Skip to main content

Adaptive Management of Environmental Flows

Abstract

Adaptive management enables managers to work with complexity and uncertainty, and to respond to changing biophysical and social conditions. Amid considerable uncertainty over the benefits of environmental flows, governments are embracing adaptive management as a means to inform decision making. This Special Issue of Environmental Management presents examples of adaptive management of environmental flows and addresses claims that there are few examples of its successful implementation. It arose from a session at the 11th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics held in Australia, and is consequently dominated by papers from Australia. We classified the papers according to the involvement of researchers, managers and the local community in adaptive management. Five papers report on approaches developed by researchers, and one paper on a community-led program; these case studies currently have little impact on decision making. Six papers provide examples involving water managers and researchers, and two papers provide examples involving water managers and the local community. There are no papers where researchers, managers and local communities all contribute equally to adaptive management. Successful adaptive management of environmental flows occurs more often than is perceived. The final paper explores why successes are rarely reported, suggesting a lack of emphasis on reflection on management practices. One major challenge is to increase the documentation of successful adaptive management, so that benefits of learning extend beyond the project where it takes place. Finally, moving towards greater involvement of all stakeholders is critical if we are to realize the benefits of adaptive management for improving outcomes from environmental flows.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. 1.

    Search was carried out on April 4, 2017, at the University of Melbourne. Search String: TS = (“adaptive manage*”) AND (“environmental flow*” or “environmental water” or eflow*)

References

  1. Acreman M et al. (2014) Environmental flows for natural, hybrid, and novel riverine ecosystems in a changing world. Front Ecol Environ 12:466–473. https://doi.org/10.1890/130134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allan C, Curtis A (2005) Nipped in the bud: why regional scale adaptive management is not blooming. Environ Manag 36:414–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0244-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Allan C, Watts RJ (2018) Revealing adaptive management of environmental flows. Environ Manage https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0931-3

  4. Arthington AH (2012) Environmental flows: saving rivers in the third millenium. University of California Press, Berkely and Los Angeles, CA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Baumgartner LJ, Conallin J, Wooden I, Campbell B, Gee R, Robinson WA, Mallen‐Cooper M (2014) Using flow guilds of freshwater fish in an adaptive management framework to simplify environmental flow delivery for semi‐arid riverine systems. Fish Fish 15:410–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brisbane Declaration (2007) The Brisbane Declaration. International Water Centre. http://www.watercentre.org/news/declaration. Accessed 30 Oct 2017

  7. Conallin J, McLoughlin CA, Campbell J, Knight R, Bright T, Fisher I (2018a) Stakeholder participation in freshwater monitoring and evaluation programs: applying thresholds of potential concern within environmental flows. Environ Manage https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0940-2

  8. Conallin J, Wilson E, Campbell J (2018b) Implementation of environmental flows for intermittent river systems: adaptive management and stakeholder participation facilitate implementation. Environ Manage https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0922-4

  9. Dudgeon D et al. (2006) Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev 81:163–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gawne B et al. (2013) Long term intervention monitoring project: logic and rationale document version 1.0. Murray–Darling Freshwater Research Centre

  11. Hardie SA, Bobbi CJ (2018) Compounding effects of agricultural land use and water use in free-flowing rivers: confounding issues for environmental flows. Environ Manage https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0836-1

  12. Hart BT (2016) The Australian Murray-Darling basin plan: factors leading to its successful development. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 16:229–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Harwood A, Johnson S, Richter B, Locke A, Xuezhong Y, Tickner D (2017) Listen to the river: lessons from a global review of environmental flow success stories. WWF-UK, Woking, UK

    Google Scholar 

  14. Holling CS (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. John Wiley & Sons

  15. Horne AC et al. (in review). Active management: can ecological outcomes be improved through alternative approaches to allocating environmental water? J Water Res Plan Manage

  16. Horne AC, Szemis JM, Webb JA, Kaur S, Stewardson MJ, Bond N, Nathan R (2018) Informing environmental water management decisions: using conditional probability networks to address the information needs of planning and implementation cycles. Environ Manage https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0874-8

  17. Horne AC Webb JA Stewardson MJ Richter B Acreman M (eds) (2017) Water for the environment: from policy and science to implementation and management.Elsevier, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ison R et al. (2011) Sustainable catchment managing in a climate changing world: new integrative modalities for connecting policy makers, scientists and other stakeholders. Water Resour Manag 25:3977–3992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9880-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Knight AT, Cowling RM, Rouget M, Balmford A, Lombard AT, Campbell BM (2008) Knowing but not doing: selecting priority conservation areas and the research-implementation gap. Conserv Biol 22:610–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00914.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Koehn JD, Todd CR, Zampatti BP, Stuart IG, Conallin A, Thwaites L, Ye Q (2018) Using a population model to inform the management of river flows and invasive carp (Cyprinus carpio). Environ Manage https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0855-y

  21. Koster WM, Crook DA, Dawson DR, Gaskill S, Morrongiello JR (2018) Predicting the influence of streamflow on migration and spawning of a threatened diadromous fish, the Australian grayling Prototroctes maraena. Environ Manage https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0853-0

  22. Le Quesne T, Kendy E, Weston D (2010) The implementation Challenge: taking stock of government policies to protect and restore environmental flows. The Nature Conservancy & WWF

  23. McCoy AL, Holmes SR, Boisjolie BA (2018) Flow restoration in the Columbia River Basin: an evaluation of a flow restoration accounting framework. Environ Manage https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0926-0

  24. Mcgregor GB, Marshall JC, Lobegeiger JS, Holloway D, Menke N, Coysh J (2018) A risk-based ecohydrological approach to assessing environmental flow regimes. Environ Manage https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0850-3

  25. Milly PCD, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M, Hirsch RM, Kundzewicz ZW, Lettenmaier DP, Stouffer RJ (2008) Stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science 319:573–574

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Moore M (2004) Perceptions and interpretations of environmental flows and implications for future water resource management: a survey study. Linköping University

  27. Moyle PB (2014) Novel aquatic ecosystems: the new reality for streams in California and other Mediterranean climate regions. River Res Appl 30:1335–1344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nichols JD, Runge MC, Johnson FA, Williams BK (2007) Adaptive harvest management of North American waterfowl populations: a brief history and future prospects. J Ornithol 148(Suppl. 2):343–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ocock JF, Bino G, Wassens S, Spencer J, Thomas RF, Kingsford RT (2018) Identifying critical habitat for Australian freshwater turtles in a large regulated floodplain: implications for environmental water management Environ Manage https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0837-0

  30. Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:419–422

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pahl-Wostl C et al. (2013) Environmental flows and water governance: managing sustainable water uses. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5:341–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Poff NL et al. (1997) The natural flow regime. BioScience 47:769–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Poff NL et al. (2003) River flows and water wars: emerging science for environmental decision making. Front Ecol Environ 1:298–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Poff NL et al. (2016) Sustainable water management under future uncertainty with eco-engineering decision scaling. Nat Clim Chang 6:25–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Poff NL, Tharme RE, Arthington AH (2017) Evolution of environmental flows assessment science, principles, and methodologies. In: Horne AC, Webb JA, Stewardson MJ, Richter BD, Acreman M (eds) Water for the Environment: from Policy and Science to Implementation and Management.. Elsevier, Cambridge MA, p 207–241

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rist L, Campbell BM, Frost P (2013a) Adaptive management: where are we now? Environ Conserv 40:5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rist L, Felton A, Samuelsson L, Sandström C, Rosvall O (2013b) A new paradigm for adaptive management. Ecol Soc 18:63. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06183-180463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Runge MC, Johnson FA, Anderson MG, Koneff MD, Reed ET, Mott SE (2006) The need for coherence between waterfowl harvest and habitat management. Wildl Soc Bull 34:1231–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ryder DS, Tomlinson M, Gawne B, Likens GE (2010) Defining and using ‘best available science’: a policy conundrum for the management of aquatic ecosystems. Mar Freshw Res 61:821–828

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Schön DA (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schreiber ESG, Bearlin AR, Nicol SJ, Todd CR (2004) Adaptive management: a synthesis of current understanding and effective application. Ecol Manag Restor 5:177–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Skinner D, Langford J (2013) Legislating for sustainable basin management: the story of Australia’s Water Act (2007). Water Policy 15:871–894. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2013.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sood A et al. (2017) Global environmental flow information for the sustainable development goals. International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo, Sri Lanka

    Book  Google Scholar 

  44. Stewardson MJ, Skinner D (2018) Evaluating use of environmental flows to aerate streams by modelling the counterfactual case. Environ Manage. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0955-8

  45. Swirepik JL, Burns IC, Dyer FJ, Neave IA, O’Brien MG, Pryde GM, Thompson RM (2016) Establishing environmental water requirements for the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia’s largest developed river system. River Res Appl 32:1153–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tharme RE (2003) A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res Appl 19:397–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. UN (2017) Sustainable development goals. http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/. Accessed 30 Oct 2017

  48. Vietz GJ, Lintern A, Webb JA, Straccione D (2018) River bank erosion and the influence of environmental flow management. Environ Manage https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0857-9

  49. Vorosmarty CJ et al. (2010) Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467:555–561. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09440

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Walters CJ (2007) Is adaptive management helping to solve fisheries problems? Ambio 36:304–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Watts RJ, Kopf RK, McCasker N, Howitt JA, Conallin J, Wooden I, Baumgartner L (2018) Adaptive management of environmental flows: using irrigation infrastructure to deliver environmental benefits during a large hypoxic blackwater event in the southern Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Environ Manage https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0941-1

  52. Webb JA, Costelloe JF, Casas-Mulet R, Lyon JP, Stewardson MJ (eds) (2016) Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics. The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

  53. Webb JA, Koster WM, Stuart IG, Reich P, Stewardson MJ (2018) Make the most of the data you’ve got: Bayesian models and a surrogate species approach to assessing benefits of upstream migration flows for the endangered Australian grayling. Environ Manage https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0822-7

  54. Webb JA, Stewardson MJ, Chee YE, Schreiber ESG, Sharpe AK, Jensz MC (2010) Negotiating the turbulent boundary: the challenges of building a science-management collaboration for landscape-scale monitoring of environmental flows. Mar Freshw Res 61:798–807

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Webb JA, Watts RJ, Allan C, Warner AT (2017) Principles for monitoring, evaluation and adaptive management of environmental flows. In: Horne AC, Webb JA, Stewardson MJ, Richter BD, Acreman M (eds) Water for the environment: from policy and science to implementation and management. Elsevier, Cambridge MA, p 599–623

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  56. Wei Y, Ison R, Colvin J, Collins K (2012) Reframing water governance: a multi-perspective study of an over-engineered catchment in China. J Environ Plan Manag 55:297–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Westgate MJ, Likens GE, Lindenmayer DB (2013) Adaptive management of biological systems: a review. Biol Conserv 158:128–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Williams BK, Brown ED (2014) Adaptive management: from more talk to real action. Environ Manag 53:465–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0205-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Wolfenden BJ, Wassens SM, Jenkins KM, Baldwin DS, Kobayashi T, Maguire J (2018) Adaptive management of return flows: lessons from a case study in environmental water delivery to a floodplain river. Environ Manage https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0861-0

  60. Yarnell SM et al. (2015) Functional flows in modified riverscapes: hydrographs, habitats and opportunities. BioScience 65:963–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the editorial staff of Environmental Management, and in particular Editor in Chief Bryan Brooks, for their forbearance during the extended gestation period of this Special Issue. The 11th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics provided the catalyst for this Special Issue, and we thank the conference organizing committee for the opportunity provided. We thank both authors and reviewers of the case studies presented in this issue for their contributions and involvement. JAW’s contribution to the Special Issue was supported by ARC LP130100174, and RJW’s by a Research Fellowship from the Institute for Land, Water and Society at Charles Sturt University.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Angus Webb.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Webb, J.A., Watts, R.J., Allan, C. et al. Adaptive Management of Environmental Flows. Environmental Management 61, 339–346 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0981-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Environmental flows
  • Adaptive management
  • Reflection
  • Researchers
  • Managers
  • Local stakeholders
  • Decision-making
  • Uncertainty
  • Learning