Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Attitudes Toward Water Allocation: Segmenting the Public on Beliefs toward Water Conservation

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The population in the American West has been increasing at a rapid rate and is predicted to continue growing. As a result, the availability, use, and allocation of water throughout the West have become the source of conflict and contention. This growing conflict emphasizes the need to understand the diversity of values, beliefs, and attitudes that members of the general public throughout the West hold about the allocation of water resources. Using data collected from an internet-based survey, dimensions for basic beliefs about water conservation were developed. Respondents from the state of Colorado were clustered based on their level of agreement to these basic belief dimensions. These clustered respondents were then compared on attitudinal preferences regarding priorities for water allocation and municipal strategies for water conservation. Results supported the existence of distinct segments based on value-laden basic beliefs about water conservation and the connection of these segments with preferences toward specific water management strategies. Values-based segmentation, when connected with specific preferences for management actions, can help inform water managers when making future water conservation and policy decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen S, Wickwar D, Clark F, Dow R, Potts R, Snyder S (2009) Values, attitudes, and beliefs technical guide for forest service land and resource management, planning, and decision-making. General technical report PNW-GTR-788. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR

  • Bentler PM (2008) EQS 6: Structural equations program manual. Encino: Multivariate Software, Inc

  • Bright AD (1998) Attitude-strength and support of recreation management strategies. J Leisure Res 29(4):363–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bright AD, Barro S, Burtz RT (2002a) Public attitudes toward ecological restoration in the Chicago metropolitan region. Soc Nat Resour 15:763–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bright AD, Burtz RT (2006) Creating defensible space in the wildland-urban interface: the values on perceptions and behavior. Environ Manage 37(2):170–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bright AD, Manfredo MJ, Fulton DC (2000) Segmenting the public: an application of value orientations to wildlife planning in Colorado. Wildl Soc Bull 28:218–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright AD, Manfredo MJ, Fulton DC (1993) Recreation and forest management preferences of Northern Colorado Front Range residents. Human Dimensions of Natural Resources Unit Report #7, for the USDA Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests and Pawnee National Grassland

  • Bright AD, Newman P, Carroll J (2007) Context, beliefs, and attitudes toward wildland fire management: an examination of residents of the wildland-urban interface. Hum Ecol Rev 14(2):212–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright AD, Vaske JJ, Kneeshaw K, Absher JD (2002b) Scale development of wildfire management basic beliefs. Paper presented at the homeowners, communities, and wildfire: science findings from the national fire plan, Bloomington, IN

  • Campbell JL, MacKay KL (2003) Attitudinal and normative influences on support for hunting as a wildlife management strategy. Hum Dimens Wildl 8:181–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers P, Biggs HC, Blignaut S, Choles AG, Hofmeyr JS, Jewitt GPW, Roux DJ Complexity, modeling, and natural resource management. Ecol Soc 18(3):1. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05382-180301

  • Cole JS, Scott D (1999) Segmenting participation in wildlife watching: a comparison of casual wildlife watchers and serious birders. Hum Dimens Wildl 4(4):44–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colorado Water Conservation Board (2015) Colorado Water Plan. Colorado Water Conservation Board. Denver, CO. coloradowaterplan.com

  • Cordell HK, Bergstrom JC, Betz CJ, Green GT (2004) Dominant socioeconomic forces shaping the future of the United States. In: Manfredo MJ, Vaske JJ, Bruyere BL, Field DR, Brown P Eds. Society and natural resources: a summary of knowledge. MO: Modern Litho, Jefferson, p 349–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman DA (2007) Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Emtage N, Herbohn J, Harrison S (2007) Landholder profiling and typologies for natural resource-management policy and program support: potential and constraints. Environ Manage 40:481–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton DC, Manfredo MJ, Lipscomb J (1996) Wildlife value orientations: a conceptual and measurement approach. Hum Dimens Wildl 1(2):24–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homer PM, Kahle LR (1988) A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. J Personal Soc Psychol 54(4):638–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrubes D, Ajzen I, Daigle J (2001) Predicting hunting intentions and behavior: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Leis Sci 23:165–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu L, Bentler P (1998) Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol. Methods 3:424–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline R (1998) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneeshaw K, Vaske JJ, Bright AD, Absher JD (2004) Situational influences of acceptable wildland fire management actions. Soc Nat Resour 17(6):477–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotchen M, Reiling SD (2000) Environmental attitudes, motivations, and contingent valuation of non-use values: a case study involving endangered species. Ecol Econ 32:93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai P, Sorice MG, Nepal SK, Cheng C (2009) Integrating social marketing into sustainable resource management at Padre Island National Seashore: An attitude-based segmentation approach. Environ Manage 43:985–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lueschner WA, Gregoire TG, Buyhoff GJ (1988) RIj; a statistic for reporting ranked responses. J Leis Res 20(3):228–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manfredo MJ (2008) Who cares about wildlife? Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manfredo MJ, Teel TL, Bright AD (2003) Why are public values toward wildlife changing? Hum Dimens Wildl 8:287–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milfont TL, Duckitt J, Wagner C (2010) A cross-cultural test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. J Appl Soc Psychol 40(11):2791–2813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison M, Durante J, Greig J, Ward J, Oczkowski E (2012) Segmenting landholders for improving the targeting of natural resource management expenditures. J Environ Plan Manage 55(1):17–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2019) www.oecd.org/fr/publications/water-resources-allocation-9789264229631-en.htm

  • Oreg S, Katz-Gerro T (2006) Predicting pro-environmental behavior cross-nationally: values, the theory of planned behavior, and value-belief-norm theory. Environ Behav 38:462–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach M (1973) The nature of human values. The Free Press, New York City

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder SA, Fulton DC, Lawrence JS (2006) Managing for preferred hunting experiences: a typology of Minnesota waterfowl hunters. Wildl Soc Bull 34(2):380–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz SH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: Zanna MP (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 24). Academic, San Diego, CA, p 1–65

  • Scott D, Shafer CS (2001) Recreation specialization: a critical look at the construct. J Leis Res 33(3):319–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC, Dietz T (1994) Value basis of environmental concern. J Soc Issues 50:65–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweikert LA, Gigliotti LM (2019) A values-based private landowner typology to improve grassland conservation initiatives. Soc Nat Resour 32(2):167–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teel. TL, Manfredo MJ (2010) Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation. Conserv Biol 24(1):128–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2019) http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/water/wwap/facts-and-figures/allocating-water/

  • Vaske JJ (2008) Survey research and analysis: applications in parks, recreation and human dimensions. Venture Publishing, State College, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaske JJ, Donnelly MP (1999) A value-attitude-behavior model predicting wildland preservation voting intentions. Soc Nat Resour 12:523–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaske JJ, Donnelly MP, Williams DR (2001) Demographic influences on environmental value orientations and normative beliefs about forest management. Soc Nat Resour 14:761–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaske JJ, Needham MD (2007) Segmenting public beliefs about conflict with coyotes in an urban recreation setting. J Park Recreat Adm 25(4):79–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Western Governors’ Association (2010) Annual report: building a sustainable west. Western Governors’ Association, Sedona, Arizona

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health and Human Development—Recreation Management and Leadership Program, Western Washington University, 516 High Street, Bellingham, WA, 98225-9067, USA

    Randall T. Burtz

  2. Human Dimensions of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1401, USA

    Alan D. Bright

  3. Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife, USDA-FS, Essex Junction, VT, 05452, USA

    Andrea Shortsleeve

Authors
  1. Randall T. Burtz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alan D. Bright
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrea Shortsleeve
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randall T. Burtz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burtz, R.T., Bright, A.D. & Shortsleeve, A. Attitudes Toward Water Allocation: Segmenting the Public on Beliefs toward Water Conservation. Environmental Management 65, 306–320 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01250-y

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01250-y

Search

Navigation