Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Small, Local Governments and Their Management of Hydraulic Fracturing

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Small, local governments are often considered “low capacity” when it comes to environmental management. This article examines how local government officials in 26 municipalities in Pennsylvania have managed high-volume hydraulic fracturing (HVHF or “fracking”). The data show that the perception of the “problems” related to HVHF and perceived resident expectations for if and how local governments should respond to these problems vary by municipality with clear differences between municipalities with zoning and those without zoning. With the exception of one municipality with the unique circumstance of having both active natural gas and coal extraction occurring, all municipalities believed they had adequate capacity to manage the problems associated with HVHF. This result shows the importance of local responses to local problems and calls into question whether capacity-building efforts are necessary in low capacity municipalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Blinded interview transcripts available upon request.

Notes

  1. This interview was dropped because the supervisor was relatively new and did not feel he could answer the questions well.

References

  • Andrews R, Boyne GA (2010) Capacity, Leadership, and Organizational Performance: testing the Black Box of Public Management. Public Adm Rev 70:443–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold G, Farrer B, Holahan R (2018) Measuring environmental and economic opinions about hydraulic fracturing: a survey of landowners in active or planned drilling units. Rev Policy Res 35(2):258–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold G, Holahan R (2014) The Federalism of Fracking: how the Locus of Policy-Making Authority Affects Civic Engagement. Publius: J Federalism 44(2):344–368. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjt064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold G, Neupane KW (2017) Determinants of Pro-Fracking Measure Adoption by New York Southern Tier Municipalities: Determinants of Pro-Fracking Measure Adoption by New York Southern Tier Municipalities. Rev Policy Res 34(2):208–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assetto VJ, Hajba E, Mumme SP (2003) Democratization, Decentralization, and Local Environmental Policy Capacity: Hungary and Mexico. Soc Sci J 40(2):249–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-3319(03)00007-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beebeejaun Y (2017) Exploring the Intersections between Local Knowledge and Environmental Regulation: A Study of Shale Gas Extraction in Texas and Lancashire. Environ Plan C: Politics Space 35(3):417–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16664905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borick C, Clarke C (2016) American Views on Fracking. Issues Energy Environ Policy 28:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Borick C, Rabe BG, Lachapelle E (2014) Public Perceptions of Shale Gas Extraction and Hydraulic Fracturing in New York and Pennsylvania. Issues Energy Environ Policy 14:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasier KJ, Filteau MR, McLaughlin DK, Jacquet J, Stedman RC, Goetz SJ (2011) Residents’ Perceptions of Community and Environmental Impacts from Development of Natural Gas in the Marcellus Shale: a Comparison of Pennsylvania and New York Cases. J Rural Soc Sci 26(no. 1):32–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown E, Hartman K, Borick C, Rabe BG, Ivacko T (2013) Public Opinion on Fracking: Perspectives from Michigan and Pennsylvania. Issues Energy Environ Policy 3:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown M (2012) Enhancing And Measuring Organizational Capacity: assessing The Results Of The U.S. Department Of Justice Rural Pilot Program Evaluation. Public Adm Rev 72:506–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen RK, Gazley B (2008) Capacity for Public Administration: analysis of Meaning and Measurement. Public Adm Dev 28:265–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins B, Gerber B (2006) Redistributive Policy and Devolution: Is State Administration a Road Block (Grant) to Equitable Access to Federal Funds? J Public Adm Res Theory 16:613–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compliance (2021) Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. https://www.depgreenport.state.pa.us/ReportExtracts/OG/OilComplianceReport. Accessed 07/09/2021

  • Corriher B (2017) Big-Money Courts Decide Fate Of Local Fracking Rules. Posted January 9, 2017. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/courts/reports/2017/01/09/296113/big-money-courts-decide-fate-of-local-fracking-rules/. Accessed 07/09/2021

  • Crowe J, Ceresola R, Silva T (2015) The Influence of Value Orientations, Personal Beliefs, and Knowledge About Resource Extraction on Local Leaders’ Positions on Shale Development. Rural Sociol 80:397–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis C (2012) The Politics of “Fracking”: Regulating National Gas Drilling Practices in Colorado and Texas. Rev Policy Res 29:177–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis C (2014) Substate Federalism and Fracking Policies: does State Regulatory Authority Trump Local Land Use Autonomy? Environ Sci Technol 48:8397–84013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Loë RC, Di Giantomasso SE, Kreutzwiser RD (2002) Local Capacity for Groundwater Protection in Ontario. Environ Manag 29(2):217–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-001-0026-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donahue AK, Selden SC, Ingraham P (2000) Measuring Government Management Capacity: a Comparative Analysis Of City Human Resources Management Systems. J Public Adm Res Theory 10:381–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton E, Kinchy A (2016) Quiet Voices in the Fracking Debate: Ambivalence, Nonmobilization, and Individual Action in Two Extractive Communities (Saskatchewan and Pennsylvania). Energy Res Soc Sci 20(October):22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gargan JJ (1981) Consideration of Local Government Capacity. Public Adm Rev 41:649–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasland A. Directed by Josh Fox. Released January 24, 2010.

  • Grindle MS, Hilderbrand ME (1995) Building Sustainable Capacity in the Public Sector: what Can Be Done? Public Adm Dev 15(5):441–463. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.4230150502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty J, McBride K (2016) Does Local Monitoring Empower Fracking Host Communities? A Case Study from the Gas Fields of Wyoming. J Rural Stud 43(February):235–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey CC (2011) Modular Buildings Could Help Address Marcellus-Related Housing Shortage. Cent Penn Bus J 27(Issue 32):p10–p11. 8/5/2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Honadle BW (2001) Theoretical and Practical Issues of Local Government Capacity in nn Era of Devolution. J Regional Anal Policy 31:77–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingraham P, and Kneedler A (2000) Dissecting The Black Box Revisited: Characterizing Government Management Capacity. In Laurence E Lynn, Jr,)ed) Models and Methods for the Empirical Study of Governance. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC

  • Ingraham P, Joyce P, Donahue AK (2003) Government Performance: Why Management Matters. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivey JL, de Loë R, Kreutzwiser R, Ferreyra C (2006) An Institutional Perspective on Local Capacity for Source Water Protection. Geoforum 37(6):944–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivey JL, Smithers J, de Loe RC, Kreutzwiser RD (2004) Community Capacity for Adaptation to Climate-Induced Water Shortages: Linking Institutional Complexity and Local Actors. Environ Manag 33(1):36–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0014-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey TW, Metcalf A, Salcedo R (2012) Marcellus Shale: Land Ownership, Local Voice, and the Distribution of Lease and Royalty Dollars. CECD Research Paper Series 18. http://aese.psu.edu/research/centers/cecd

  • Kriesky J, Goldstein BD, Zell K, Beach S (2013) Differing opinions about natural gas drilling in two adjacent counties with different levels of drilling activity. Energy Policy 58:228–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson LR, Lauber TB, Kay DL, Cutts BB (2017) Local Government Capacity to Respond to Environmental Change: Insights from Towns in New York State. Environ Manag 60(1):118–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0860-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loh CG (2015) Conceptualizing and Operationalizing Planning Capacity. State Local Gov Rev 47:134–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loh CG, Osland AC (2016) Local Land Use Planning Responses to Hydraulic Fracturing. J Am Plan Assoc 82(3):222–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2016.1176535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire M, Silvia C (2010) The Effect of Problem Severity, Managerial and Organizational Capacity, and Agency Structure on Intergovernmental Collaboration: Evidence from Local Emergency Management. Public Adm Rev 70:279–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey W (2019) Fracking brought spikes in crime, road deaths and STDs to Pa.: report. Penn-Live Patriot News. January 5, 2019. https://www.pennlive.com/midstate/2014/12/fracking_brought_spikes_in_vio.html Accessed 10/04/2021

  • Meier KJ, O’Toole LJ (2010) Beware of Managers not Bearing Gifts: How Management Capacity Augments the Impact of Managerial Networking. Public Adm 88(4):1025–1044. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01853.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metze T, Dodge J (2016) Dynamic Discourse Coalitions on Hydro-fracking in Europe and the United States. Environ Commun 10:365–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischen, PA, and Swim S (2018) Social Equity and ‘Fracking’: Local Awareness and Responses. Administration & Society. (May, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399718774032

  • Muehlenbachs L, Spiller E, Timmins C (2015) The Housing Market Impacts of Shale Gas Development. Am Economic Rev 105:3633–3659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natural Gas Drilling Complaints Heard, Observer-Reporter, November 6, 2007, B2. http://infoweb.newsbank.com/iw-search/we/InfoWeb. Accessed 10/24/2012.

  • Oil and Gas Well Inventory (2021) Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. https://www.depgreenport.state.pa.us/ReportExtracts/OG/OilGasWellInventoryReport. Accessed 07/09/21

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development (2017) Statewide Municipal Annual Financial Reports. http://munstats.pa.gov/Reports/ReportInformation2.aspx?report=StatewideMuniAfr. Accessed 5/30/2019

  • Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (2003) Department of Community and Economic Development. http://www.dep.state.pa.us/HOSTING/GROWINGSMARTER/MPCode%5B1%5D.pdf. Accessed 07/09/21

  • Press D (1998) Local Environmental Policy Capacity: a Framework for Research. Nat Resour J 38(no. 1):29–52. (Winter 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz PM, Slizovskiy IB, Lamers V, Trufan SJ, Holford TR, Dziura JD, Peduzzi PN, Kane MJ, Reif JS, Weiss TR, Stowe MH (2015) Proximity to Natural Gas Wells and Reported Health Status: Results of a Household Survey in Washington County, Pennsylvania. Environ Health Perspect 123(no. 1):21–26. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruddell R, Ortiz N (2015) Boomtown Blues: Long-Term Community Perceptions of Crime and Disorder. Am J Crim Justice 40(no. 1):129–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-014-9237-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusk D (2003) “Little Boxes” – Limited Horizons: A Study of Fragmented Local Governance in Pennsylvania: Its Scope, Consequences and Reforms. Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Rusk.pdf

  • Schug K, Hildenbrand Z (eds) (2017) Environmental Issues Concerning Hydraulic Fracturing. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva T, Crowe J (2015) The Hope-Reality Gap: Rural Community Officials’ Perceptions of Unconventional Shale Development as a Means to Increase Local Population and Revitalize Resource Extraction. Community Dev 46:312–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small MJ, Stern PC, Bomberg E, Christopherson SM, Goldstein BD, Israel AL, Jackson RB, Krupnik A, Mauter MS, Nash J, North DW, Olmstead SM, Prakash A, Rabe B, Richardson N, Tierney S, Webler T, Wong-Parodi G, Zielinska B (2014) Risks and Risk Governance in Unconventional Gas Development. Environ Sci Technol 48:8289–8297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • State Impact (2017) The Oil and Gas Law of the Land: Act 13. https://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/tag/act-13/. Accessed 7/17/2017

  • Stevens J (2008) Large Drilling Equipment, Big Headache. Observer-Report, September 27(2008):B1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

100%.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela Ann Mischen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

Human Subjects Proposal 3298-14 Approved by Binghamton University IRB on 06/06/2014 as Exempt.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mischen, P.A. Small, Local Governments and Their Management of Hydraulic Fracturing. Environmental Management 69, 514–528 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01551-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01551-1

Keywords

Navigation