Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An LCA-Based Environmental Performance of Rice Production for Developing a Sustainable Agri-Food System in Malaysia

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to assess the environmental impacts of conventional and organic rice cultivations and proposes a sustainable conceptual framework of rice farming based on the life cycle assessment (LCA) approach. A cradle-to-gate LCA was performed by using the ReCiPe 2016 method and SimaPro 8.5 software. The functional unit was one ton of rice grains harvested. Primary data were obtained from the farmer, while secondary data were collected from Ecoinvent 3.0, the Agri Footprint 3.0 database and the literature. The total characterization factors for global warming potential (GWP), water consumption potential (WCP) and fossil fuel depletion potential (FFP) were 457.89 kg CO2-eq, 98.18 m3 and 84.56 kg oil-eq, respectively, at the midpoint level for conventional rice, while the impacts for organic rice were 140.55 kg CO2-eq, 29.45 m3 and 22.25 kg oil-eq, respectively. At the endpoint level, the total characterization factors for human health damage (HH), ecosystem damage (ED) and resource availability (RA) for conventional rice were 9.63 × 10−4 DALY, 5.54 × 10−6 species.year and 30.98 Dollar, respectively, while for organic rice, the impacts were 2.60 × 10−4 DALY, 2.28 × 10−6 species.year and 8.44 Dollar, respectively. Rice cultivation impacted the environment, particularly in relation to three impact categories: GWP, WCP and FFP. The cultivation phase of rice production was the main contributor to environmental impacts due to the production and application of fertilizer and pesticides. It can be concluded that the application of LCA in agricultural sector is able to provide information and responses for policy makers in understanding the potential environmental impacts at various spatial levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Aguilera E, Guzmán G, Alonso A (2015) Greenhouse gas emissions from conventional and organic cropping systems in Spain. I. Herbaceous crops. Agron Sustain Dev 35(2):713–724

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Akinbile C, El-Latif KA, Abdullah R, Yusoff M (2011) Rice production and water use efficiency for self-sufficiency in Malaysia: a review. Trends Appl Sci Res 6(10):1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz NIHA, Hanafiah MM (2020) Life cycle analysis of biogas production from anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent. Renew Energy 145:847–857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz NIHA, Hanafiah MM, Ali MYM (2019a) Sustainable biogas production from agrowaste and effluents–a promising step for small-scale industry income. Renew Energy 132:363–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz NIHA, Hanafiah MM, Gheewala SH (2019b) A review on life cycle assessment of biogas production: challenges and future perspectives in Malaysia. Biomass- Bioenergy 122:361–374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz NIHA, Hanafiah MM, Gheewala SH, Ismail H (2020) Bioenergy for a cleaner future: a case study of sustainable biogas supply chains in the malaysian energy sector. Sustainability 12:3213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagheri A, Bondori A, Allahyari MS, Damalas CA (2019) Modelling farmers’ intention to use pesticides: an expanded version of the theory of planned behavior. J Environ Manag 248:109291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batáry P, Holzschuh A, Orci KM, Samu F, Tscharntke T (2012) Responses of plant, insect and spider biodiversity to local and landscape scale management intensity in cereal crops and grasslands. Agriculture, Ecosyst Environ 146(1):130–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blengini GA, Busto M (2009) The life cycle of rice: lca of alternative agri-food chain management systems in Vercelli (Italy). J Environ Manag 90(3):1512–1522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodt S, Kendall A, Mohammadi Y, Arslan A, Yuan J, Lee I-S, Linquist B (2014) Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in California rice production. Field Crops Res 169:89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Statistics Malaysia (2017) States’s Socioeconomic Report (2017) Strategic Communication, Malaysia

  • Department of Statistic Malaysia (DOSM) (2018) Selected agriculture indicators, strategic communication and international division. Department of Statistic Malaysia, Putrajaya, Malaysia

  • Dijkman TJ, Basset-Mens C, Antón A, Núñez M (2018) Lca of Food and Agriculture. Dlm. (pnyt.). Life Cycle Assessment, pp. 723–754. Springer

  • Durlinger B, Tyszler M, Scholten J, Broekema R, Blonk H, Beatrixstraat G (2014) Agri-footprint: a life cycle inventory database covering food and feed production and processing. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector. 310–317

  • Economic Planning Unit (2016) The Malaysian Economy in Figures. Kuala Lumpur: Prime Minister’s Department, Malaysia

  • Eggleston S (2006) Estimation of Emissions from CO2 Capture and Storage: the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Presentation at the UNFCCC Workshop on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage

  • FAO (2016) Save and grow in practice maize rice wheat, a guide to sustainable cereal production. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy

  • Fawibe OO, Honda K, Taguchi Y, Park S, Isoda A (2019) Greenhouse gas emissions from rice field cultivation with drip irrigation and plastic film mulch. Nutrient Cycl Agroecosystems 113:51–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaona L, Bedmar F, Gianelli V, Faberi AJ, Angelini H (2019) Estimating the risk of groundwater contamination and environmental impact of pesticides in an agricultural basin in Argentina. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16:6657–6670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gathorne-Hardy A (2013) A life cycle assessment (LCA) of greenhouse gas emissions from SRI and flooded rice production in SE India. Taiwan Water Conservancy 61(4):110–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathorne-Hardy A, Reddy DN, Venkatanarayana M, Harriss-White B (2016) System of rice intensification provides environmental and economic gains but at the expense of social sustainability—a multidisciplinary analysis in India. Agric Syst 143:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golsteijn L, Menkveld R, King H, Schneider C, Schowanek D, Nissen S (2015) A compilation of life cycle studies for six household detergent product categories in Europe: the basis for product-specific aise charter advanced sustainability profiles. Environ Sci Eur 27(1):23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Habibi E, Niknejad Y, Fallah H, Dastan S, Tari DB (2019) Life cycle assessment of rice production systems in different paddy field size levels in north of Iran. Environ Monit Assess 191:202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanafiah MM, Ghazali NF, Harun SN, Abdulaali H, AbdulHasan MJ, Kamarudin MKA (2019) Assessing water scarcity in Malaysia: a case study of rice production. Desalination Water Treat 149:274–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartono N, Johannes H (2017) Identification, measurement, and assessment of water cycle of unhusked rice agricultural phases: case study at tangerang paddy field, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. p 012009

  • Harun SN, Hanafiah MM (2017) Consumptive use of water by selected cash crops in Malaysia. Malays J Sustain Agriculture 1:6–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harun SN, Hanafiah MM (2018a) Estimating the country-level water consumption footprint of selected crop production. Appl Ecol Environ Res 16:5381–5403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harun SN, Hanafiah MM (2018b) Blue and green water use of cultivating selected crops in Malaysia. AIP Conf Proc 1940:020027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauschild MZ, Huijbregts MA (2015) Introducing life cycle impact assessment. Dlm. (pnyt.). In: Life cycle impact assessment. Springer, p 1–16, the Netherlands

  • He X, Qiao Y, Liang L, Knudsen MT, Martin F (2018) Environmental life cycle assessment of long-term organic rice production in subtropical China. J Clean Prod 176:880–888

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hokazono S, Hayashi K (2012) Variability in environmental impacts during conversion from conventional to organic farming: a comparison among three rice production systems in Japan. J Clean Prod 28:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hokazono S, Hayashi K, Sato M (2009) Potentialities of organic and sustainable rice production in Japan from a life cycle perspective. Agron Res 7(1):257–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang S, Rui W, Peng X, Huang Q, Zhang W (2010) Organic carbon fractions affected by long-term fertilization in a subtropical paddy soil. Nutrient Cycl Agroecosyst 86(1):153–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts M, Steinmann Z, Elshout P, Stam G, Verones F, Vieira M, Zijp M, Hollander A, Van Zelm R (2017) Recipe 2016: a harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. Int. J. Life Cycle. Assess 22:138–147

  • IPCC (2006) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. IGES, Japan

  • Ismail H, Hanafiah MM (2019a) An overview of LCA application in WEEE management: current practices, progress and challenges. J Clean Prod 232:79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail H, Hanafiah MM (2019b) Discovering opportunities to meet the challenges of an effective waste electrical and electronic equipment recycling system in Malaysia. J Clean Prod 238:117927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail H, Hanafiah MM (2020) A review of sustainable E-waste generation and management: present and future perspectives. J Environ Manag 264:110495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management - life cycle assessment-principles and framework. London, British Standards Institution

  • ISO 14044 (2006) Environmental management - life cycle assessment-requirements and guidelines. European Committee for Standardization

  • Jeong ST, Kim GW, Hwang HY, Kim PJ, Kim SY (2018) Beneficial effect of compost utilization on reducing greenhouse gas emissions in a rice cultivation system through the overall management chain. Sci Total Environ 613:115–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jimmy AN, Khan NA, Hossain MN, Sujauddin M (2017) Evaluation of the environmental impacts of rice paddy production using life cycle assessment: case study in Bangladesh. Model Earth Syst Environ 3:1691–1705

  • Jumadi O, Hartono H, Masniawati A, Iriany RN, Makkulawu AT, Inubushi K (2019) Emissions of nitrous oxide and methane from rice field after granulated urea application with nitrification inhibitors and zeolite under different water managements. Paddy Water Environ 17:715–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasmaprapruet S, Paengjuntuek W, Saikhwan P, Phungrassami H (2009) Life cycle assessment of milled rice production: case study in Thailand. Eur J Sci Res 30(2):195–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoramdel S, Shabahang J, Amin Ghafouri A (2017) Evaluation of environmental impacts for rice agroecosystems using life cycle assessment (LCA). Iran J Appl Ecol 5(18):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoshnevisan B, Rajaeifar MA, Clark S, Shamahirband S, Anuar NB, Shuib NLM, Gani A (2014) Evaluation of traditional and consolidated rice farms in Guilan Province, Iran, using life cycle assessment and fuzzy modeling. Sci Total Environ 481:242–251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Kim T, Smith TM, Suh K (2018) Environmental implications of eco-labeling for rice farming systems. Sustainability 10:1050

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koga N, Tajima R (2011) Assessing energy efficiencies and greenhouse gas emissions under bioethanol-oriented paddy rice production in Northern Japan. J Environ Manag 92(3):967–973

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Nayak AK, Das BS, Panigrahi N, Dasgupta P, Mohanty S, Kumar U, Panneerselvam P, Pathak H (2019) Effects of water deficit stress on agronomic and physiological responses of rice and greenhouse gas emission from rice soil under elevated atmospheric CO2. Sci Total Environ 650:2032–2050

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CT, Hashim H, Ho CS, Van Fan Y, Klemeš JJ (2017) Sustaining the low-carbon emission development in Asia and beyond: sustainable energy, water, transportation and low-carbon emission technology. J Clean Prod 146:1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masuda K (2018) Energy efficiency of intensive rice production in Japan: an application of data envelopment analysis. Sustainability 10(1):120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masuda K (2019) Eco-efficiency assessment of intensive rice production in Japan: joint application of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. Sustainablity 11:5368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meisterling K, Samaras C, Schweizer V (2009) Decisions to reduce greenhouse gases from agriculture and product transport: LCA case study of organic and conventional wheat. J Clean Prod 17(2):222–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mels A, Bisschops I, Swart B (2008) Zware metalen in meststoffen: vergelijking van urine en zwart water met in nederland toegepaste meststoffen toon extra info

  • Meng F, Dungait JA, Xu X, Bol R, Zhang X, Wu W (2017) Coupled incorporation of Maize (Zea Mays L.) straw with nitrogen fertilizer increased soil organic carbon in fluvic cambisol. Geoderma 304:19–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MOA (2018) Booklet Statistik Tanaman 2017. Putrajaya, Malaysia, http://www.doa.gov.my/index/resources/aktiviti_sumber/sumber_awam/maklumat_pertanian/perangkaan_tanaman/booklet_statistik_tanaman_2017.pdf

  • Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (NRE) (2015) Biennieal Update Report to the UNFCCC. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (NRE), Putrajaya. Malaysia.

  • Mungkung R, Pengthamkeerati P, Chaichana R, Watcharothai S, Kitpakornsanti K, Tapananont S (2019) Life cycle assessment of Thai organic hom mali rice to evaluate the climate change, water use and biodiversity impacts. J Clean Prod 211:687–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musyoka MW, Adamtey N, Bunemann EK, Muriuki AW, Karanja EN, Mucheru-Muna M, Fiaboe KKM, Cadish G (2019) Nitrogen release and synchrony in organic and conventional farming systems of the central highlands of Kenya. Nutrient Cycl Agroecosystems 113:283–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nabavi-Pelesaraei A, Rafiee S, Mohtasebi SS, Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha H, Chau K-W (2017) Energy consumption enhancement and environmental life cycle assessment in paddy production using optimization techniques. J Clean Prod 162:571–586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nemecek T, Schnetzer J (2011) Methods of Assessment of Direct Field Emissions for LCIS of Agricultural Production Systems. Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ART

  • Ng FY, Yew FK, Basiron Y, Sundram K (2012) A renewable future driven with malaysian palm oil-based green technology. J Oil Palm, Environ Health (JOPEH) 2:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris GA (2004) Simapro Database Manual: The Franklin Us Lci Library. Pré Consultants and Sylvatica

  • Nunes FA, Seferin M, Maciel VG, Flôres SH, Ayub MaZ (2016) Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from rice production systems in Brazil: a comparison between minimal tillage and organic farming. J Clean Prod 139:799–809

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Othman J (2017) Employing a Cge model in analysing the environmental and economy-wide impacts of Co2 emission abatement policies in Malaysia. Sci Total Environ 584:234–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Pishgar-Komleh S, Sefeedpari P, Rafiee S (2011) Energy and economic analysis of rice production under different farm levels in Guilan Province of Iran. Energy 36(10):5824–5831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin J, Wang X, Hu F, Li H (2010) Growth and physiological performance responses to drought stress under non-flooded rice cultivation with straw mulching. Plant Soil Environ 56(2):51–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MHA, Chen SS, Razak PRA, Bakar NaA, Shahrun MS, Zawawi NZ, Mujab AaM, Abdullah F, Jumat F, Kamaruzaman R (2019) Life cycle assessment in conventional rice farming system: estimation of greenhouse gas emissions using cradle-to-gate approach. J Clean Prod 212:1526–1535

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden SJ, Wilson P, Phrommarat B (2017) Integrating economic and environmental impact analysis: the case of rice-based farming in Northern Thailand. Agric Syst 157:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sande D, Mullen J, Wetzstein M, Houston J (2011) Environmental impacts from pesticide use: a case study of soil fumigation in florida tomato production. Int J Environ Res Public Health 8(12):4649–4661

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shahid S, Minhans A, Puan OC (2014) Assessment of greenhouse gas emission reduction measures in transportation sector of Malaysia. J Teknol 70(4):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiferaw BA, Okello J, Reddy RV (2009) Adoption and adaptation of natural resource management innovations in smallholder agriculture: reflections on key lessons and best practices. Environ Dev Sustain 11(3):601–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soam S, Borjesson P, Sharma PK, Gupta RP, Tuli DK, Kumar R (2017) Life cycle assessment of rice straw utilization practices in India. Bioresour Technol 228:89–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soni P, Taewichit C, Salokhe VM (2013) Energy consumption and Co2 emissions in rainfed agricultural production systems of Northeast Thailand. Agric Syst 116:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struijs J, Beusen A, De Zwart D, Huijbregts M (2011) Characterization factors for inland water eutrophication at the damage level in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(1):59–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thanawong K, Perret S, Basset-Mens C (2014) Eco-efficiency of paddy rice production in Northeastern Thailand: a comparison of rain-fed and irrigated cropping systems. J Clean Prod 73:204–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2018) United States Department of Agriculture National Resources Conservation Service. 2008. The Plants Database, National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, La

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Zelm R, Larrey-Lassalle P, Roux P (2014) Bridging the gap between life cycle inventory and impact assessment for toxicological assessments of pesticides used in crop production. Chemosphere 100:175–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W-M, Ding J-L, Shu J-W, Chen W (2010) Exploration of early rice farming in China. Quat Int 227(1):22–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidema BP, Bauer C, Hischier R, Mutel C, Nemecek T, Reinhard J, Vadenbo C, Wernet G (2013) Overview and Methodology: Data Quality Guideline for the Ecoinvent Database Version 3

  • Yodkhum S, Gheewala SH, Sampattagul S (2017) Life cycle Ghg evaluation of organic rice production in Northern Thailand. J Environ Manag 196:217–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yusoff S, Panchakaran P (2015) Life cycle assessment on paddy cultivation in Malaysia: a case study in kedah. LCA Rice 1–10

  • Zhao X, Pu C, Ma ST, Liu SL, Xue JF, Wang X, Wang YQ, Li SS, Lal R, Chen F, Zhang HL (2019) Management-induced greenhouse gases emission mitigation in global rice production. Sci Total Environ 649:1299–1306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

MMH was financed by the research grants (DIP-2019-001; MI-2020-005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth Sciences and Environment, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

    Siti Norliyana Harun, Marlia M. Hanafiah & Nur Izzah Hamna Abd. Aziz

  2. Centre for Tropical Climate Change System, Institute of Climate Change, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

    Marlia M. Hanafiah

Authors
  1. Siti Norliyana Harun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marlia M. Hanafiah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nur Izzah Hamna Abd. Aziz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marlia M. Hanafiah.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harun, S.N., Hanafiah, M.M. & Aziz, N.I.H.A. An LCA-Based Environmental Performance of Rice Production for Developing a Sustainable Agri-Food System in Malaysia. Environmental Management 67, 146–161 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01365-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01365-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation