CA (2017) Beavers: boreal ecosystem engineers. Springer, Cham, Switzerland
Kamczyz J, Bielachowicz M, Pers-Kamczyc E (2016) Damages caused by European beaver (Castor fiber L., 1758) in broadleaved stands. Lett 109:7–10
Kulshreshtha SN, Gillies JA (1993) The economic value of the South Saskatchewan River to the City of Saskatoon: (II) Estimation of recreational use value. Can Wat Res J 18(4):369–383. https://doi.org/10.4296/cwrj1804369
Lineman MJ (2000) A survey of the natural vegetation and flora along the South Saskatchewan River valley within and near Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. Master’s Thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Loeb RE, King S, Helton J (2014) Human pathways are barriers to beavers damaging trees and saplings in urban forests. Urban For Urban Green 13(2):290–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.12.005
Loven JE (1985) Reported beaver damage and control methods used in Texas. Proc Gt Plain Wildl Damage Control Workshop 170:145–171. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/gpwdcwp/170/
Mahoney MJ, Stella JC (2020) Stem selectivity is stronger than species preference for beaver, a central place forager. Ecol Manag 475(1):118331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118331
Morzillo AT, Needham MD (2015) Landowner incentives and normative tolerances for managing beaver impacts. Hum Dimens Wildl 20(6):514–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2015.1083062
Müller-Schwarze D (2011) The beaver: its life and impact. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Nolet BA, Rosell F (1998) Comeback of the beaver Castor fiber: An overview of old and new conservation problems. Biol Conserv 83(2):165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00066-9
Nolte DL, Lutman MW, Bergman DL, Arjo WM, Perry KR (2003) Feasibility of non-lethal approaches to protect riparian plants from foraging beavers in North America. USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications no. 256. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/256?utm_source=digitalcommons.unl.edu%2Ficwdm_usdanwrc%2F256&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
Page N (2017) Beaver the disruptor: tolerating disorder in the heart of Vancouver. L/P 19(2):51–53
Pollock MM, Lewallen G, Woodruff K, Jordan CE, Castro JM (2017) The beaver restoration guidebook: working with beaver to restore streams, wetlands, and floodplains, ver 2.0. https://www.fws.gov/oregonfwo/Documents/BRGv.2.0_6.30.17_forpublicationcomp.pdf. Accessed 18 October 2021
Rosell F, Czech A (2000) Responses of foraging Eurasian beavers Castor fiber to predator odours. Wildl. Biol 6(4):13–21. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.2000.033
Schulte BA, Müller-Schwarzei D (1999) Understanding North American beaver behaviour as an aid to management. In: Busher PE, Dzięciołowski RM (eds.) Beaver protection, management, and utilization in Europe and North America. Springer, New York, NY, p 109–128
Severud WJ, Belant JL, Bruggink JG, Windels SK (2011) Predator cues reduce American beaver use of foraging trails. Hum-Wildl Interact 5(2):296–305. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24868890
Shorthouse JD (2010) Ecoregions of Canada’s prairie grasslands. In: Shorthouse JD, Floate KD (eds.) Arthropods of Canadian grasslands (Volume 1): ecology and interactions in grassland habitats. Biological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, p 53–81
Siemer WF, Jonker SA, Decker DJ, Organ JF (2013) Toward an understanding of beaver management as human and beaver densities increase. Hum-Wildl Interact 7(1):114–131. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24874123
Stoffyn-Egli P, Willison JHM (2011) Including wildlife habitat in the definition of riparian areas: The beaver (Castor canadensis) as an umbrella species for riparian obligate animals. Environ Rev 19:479–494. https://doi.org/10.1139/a11-019
Stokes A, Norris JE, van Beek LPH, Bogaard T, Cammeraat E, Mickovski SB, Jenner A, Di Iorio A, Fourcaud T (2008) How vegetation reinforces soil on slopes. In: Norris JE (ed) Slope stability and erosion control: Ecotechnological solutions. Springer, Dordrecht, 10.1007/978-1-4020-6676-4_4
Swinnen KR, Strubbe D, Matthysen E, Leirs H (2017) Reintroduced Eurasian beavers (Castor fiber): colonization and range expansion across human-dominated landscapes. Biodivers Conserv 26(8):1863–1876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1333-9
Taylor JD, Yarrow GK, Miller JE (2017) Beavers. Wildlife Damage Management Technical Series 11, https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nwrcwdmts/11. Accessed 10 September 2021
Willging B, Sramek R (1989) Urban beaver damage and control in Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas. Ninth Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop Proceedings, General Technical Report RM-171, pp. 77–81. https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_series/rm/gtr/rm_gtr171.pdf
Wittmann K, Vaske JJ, Manfredo MJ, Zinn HC (1998) Standards for lethal response to problem urban wildlife. Hum Dimens Wildl 3(4):29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209809359137
Acknowledgements
We thank Z. Waldner and L. Boyer for field assistance, J. Boone (City of Saskatoon) and R. Grilz (Meewasin Valley Authority) for site access and insights into beaver management practices, and J. and S. Schmutz for in kind support. We acknowledge the study was carried out on Treaty 6 Territory and Homeland of the Métis. Funding was provided by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant (RGPIN-2017-05873) to CJW and a Department of Geography and Planning, University of Saskatchewan, Devolved Scholarship to KE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Westbrook, C.J., England, K. Relative Effectiveness of Four Different Guards In Preventing Beaver Cutting of Urban Trees. Environmental Management 70, 97–104 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01658-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01658-z