Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploring Influences on Environmental Stewardship of Fishing Communities in Fisheries Management in the Philippines

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fisheries compliance has been explored conceptually and empirically in numerous contexts but in many fisheries, compliance with rules is not sufficient to return to sustainable levels of effort. Failing to understand the context and what drives fishers to behave the way they do, has the potential to misdirect investments. The authors present a conceptual model of fisheries ecosystem stewardship (FES) that expands upon fisheries compliance with the addition of moral obligation for fishing communities. This paper uses household survey data from fishing communities in three marine key biodiversity areas (MKBA) in the Philippines to test part of the FES model using logistic regression and multiple regression analysis with empirical data to test the model. Data shows that apart from the respondents’ location (i.e., which MKBA is adjacent to their community), knowledge of laws protecting coastal/marine resources was the most important predictor of environmental stewardship, followed by support for limiting fishing effort and knowledge of illegal fishing. Individual decisions about if and how-to fish are influenced by the economic context and available livelihood opportunities. However, the moral obligation to “do the right thing” is equally, if not more important to consider for fisheries ecosystem stewardship in fishing communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. Articles 147 and 148 of the Family Code recognizes and honors the possibility of cohabiting without the benefit of marriage in the Philippines.

References

  • Ambal RGR, Duya MV, Cruz MA, Coroza OG, Vergara SG, de Silva N, Molinyawe N, Tabaranza B (2012) Key biodiversity areas in the Philippines: priorities for conservation. J Threatened Taxa 4(8):2788–2796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arias A (2015) Understanding and managing compliance in the nature conservation context. J Environ Manag 153:134–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison EH, Ellis F (2001) The livelihoods approach and management of small-scale fisheries. Mar Policy 25(5):377–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-597X(01)00023-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballasteros HM, Rodriguez-Rodriguez G (2018) How much in the clan are you? The community as an explanatory factor of the acceptance of poaching in small-scale fisheries. Mar Policy 97:188–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battista W, Romero-Canyas R, Smith S, Fraire J, Effron M, Larson-Konar D, Fujita R (2018) Behavior Change Interventions to Reduce Illegal Fishing. Front Marine Sci 5(403). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00403

  • Beddington JR, Agnew DJ, Clark CW (2007) Current problems in the management of marine fisheries Science 316:1713–1716

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • BFAR, USAID (2017) Mainstreaming ecosystem program: ecosystems approach to fisheries management planning and implementation process handbook. Tetra Tech-ARD for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID)-USAID/Philippines’ Ecosystems Improved for Sustainable Fisheries (ECOFISH) Burlington, VT, United States

  • BFAR-FPED (2019) The Philippine fisheries profile of 2018 (ISSN: 2704-4246; 72). DA-BFAR. https://www.bfar.da.gov.ph/publication.jsp?id=2369#post

  • Boonstra WJ, Nguyen BD (2010) A history of breaking laws—Social dynamics of non-compliance in Vietnamese marine fisheries. Mar Policy 34:1261–1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2010.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camic C (1986) The matter of habit. Am J Sociol 91:1039–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett NJ, Whitty TS, Finkbeiner E et al. (2018) Environmental Stewardship: A Conceptual Review and Analytical Framework. Environ Manage 61:597–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0993-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catedrilla LC, Espectato LN, Serofia GD, Jimenez CN (2012) Fisheries law enforcement and compliance in District 1, Iloilo Province, Philippines. Ocean Coast Manag 60:31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cepic D, Nunan F (2017) Justifying non-compliance: The morality of illegalities in small scale fisheries of Lake Victoria, East Africa. Mar Policy 86:104–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.09.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cinner JE, Daw T, McClanahan TR (2009) Socioeconomic factors that affect artisanal fishers’ readiness to exit a declining fishery. Conserv Biol 23(1):124–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edition. L, Hillsdale, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychological Bull 112(1):155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1994) The earth is round (p < 05). Am Psychologist 49(12):997–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford BR, Siahainenia A, Rotinsulu C, Sukmara A (2004) Compliance and enforcement of community-based coastal resource management regulations in North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Coast Manag 32:39–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920750490247481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DA-BFAR (2016) Comprehensive national fisheries industry development plan medium term 2016–2020. DA-BFAR. Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines

  • Dalton T, Pollnac R, Forrester G (2015) Investigating causal pathways linking site-level characteristics, compliance, and ecological performance in Caribbean MPAs. Coast Manag 43(3):329–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DENR (2016) Philippine Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2015–2028. Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR)-Biodiversity Management Bureau; Manila Philippines

  • DENR, DA-BFAR, DILG, CRMP (2001). Philippine coastal management guidebook. Cebu City, Philippines

  • Eggert H, Lokina RB (2010) Regulatory compliance in Lake Victoria fisheries. Environ Dev Econ 15(2):197–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias N (1978) What is sociology? Hutchinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Enqvist JP, West S, Masterson VA, Haider LJ, Svedin U, Tengö M (2018) Stewardship as a boundary object for sustainability research: linking care, knowledge and agency. Landsc Urban Plan 179:17–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2020) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2020– sustainability in action. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz CO, Morris PE, Richler JJ (2012) Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. J Exp Psychol 141(1):2–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelcich S, Martínez-Harms MJ, Tapia-Lewin S, Vasquez-Lavin F, Ruano-Chamorro C (2019) Comanagement of small-scale fisheries and ecosystem services. Conserv Lett 12(2):e12637. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha TTP, van Dijk H (2013) Fishery livelihoods and (non-) compliance with fishery regulations—A case study in Ca Mau Province, Mekong Delta, Viet Nam. Mar Policy 38:417–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.06.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlow LL (2005) The essence of multivariate thinking: Basic themes and methods. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. New Jersey, United States

  • Harring N, Rönnerstrand B (2016) Government effectiveness, regulatory compliance and public preference for marine policy instruments. An experimental approach. Mar Policy 71:106–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher A, Pascoe S (2006) Non-compliance and fisheries policy formulation. In Developments in aquaculture and fisheries science (Vol. 36, pp. 355–373). Elsevier. Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • Hauck M (2008) Rethinking small-scale fisheries compliance. Mar Pol 32:635–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He J (2019) Unilateral trade measures against illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing: Unlocking a paradigm change in trade-environmental partnerships? J World Trade 53:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagers SC, Berlin D, Jentoft S (2012) Why comply? Attitudes towards harvest regulations among Swedish fishers. Mar Policy 36(5):969–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft S (1989) Fisheries co-management. Delegating government responsibility to fishermen’s organizations. Mar Policy 1989 13(2):137–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson ML, Campbell LK, Svendsen ES (2020) Conceptualizing, analyzing, and supporting stewardship: examining the role of civil society in environmental governance. Ecol Soc 25:4

    Google Scholar 

  • Karper MA, Lopes PF (2014) Punishment and compliance: exploring scenarios to improve the legitimacy of small-scale fisheries management rules on the Brazilian coast. Mar Policy 44:457–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King DM, Sutinen JG (2010) Rational noncompliance and the liquidation of Northeast groundfish resources. Mar Policy 34(1):7–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2009.04.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuperan KV, Jahan KM (2009) Noncompliance a major threat in fisheries management – experience from the artisanal coastal fisheries of Bangladesh. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254444164_Noncompliance_a_major_threat_in_fisheries_management-experience_from_the_Artisanal_coastal_fisheries_of_Bangladesh

  • Kuperan KV, Sutinen JG (1998) Blue water crime: deterrence, legitimacy, and compliance in fisheries. Law Soc Rev 32(2):309–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link JS, Watson RA (2019) Global ecosystem overfishing: clear delineation within real limits to production. Sci Adv 5(6):eaav0474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marin-Monroy EA, Romero-Canyas R, Fraire-Cervantes JA, Larson-Konar D, Fujita R (2020) Compliance with rights-based fisheries management is associated with fishermen’s perceptions of peer compliance and experience: a case study in the Upper Gulf of California. Ocean Coast Manag 189:105155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercene-Mutia MT (2001) Assessment of local government’s implementation of open access policy in Taal Lake, Philippines: effect on lake conservation and management. conservation and ecological management of the Philippine lakes in relation to fisheries and aquaculture, 123–132

  • Minter A (2008) Compliance and enforcement for coastal fisheries management in Fiji. Regional Office for Oceania, IUCN

  • Nielsen JR (2003) An analytical framework for studying: compliance and legitimacy in fisheries management. Mar Policy 27(5):425–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-597X(03)00022-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen JR, Mathiesen C (2003) Important factors influencing rule compliance in fisheries lessons from Denmark. Mar Policy 27(5):409–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-597X(03)00024-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oracion EG, Miller ML, Christie P (2005) Marine protected areas for whom? Fisheries, tourism, and solidarity in a Philippine community. Ocean Coast Manag 48(3-6):393–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palomares MLD, Pauly D (2019) Coastal fisheries: the past, present, and possible futures. In Coasts and estuaries (pp. 569–576). Elsevier. Amsterdam, Netherlands.

  • Philippines Statistics Authority (2019) Fisheries Statistics of the Philippines 2015-2017 (Vol. 26). https://psa.gov.ph/sites/default/files/FSP%202015-2017.pdf

  • Philippines Statistics Authority (2019) 2019 Philippine Statistical Yearbook. https://psa.gov.ph/products-and-services/publications/philippine-statistical-yearbook/2015

  • Pollnac RB, Christie P, Cinner J, Dalton T et al. (2010) Marine reserves as linked social-ecological systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(no. 43):18262–18265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pollnac R, Hagos KW, Crawford B, Dahir AM, Yusuf HH, Hussein AM (2018) Chaos, conflict and change: the reemergence and evolution of fishery governance in the small scale fisheries of Somalia. Ocean Coast Manag 162:193–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy R, Reaugh-Flower K, Guidote M, Govan H, Atkinson S (2015) Status and priority capacity needs for local compliance and community-supported enforcement of marine resource rules and regulations in the coral triangle region. Coastal Manag 43(3), 301–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2015.1030330

  • Schindler DE, Hilborn R (2015) Prediction, precaution, and policy under global change. Science 347(6225):953–954

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siar SV, Agbayani RF, De Veyra JB (1992) Acceptability of territorial use rights in fisheries: towards community-based management of small-scale fisheries in the Philippines. Fish Res 14:295–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stratoudakis Y (2021) Legitimacy objects, agents, and evaluators: a framing to strengthen planning and performance of fisheries co-management. Environ Sci Policy 116:230–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumaila UR, Keith H, Alder J (2006) Global scope and economics of illegal fishing. Mar Policy 30(6):696–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2005.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutinen JG, Kuperan (1999) A socio-economic theory of regulatory compliance. Int J Soc Econ 26:174–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068299910229569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torell E, McNally C, Crawford B, Majubwa G (2017) Coastal livelihood diversification as a pathway out of poverty and vulnerability: experiences from Tanzania. Coast Manag 45(3):199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2017.1303718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner RA, Addison J, Arias A, Bergseth BJ, Marshall NA, Morrison TH, Tobin RC (2016) Trust, confidence, and equity affect the legitimacy of natural resource governance. Ecol Soc 21:3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler TR, Jackson J (2014) Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: motivating compliance, cooperation, and engagement. Psychol Public Policy Law 20(1):78

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research presented in this manuscript was co-funded through the generous support of the American people through United States Agency for International Development Fisheries Fish Right Program, Cooperative Agreement number: 72049218CA00004, Fish Right. The authors would like to thank the Philippine community members, including fishers, post-harvest processors, biodiversity conservation champions, community leaders, and fisheries extension officers who participated in the research that forms the basis for this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dawn M. Kotowicz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kotowicz, D.M., Torell, E., Castro, J. et al. Exploring Influences on Environmental Stewardship of Fishing Communities in Fisheries Management in the Philippines. Environmental Management 69, 1102–1117 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01645-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01645-4

Navigation