Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quantifying the Hydrological Effect of Permitted Water Abstractions across Spatial Scales

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water abstraction from rivers and aquifers has considerable potential to alter flow regimes, thereby influencing the physical, chemical, and ecological well-being of freshwater ecosystems. The economic and social benefits of abstraction need to be balanced against its potentially deleterious consequences for hydrologically-driven ecological functions, ecosystem services, cultural values, and recreation. In New Zealand, recent legislation states that limits for the use of water resources should be set for all waterbodies to manage the potential cumulative impacts of abstraction and reduce allocation of the hydrological resource in over-allocated catchments. These limits must comprise at least a predefined minimum flow (the flow at which all abstraction must cease) and a total allocation (the maximum rate of abstraction summed across upstream abstractions). Over-allocation occurs when the sum of all upstream abstractions exceeds the total allocation. A national database describing consents to abstract water was collated. A replicable, transferable, and objective method was applied to calculate total allocation at the national, catchment, and reach scales across the entire country. Total allocation for each catchment was expressed by mapping Weighted Allocation Impact; an index that integrates magnitude and spread of water resource allocation across entire catchments. Results show that existing consents have caused over-allocation in several catchments, prompting questions about how to reduce abstraction in these locations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acreman MC, Dunbar MJ, Hannaford J, Mountford O, Wood P, Holmes N, Cowx I, Noble R, Extence C, Aldrick J, King J, Black A, Crookall D (2008) Developing environmental standards for abstractions from UK rivers to implement the EU Water Framework Directive. Hydrol Sci J 53:1105–1120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baalousha H (2009) Stochastic water balance model for rainfall recharge quantification in Ruataniwha Basin, New Zealand. Environ Geol 58:85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow PM, Leake SA (2012) Streamflow depletion by wells—understanding and managing the effects of groundwater pumping on streamflow (No. 1376, pp. i–84). US Geological Survey

  • Biggs BJF (2000) Eutrophication of streams and rivers: dissolved nutrient chlorophyll relationships for benthic algae. J North Am Benthol Soc 19:17–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booker DJ (2010) Predicting width in any river at any discharge. Earth Surf Process Landf 35:828–841

    Google Scholar 

  • Booker DJ (2013) Spatial and temporal patterns in the frequency of events exceeding three times the median flow (FRE3) across New Zealand. J Hydrol 52:15–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Booker DJ (2016) Generalized models of riverine fish hydraulic habitat. J Ecohydraulics 1(1–2):31–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705357.2016.1229141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booker DJ, Franklin PA, Dietrich JC, Rouse HL (2014b) Implementing water resource use limits: same rules different outcomes. J Hydrol 53:129–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Booker DJ, Hicks DM (2013) Estimating wetted width and fish habitat areas across New Zealand's rivers. NIWA Report to Department of Conservation. CHC2013–CHC2075, 33pp

  • Booker DJ, Snelder TH (2012) Comparing methods for estimating flow duration curves at ungauged sites. J Hydrol 434–435:78–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booker DJ, Snelder TH, Greenwood MJ, Crow SK (2014a) Relationships between invertebrate community composition and both flow regime and other environmental factors across New Zealand rivers. Ecohydrology. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1481

  • Booker DJ, Whitehead AL, Henderson RD, Yang J (2016) Nationally consistent methods for calculating water allocation indicators. NIWA report to Ministry for the Environment. 2016023CH 46pp. http://www.mfe.govt.nz/sites/default/files/media/Fresh%20water/nationally-consistent-methods-report.pdf

  • Booker DJ, Woods RA (2014) Comparing and combining physically-based and empirically-based approaches for estimating the hydrology of ungauged catchments. J Hydrol 508:227–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brauman KA, Richter BD, Postel S, Malsy M, Flörke M (2016) Water depletion: an improved metric for incorporating seasonal and dry-year water scarcity into water risk assessments. Elementa 4. Article 000083. http://dx.doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000083.

  • Bunn SE, Arthington AH (2002) Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ Manag 30:492–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canterbury Water Management Strategy (2009) Canterbury Water Management Strategy: strategic framework, Environment Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, pp 151

  • Caruso B, Booker DJ, Scarsbrook M (2016) Changes in regional hydrology, water quality and ecology in the last 10 years. In: Jellyman PG, Davie TJA, Pearson CP, Harding JS (eds) Advances in freshwater research, New Zealand Freshwater Sciences Society Publication, Wellington, New Zealand, pp 17–34

  • Dalin C, Wada Y, Kastner T, Puma MJ (2017) Groundwater depletion embedded in international food trade. Nature 543:700–704. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daughney CJ, Reeves RR (2006) Analysis of temporal trends in New Zealand's groundwater quality based on data from the national groundwater monitoring programme. J Hydrol 45(1):41–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Death RG, Collier KJ (2010) Measuring stream macroinvertebrate responses to gradients of vegetation cover: when is enough enough? Freshw Biol 55:1447–1464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Döll P, Fiedler K, Zhang J (2009) Global-scale analysis of river flow alterations due to water withdrawals and reservoirs. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13(12):2413–2432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran GT (1981) There’s a SMART way to write management’s goals and objectives. Manag Rev 70(11):35–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghassemi F, White I (2007) Inter-basin water transfer: case studies from Australia. Cambridge University Press, Canada, China, and India

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood MJ, Booker DJ (2016) Influence of hydrological regime and land cover on traits and potential export capacity of adult aquatic insects from river channels. Oecologia 180(2):551–566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra A, Mekonnen M (2012) The water footprint of humanity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(9):3232–3237. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109936109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra AY (2014) Sustainable, efficient, and equitable water use: the three pillars under wise freshwater allocation. WIREs Water 1:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra AY, Mekonnen MM, Chapagain AK, Mathews RE, Richter BD (2012) Global monthly water scarcity: blue water footprints versus blue water availability. PLoS ONE 7(2):e32688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horne A, Webb A, Stewardson M, Richter B, Acreman M (eds) (2017) Water for the environment: from policy and science to implementation and management. Academic Press, Cambridge, UK, p 758

  • Hunt B (2012) Review of stream depletion solutions, behavior, and calculations. J Hydrol Eng 19(1):167–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt B, Weir J, Clausen B (2001) A stream depletion field experiment. Groundwater 39(2):283–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Konar M, Evans TP, Levy M, Scott CA, Troy TJ, Vörösmarty CJ, Sivapalan M (2016) Water resources sustainability in a globalizing world: who uses the water? Hydrol Process 30(18):3330–3336. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehner B, Liermann CR, Revenga C, Vörösmarty C, Fekete B, Crouzet P, Döll P, Endejan M, Frenken K, Magome J, Nilsson C (2011) High‐resolution mapping of the world's reservoirs and dams for sustainable river‐flow management. Front Ecol Environ 9(9):494–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li FY, Snow VO, Holzworth DP (2011) Modelling the seasonal and geographical pattern of pasture production in New Zealand. NZ J Agric Res 54(4):331–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2011.613403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan HK, Booker DJ, Cattoen C (2016) Validation of a national hydrological model. J Hydrol 541:800–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry for the Environment (2008) Proposed national environmental standard on ecological flows and water levels: discussion document. New Zealand Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand, ME 868, 61pp

  • Ministry for the Environment (MFE (2011) National policy statement for freshwater management 2011: implementation guide. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand, 50pp

  • Ministry for the Environment (MFE (2015) A guide to the national policy statement for freshwater management 2014. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand, 96pp

  • Ministry for the Environment, Stats NZ (2017) New Zealand’s environmental reporting series: our fresh water 2017. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand, p 98

  • New Zealand Government (2011) National policy statement for freshwater management 2011. New Zealand Government, Wellington, New Zealand, 11pp

  • New Zealand Government (2014) National policy statement for freshwater management 2014. New Zealand Government, Wellington, New Zealand, 34pp

  • Nilsson C, Reidy CA, Dynesius M, Revenga C (2005) Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world's large river systems. Science 308(5720):405–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nyholm T, Rasmussen KR, Christensen S (2003) Estimation of stream flow depletion and uncertainty from discharge measurements in a small alluvial stream. J Hydrol 274(1):129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Richter BD, Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Naiman RJ, Kendy E, Acreman M, Apse C, Bledsoe BP, Freeman MC, Henriksen J, Jacobson RB, Kennen JG, Merritt DM, O’Keefe JH, Olden JD, Rogers K, Tharme RE, Warner A (2010) The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshw Biol 55:147–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC (1997) The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience 47:769–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pokhrel YN, Felfelani F, Shin S, Yamada TJ, Satoh Y (2017) Modeling large-scale human alteration of land surface hydrology and climate. Geosci Lett 4(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-017-0076-5

  • Poyck S, Hendrikx J, McMillan H, Hreinsson EO, Woods R (2011) Combined snow and streamflow modelling to estimate impacts of climate change on water resources in the Clutha River, New Zealand. J Hydrol 50(2):293–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter BD, Davis MM, Apse C, Konrad C (2012) A presumptive standard for environmental flow protection. River Res Appl 28(8):1312–1321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider JC, Ahlfeld DP, Spalding CP (2017) Allocation of streamflow depletion impacts under nonlinear conditions. J Am Water Resour Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12525.

  • Scott DM (2009) Discussion of “Stream depletion by groundwater pumping in Leaky aquifers” by Vitaly A. Zlotnik and Daniel M. Tartakovsky. J Hydrol Eng 14(8):887–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivapalan M, Wagener T, Uhlenbrook S, Zehe E, Lakshmi V, Liang X, Tachikawa Y, Kumar P (2006) Predictions in ungauged basins (PUB): promise and progress. Proceedings of the PUB Symposium, IAHS Scientific Congress, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil. IAHS Publication No. 301, IAHS Press, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, 520pp

  • Smakhtin VU (2001) Low flow hydrology: a review. J Hydrol 240(3–4):147–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snelder TH, Biggs BJF (2002) Multi-scale river environment classification for water resources management. J Am Water Resour Assoc 38:1225–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snelder TH, Booker DJ, Lamouroux N (2011) A method to assess and define environmental flow rules for large jurisdictional regions. J Am Water Resour Assoc 47:828–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snelder TH, Dey K, Leathwick J (2005) Definition of the multivariate environmental river classification—“Freshwater Environments of New Zealand”. NIWA Client report to the Department on Conservation. DOC04504

  • Soil Conservation and River Control Council (1956) River and stream catchments of New Zealand. Soil Conservation and River Control Council, Wellington

  • Tait AB, Henderson RD, Turner RW, Zheng X (2006) Thin plate smoothing spline interpolation of daily rainfall for New Zealand using a climatological rainfall surface. Int J Climatol 26(4):2097–2115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tipa G, Harmsworth GH, Williams E, Kitson JC (2016) Integrating mātauranga māori into freshwater management, planning and decision-making. In: Jellyman PG, Davie TJA, Pearson CP, Harding JS (eds) Advances in freshwater research. New Zealand Freshwater Sciences Society Publication, Wellington, New Zealand, pp 613–631

  • Vickers A (2001) Handbook of water use and conservation. WaterPlow Press, Amherst, MA, p 464

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel RM, Fennessey NM (1995) Flow duration curves II: a review of applications in water resources planning. J Am Water Resour Assoc 31:1029–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wada Y, van Beek LP, van Kempen CM, Reckman JW, Vasak S, Bierkens MF (2010) Global depletion of groundwater resources. Geophys Res Lett 37:L20402. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wada Y, Van Beek LP, Bierkens MF (2011) Modelling global water stress of the recent past: on the relative importance of trends in water demand and climate variability. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15(12):3785–3808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White PA, Hong YS, Murray DL, Scott DM, Thorpe HR (2003) Evaluation of regional models of rainfall recharge to groundwater by comparison with lysimeter measurements, Canterbury, New Zealand. J Hydrol 42(1):39–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward SJR, Barker DJ, Zyskowski RF (2001) A practical model for predicting soil water deficit in New Zealand pastures. NZ J Agric Res 44(1):91–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2001.9513464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young R, Smart G, Harding J (2004) Impacts of hydro-dams, irrigation schemes and river control works. In: Harding JS, Mosley MP, Pearson CP, Sorrell BK (eds) Freshwaters of New Zealand. New Zealand Hydrological Society and New Zealand Limnological Society, Christchurch, pp 31–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlotnik VA, Tartakovsky DM (2008) Stream depletion by groundwater pumping in leaky aquifers. J Hydrol Eng 13(2):43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by NIWA (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, New Zealand) as part of the funded Sustainable Water Allocation Programme (SWAP) and built upon development of water allocation indicators for environmental reporting purposes for the New Zealand Ministry for the Environment (Ministry for the Environment and Stats NZ 2017). Thanks to Helen Rouse for providing internal NIWA review. Thanks to the reviews and editor for their helpful suggestions to improve an earlier draft. The views expressed are those of the author only. Many thanks to all regional council staff who helped provide consent data. Data associated with this publication are available through the New Zealand Ministry for the Environment data portal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Christchurch, New Zealand

    D. J. Booker

Authors
  1. D. J. Booker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. J. Booker.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Booker, D.J. Quantifying the Hydrological Effect of Permitted Water Abstractions across Spatial Scales. Environmental Management 62, 334–351 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1040-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1040-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation