Abstract
Our paper, “The Insignificance of Thresholds in Environmental Impact Assessment: An Illustrative Case Study in Canada” received a critique that challenged us on a number of grounds. Namely, that we defame EIA practitioners, that we advocate EIAs to become a scientific enterprise, that we do not recognize the complexity inherent in EIA, and that EIA undergo an independent assessment by regulators. We respond to all of these points, and argue that conflict of interest is an institutional issue (not one of corrupt practitioners), and that we critique the science that forms the basis of evidence in EIA. Further, we show that the complexity and uncertainty in the critique cannot explain the findings from our paper that all cases of impact threshold exceedance were determined to be not significant in EIA. Finally, we compare the significance determinations in proponent reports to final regulator decisions and determine that they are overwhelmingly identical (93–95%). Regulators are financially independent of proponents, but their decisions on significant are heavily dependent on the information and analysis provided by the proponent reports. As regulators rely on these reports, environmental impact assessments must be based on rigorous and transparent analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BC EAO (2013) Guideline for the selection of valued components and assessment of potential effects. Prepared by the BC Environmental Assessment Office. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/environment/natural-resource-stewardship/environmental-assessments/guidance-documents/eao-guidance-selection-of-valued-components.pdf
BC EAO (2018) Environmental Assessment Office user guide: an overview of Environmental Assessment in British Columbia. Prepared by the BC Environmental Assessment Office. http://www.eao.gov.bc.ca/files/EAO-Guidance-EAO-User-Guide.pdf
Crain CM, Kroeker K, Halpern BS (2008) Interactive and cumulative effects of multiple human stressors in marine systems. Ecol Lett 11:1304–1315
Darling ES, Côté IM (2008) Quantifying the evidence for ecological synergies. Ecol Lett 11:1278–1286
Eccleston (2010) Assessing cumulative significance of greenhouse gas emissions: resolving the paradox—the sphinx solution. Env Pract 12:105–115
Esteves AM, Franks D, Vanclay F (2012) Social impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Proj A 30:34–42
Government of British Columbia (2018) Environmental assessment revitalization: what we heard report. prepared by the Government of British Columbia. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/environment/natural-resource-stewardship/environmental-assessments/environmental-assessment-revitalization/documents/what_we_heard_report_final.pdf
Hollick M (1984) Who should prepare environmental impact assessments? Environ Manage 8:191–196
Moore DA, Loewenstein G (2004) Self-interest, automaticity, and the psychology of conflict of interest. Soc Justice Res 17:189–202
Moore DA, Tanlu L, Bazerman MH (2010) Conflict of interest and the intrusion of bias. Judgm Decis Mak 5:37–53
Murray CC, Wong J, Singh GG, Mach M, Lerner J, Ranieri B, St-Laurent GP, Guimaraes A, Chan KM (2018) The insignificance of thresholds in environmental impact assessment: an illustrative Case Study in Canada. Environ Manage 61:1062–1071
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Bram Noble for his constructive and professional conduct in fostering a forum for debate on this important topic. There was no specific funding for this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This response refers to the letter at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01183-6
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, G.G., Lerner, J., Clarke Murray, C. et al. Response to Critique of “The Insignificance of Thresholds in Environmental Impact Assessment: An Illustrative Case Study in Canada”. Environmental Management 64, 133–137 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01182-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01182-7