Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Early Detection of Conflicts for the Management of Protected Areas: The Case of Charcoal Production in the Los Petenes Biosphere Reserve, Mexico

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Management of conservation conflicts is a challenge of growing relevance for the effectiveness of protected areas worldwide, particularly in the case of socially inclusive areas such as biosphere reserves. For a successful management of the protected area, is critical to consider the social use of natural resources carried out by local populations linked to reserves, especially in socio-ecological contexts facing potential conservation conflicts (i.e., conflicts that have not yet arisen). We addressed the importance of an early detection of potential conflicts through the study of artisanal charcoal production by Yucatec Mayan communities located in the zone of influence of a biosphere reserve in Northwest Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Through semi-structured interviews with charcoal producers and in-depth interviews with environmental authorities linked to the reserve, we discuss the advantages associated to early detection of potential conservation conflicts for biosphere reserves’ management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anaya FC, Espírito-Santo MM (2018) Protected areas and territorial exclusion of traditional communities: analyzing the social impacts of environmental compensation strategies in Brazil. Ecol Soc 23(1):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrocha F, Villena MG (2012) Applying a bioeconomic optimal control model to charcoal production: the case of slash-and-burn agriculture in Mexico. Cienc Investig Agra 39(3):489–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrera-Bassols N, Toledo V (2005) Ethnoecology of the Yucatec Maya: symbolism, knowledge and management of natural resources. J Lat Am Geogr 4:9–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baynham-Herd Z, Redpath S, Bunnefeld N, Molony T, Keane (2018) Conservation conflicts: Behavioural threats, frames, and intervention recommendations. Biol Conserv 222:180–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennet NJ, Dearden P (2014) Why local people do not support conservation: Community perceptions of marine protected area livelihood impacts, governance and management in Thailand. Mar Policy 44:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouamrane M, Spierenburg M, Agrawal A, Boureima A, Cormier-Salem MC, Etienne M, Le Page C, Levrel H, Mathevet R (2016) Stakeholder engagement and biodiversity conservation challenges in social-ecological systems: some insights from biosphere reserves in western Africa and France. Ecol Soc 21(4):25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown DF (2007) The spatial and temporal dimensions of a rural landscape: the Yucatec Maya k’ax. The Canadian Geographer / Le Geographe canadien 51(1):91–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmen E, Young JC, Watt A (2015) Linking conflict and global biodiversity conservation policies. In: Redpath SM, Gutiérrez RJ, Wood KA, Young JC (Eds) Conflicts in conservation. Navigating towards solutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, pp 180–189

  • CCMSS (2008) Tramitología: un fuerte obstáculo para el sector forestal de México. Nota Informativa Número 19 Red De Monitoreo De Políticas Públicas – CCMSS JUNIO

  • CONANP (2006) Programa de Conservación y Manejo. Reserva de la Biósfera Los Petenes. Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas, Campeche, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper NA, Kainer KA (2018) To log or not to log: local perceptions of timber management and its implications for wellbeing within a sustainable-use protected area. Ecol Soc 23(2):4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson N, Martin A, Danielsen F (2018) Assessing equity in protected area governance: approaches to promote just and effective conservation. Conserv Lett 11(2):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Pourcq K, Thomas E, Arts B, Vranckxa A, Leónn-Sicard T, Van Damme P (2017) Understanding and resolving conflict between local communities and conservation authorities in Colombia. World Dev 93:125–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durand L, Figueroa F, Trench T (2015) Inclusión, exclusión y estrategias de participación en la reserva de la biosfera Montes Azules (Chiapas). In: Durand L, Figueroa F, Guzmán M (Eds) La naturaleza en contexto. Hacia una ecología política mexicana. Colección Alternativas

  • Eastmond A, Faust B (2006) Farmers, fires, and forests: a green alternative to shifting cultivation for conservation of the Maya forest? Landscape and Urban Planning 74:267–284

  • FAO (2018) El estado de los bosques del mundo - Las vías forestales hacia el desarrollo sostenible. Roma. Licencia: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO

  • Flores JS, Espejel I (1994) Etnoflora Yucatanense. Tipos de Vegetación de la Península de Yucatán. Fasc. No. 4. Lic. en Biología. Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Frapolli E, Ayala-Orozco B, Oliva M, Smith RJ (2018) Different approaches towards the understanding of socio-environmental conflicts in protected areas. Sustainability 10:2240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Frapolli E, Ramos-Fernández G, Galicia E, Serrano A (2009) The complex reality of biodiversity conservation through Natural Protected Area policy: three cases from the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Land Use Policy 26:715–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner CJ, Gabriel FUL, ST. JOHN FAV, Davies ZG (2016) Changing livelihoods and protected area management: a case study of charcoal production un south-west Madagascar. Oryx 50(3):495–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerez-Fernández P, Alatorre-Guzmán E (2007) Los retos de la certificación forestal en la silvicultura comunitaria de México. In: Bray DB, Merino-Pérez L, Barry D (Eds) Los bosques comunitarios de México Manejo sustentable de paisajes forestales. Instituto Nacional de Ecología (INE-Semarnat), pp 99–120

  • Haenn N (2006) The changing and enduring ejido: a state and regional examination of Mexico’s land tenure counter-reforms. Land Use Policy 23(2):136–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halffter G (2011) Reservas de la biosfera: problemas y oportunidades en México. Acta Zoológica Mexicana 27(1):177–189

    Google Scholar 

  • INEGI (1997) Plano producido para el Registro Agrario Nacional. Ejido “Los Petenes”, Clave 001

  • INEGI (2010) Censo de Población y Vivienda 2010. http://www3.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/iter/entidad_indicador.aspx?ev=5. Accessed 17 Apr 2016

  • Jerneck A, Olsson L, Ness B, Anderberg S, Baier M, Clark E, Hickler T, Hornborg A, Kronsell A, Lövbrand E, Persson J (2011) Structuring sustainability science. Sustain Sci 6:69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kefa CA, Lung M, Espira A, Gregory AJ (2018) Quantifying the rate of subsistence wood harvesting from a tropical rainforest in Kenya. Oryx 52(2):369–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • León P, Montiel S (2008) Wild meat use and traditional hunting practices in a rural Mayan community of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Hum Ecol 36:249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis C (1996) Managing Conflicts in Protected Areas. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • LGDFS (2018) Ley General de Desarrollo Forestal Sustentable No. – (05 de Junio). http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/LGDFS_050618.pdf. Accessed 3 Jul 2018

  • LGDFS for the state of Campeche (2018) Ley General de Desarrollo Forestal Sustentable para el Estado de Campeche No. – (12 de Abril). http://legislacion.congresocam.gob.mx/images/legislacion/leyes/pdf/ley_de_desarrollo_forestal_sustentable_para_el_estado_de_campeche.pdf. Accessed 3 Jul 2018

  • Lu DJ, Kao CW, Chao CL (2012) Evaluating the management effectiveness of five protected areas in Taiwan using WWF’s RAPPAM. Environ Manage 50:272–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden F, McQuinn B (2015) Conservation conflict transformation: the missing link in conservation. In: Redpath SM, Gutiérrez RJ, Wood KA, Young JC (Eds) Conflicts in conservation. Navigating towards solutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, pp 257–267

  • Martín-López B, Montes C (2015) Restoring the human capacity for conserving biodiversity: a social-ecological approach. Sustain Sci 10:699–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijboom FLB, Brom FWA (2012) Ethics and sustainability: guest or guide? On sustainability as a moral idea. J Agric Environ Ethics 25:117–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Méndez-López ME, García-Frapolli E, Ruiz-Mallén I, Porter-Bolland L, Reyes-García V (2015) From paper to forest: local motives for participation in different conservation initiatives. Case Studies in Southeastern Mexico. Environ Manage 56:695–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merino-Pérez L (2013) Conservation and Forest Communities in Mexico: Experiences, Visions, and Rights. In: Porter-Bolland L, Ruiz-Mallen I, Camacho-Benavides C, McCandless SR (Eds) Community Action for Conservation: Mexican Experiences. Springer Science+Business Media, New York, NY, p 25–44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mohibbi AA, Cochard R (2014) Residents’ resource uses and nature conservation in Band-e-Amir National Park, Afghanistan. Environ Dev 11:141–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newing H (2011) Conducting Research in Conservation. A Social Science perspective. Ed. Routlegde, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • NOM-059 (2001) Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-ECOL-2001, Protección ambiental-Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres-Categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio-Lista de especies en riesgo (2001). No. – (6 de Marzo de 2002). http://www.profepa.gob.mx/innovaportal/file/435/1/NOM_059_SEMARNAT_2010.pdf. Accessed 3 Jul 2018

  • Oliva M, Montiel S (2016) Stakeholder linkage in conservation strategies: a qualitative tool for improving the management of a biosphere reserve in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Trop Conserv Sci 9(1):423–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliva M, Montiel S, García A, Vidal L (2014) Local perceptions of wildlife use in Los Petenes Biosphere Reserve, Mexico: Maya subsistence hunting in a conservation conflict context. Trop Conserv Sci 7(4):781–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redpath SM, Sutherland WJ (2015) The value of ecological information in conservation conflict. In: Redpath SM, Gutiérrez RJ, Wood KA, Young JC (Eds) Conflicts in conservation. Navigating towards solutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, pp 35–45

  • Redpath SM, Gutiérrez RJ, Wood KA, Young JC (2015) Finding a way out of conservation conflicts. In: Redpath SM, Gutiérrez RJ, Wood KA, Young JC (Eds) Conflicts in conservation. Navigating towards solutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, pp 287–300

  • Redpath SM, Young J, Evely A, Adams WM, Sutherland WJ, Whitehouse A, Amar A, Lambert RA, Linnell JDC, Watt A, Gutiérrez RJ (2013) Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends Ecol Evolut 28(2):100–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biol Conserv 141:2417–2431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regulation LGDFS (2005) Reglamento de la Ley General de Desarrollo Forestal Sustentable No. – (21 de Febrero). Accessed 3 July 2018.

  • Robinson JG (2011) Ethical pluralism, pragmatism, and sustainability in conservation practice. Biol Conserv 144:958–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez M, Montiel S, Cervera MD, Castillo MT, Naranjo EJ (2012) The practice and perception of batida (group hunting) in a maya community of Yucatan, Mexico. J Ethnobiol 32(2):212–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Román-Dañobeytia FJ, Levy-Tacher SI, Macario-Mendoza P, Zúñiga-Morales J (2014) Redefining secondary forests in the Mexican forest code: implications for management, restoration, and conservation. Forests 5:978–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith HE, Hudson MD, Schreckenberg K (2017) Livelihood diversification: The role of charcoal production in southern Malawi. Energy Sustain Dev 36:22–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soliku O, Schraml U (2018a) Making sense of protected area conflicts and management approaches: a review of causes, contexts and conflict management strategies. Biol Conserv 222:136–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soliku O, Schraml U (2018b) From conflict to collaboration: the contribution of co-management in mitigating conflicts in Mole National Park, Ghana. Oryx 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318000285

  • UNESCO (1996) Reservas de biosfera: La Estrategia de Sevilla y el Marco Estatutario de la Red Mundial. UNESCO, París

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2014) Biosphere Reserves – Learning Sites for Sustainable Development. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/ecological-sciences/biosphere-reserves/. Accessed 5 Sept 2018

  • Van Cuong C, Dart P, Hockings M (2017) Biosphere reserves: attributes for success. J Environ Manage 188:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wali A, Alvira D, Tallman PS, Ravikumar A, Macedo MO (2017) A new approach to conservation: using community empowerment for sustainable well-being. Ecol Soc 22(4):6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse A (2015) Anthropological approaches to conservation conflicts. In: Redpath SM, Gutiérrez RJ, Wood KA, Young JC (Eds) Conflicts in conservation. Navigating towards solutions. Cambridge University Press. pp 94–104

  • Wolf F, Vogel E (1985) Manual para la producción de carbón vegetal con métodos simples. Facultad de Silvicultura y manejo de recursos renovables. Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León

  • Woodhouse E, Homewood KM, Beauchamp E, Clements T, McCabe JT, Wilkie D, Milner-Gulland EJ (2015) Guiding principles for evaluating the impacts of conservation interventions on human well-being. Phil Trans R Soc B 370:20150103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young JC, Thompson DBA, Moore P, MacGugan A, Watt A, Redpath SM (2016a) A conflict management tool for conservation agencies. J Appl Ecol 53:705–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young JC, Searle K, Butler A, Simmons P, Watt AD, Jordan A (2016b) The role of trust in the resolution of conservation conflicts. Biol Conserv 195:196–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author extends acknowledgment to the PhD Program in Sustainability Sciences, UNAM “Doctorado en Ciencias de la Sostenibilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México”, and a PhD scholarship received from CONACYT, Mexico. This research was funded by UNAM—PAPIIT, grant number IN302517. We are very grateful to the people who participated and shared valuable information for this study. We thank Mary Ann Hall for the English language revision.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Antigua carretera a Pátzcuaro No. 8701, Col. San José de la Huerta, Morelia, 58190, Michoacán, Mexico

    Malena Oliva & Eduardo García-Frapolli

  2. Red de Ecología Funcional, Instituto de Ecología, A. C., El Haya, Xalapa, Veracruz, 91070, Mexico

    Luciana Porter-Bolland

  3. Departamento de Ecología Humana, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (CINVESTAV-IPN), Unidad Mérida, México, Km. 6 antigua carretera a Progreso, Mérida, Yucatán, 97310, Mexico

    Salvador Montiel

Authors
  1. Malena Oliva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eduardo García-Frapolli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luciana Porter-Bolland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Salvador Montiel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo García-Frapolli.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oliva, M., García-Frapolli, E., Porter-Bolland, L. et al. Early Detection of Conflicts for the Management of Protected Areas: The Case of Charcoal Production in the Los Petenes Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. Environmental Management 64, 52–63 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01170-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01170-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation