Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Small-Scale Treatment Plant Industry: Institutional Features of Companies, Problems and Functionality of Small-Scale Treatment Systems

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purposes of this study is to show the corporate characteristics of companies which have been operating in the fields of small-scale treatment plants’ (SSTPs’) design, construction, and installation processes, and to exhibit findings/perceptions of company employees on issues such as the initial investment and operating costs, common production and operating problems, the functionality of the small-scale treatment systems and the added value they provide to their customers’ facilities. As a result of this study, it was determined that when the personnel participating in the survey were directly trained and recruited by the companies, which is generally the case, their training includes more practical methods and their experiences are shaped by the master-apprentice relationships in the sector. Regarding water treatment in SSTPs, the companies surveyed opted for traditional methods such as reverse osmosis and coagulation-flocculation, and preferred to use traditional biological treatment units—continuous flow or sequencing batch reactors (SBRs)- in wastewater treatment. In favor of businesses in need of water and wastewater management systems, the surveyed company employees have considered SSTPs as a successful, competitive advantage in the industry by maintaining low initial investment and operational costs while fulfilling the relevant environmental legal obligations. After examining the data regarding the opinions of company employees about SSTPs, it was found that there is a very significant relationship between the problems experienced during the installation/construction process and the problems during their operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altin S, Altin A (2014) Study on the expectancies and benefits of companies from the ISO 14001 certification process. Glob J Pure Appl Sci 3:23–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho P, Marques RC (2014) Computing economies of vertical integration, economies of scope and economies of scale using partial frontier nonparametric methods. Eur J Oper Res 234:292–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesaroni G, Giovannola D (2015) Average-cost efficiency and optimal scale sizes in nonparametric analysis. Eur J Oper Res 242:121–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee S, Hadi AS (2012) Regression analysis by example, 5th edn. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2013) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coolidge F (2013) Statistics: a gentle introduction, 3rd edn. SAGE, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossio C, McConville J, Rauch S, Wilén BM, Dalahmeh S, Mercado A, Romero AM (2018) Wastewater management in small towns–understanding the failure of small treatment plants in Bolivia. Environ Technol 39(11):1393–1403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cossio C, Norrman J, McConville J, Mercado A, Rauch S (2020) Indicators for sustainability assessment of small-scale wastewater treatment plants in low and lower-middle income countries. Environ Sustain Indic 6:100028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallego A, Hospido A, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2008) Environmental performance of wastewater treatment plants for small populations. Resour Conserv Recy 52(6):931–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gautam S, Ahmed S, Dhingra A, Fatima Z (2017) Cost-effective treatment technology for small size sewage treatment plants in India. J Sci Ind Res 76:249–254

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrini A, Romano G, Leardini C, Martini M (2015) Measuring the efficiency of wastewater services through data envelopment analysis. Water Sci Technol 71:1845–1851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hajjar ST (2018) Statistical analysis: internal-consistency reliability and construct validity. IJQQRM 6(1):46–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Chover V, Bellver-Domingo Á, Hernández-Sancho F (2018) Efficiency of wastewater treatment facilities: the influence of scale economies. J Environ Manag 228:77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain S, Chourse S, Dubey S, Jain S, Kamakoty J, Jain D (2016) Regression analysis–its formulation and execution in dentistry. J Appl Dent 2(1):199–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleimbaum DG, Lawrence LK, Azhar N, Rosenberg ES (2014) Applied regression analysis and multivariable methods. Thomson, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Langergraber G, Pressl A, Kretschmer F, Weissenbacher N (2018) Small wastewater treatment plants in Austria—technologies, management and training of operators. Ecol Eng 120:164–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundin M, Bengtsson M, Molander S (2000) Life cycle assessment of wastewater systems: influence of system boundaries and scale on calculated environmental loads. Environ Sci Technol 34(1):180–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Molinos-Senante M, Hernández-Sancho F, Sala-Garrido R (2013) Benchmarking in wastewater treatment plants: a tool to save operational costs. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16:149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukaka MM (2012) Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J 24(3):69–71

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murmura F, Liberatore L, Bravi L, Casolani N (2018) Evaluation of Italian companies’ perception about ISO 14001 and eco management and audit scheme III: motivations, benefits and barriers. J Clean Prod 174:691–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearse N (2011) Deciding on the scale granularity of response categories of Likert type scales: the case of a 21-point scale. Electron J Bus Res Methods 9(2):159–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Preziosi M, Merli R, D’amico M (2016) Why companies do not renew their EMAS Registration? An exploratory research. Sustainability 8(2):191–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren X, Shon HK, Jang N, Lee YG, Bae M, Lee J, Kwangmyeung C, Kim IS (2010) Novel Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) coupled with a nonwoven fabric filter for household wastewater treatment. Water Res 44(3):751–760

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sauro J, Lewis JR (2012) Quantifying the user experience: practical statistics for user research. 2nd edition. Morgan Kaufman, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder LD, Sjoquist DL, Stephan PE (1986) Understanding regression analysis: an introductory guide. SAGE, California

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Senthilnathan S (2019) Usefulness of correlation analysis, SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3416918. Accessed 26 June 2020

  • Tavakol M, Dennick R (2011) Making sense of Cronbach’s Alpha. Int J Med Educ 2:53–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TOBB (2017) The Union of Chambers and Commodity Exchanges of Turkey, Industrial Capacity Report Statistics. http://sanayi.tobb.org.tr/resmi_istatistik.php. Accessed 5 May 2017

  • Tongco MDC (2007) Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobot Res Appl 5:147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vehovar V, Toepoel V, Steinmetz S (2016) Non-probability sampling. In: Wolf C, et al. (ed) The Sage handbook of survey methods, 1st edn. SAGE, London, p 329–345

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal N, Poch M, Marti E, Rodriguez-Roda I (2002) Evaluation on the environmental implications to include structural changes in a wastewater treatment plant. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 77:1206–1211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zacks S (2012) Introduction to reliability analysis: probability models and statistical methods. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No funding support was used in this study. The authors would like to thank Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University officials for providing information access.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Dept. of Environmental Eng, Zonguldak, Turkey

    Ahmet Altin & Süreyya Altin

  2. Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak Vocational College, Zonguldak, Turkey

    Hasan Tezcan Uysal

Authors
  1. Ahmet Altin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hasan Tezcan Uysal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Süreyya Altin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmet Altin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Altin, A., Uysal, H.T. & Altin, S. The Small-Scale Treatment Plant Industry: Institutional Features of Companies, Problems and Functionality of Small-Scale Treatment Systems. Environmental Management 67, 468–476 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01388-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01388-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation