Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do governance networks build collaborative capacity for sustainable development? Insights from Solomon Islands

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To build capacity for addressing complex sustainable development challenges, governments, development agencies, and non-governmental organizations are making substantial investments in governance networks. Yet, enthusiasm for establishing governance networks is not always matched by empirical evidence on their effectiveness. This gap challenges these groups to know whether investing in governance networks is worth their time and effort; a weighing-up that is particularly critical in contexts of limited resources. Through a qualitative case study in Solomon Islands, we evaluate the extent to which a governance network, called the Malaita Provincial Partners for Development, contributed to four dimensions of collaborative governance capacity: individual, relational, organizational, and institutional. We find that the network made moderate contributions to individual, relational and organizational capacity, while institutional capacity remained low despite the presence of the network. Based on these findings, we argue that governance networks are not a panacea. Continued efforts are needed to establish when, how, and in what contexts collaborative networks are effective for building collaborative capacity for sustainable development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. Please note, data was collected in 2014. A series of institutional and international moves among the authorship team lead to the delay in publication.

References

  • Alexander SM, Andrachuk M, Armitage D (2016) Navigating governance networks for community‐based conservation. Front Ecol Environ 14(3):155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angst M, Hirschi C (2017) Network dynamics in natural resource governance: a case study of Swiss landscape management. Policy Stud J 45(2):315–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell C, Gash A (2008) Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Public Admin Res Theory 18(4):543–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage DR, Plummer R, Berkes F, Arthur RI, Charles AT, Davidson-Hunt IJ, McConney P (2009) Adaptive co‐management for social–ecological complexity. Front Ecol Environ 7(2):95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird J, Plummer R, Bodin Ö (2016) Colaborative governance for climate change adaptation in Canada: experimenting with adaptive co-management. Reg Environ Change 16(3):747–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett NJ (2016) Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management. Conserv Biol 30(3):582–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blythe, J, Bennett, G, & Cohen, P (2017). Five principles for network success in Solomon Islands. WorldFish, Penang, Malaysia.

  • Bodin Ö (2017) Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science 357(6352):eaan1114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bodin Ö, Nohrstedt D, Baird J, Summers R, Plummer R (2019) Working at the “speed of trust”: pre-existing and emerging social ties in wildfire responder networks in Sweden and Canada. Reg Environ Change 19(8):2353–2364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brondizio ES, Ostrom E, Young OR (2009) Connectivity and the governance of multilevel social-ecological systems: the role of social capital. Ann Rev Environ Res 34:253–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodin Ö, Crona BI (2009) The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Glob Environ Change 19(3):366–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass JN, Longhofer W, Robinson RS, Schnable A (2018) NGOs and international development: A review of thirty-five years of scholarship. World Dev 112:136–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, J, & Kennedy, KS (2015). A Network approach to capacity building. National Council of Nonprofits, Washington, DC.

  • Christie P, Pietri DM, Stevenson TC, Pollnac R, Knight M, White AT (2016) Improving human and environmental conditions through the Coral Triangle Initiative: progress and challenges. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 19:169–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen PJ, Evans LS, Mills M (2012) Social networks supporting governance of coastal ecosystems in Solomon Islands. Conserv Lett 5(5):376–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J, & Morrison, J (2004). Solomon Islands provincial governance information paper. Report to AusAID.

  • Creswell, JW, & Creswell, JD (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

  • Dang TKP, Visseren-Hamakers IJ, Arts B (2016) A framework for assessing governance capacity: An illustration from Vietnam’s forestry reforms. Environ Plann C Gov Policy 34(6):1154–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson K, Gerlak AK (2014) Adaptation in collaborative governance regimes. Environ Manag 54(4):768–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson K, Nabatchi T, Balogh S (2012) An integrative framework for collaborative governance. J Pub Admin Res Theory 22(1):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, K, & Nabatchi, T (2015) Collaborative governance regimes. Georgetown University Press.

  • Evans LS, Cohen PJ, Case P, Hicks CC, Prideaux M, Mills DJ (2017) The landscape of leadership in environmental governance: a case study from Solomon Islands. Hum Ecol 45(3):357–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feist A, Plummer R, Baird J (2020) The inner-workings of collaboration in environmental management and governance: a systematic mapping review. Environ Manag 66(5):801–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foale S, Adhuri D, Aliño P, Allison EH, Andrew N, Cohen P, Stacey N (2013) Food security and the Coral Triangle initiative. Mar Pol 38:174–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foli S, Ros-Tonen MA, Reed J, Sunderland T (2018) Natural resource management schemes as entry points for integrated landscape approaches: evidence from Ghana and Burkina Faso. Environ Manag 62(1):82–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster-Fishman PG, Berkowitz SL, Lounsbury DW, Jacobson S, Allen NA (2001) Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions: A review and integrative framework. Am J Community Psychol 29(2):241–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlak AK, Heikkila T (2011) Building a theory of learning in collaboratives: Evidence from the Everglades Restoration Program. J Pub Admin Res Theory 21(4):619–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlak, AK, Heikkila, T, & Lubell, M (2013). The promise and performance of collaborative governance. In The Oxford handbook of US environmental policy.

  • Govan, H, Schwarz, AM, Harohau, D, Oeta, J, Orirana, G, & Ratner, BD (2013). Solomon Islands: Essential aspects of governance for Aquatic Agricultural Systems in Malaita Hub. WorldFish.

  • Guerrero, A, Bodin, Ö, McAllister, R, & Wilson, K (2015) Achieving social-ecological fit through bottom-up collaborative governance: an empirical investigation. Ecol Soc, 20(4):1–14

  • Hobbis SK, Hobbis G (2021) Leadership in absentia: Negotiating distance in centralized Solomon Islands. Oceania 91(1):47–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, M (2014). Disaster risk management and climate adaptation revisited. In: Palutikof, J.P., Boulter, S.L., Barnett, J., and Rissik, D. (Eds.). Applied Studies in Climate Adaptation. Wiley-Blackwell, US 407–414

  • Innes, JE, & Booher, DE (2003) The impact of collaborative planning on governance capacity. Working paper 2003-03. Berkeley.

  • Isett KR, Mergel IA, LeRoux K, Mischen PA, Rethemeyer RK (2011) Networks in public administration scholarship: Understanding where we are and where we need to go. J Pub Admin Res Theory 21(suppl_1):i157–i173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klijn EH, Steijn B, Edelenbos J (2010) The impact of network management on outcomes in governance networks. Pub Admin 88(4):1063–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koppenjan, JFM, Koppenjan, J, & Klijn, EH (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks: a network approach to problem solving and decision making. Psychology Press.

  • Kumar S, Kant S, Amburgey TL (2007) Public agencies and collaborative management approaches: Examining resistance among administrative professionals. Admin Soc 39(5):569–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane MB (2006) Towards integrated coastal management in Solomon Islands: Identifying strategic issues for governance reform. Ocean Coastal Manag 49(7-8):421–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lengnick-Hall CA, Beck TE, Lengnick-Hall ML (2011) Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management. Hum Res Manag Rev 21(3):243–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubell M, Leach, WB, Sabatier P (2009) Collaborative watershed partnerships in the epoch of sustainability. In: Mazmanian D, Kraft M (eds.) Toward sustainable communities: transition and transformations in environmental policy, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

  • Lubell M (2004) Collaborative watershed management: A view from the grassroots. Policy Stud J 32(3):341–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubell M (2015) Collaborative partnerships in complex institutional systems Curr Opin Envioron Sustain 12:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mashaw, JL (2006) Accountability and Institutional Design: Some Thoughts on the Grammar of Governance. In Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences, edited by Michael WD, p. 115–156. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Meier KJ, O’Toole Jr LJ (2007) Modelling public management: Empirical analysis of the management–performance nexus. Pub Manag Rev 9(4):503–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mount, L (2021) Funding does something to people: NGOs navigating funding challenges in India. Develop Pract 1–13 32(1):69–81

  • Nelson A, Johnson GL, Wenzel L, Antoine A, Avilla L, Manubag ML (2019) Integrating social network development into marine protected area management capacity building and institutionalization in the Philippines and Indonesia. Aqua Conserv Mar Freshwater Ecosyst 29:233–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newig, J, Günther, D, & Pahl-Wostl, C (2010) Synapses in the network: learning in governance networks in the context of environmental management. Ecol Soc 15(4):1–16

  • Newig J, Challies E, Jager NW, Kochskaemper E, Adzersen A (2018) The environmental performance of participatory and collaborative governance: a framework of causal mechanisms. Policy Stud J 46(2):269–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer R, Baird J, Dzyundzyak A, Armitage D, Bodin Ö, Schultz L (2017) Is adaptive co-management delivering? Examining relationships between collaboration, learning and outcomes in UNESCO biosphere reserves. Ecolog Econ 140:79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers E, Weber EP (2010) Thinking harder about outcomes for collaborative governance arrangements. Am Rev Pub Admin 40(5):546–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña, J (2015) The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.

  • Samoff J (2004) From funding projects tosupporting sectors? Observation on the aid relationship in Burkina Faso. Int J Educ Dev 24(4):397–427

  • Scott M (2015) Re-theorizing social network analysis and environmental governance: Insights from human geography. Prog Hum Geogr 39(4):449–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seawright J, Gerring J (2008) Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Res Q 61(2):294–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suluia, GT (2012). Decentralisation and central-local relations: a Solomon Islands case study on the negotiations of relations between national and provincial governments: a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy in Development Studies at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand (Doctoral dissertation, Massey University).

  • Taylor B, de Loe RC (2012) Conceptualizations of local knowledge in collaborative environmental governance. Geoforum 43(6):1207–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations, New York.

  • van Popering-Verkerk J, van Buuren A (2017) Developing collaborative capacity in pilot projects: Lessons from three Dutch flood risk management experiments. J Clean Prod 169:225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance‐Borland K, Holley J (2011) Conservation stakeholder network mapping, analysis, and weaving. Conserv Lett 4(4):278–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber EP, Khademian AM (2008) Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Pub Admin Rev 68(2):334–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weible CM (2011) Political-administrative relations in collaborative environmental management. Int J Pub Admin 34(7):424–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2014). Increasing the effectiveness of multi-stakeholder initiatives through active collaboration. Conference Report, April 28-30, 2014

  • Yang Y (2017) Types and institutional design principles of collaborative governance in a strong-government society: the case study of desertification control in Northern China. Int Pub Manag J 20(4):586–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the members of the Malaita Provincial Partners for Development for their participation in this research. This work was supported by the Australian Center for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR projects FIS/2010/057 and FIS/2012/074), and the CGIAR Research Programs on Aquatic Agricultural Systems and Fish Agri-Food Systems (FISH) which were supported by contributors to the CGIAR Trust Fund. We would also like to acknowledge the support of the Australian Research Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica L. Blythe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blythe, J.L., Cohen, P.J., Eriksson, H. et al. Do governance networks build collaborative capacity for sustainable development? Insights from Solomon Islands. Environmental Management 70, 229–240 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01644-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01644-5

Keywords

Navigation