Factors Contributing to the Decline of Traditional Practices in Communities from the Gwallek–Kedar area, Kailash Sacred Landscape, Nepal
- 213 Downloads
Traditional knowledge and practices are increasingly recognized in the resource conservation and management practices, however are declining in many parts of the world including Nepal. Studies on the inventory of traditional knowledge are available, albeit limited, and empirical analysis of factors contributing to the decline of traditional knowledge are negligible in Nepal. We thus initiated this study in the Nepal part of the Kailash Sacred Landscape to (i) document traditional knowledge and practices on agriculture, forest-based herbal remedy, and genetic resource conservation; and (ii) identify factors contributing to the decline of traditional practices in the communities. Data was collected during September–December 2015 through key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and households survey. The household survey data was used in binary logistic regression analysis to identify factors contributing to the decline of six key traditional practices. The study documented 56 types of traditional practices. The regressions showed that the age of the respondent, distance to the nearest forest, distance to the nearest motorable road, family members’ ill health, and seasonal migration of the household members for jobs significantly influencing to the decline of the particular traditional practices, however, their effects vary within a practice and among the practices. The use of modern medicine, increasing road linkages, decreasing trend of plant resource availability, and agriculture intensification are responsible for the decline of the particular traditional practices. We recommend to recognize their significance in the governing socio-ecological systems and to link the traditional and scientific knowledge systems through policy formulations.
KeywordsTraditional knowledge Contributing factors Bridging knowledge systems Kailash Sacred Landscape
This study was undertaken by the International Center for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD)/ Kailash Sacred Landscape Conservation and Development Initiative (KSLCDI). KSLCDI is a joint effort of the Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Government of Nepal (MoFSC), ICIMOD and RECAST/Tribhuvan University and supported by the GIZ/Germany and DFID/UKAid as well as core funds of ICIMOD contributed by the governments of Afghanistan, Australia, Austria, Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, India, Myanmar, Nepal, Norway, Pakistan, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. The views and interpretation in this publication are those of the authors and should not be ascribed to MoFSC, ICIMOD, RECAST or their donors. The comment and suggestion from the two anonymous reviewers, especially on the bridging knowledge systems, are highly appreciated.
This study was funded by the International Center for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD)/ Kailash Sacred Landscape Conservation and Development Initiative (KSLCDI).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Abbasi AM, Khan MA, Ahmad M, Zafar M (2013) Medicinal plant biodiversity of lesser Himalayas—Pakistan. Springer Science Business Media, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
- Atreya K, Pyakurel D, Thagunna KS, Bhatta LD, Uprety Y, Kotru R, Oli BN, Rimal S, Chaudhary RP (2017) Traditional agricultural and medicinal practices in the Kailash Sacred Landscape, Nepal. ICIMOD, Kathmandu, Nepal, ICIMOD Working Paper 2017/12Google Scholar
- Carson B (1992) The land, the farmer and the future: A soil fertility management strategy for Nepal. ICIMOD, Kathmandu, Nepal, (ICIMOD Occasional Paper No. 21)Google Scholar
- Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) (2011) Population census of Nepal 2011. CBS, Kathmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
- Chaudhary RP, Bhattarai SH, Basnet G, Bhatta KP, Uprety Y, Bhatta LD, Kotru R, Oli BN, Sharma LN, Khanal S, Sharma UR (2017) Traditional practice and knowledge of indigenous and local communities in Kailash Sacred Landscape, Nepal. ICIMOD, Kathmandu, Nepal, ICIMOD Working Paper 2017/1Google Scholar
- Chauhan N (1999) Medicinal and aromatic plants of Himanchal Pradesh. Indus Publishing Company, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
- Chauhan R, Ruby K, Dwivedi J (2012) Bergenia ciliata mine of medicinal properties: A review. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res 15(2):20–23Google Scholar
- Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) (1986) The useful plants of India. Publications & Information Directorate, CSIR, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
- Department of Medicinal Plants (DMP) (1970) Medicinal plants of Nepal, First edition. His Majesty Government of Nepal, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal, Bulletin of the Department of Medicinal Plants, No. 3Google Scholar
- Ghimire SK, Pyakurel D, Nepal BK, Sapkota IB, Parajuli RR, Oli BR (2008) A manual of NTFPs of Nepal Himalaya (Gair Kastha Ban Paidawar Digdarshan). WWF Kathmandu, Nepal, (in Nepali)Google Scholar
- Gurung K, Pyakurel D (2012) Nepalka pramukh jadibutiharuko chinari (An introduction to important medicinal and aromatic plants of Nepal). Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) / Nepal Herbs and Herbal Products Association (NEHHPA), Kathmandu, Nepal (in Nepali)Google Scholar
- Hansen S, Van Fleet J (2003) Traditional knowledge and intellectual property: A handbook on issues and options for traditional knowledge holders in protecting their intellectual property and maintaining biological diversity. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
- IUCN (2004) National register of medicinal and aromatic plants. IUCN-The World Conservation Union, Kathmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
- Kavitha KL, Rajesh K, Sundar NS (2009) Buffalo mastitis: risk factors. Buffalo Bull 28:134–137Google Scholar
- Manandhar NP (2002) Plants and people of Nepal. Timber Press, Oregon, USAGoogle Scholar
- MoSTE (2015) Indigenous and local knowledge and practices for climate resilience in Nepal: mainstreaming climate change risk management in development. Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment (MoSTE), Kathmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
- Pandey A, Kotru R, Pradhan N (2016) Kailash Sacred Landscape: bridging cultural heritage, conservation and development through a transboundary landscape approach. In: Verschuuren B, Futura N (eds.) Asian sacred natural sites: philosophy and practice in protected areas and conservation. Routledge, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
- Rajkumar V, Guha G, Kumar R, Mathew L (2010) Evaluation of antioxidant activities of Bergenia ciliata rhizome. Rec Nat Prod 4:38–48Google Scholar
- Sharma SM (2017) Traditional ecological knowledge-based practices ad bio-formulations: key to agricultural sustainability. In: Kumar V et al. (eds) Probiotics in agroecosystem, Springer Nature, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4059-7_21
- Sumane S, Kunda I, Knickel K, Strauss A, Tisenkopfs T, des Ios Rios I, Rivera M, Chebach T, Ashkenazy A (2018) Local and farmers’ knowledge matter! How integrating informal and formal knowledge enhances sustainable and resilient agriculture. J Rural Stud. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.01.020
- Thompson PB (2017) The spirit of the soil: agriculture and environmental ethics. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- United Nations Field Coordination Office (UNFCO) (2013) District profile: Baitadi. Transition Support Strategy, RCHC Office, Kathmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
- Zomer R, Oli KP (eds) (2011) Kailash sacred landscape conservation initiative—Feasibility assessment report. ICIMOD, KathmanduGoogle Scholar