Skip to main content
Log in

Municipal Stormwater Management Spending in California: Data Extraction, Compilation, and Analysis

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Communities in the U.S. fund stormwater management programs to reduce flooding and improve and protect water quality. Few studies have attempted to quantify municipal storwmater management expenditures. This task is important given efforts to meet increasing water quality standards and develop new revenue sources. The purpose of this study was to evaluate trends in municipal stormwater management expenditures across the state of California. The study identified and compiled publicly-available data on reported stormwater expenditures (spending) and budgets for local governments in California. Data were extracted from annual reports for over 160 public agencies. A standardized rubric of activities was developed and used to create a first-of-its-kind database of municipal stormwater budgets and expenditures. The results indicated that there is over $700 million in annual municipal stormwater spending, but this total does not represent all spending due to gaps in publicly-available data. Counties and flood control districts often have the largest total expenditures in a region, but in aggregate cities reported more spending statewide. Available data are not sufficient to adequately evaluate whether current spending meets regulatory requirements. Additionally, publicly-available data are inconsistent across geographic regions regulated by different agencies. The analysis offers a template for improved cost reporting of stormwater programs in U.S. municipalities, which can help answer key questions such as the sufficiency of current funding. Future research can use the method to evaluate spending in other states and regions, evaluate trends over time to improve outcomes, and refine the spending categories based on examples from other states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

All data are provided as supplemental data files to the text.

References

  • 33 U.S.C. 1251–1376; Chapter 758; Amended February 4 (1987) Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act). Washington, DC

  • ASCE (2021) Report Card for America’s Infrastructure. American Society of Civil Engineers

  • Campbell CW, Dymond R, Key K, Dritschel A (2018) Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2018. Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, Kentucky

  • CASQA (2020) Vision for Sustainable Stormwater Management. California Stormwater Quality Association, Sacramento, CA

  • Currier B, Jones JM, Moeller G, Fujimoto B (2005) NPDES Stormwater Cost Survey: Final Report. Office of Water Programs at Sacramento State. Prepared for the California State Water Resources Control Board, Sacramento, CA

  • Devinny J, Kamieniecki S, Stenstrom M (2004) Alternative Approaches to Stormwater Quality Control. Prepared for the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles, CA

  • EFAB (2020) Evaluating Stormwater Infrastructure Funding and Financing: A Report from the Stormwater Infrastructure Finance Task Force Workgroup of the Environmental Financial Advisory Board. US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Financial Advisory Board, Washington, DC

  • EPA (2020) Evaluating Stormwater Infrastructure Funding and Financing. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

  • EPA (2000) National Menu of Best Management Practices (BMPs) for Stormwater. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

  • Fedorchak A, Dymond R, Campbell W (2017) The financial impact of different stormwater fee types: a case study of two municipalities in Virginia. J Am Water Resour Assoc 53:1483–1494. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigg NS (2013) Stormwater programs: organization, finance, and prospects. Public Works Manag Policy 18:5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X12461259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanak E, Gray B, Lund J, et al. (2014) Paying for water in California. Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco, CA

  • Kea K, Dymond R, Campbell W (2016) An analysis of patterns and trends in united states stormwater utility systems. J Am Water Resour Assoc 52:1433–1449. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Harvey JT, Holland TJ, Kayhanian M (2013) The use of reflective and permeable pavements as a potential practice for heat island mitigation and stormwater management. Environ Res Lett 8:015023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meerow S (2019) A green infrastructure spatial planning model for evaluating ecosystem service tradeoffs and synergies across three coastal megacities. Environ Res Lett 14:125011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab502c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prudencio L, Null SE (2018) Stormwater management and ecosystem services: a review. Environ Res Lett 13:033002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa81a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SWB (2019a) Guidance for Obtaining Phase I Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit (MS4) Compliance Costs. California State Water Resources Control Board, Sacramento, CA

  • SWB (2019b) Guidance for Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Municipal Storm Water Compliance Cost Estimation. California State Water Resources Control Board, Sacramento, CA

  • US Census (2014) American Community Survey. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office

  • USBLS (2019) Consumer Price Index. United States Bureau of Labor and Statistics, Washington, DC

  • Zhao J, Fonseca C, Zeerak R (2019) Stormwater utility fees and credits: a funding strategy for sustainability. Sustainability 11:1913. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071913

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Several reviewers provided important insights for the analysis, including Dave Smith of EPA Region 9, Greg Pierce of UCLA, the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), the STORMS unit at the California State Water Resources Control Board, and staff of Regional Water Boards in California. Many thanks to Renee Purdy at the Los Angeles Regional Water Board for assistance in refining the scope of the analysis. The views expressed in this document are those of the authors.

Funding

This research was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through grant funding to the Region 9 Environmental Finance Center (EFC) and by the Office of Water Programs at California State University, Sacramento (OWP at Sacramento State).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik Porse.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Babchanik, D., Salt, D., Kerner, M. et al. Municipal Stormwater Management Spending in California: Data Extraction, Compilation, and Analysis. Environmental Management 69, 1053–1065 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01621-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01621-y

Keywords

Navigation