Abstract
Natural regeneration of seismic lines, cleared for hydrocarbon exploration, is slow and often hindered by vegetation damage, soil compaction, and motorized human activity. There is an extensive network of seismic lines in western Canada which is known to impact forest ecosystems, and seismic lines have been linked to declines in woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou). Seismic line restoration is costly, but necessary for caribou conservation to reduce cumulative disturbance. Understanding where motorized activity may be impeding regeneration of seismic lines will aid in prioritizing restoration. Our study area in west-central Alberta, encompassed five caribou ranges where restoration is required under federal species at risk recovery strategies, hence prioritizing seismic lines for restoration is of immediate conservation value. To understand patterns of motorized activity on seismic lines, we evaluated five a priori hypotheses using a predictive modeling framework and Geographic Information System variables across three landscapes in the foothills and northern boreal regions of Alberta. In the northern boreal landscape, motorized activity was most common in dry areas with a large industrial footprint. In highly disturbed areas of the foothills, motorized activity on seismic lines increased with low vegetation heights, relatively dry soils, and further from forest cutblocks, while in less disturbed areas of the foothills, motorized activity on seismic lines decreased proportional to seismic line density, slope steepness, and white-tailed deer abundance, and increased proportional with distance to roads. We generated predictive maps of high motorized activity, identifying 21,777 km of seismic lines where active restoration could expedite forest regeneration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ABMI (2016) ABMI species website, version 3.2. http://species.abmi.ca/pages/species/mammals. Accessed 18 March 2016
Arnold TW (2010) Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike’s information criterion. J Wildl Manag 74:1175–1178. https://doi.org/10.2193/2009-367
Bonn A, Schroder B (2001) Habitat models and their transfer for single and multi species groups: a case study of carabids in an alluvial forest. Ecography 24:483–496. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2001.d01-204.x
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference. Springer, New York, NY
COSEWIC (2014) COSEWIC assessment and status report on the caribou (Rangifer tarandus) in Canada. Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON
COSEWIC (2011) Designatable units for caribou (Rangifer tarandus) in Canada. Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON, p 88
Dabros A, Pyper M, Castilla G (2018) Seismic lines in the boreal and arctic ecosystems of North America: environmental impacts, challenges and opportunities. Environ Rev. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2017-0080
DeCesare NJ, Hebblewhite M, Schmiegelow F, Hervieux D, McDermid GJ, Neufeld L, Bradley M, Whittington J, Smith KG, Morgantini LE, Wheatley M, Musiani M (2012) Transcending scale dependence in identifying habitat with resource selection functions. Ecol Appl 22:1068–1083
Dickie M, Serrouya R, McNay RS, Boutin S (2017a) Faster and farther: wolf movement on linear features and implications for hunting behaviour. J Appl Ecol 54:253–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12732
Dickie M, Serrouya R, DeMars C, Cranston J, Boutin S (2017b) Evaluating functional recovery of habitat for threatened woodland caribou. Ecosphere 9:e01936. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1936
Dyer SJ, Neill JPO, Wasel SM, Boutin S (2002) Quantifying barrier effects of roads and seismic lines on movements of female woodland caribou in northeastern Alberta. Can J Zool 80:839–845. https://doi.org/10.1139/Z02-060
Environment Canada (2014) Recovery strategy for the woodland caribou, southern mountain population (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in Canada. Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON
Environment Canada (2012) Recovery strategy for the woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou), boreal population, in Canada. Species at risk act recovery strategy series. Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON
ESRI (2013) ArcGIS desktop: release 10.2.2. ESRI, Redlands, CA
Fielding AH (2002) Modeling tools and accuracy assessment. In: Scott JM, Heglund PJ, Morrison ML, Haufler JB, Raphael MG, Wall WA, Samson FB (eds) Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 265–270
Finnegan L, MacNearney D, Pigeon KE (2018b) Divergent patterns of understory forage growth after seismic line exploration: Implications for caribou habitat restoration. For Ecol Manag 409:634–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.12.010
Finnegan L, Pigeon KE, Cranston J, Hebblewhite M, Musiani M, Neufeld L, Schmiegelow F, Duval J, Stenhouse GB (2018a) Natural regeneration on seismic lines influences movement behaviour of wolves and grizzly bears. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195480
Fiori SM, Zalba SM (2003) Potential impacts of petroleum exploration and exploitation on biodiversity in a Patagonian nature reserve, Argentina. Biodivers Conserv 12:1261–1270. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023091922825
Franklin SE, Peddle S, Dechka J, Stenhouse G (2002) Evidential reasoning with Landsat TM, DEM and GIS data for landcover classification in support of grizzly bear habitat mapping. Int J Remote Sens 23:4633–4652
Fuller TK, Mech LD, Cochrane JF (2003) Wolf population dynamics. In: Mech LD, Boitani L (eds) Wolves: behavior, ecology and conservation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 161–191
Government of Alberta (2016) Little Smoky and A La Peche caribou range plan (draft). Government of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
Government of Alberta (2017) Provincial woodland caribou range plan (draft). Government of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
Hebblewhite M (2017) Billion dollar boreal woodland caribou and the biodiveristy impacts of the global oil and gas industry. Biol Conserv 206:102–111
Hervieux D, Hebblewhite M, DeCesare NJ, Russell M, Smith K, Robertson S, Boutin S (2013) Widespread declines in woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) continue in Alberta. Can J Zool 91:872–882. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2013-0123
James A, Stuart-Smith A (2002) Distribution of caribou and wolves in relation to linear corridors J Wildl Manag 64:154–159. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802985
Joroenson JC, Ver Hoef JM, Jorgenson MT (2010) Long-term recovery patterns of arctic tundra after winter seismic exploration. Ecol Appl 20:205–221. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1856.1
Kansas JL, Charlebois ML, Skatter HG (2015) Vegetation recovery on low impact seismic lines in Alberta’s oil sands and visual obstruction of wolves (Canis lupus) and woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou). Can Wildl Biol Manag 4-2:137–149
Kemper JT, Macdonald SE (2009) Directional change in upland tundra plant communities 20–30 years after seismic exploration in the Canadian low-arctic. J Veg Sci 20:557–567
Komers PE, Stanojevic Z (2013) Rates of disturbance vary by data resolution: Implications for conservation schedules using the Alberta Boreal Forest as a case study. Glob Chang Biol 19:2916–2928. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12266
Kuhn M (2015) Package ‘caret’. http://caret.r-forge.r-project.org/
Latham ADM, Boutin S (2015) Impacts of utility and other industrial linear corridors on wildlife. In: van der Ree R, Smith DJ, Grilo C (eds) Handbook of road ecology. Wiley, Oxford, pp 228–236
Latham ADM, Latham MC, Boyce MS, Boutin S (2011) Movement responses by wolves to industrial linear features and their effect on woodland caribou in northeastern alberta. Ecol Appl 21:2854–2865. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-0666.1
Lee P, Boutin S (2006) Persistence and developmental transition of wide seismic lines in the western Boreal Plains of Canada. J Environ Manag 78:240–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.03.016
McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Front Econom 1:105–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb028592
National Energy Board (2016) Crude oil and petroleum products. https://www.neb-one.gc.ca/nrg/sttstc/crdlndptrlmprdct/index-eng.html
Natural Regions Committee (2006) Natural regions and subregions of Alberta. Compiled by D.J. Downing and W.W. Pettapiece. Government of Alberta. Pub. No. T/852
Nielsen SE, Larsen TA, Stenhouse GB, Coogan SCP (2017) Complementary food resources of carnivory and frugivory affect local abundance of an omnivorous carnivore. Oikos 126:369–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.03144
Nijland W, Coops NC, Nielsen SE, Stenhouse G (2015) Integrating optical satellite data and airborne laser scanning in habitat classification for wildlife management. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 38:242–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2014.12.004
Noss R, Nielsen S, Vance-Borland K (2009) Prioritizing ecosystems, species, and sites for restoration. In: Moilanen A, Wilson KA, Possingham H (eds) Spatial conservation prioritization: quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford University Press, London, pp 158–171
Pagano AM, Arnold TW (2009) Detection probabilities for ground-based breeding waterfowl surveys. J Wildl Manag 73:392–398. https://doi.org/10.2193/2007-411
Pigeon KE, Anderson M, MacNearney D, Cranston J, Stenhouse G, Finnegan L (2016) Toward the restoration of caribou habitat: understanding factors associated with human motorized use of legacy seismic lines. Environ Manag 58:821–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0763-6
Pierskalla CD, Schuett MA, Thompson KA (2011) Management perceptions of off-highway vehicle use on national forest system lands in Appalachia. North J Appl For 28:208–213
Pyper M, Nishi J, McNeil L (2014) Linear feature resotration in caribou habitat: a summary of current practices and a roadmap for future progreams. Technical Report, Canada’s Oils Sails Innovation Alliances, Calgary, AB
R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Found Stat Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74686-7
Ray J (2014) Defining habitat restoration for boreal caribou in the context of national recovery: a discussion paper. Prepared for Environment Canada. https://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=90C9755C-1
Sawyer H, Kauffman MJ, Nielson RM, Horne JS (2009) Identifying and prioritizing ungulate migration routes for landscape-level conservation. Ecol Appl 19:2016–2025. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-2034.1
Schneider RR, Stelfox JB, Boutin S, Wasel S (2003) Managing the cumulative impacts of land uses in the western Canadian sedimentary basin: a modeling approach. Conserv Ecol 7:8
Schneider RR, Hauer G, Adamowicz WL, (Vic) Boutin S (2010) Triage for conserving populations of threatened species: the case of woodland caribou in Alberta. Biol Conserv 143:1603–1611
Scrafford MA, Avgar T, Abercrombie B, Tigner J, Boyce MS (2017) Wolverine habitat selection in response to anthropogenic disturbance in the western Canadian boreal forest. For Ecol Manag 395:27–36
Tigner J, Bayne EM, Boutin S (2015) American marten respond to seismic lines in northern Canada at two spatial scales. PLoS ONE 10:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118720
van Rensen CK, Nielsen SE, White B, Vinge T, Lieffers VJ (2015) Natural regeneration of forest vegetation on legacy seismic lines in boreal habitats in Alberta’s oil sands region. Biol Conserv 184:127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.020
Venier LA, Thompson ID, Fleming R, Malcolm J, Aubin I, Trofymow JA, Langor D, Sturrock R, Patry C, Outerbridge RO, Holmes SB, Haeussler S, Grandpré L, De, Chen HYH, Bayne E, Arsenault A, Brandt JP (2014) Effects of natural resource development on the terrestrial biodiversity of Canadian boreal forests 1. Environ Rev 490:457–490
White B,Ogilvie J, Campbell DMHH, Hiltz D, Gauthier B, Chisholm HK, Wen HK, Murphy P.N.C.C, Arp Pa (2012) Using the cartographic depth-to-water index to locate small streams and associated wet areas across landscapes. Can Water Resour J 37:347–333. https://doi.org/10.4296/cwrj2011-909
Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol 1:3–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2009.00001.x
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the Alberta Upstream Petroleum Research Fund (15-ERPC-01), the Government of Canada under the National Conservation Plan (HSP6617, 6699, 7195), the Foothills Landscape Management Forum, the Forest Resource Improvement Association of Alberta (FRIP OF-13-006), the British Columbia Oil and Gas Research and Innovation Society (BC OGRIS 15-04), Alberta Environment and Parks, Canadian Natural Resources, Daishowa-Marubeni International Ltd., fRIResearch, Jupiter Resources Ltd., Manning Diversified Forest Products, Millar Western Forest Products Ltd., Paramount Resources Ltd., Talisman Energy Inc., Tolko Industries Ltd., Vanderwell Contractors Ltd., and Weyerhaeuser Co. Ltd. In-kind support was provided by Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Alberta Environment and Parks, ANC Timber Ltd., Canfor Corporation, Daishowa-Marubeni International Ltd., Tolko Industries Ltd., West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd., and Weyerhaeuser Co. Ltd. Field data were collected by M Anderson, L Brown, F Deagle, L Dewart, J Dillon, S Fassina, J Halbert, B Knox, C Lambert, A MacDonald, K Ridley, T Vandermolen, and R Viejou. We thank the fRI Research GIS Program for additional support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hornseth, M.L., Pigeon, K.E., MacNearney, D. et al. Motorized Activity on Legacy Seismic Lines: A Predictive Modeling Approach to Prioritize Restoration Efforts. Environmental Management 62, 595–607 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1063-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1063-0