Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effects of Public Participation on Multi-Level Water Governance, Lessons from Uganda

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water governance occurs at multiple levels, from the local to the supra-national, which are often highly fragmented. The interconnected nature of water requires interactions among these multiple governance levels. Public participation may foster such interactions. Thus, many water management reforms involved decentralization and public participation worldwide over the last decades. Yet, it is not demonstrated how these reforms may improve water resources sustainability. Their analysis in the literature does not show concretely how interactions among multiple levels materialize and are influenced by participation. As such, the question addressed is how interactions among multiple levels of water governance manifest over time in a participatory intervention. Using a case study in the Rwenzori region in Uganda, this article compares the multi-level interactions before and during a participatory process. The latter has been purposely implemented to bridge gaps between local and provincial levels through a participatory planning process centred on the provincial level. Four types of flows were analyzed: information and knowledge, hydrosocial, financial and human. Our analysis shows that using artefacts like the role-playing game and planning matrix fostered bi-directional information and knowledge flows. Hydrosocial flows did not change in depth but the legitimacy of the two organizations implementing the participatory process was reinforced. Project financial flows were injected through a provincial academic institution, who is not a regular budget recipient. They were therefore superimposed on existing budgeting process. We conclude by providing suggestions for the engineering of participatory processes in order to foster more collaborative and effective multi-level water governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. AfroMaison project (2011–2014): “Africa at a meso-scale: adaptive and integrated tools and strategies for natural resources management “funded by the 7th Framework Program of the European Union, theme” ENV.2010.2.1.1-1” [integrated management of water and other natural resources in Africa].

  2. The questionnaires used in the baseline study were common to the five cases of the AfroMaison project (the Oum Zessar watershed in Tunisia, the Inner Niger Delta in Mali, the Fogera woreda in Ethiopia, the Rwenzori region in Uganda and the Drakensberg in South Africa). The complementary interviews therefore allowed understanding of the Ugandan case specifically.

References

  • Abrami G, Ferrand N, Morardet S, Murgue C, Popova A, De Fooij H, … Aquae-Gaudi W (2012) Wat-A-Game, a toolkit for building role-playing games about integrated water management. In: Seppelt R, Voinov AA, Lange S, Bankamp D (eds) iEMSs Sixth Biennial Meeting. http://www.iemss.org/society/index.php/iemss-2012-proceedings

  • AfroMaison (2010) AfroMaison grant agreement annex 1 “description of work” part B1. AfroMaison, Brussels, Belgium

  • AfroMaison (2014) AfroMaison website. Rwenzori Mountains & Albertine Rift, Uganda. http://www.afromaison.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=6&Itemid=109. Accessed 17 Aug 2020

  • Barbier R (2005) Quand le public prend ses distances avec la participation. Nat Sci Sociétés 13(3):258–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boelens R, Getches D, Guevara-Gil A (2010) Out of the mainstream: water rights, politics and identity. Earthscan, London, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bousquet F, Etienne M, D’Aquino P (2011) Introduction. In: Etienne M (ed) Companion modelling: a participatory approach to support sustainable development. Quae, Versailles, p 11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Young O (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc 11(2):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claeys-Mekdade C (2006). La participation environnementale à la française: le citoyen, l’État… et le sociologue. VertigO, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.8446

  • Daniell KA (2012) Co-engineering and participatory water management: organisational challenges for water governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Daniell KA, Barreteau O (2014) Water governance across competing scales: coupling land and water management. J Hydrol 519(C):2367–2380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daré W, Venot J-P (2016) Dynamique des postures de chercheurs-engagés Retours sur la participation dans les politiques de l’eau au Burkina Faso. Anthropologie Développement 44:149–178. https://doi.org/10.4000/anthropodev.514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dore J, Lebel L (2010) Deliberation and scale in Mekong region water governance. Environ Manag 46(1):60–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducrot R (2009) Gaming across scale in peri-urban water management: contribution from two experiences in Bolivia and Brazil. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 16(4):240–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelenbos J, Teisman G (2013) Water governance capacity: the art of dealing with a multiplicity of levels, sectors and domains. Int J Water Gov 1(1):89–108. https://doi.org/10.7564/12-IJWG5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrand N, Farolfi S, Abrami G, Du Toit D (2009) WAT-A-GAME: sharing water and policies in your own basin. In: ISAGA 40th Annual Conference: Learn to Game, Game to Learn, Singapore

  • Ferrand N, Hassenforder E, Abrami G, Aquae-Gaudi W (2015) Integrated participatory modeling using the CoOPLAaGE toolkit. In: Lamsade, Dauphine UP (eds) International Workshop on Citizen Science. dimacs.rutgers.edu/Workshops/Citizen/Slides/EmelineHASSENFORDER.pdf

  • Floc’Hlay B, Plottu E (1998) Consultation ou co-décision? La question de la participation du citoyen à l’évaluation des projets publics. Metropolis 76–79, https://hal.archivesouvertes.fr/hal-01061458/document

  • Hartter J, Ryan SJ (2010) Top-down or bottom-up? Land Use Policy 27(3):815–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassenforder E (2015) Chapter 7—operationalizing multi-scale INRM in Africa: comparison of regional participatory planning processes in Ethiopia and Uganda. In: PhD thesis—participatory planning, evaluation and institutional dynamics in African natural resource management. pp 209–234. https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/101161/1/HassenforderThesis2015.pdf

  • Hassenforder E, Ferrand N, Pittock J, Daniell KA, Barreteau O (2015) A participatory planning process as an arena for facilitating institutional bricolage—example from the Rwenzori region, Uganda. Soc Nat Resour 28(9):995–1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2015.1054977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassenforder E, Girard S, Ferrand N, Petitjean C, Fermond C (n.d.) La co-ingénierie de la participation: une expérience citoyenne sur la rivière Drôme. Nat Sci Sociétés

  • Kabarole District Planning Division (2020) Kabarole district plan. Fort Portal, Uganda

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Goff J-L (2012) L’accompagnement: outils de domination ou d’émancipation. Réseau Thématique de l'Association Française de Sociologie, Rouen (France). http://rt25.hypotheses.org

  • Lebel L, Garden P (2007) Deliberation, negotiation and scale in the governance of water resources in the Mekong region. In: Pahl-Wostl C, Kabat P, Möltgen J (eds) Adaptive and integrated water management, coping with complexity and uncertainty. pp 205–225. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75941-6

  • Lovell C, Mandondo A, Moriarty P (2002) The question of scale in integrated natural resource management. Ecol Soc 5(2):25

    Google Scholar 

  • Maleki A, Bots PWG (2013) A framework for operationalizing the effect of national culture on participatory policy analysis. J Comp Policy Anal 15(5):371–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2013.846959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migongo-Bake C, Catactutan D (2012) AfroMaison WP2 report chapter 6 context analysis of Rwenzori mountains/Albertine Rift, Uganda. AfroMaison, Nairobi, Kenya. http://www.afromaison.net/images/Products/Reports/part2.pdf

  • Moss T, Newig J (2010) Multilevel water governance and problems of scale: setting the stage for a broader debate. Environ Manag 46(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NEMA (2004) District state of environment report: Kabarole district. Kampala, Uganda

    Google Scholar 

  • Newig J, Fritsch O (2009) Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level—effective? Environ Policy Gov 19:197–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newig J, Koontz TM (2013) Multi-level governance, policy implementation and participation: the EU’s mandated participatory planning approach to implementing environmental policy. J Eur Public Policy 21(2):248–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman ES, Bakker K, Cook C (2012) Introduction to the themed section: Water governance and the politics of scale. Water Alternatives 5(1):52–61

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011) Water governance in OECD countries: a multi-level approach. OECD, Paris

  • OECD (2015) OECD principles on water governance. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/gov/regional-policy/OECD-Principles-on-Water-Governance-brochure.pdf

  • Ojambo H (2012) Decentralisation in Africa: a critical review of Uganda’s experience. Potchefstroom Electron Law J 15(2):70–88. https://doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v15i2.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onyach-Olaa M (2003) The challenges of implementing decentralisation: recent experiences in Uganda. Public Adm Dev 23(1):105–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pluchinotta I, Kazakçi AO, Giordano R, Tsoukiàs A (2019) Design theory for generating alternatives in public decision making processes. Group Decis Negot 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-09610-5

  • Plumptre AJ (2002) Extent and status of the forests in the Ugandan Albertine Rift. Wildlife Conservation Society, Kampala, Uganda. http://albertinerift.org/DesktopModules/Bring2mind/DMX/Download.aspx?EntryId=11636&PortalId=49&DownloadMethod=attachment. Unpublished report to UNDP/GEF

  • Renn O, Berghöfer A, Wittmer H, Rauschmayer F (2010) WP3: participation in the multi-level governance of European water and biodiversity—a review of case studies (no. 1). Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung, Leipzig, Germany. UFZ Discussion Paper, No. 1/2010, http://hdl.handle.net/10419/44726

  • RRDF (2011) Rwenzori regional development framework 2012-2016. RRDF. http://www.krcuganda.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Rwenzori-Regional-Framework.pdf

  • Schwidt D (2017) L’accompagnement. Une logique paradoxale d’émancipation/domination participant à l’élaboration du système socio-politique Pour une sociologie critique française. Consultori Familiari Oggi 25(1):75–91

    Google Scholar 

  • UBOS & ILRI (2007) Nature, distribution and evolution of poverty and inequality in Uganda 1992-2002. UBOS & ILRI. http://www.ubos.org/onlinefiles/uploads/ubos/pdfdocuments/ILRIPovertyReport2007.pdf

  • UNECA (2014) Popular participation & decentralization in Africa. UNECA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the people who contributed to collect data on the Ugandan case study, especially the teams from Mountains of the Moon University and the Sustainable Agricultural Trainers Network: S. Akaganyira, K. Baha, J. Birungi, G. Bwambale, E. Gumpinger, P. Kusemererwa, R. Lemmens, S. Mwanguhya, R. Mwesige Mujuku and M. Nzdghera. The authors also thank the editorial team and the anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions.

Funding

This research was supported by the AfroMaison European FP7 research project, the UNESCO Chair in Water Economics and Transboundary Water Governance and the Fenner School of Environment and Society from the Australian National University (ANU). The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official position of the European Commission, UNESCO or the ANU.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. G-EAU, INRAE, Cirad, AgroParisTech, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Univ Montpellier, 361 rue J.F. Breton, BP 5095, 34196, Montpellier Cedex 5, France

    Emeline Hassenforder, Olivier Barreteau & Nils Ferrand

  2. The Australian National University (ANU), Fenner School of Environment and Society, 48 Linnaeus Way, Acton, ACT, 2601, Australia

    Katherine Anne Daniell

  3. Mountains of the Moon University (MMU), P.O. Box 837, Kabundaire, Fort Portal, Uganda

    Clovis Kabaseke & Moses Muhumuza

  4. Division of Organic Farming (IFÖL), Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria

    Thaddeo Tibasiima

Authors
  1. Emeline Hassenforder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Olivier Barreteau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Katherine Anne Daniell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nils Ferrand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Clovis Kabaseke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Moses Muhumuza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Thaddeo Tibasiima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emeline Hassenforder.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the European Commission 7th Framework Program ethical standards (2013): http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/fp7/89888/ethics-for-researchers_en.pdf.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hassenforder, E., Barreteau, O., Daniell, K.A. et al. The Effects of Public Participation on Multi-Level Water Governance, Lessons from Uganda. Environmental Management 66, 770–784 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01348-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01348-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation