Abstract
Hurricane Maria, a category 4 tropical cyclone, hit the US non-incorporated territory of Puerto Rico on September 20, 2017. Widespread physical and natural infrastructure damage was observed, especially in already vulnerable coastal communities. As public sector funding availability for natural infrastructure (ex. coastal ecosystems) increases, mechanisms for its efficient and equitable allocation are lacking. An accessible and replicable coastal vulnerability indicator framework is presented to assist state and federal policy makers in the allocation of funding for coastal natural infrastructure recovery. To assess funding priorization gaps and test the applicability of the proposed framework, spatial patterns in the estimated funding need identified in state-led post-Hurricane Maria assessments for natural infrastructure rehabilitation efforts were compared to physical and social coastal vulnerability estimations. Three main challenges that emerge during the implementation of a vulnerability indicator framework were considered for its design: (1) the compressed time frame in which decisions are made after an extreme weather event, (2) the availability of data to calculate indicators in a reduced time frame, and (3) the accessibility of results to a broad variety of stakeholders. We propose a vulnerability indicator framework that can become operational in a relatively short period of time, attempts to simplify data gathering efforts, and uses methods that aim to be more transparent and understandable to a broad group of stakeholders.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arkema KK, Griffin R, Maldonado S, Silver J, Suckale J, Guerry AD (2017) Linking social, ecological, and physical science to advance natural and nature-based protection for coastal communities. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1399(1):5–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13322
Barreto-Orta M, Méndez-Tejeda R, Rodríguez E, Cabrera N, Díaz E, Pérez K (2019) State of the beaches in Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria (2017) Shore Beach 87:16–23. http://asbpa.org/wpv2/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/barreto_87_1_color.pdf
Bathi J, Das H (2016) Vulnerability of coastal communities from storm surge and flood disasters. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13(2):239. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13020239
Beck MW, Losada IJ, Menéndez P, Reguero BG, Díaz-Simal P, Fernández F (2018) The global flood protection savings provided by coral reefs. Nat Commun 9(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04568-z
Benfield K, Chasis S, Doniger D, Huang A, Hwang R, Kassel R,… & Sewell B (2005) After katrina. New Solutions for Safe Communities and a Secure Energy Future. https://assets.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/hk.pdf
Bevacqua A, Yu D, Zhang Y (2018) Coastal vulnerability: evolving concepts in understanding vulnerable people and places. Environ Sci Policy 82:19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.006
Boruff BJ, Emrich C, Cutter SL (2005) Erosion hazard vulnerability of US coastal counties. J Coast Res 215(5):932–942. https://doi.org/10.2112/04-0172.1
Bracero-Marrero L (2019) Using airborne and UAS aerial images to evaluate coastal change and impacts to archaeological sites along Loíza’s Coast, Puerto Rico. In: IGARSS 2019-2019 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 9149–9152. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2019.8899100
Bridges T, Burks-Copes KA, Bates ME, Collier ZA, Fischenich JC, Piercy CD,… & Rosati JD (2015) Use of natural and nature-based features (NNBF) for coastal resilience. US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Environmental Laboratory, Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a613224.pdf
Bridges T, Henn R, Komlos S, Scerno D, Wamsley T, White K (2013) Coastal risk reduction and resilience: using the full array of measures. http://cdm16021.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/getfile/collection/p266001coll1/id/5270
Bukvic A, Rohat G, Apotsos A, de Sherbinin A (2020) A systematic review of coastal vulnerability mapping. Sustainability 12(7):2822. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072822. MDPI AG
Colgan C, Beck M, Narayan S (2017) Financing natural infrastructure for coastal flood damage reduction. Lloyd’s Tercentenary Research Foundation, London. https://conservationgateway.org/ConservationPractices/Marine/crr/library/Documents/FinancingNaturalInfrastructureReport.pdf
Cortinovis C, Zulian G, Geneletti D (2018) Assessing nature-based recreation to support urban green infrastructure planning in trento (italy). Land 7(4):112. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040112
Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(2):242–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
Domingue S, Emrich C (2019) Social vulnerability and procedural equity: exploring the distribution of disaster aid across counties in the United States. Am Rev Public Adm 49(3):897–913. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019856122
Dundas S (2017) Benefits and ancillary costs of natural infrastructure: evidence from the New Jersey coast. J Environ Econ Manage 85:62–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.04.008
Fennell A (2019) Army corps of engineers: consideration of project costs and benefits in using natural coastal infrastructure and associated challenges. United States Government Accountability Office. https://www.gao.gov/assets/700/698019.pdf
Fletcher CH, Romine BM, Genz AS, Barbee MM, Dyer M, Anderson TR… & Richmond BM (2012) National assessment of shoreline change: historical shoreline change in the Hawaiian Islands. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2011/1051.
Gotham K (2014) Reinforcing inequalities: the impact of the CDBG program on post-Katrina rebuilding. Hous Policy Debate 24(1):192–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2013.840666
Gunnell K, Mulligan M, Francis RA, Hole DG (2019) Evaluating natural infrastructure for flood management within the watersheds of selected global cities. Sci Total Environ 670:411–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.212
Hamid AIA, Din AHM, Yusof N, Abdullah NM, Omar AH, Abdul Khanan MF (2019) Coastal vulnerability index development: a review. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-4-w16-229-2019
Hernández-Delgado E, Toledo-Hernández C, Ruíz-Díaz C, Gómez-Andújar N, Medina-Muñiz J, Suleimán-Ramos S (2018) Seagrass rapid assessment of Hurricane María impacts—Northeast Reserves System Habitat Focus Area (NER-HFA), Culebra Island, Puerto Rico—final report. Sociedad Ambiente Marino. http://drna.pr.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Culebras-seagrass-assessment-after-hurricane-Maria-SAM-compressed.pdf
Himmelstoss EA, Henderson RE, Kratzmann MG, Farris AS (2018) Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) version 5.0 User Guide; Open-File Report 2018–1179. US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20181179
International Institute for Sustainable Development (2020) The Multiple Benefits of Natural Infrastructure. https://www.iisd.org/articles/multiple-benefits-natural-infrastructure
Johnson LA, Olshansky RB (2017) After great disasters: an in-depth analysis of how six countries managed community recovery. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge. https://www.lincolninst.edu/sites/default/files/pubfiles/after-great-disasters-full_0.pdf
Kantamaneni K, Phillips M, Thomas T, Jenkins R (2018) Assessing coastal vulnerability: development of a combined physical and economic index. Ocean Coast Manag 158:164–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.03.039
Kantamaneni K (2016) Coastal infrastructure vulnerability: an integrated assessment model. Nat Hazards (Dordr) 84(1):139–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2413-y
Kulczyk S, Woźniak E, Derek M (2018) Landscape, facilities and visitors: an integrated model of recreational ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 31:491–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.016
Mathew MJ, Sautter B, Ariffin EH, Menier D, Ramkumar M, Siddiqui NA, Delanoe H, Del Estal N, Traoré K, Gensac E (2020) Total vulnerability of the littoral zone to climate change-driven natural hazards in north Brittany, France Sci Total Environ 706:135963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135963
Mayer RJ, Soto E, Mártir-Vargas H, Rodríguez-Sosa A, Bonet-Muniz S, Cabañas-Ramos N, Mayer RB (2018) Coastal dune erosion assessment on the north coast of Puerto Rico—Final Report. DOI-FEMA Natural and Cultural Resources Recovery Support Function (NCR RSF). Vida Marina—Centro de Conservación y Restauración Ecológica y Costera. http://drna.pr.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Coastal-Dune-and-Erosion-Assessment-of-the-North-Coast-of-Puerto-Rico.pdf
Mclaughlin S, Cooper JAG (2010) A multi-scale coastal vulnerability index: a tool for coastal managers? Environ Hazards 9(3):233–248. https://doi.org/10.3763/ehaz.2010.0052
McLaughlin S, McKenna J, Cooper J (2002) Socio-economic data in coastal vulnerability indices: constraints and opportunities. J Coast Res 36:487–497. https://doi.org/10.2112/1551-5036-36.sp1.487
Mell I (2020) The impact of austerity on funding green infrastructure: A DPSIR evaluation of the Liverpool Green & Open Space Review (LG&OSR), UK. Land Use Policy 91:104284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104284
Morton RA, Miller TA (2005) National assessment of shoreline change: Part 2: Historical shoreline changes and associated coastal land loss along the U.S. Southeast Atlantic Coast: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2005–1401, p. 35 https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20051401
Morton RA, Miller TA, Moore LJ (2004) National assessment of shoreline change: Part 1: Historical shoreline changes and associated coastal land loss along the U.S. Gulf of Mexico: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2004–1043, p. 42 http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2004/1043/
Muñoz C, Tate E (2016) Unequal recovery? Federal resource distribution after a midwest flood disaster. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13(5):1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13050507
Narayan S, Beck MW, Reguero BG, Losada IJ, van Wesenbeeck B, Pontee N, Sanchirico JN, Ingram JC, Lange GM, Burks-Copes KA (2016) The effectiveness, costs and coastal protection benefits of natural and nature-based defences. PLoS ONE 11(5):e0154735. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154735
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2018a) Status of Puerto Rico’s coral reefs in the aftermath of Hurricanes Irma and María. http://drna.pr.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Coral-Assessment-Report.pdf
National Hurricane Center (2017) Hurricane Maria Path [Data file]. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/gis/
Nelson KS, Abkowitz MD, Camp JV (2015) A method for creating high resolution maps of social vulnerability in the context of environmental hazards. Appl Geogr 63:89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.06.011
Nguyen TT, Bonetti J, Rogers K, Woodroffe CD (2016) Indicator-based assessment of climate-change impacts on coasts: A review of concepts, methodological approaches and vulnerability indices. Ocean Coast Manag 123:18–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.11.022
NOAA (2018b) A broad scale assessment of seagrass physical disturbance after hurricanes Irma and Maria. Submitted to FEMA Natural and Cultural Resources Recovery Support Function. NOAA Restoration Center. http://drna.pr.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/FEMA_Assessment_Seagrass_NOAA_RC.pdf
Olshansky R (2006) Planning after hurricane Katrina. J Am Plan Assoc 72(2):147–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360608976735
Pinsky ML, Guannel G, Arkema KK (2013) Quantifying wave attenuation to inform coastal habitat conservation. Ecosphere 4(8):art95–16. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00080.1
Puerto Rico Planning Board (2009) Municipios y barrios, edicion marzo 2009, Puerto Rico [Data file]. http://gis.otg.gobierno.pr/Downloads/Metadata/Municipios_Barrios_2009_JP.htm#Metadata_Reference_Information
Puerto Rico Government (2018) Transformation and innovation in the wake of devastation: an economic and disaster recovery plan for Puerto Rico. http://www.p3.pr.gov/assets/pr-draft-recovery-plan-for-comment-july-9-2018.pdf
Rangel-Buitrago N, Neal WJ, Bonetti J, Anfuso G, de Jonge VN (2020) Vulnerability assessments as a tool for the coastal and marine hazards management: an overview. Ocean Coast Manag 189:105134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105134
Reguero B, Beck M, Bresch D, Calil J, Meliane I (2018) Comparing the cost effectiveness of nature-based and coastal adaptation: a case study from the Gulf Coast of the United States. PLoS ONE 13(4):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192132
Resilient Puerto Rico Advisory Commission (2018) ReImagina Puerto Rico Report. https://reimaginapuertorico.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/ReImagina_Puerto_Rico_Report_ENG_03.04.2019.pdf
Sajjad M, Chan JCL, Lin N (2020) Incorporating natural habitats into coastal risk assessment frameworks. Environ Sci Policy 106:99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.01.004
Saleh F, Weinstein MP (2016) The role of nature-based infrastructure (NBI) in coastal resiliency planning: a literature review. J Environ Manag 183(Pt 3):1088–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.077
Santos M, Río LD, Benavente J (2013) GIS-based approach to the assessment of coastal vulnerability to storms. Case study in the Bay of Cádiz (Andalusia, Spain). J Coast Res 65:826–831
Satyanarayana B, Van der Stocken T, Rans G, Kodikara KAS, Ronsmans G, Jayatissa LP, Dahdouh-Guebas F (2017) Island-wide coastal vulnerability assessment of sri lanka reveals that sand dunes, planted trees and natural vegetation may play a role as potential barriers against ocean surges. Glob Ecol Conserv 12(C):144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2017.10.001
Silver JM, Arkema KK, Griffin RM, Lashley B, Lemay M, Maldonado S… Verutes G (2019) Advancing coastal risk reduction science and implementation by accounting for climate, ecosystems, and people. Front Mar Sci 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00556
Smith Smith RL (2009) Principles of ecosystem stewardship: resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. Choice 47(3):519
Sutton-Grier A, Gittman R, Arkema K, Bennett R, Benoit J, Blitch S, Grabowski J (2018) Investing in natural and nature-based infrastructure: building better along our coasts. Sustainability 10(2):523. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020523
Sutton-Grier AE, Wowk K, Bamford H (2015) Future of our coasts: The potential for natural and hybrid infrastructure to enhance the resilience of our coastal communities, economies and ecosystems. Environ Sci Policy 51:137–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.006
Tano RA, Aman A, Toualy E, Kouadio YK, François-Xavier BBD, Addo KA (2018) Development of an integrated coastal vulnerability index for the Ivorian Coast in West Africa. J Environ Prot 9(11):1171–1184
Terkenli TS, Bell S, Živojinović I, Tomićević-Dubljević J, Panagopoulos T, Straupe I… O’Brien L (2017) Recreational use of urban green infrastructure: the tourist’s perspective. In: The urban forest. Springer, Cham, p 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50280-9_16
Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Polsky C (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8074–8079. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231335100
US Census Bureau (2009) American Community Survey Concepts and Definitions. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/geography-acs/concepts-definitions.html
Wen C, Albert C, Von Haaren C (2018) The elderly in green spaces: exploring requirements and preferences concerning nature-based recreation. Sustain Cities Soc 38:582–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.023
Acknowledgements
Financial support for this study was provided by a grant from the University of Puerto Rico Institutional Funding for Research (FIPI UPRRP 21120.293.146 FIP3570018).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Santiago, L., Barreto, M., Montañez-Acuña, A. et al. A Coastal Vulnerability Framework to Guide Natural Infrastructure Funds Allocation in Compressed Time. Environmental Management 67, 67–80 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01397-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01397-z