Abstract
Green infrastructure, and specifically urban afforestation, is one of the most important activities of city management today, because of the multitude of ecosystem services it provides. The pattern of tree planting in urban areas is related to age, ethnicity, education, and household income. Unfortunately, this issue has not been evaluated, nor has it received significant subsidized governmental actions, funding, study, or public policies in large tropical cities in developing countries. Thus, we aimed to investigate if there was a pattern of urban afforestation related by socio-territorial inequalities, in the city of São Paulo, or if there was a relationship between the number of seedlings planted over the past 4 years and zoning, socioeconomic, health, and environment variables in the neighborhoods of São Paulo, as well as to evaluate the ecosystem services provided by the planted species. Our results showed that tree planting was not oriented to increase cover of less-vegetated areas of the city and where more respiratory diseases have been registered. In fact, the number of seedlings planted over the past 4 years was very influenced by socioeconomic status of inhabitants. In this sense, wealth and education proved to be a better predictor than zoning, health, and environmental variables for the tree planting. Finally, our results reveal that supporting, provision, and cultural functions and services are being provided to São Paulo city by the selected woody species. In Sao Paulo, urban afforestation must extend to the neighborhoods that need the services the most.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abelt K, McLafferty S (2017) Green streets: urban green and birth outcomes. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:771. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070771
Barona CO, Devisscher T, Dobbs C et al. (2020) Trends in urban forestry research in Latin America and the Caribbean: a systematic literature review and synthesis. Urban For Urban Green 47:26544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126544
Bell RG, Russell C (2002) Environmental policy for developing countries. Issues Sci Technol 18:63–70
Benedict M, McMahon E (2002) Green infrastructure: smart conservation for the 21st century. Renew Resour J 20:12–17
Brasil (1988) Constituição da república federativa do Brasil. Senado Federal, Brasília
Beninde J, Veith M, Hochkirch A (2015) Biodiversity in cities needs space: a meta‐analysis of factors determining intra‐urban biodiversity variation. Ecol Lett 18:581–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12427
CETESB – Companhia de Tecnologia de Saneamento Ambiental (2019) Qualidade do ar no Estado de São Paulo. CETESB, São Paulo
Dawes L, Adams A, Escobedo F, Soto J (2018) Socioeconomic and ecological perceptions and barriers to urban tree distribution and reforestation programs. Urban Ecosyst 21:657–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0760-z
De Groot R, Wilson M, Boumans R (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
De Vries S, Verheij R, Groenewegen P, Spreeuwenberg P (2003) Natural environments—healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health. Environ Plan 35:1717–1731. https://doi.org/10.1068/a35111
United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication. Accessed 3 July 2020
Dobbs C, Escobedo F, Zipperer WC (2011) A framework for developing urban forest ecosystem services and goods indicators. Landsc Urban Plan 99:196–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.004
Fan C, Johnston M, Darling L, Scott L, Liao FH (2019) Land use and socio-economic determinants of urban forest structure and diversity. Landsc Urban Plan 181:10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.09.012
Fisher B, Turner K, Morling P (2009) Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ 68:643–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014
Hewitt CN, Ashworth K, MacKenzie AR (2020) Using green infrastructure to improve urban air quality (GI4AQ). Ambio 49:62–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01164-3
IBGE (2019) Panorama Município de São Paulo. https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/sp/sao-paulo/panorama. Accessed 3 July 2020
INMET (2019) Normais Climatológicas do Brasil. http://www.inmet.gov.br/webcdp/climatologia/normais2/index.php. Accessed 3 July 2020
Kuras E, Warren P, Zinda JA et al. (2020) Urban socioeconomic inequality and biodiversity often converge, but not always: a global meta-analysis. Landsc Urban Plan 198:103799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103799
Lepczyk C, Aronson M, Evans K, Goddard M, Lerman S, MacIvor JS (2017) Biodiversity in the city: fundamental questions for understanding the ecology of urban green spaces for biodiversity conservation. BioScience 67:799–807. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix079
Lombardo MA (1985) Ilha de calor nas metrópoles: o exemplo de São Paulo. Editora Hucitec, São Paulo
Marques E (2015) Urban poverty, segregation and social networks in São Paulo and Salvador, Brazil. Int J Urban Reg Res 39:1067–1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12300
Martin C, Warren P, Kinzig A (2004) Neighborhood socioeconomic status is a useful predictor of perennial landscape vegetation in residential neighborhoods and embedded small parks of Phoenix, AZ. Landsc Urban Plan 69:355–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.034
Momm-Schult SI, Piper J, Denaldi R, Freitas SR, Fonseca MLP, Oliveira VE (2013) Integration of urban and environmental policies in the metropolitan area of São Paulo and in Greater London: the value of establishing and protecting green open spaces. Int J Urban Sustain Dev 5:89–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2013.777671
Morgenroth J, Östberg J, van den Bosch CK et al. (2016) Urban tree diversity—taking stock and looking ahead. Urban For Urban Green 15:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.11.003
Nowak D, Dwyer J (2007) Understanding the benefits and costs of urban forest ecosystems. In: Kuser JE (ed.) Urban and community forestry in the northeast. Springer, Dordrecht, p 25–46
Nowak D, Hirabayashi S, Doyle M, McGovern M, Pasher J (2018) Air pollution removal by urban forests in Canada and its effect on air quality and human health. Urban For Urban Green 29:40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.10.019
Nuñez-Flores R, Pérez-Gomez U, Fernández-Méndez F (2019) Functional diversity criteria for selecting urban trees. Urban For Urban Green 38:251–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.01.005
Perkins H, Heynen N, Wilson J (2004) Inequitable access to urban reforestation: the impact of urban political economy on housing tenure and urban forests. Cities 21:291–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2004.04.002
PMSP – Prefeitura Municipal de São Paulo (2016) Inventário da biodiversidade do município de São Paulo. https://www.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/cidade/secretarias/meio_ambiente/publicacoes_svma/index.php?p=229837. Accessed 3 July 2020
PMSP – Prefeitura Municipal de São Paulo (2019) Plano municipal de arborização urbana. https://www.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/cidade/secretarias/meio_ambiente/projetos_e_programas/index.php?p=284680. Accessed 3 July 2020
PMSP – Prefeitura Municipal de São Paulo (2020a) https://www.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/cidade/secretarias/meio_ambiente/parques/index.php?p=284396. Accessed 3 July 2020
PMSP – Prefeitura Municipal de São Paulo (2020b) https://www.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/cidade/secretarias/meio_ambiente/parques/index.php?p=284396. Accessed 3 July 2020
Riley C, Gardiner M (2020) Examining the distributional equity of urban tree canopy cover and ecosystem services across United States cities. PLoS One 15(2):e0228499
São Paulo – SP (2014). Lei n° 16.050, de 31 de julho de 2014. Política de Desenvolvimento Urbano e o Plano Diretor Estratégico do Município de São Paulo
Sass CK, Lodder RA, Lee BD (2019) Combining biophysical and socioeconomic suitability models for urban forest planning. Urban For Urban Green 38:371–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.01.019
Schwarz K, Fragkias M, Boone C et al. (2015) Trees grow on money: urban tree canopy cover and environmental justice. PLoS One 10:e0122051. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122051
Silva JLS, de Oliveira MTP, Oliveira W, Borges LA, Cruz-Neto O, Lopes AV (2020) High richness of exotic trees in tropical urban green spaces: Reproductive systems, fruiting and associated risks to native species. Urban For Urban Green 50:126659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126659
Soto JR, Escobedo FJ, Khachatryan H, Adams D (2018) Consumer demand for urban forest ecosystem services and disservices: examining trade-offs using choice experiments and best-worst scaling. Ecosyst Serv 29:31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.009
SVMA – Secretaria Municipal do Verde e Meio Ambiente. (2014) GEO cidade de São Paulo: panorama do meio ambiente urbano. PNUMA, Brasília
Szantoi Z, Escobedo FJ, Wagner J, Rodriguez JM, Smith S (2012) Socioeconomic factors and urban tree cover policies in a subtropical urban forest. GIsci Remote Sens 49:428–449. https://doi.org/10.2747/1548-1603.49.3.428
Troy AR, Grove JM, O’Neil-Dunne JPM, Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML (2007) Predicting opportunities for greening and patterns of vegetation on private urban lands. Environ Manag 40:394–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-006-0112-2
United Nations (2018) World urbanization prospects: the 2018 revision, key facts. Technical report
Whitford V, Ennos R, Handley J (2001) “City form and natural process”—indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas and their application to Merseyside, UK. Landsc Urban Plan 57:91–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00192-X
Wolch JR, Byrne J, Newell JP (2014) Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: the challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landsc Urban Plan 125:234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
World Health Organization (2016) Urban green spaces and health: a review of evidence. World Health Organization, Copenhagen
Zhu P, Zhang Y (2008) Demand for urban forests in United States cities. Landsc Urban Plan 84:293–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.005
Zhou X, Wang Y-C (2011) Spatial–temporal dynamics of urban green space in response to rapid urbanization and greening policies. Landsc Urban Plan 100:268–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.12.013
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takakura, M., Massi, K.G. Wealth and Education Influences on Spatial Pattern of Tree Planting in a Tropical Metropolis in Brazil. Environmental Management 69, 169–178 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01542-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01542-2