Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using Cluster Analysis to Compartmentalize a Large Managed Wetland Based on Physical, Biological, and Climatic Geospatial Attributes

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hierarchical and partitional cluster analyses were used to compartmentalize Water Conservation Area 1, a managed wetland within the Arthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge in southeast Florida, USA, based on physical, biological, and climatic geospatial attributes. Single, complete, average, and Ward’s linkages were tested during the hierarchical cluster analyses, with average linkage providing the best results. In general, the partitional method, partitioning around medoids, found clusters that were more evenly sized and more spatially aggregated than those resulting from the hierarchical analyses. However, hierarchical analysis appeared to be better suited to identify outlier regions that were significantly different from other areas. The clusters identified by geospatial attributes were similar to clusters developed for the interior marsh in a separate study using water quality attributes, suggesting that similar factors have influenced variations in both the set of physical, biological, and climatic attributes selected in this study and water quality parameters. However, geospatial data allowed further subdivision of several interior marsh clusters identified from the water quality data, potentially indicating zones with important differences in function. Identification of these zones can be useful to managers and modelers by informing the distribution of monitoring equipment and personnel as well as delineating regions that may respond similarly to future changes in management or climate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arceneaux JC, Meselhe EA, Waldon MG (2007) The Arthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge Water Budget and Water Quality Models. In: US Fish and Wildlife Service Open-File Report LOXA-07-004. Boynton Beach, FL, USA

  • Bazgirkhoob, H (2012) Stage and water quality compartmental model of an Everglades wetland. MS Thesis, University of Louisiana

  • Bernhardt CE, Brandt LA, Landacre B, Marot ME, Willard DA (2013) Reconstructing vegetation response to altered hydrology and its use for restoration, Arthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Florida. Wetlands 33(6):1139–1149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-013-0469-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharath R, Srinivas VV (2015) Delineation of homogeneous hydrometeorological regions using wavelet-based global fuzzy cluster analysis. Int J Climatol 35(15):4707–4727. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt LA, Ecker D, Rivera IG, Traut A, Mazzotti FJ (2003) Wildlife and vegetation of bayhead islands in the A.R.M. Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge. Southeast Nat 2(2):179–194. https://doi.org/10.1656/1528-7092(2003)002[0179:WAVOBI]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenden TO, Wang L, Seelbach PW, Clark Jr. RD, Wiley MJ, Sparks-Jackson BL (2008) A spatially constrained clustering program for river valley segment delineation from GIS digital river networks. Environ Model Softw 23(5):638–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desgraupes B (2016) clusterCrit: clustering indices. R package version 1.2.7

  • Douglas-Mankin KR, Surratt DD (2017) Hydraulic characteristics and impacts of flow-path cuts through dense rim vegetation in a northern Everglades wetland. Int J Hydrol Sci Technol (in press)

  • Force JE, Machlis GE (1997) The human ecosystem Part II: Social indicators in ecosystem management. Soc Nat Resour 10(4):369–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929709381035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong X, Richman MB (1995) On the application of cluster analysis to growing season precipitation data in North America east of the Rockies. J Clim 8(4):897–931. 10.1175/1520-0442(1995)008 0897:OTAOCA 2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grumbine RE (1994) What is ecosystem management? Conserv Biol 8(1):27–38. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08010027.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson L, Light SS (2006) Adaptive management and adaptive governance in the everglades ecosystem. Policy Sci 39:323–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-006-9027-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harwell MC, Surratt DD, Barone DM, Aumen NG (2008) Conductivity as a tracer of agricultural and urban runoff to delineate water quality impacts in the northern Everglades. Environ Monit Assess 147(1–3):445–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-0131-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ (1990) Finding groups in data, an introduction to cluster analysis.. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Light SS, Dineen JW (1994) Water control in the Everglades: a historical perspective. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC (eds) Everglades: The ecosystem and its restoration. St. Lucie Press, Boca Raton, FL, p 47–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlis GE, Force JE, Burch WR (1997) The human ecosystem Part I: The human ecosystem as an organizing concept in ecosystem management. Soc Nat Resour 10(4):347–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929709381034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacQueen J (1967) Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Neyman J, Le Cam LM (eds) Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol 1. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 281–297

  • Maechler M, Rousseeuw PJ, Struyf A, Hubert M, Hornik K (2016) cluster: Cluster analysis basics and extensions. R package version 2.0.5

  • Mayer A, Winkler R, Fry L (2014) Classification of watersheds into integrated social and biophysical indicators with clustering analysis. Ecol Indic 45:340–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menció A, Folch A, Mas-Pla J (2012) Identifying key parameters to differentiate groundwater flow systems using multifactorial analysis. J Hydrol 472–473:301–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.09.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meselhe EA, Arceneaux JC, Waldon MG (2010) Water budget model for a remnant northern Everglades wetland. J Hydraul Res 48(1):100–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221680903568634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan RJ, McMahon TA (1990) Identification of homogeneous regions for the purposes of regionalisation. J Hydrol 121(1–4):217–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(90)90233-N

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1953) Fundamentals of ecology. WB Saunders Co., Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum HT (1983) Systems ecology. John Wiley, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang R, Ren L, Cheng W, Zhou C (2010) Similarity search and pattern discovery in hydrological time series data mining. Hydrol Process 24(9):1198–1210. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao RA, Srinivas VV (2006) Regionalization of watersheds by hybrid-cluster analysis. J Hydrol 318(1–4):37–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutchey K et al. (2006). Vegetation Classification for South Florida Natural Areas. In: US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1240, Saint Petersburg, FL. p 142

  • Surratt DD, Waldon MG, Harwell MC, Aumen NG (2008) Time-series and spatial tracking of polluted canal water intrusion into wetlands of a National Wildlife Refuge in Florida, USA. Wetlands 28(1):176–183. https://doi.org/10.1672/07-74.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tansley AG (1935) The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology 16(3):284–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/1930070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarboton KC, Irizarry-Ortiz MM, Loucks DP, Davis SM, Obeysekera JT (2004) Habitat suitability indices for evaluating water management alternatives. Office of Modeling Technical Report, South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL, USA, p 120

    Google Scholar 

  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2000) Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan. USFWS, Boynton Beach, FL, pp 362

  • Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277(5325):494–499. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5325.494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Meselhe EA, Waldon MG, Harwell MC, Chen C (2012) Compartment-based hydrodynamics and water quality modeling of a Northern Everglades Wetland, Florida, USA. Ecol Modell 247:273–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.09.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Meselhe EA, Waldon MG, Surratt DD, Abdou S, Chen C, Harwell MC (2008) Compartment delineation for a wetland water quality model in the northern everglades, Florida, USA. J Environ Hydrol 16(October):1–13

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward Jr. JH (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 58:236–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Mike Waldon for his insights into Refuge hydrology and modeling; Dr. Donatto Surratt for providing data and resources, improving our understanding of the Refuge, and for his help improving drafts of this manuscript; and the South Florida Water Management District, the Everglades Depth Estimation Network (EDEN) project, and the US Geological Survey for providing data for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

    Ian Hahus, Kati Migliaccio, Geraldine Klarenberg & Rafael Muñoz-Carpena

  2. New Mexico Water Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Albuquerque, NM, USA

    Kyle Douglas-Mankin

Authors
  1. Ian Hahus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kati Migliaccio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kyle Douglas-Mankin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Geraldine Klarenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rafael Muñoz-Carpena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Hahus.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hahus, I., Migliaccio, K., Douglas-Mankin, K. et al. Using Cluster Analysis to Compartmentalize a Large Managed Wetland Based on Physical, Biological, and Climatic Geospatial Attributes. Environmental Management 62, 571–583 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1050-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1050-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation