Environmental Management

, Volume 61, Issue 3, pp 339–346 | Cite as

Adaptive Management of Environmental Flows

  • J. Angus Webb
  • Robyn J. Watts
  • Catherine Allan
  • John C. Conallin


Adaptive management enables managers to work with complexity and uncertainty, and to respond to changing biophysical and social conditions. Amid considerable uncertainty over the benefits of environmental flows, governments are embracing adaptive management as a means to inform decision making. This Special Issue of Environmental Management presents examples of adaptive management of environmental flows and addresses claims that there are few examples of its successful implementation. It arose from a session at the 11th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics held in Australia, and is consequently dominated by papers from Australia. We classified the papers according to the involvement of researchers, managers and the local community in adaptive management. Five papers report on approaches developed by researchers, and one paper on a community-led program; these case studies currently have little impact on decision making. Six papers provide examples involving water managers and researchers, and two papers provide examples involving water managers and the local community. There are no papers where researchers, managers and local communities all contribute equally to adaptive management. Successful adaptive management of environmental flows occurs more often than is perceived. The final paper explores why successes are rarely reported, suggesting a lack of emphasis on reflection on management practices. One major challenge is to increase the documentation of successful adaptive management, so that benefits of learning extend beyond the project where it takes place. Finally, moving towards greater involvement of all stakeholders is critical if we are to realize the benefits of adaptive management for improving outcomes from environmental flows.


Environmental flows Adaptive management Reflection Researchers Managers Local stakeholders Decision-making Uncertainty Learning 



We thank the editorial staff of Environmental Management, and in particular Editor in Chief Bryan Brooks, for their forbearance during the extended gestation period of this Special Issue. The 11th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics provided the catalyst for this Special Issue, and we thank the conference organizing committee for the opportunity provided. We thank both authors and reviewers of the case studies presented in this issue for their contributions and involvement. JAW’s contribution to the Special Issue was supported by ARC LP130100174, and RJW’s by a Research Fellowship from the Institute for Land, Water and Society at Charles Sturt University.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Acreman M et al. (2014) Environmental flows for natural, hybrid, and novel riverine ecosystems in a changing world. Front Ecol Environ 12:466–473. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allan C, Curtis A (2005) Nipped in the bud: why regional scale adaptive management is not blooming. Environ Manag 36:414–425. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allan C, Watts RJ (2018) Revealing adaptive management of environmental flows. Environ Manage
  4. Arthington AH (2012) Environmental flows: saving rivers in the third millenium. University of California Press, Berkely and Los Angeles, CACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumgartner LJ, Conallin J, Wooden I, Campbell B, Gee R, Robinson WA, Mallen‐Cooper M (2014) Using flow guilds of freshwater fish in an adaptive management framework to simplify environmental flow delivery for semi‐arid riverine systems. Fish Fish 15:410–427. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brisbane Declaration (2007) The Brisbane Declaration. International Water Centre. Accessed 30 Oct 2017
  7. Conallin J, McLoughlin CA, Campbell J, Knight R, Bright T, Fisher I (2018a) Stakeholder participation in freshwater monitoring and evaluation programs: applying thresholds of potential concern within environmental flows. Environ Manage
  8. Conallin J, Wilson E, Campbell J (2018b) Implementation of environmental flows for intermittent river systems: adaptive management and stakeholder participation facilitate implementation. Environ Manage
  9. Dudgeon D et al. (2006) Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev 81:163–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gawne B et al. (2013) Long term intervention monitoring project: logic and rationale document version 1.0. Murray–Darling Freshwater Research CentreGoogle Scholar
  11. Hardie SA, Bobbi CJ (2018) Compounding effects of agricultural land use and water use in free-flowing rivers: confounding issues for environmental flows. Environ Manage
  12. Hart BT (2016) The Australian Murray-Darling basin plan: factors leading to its successful development. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 16:229–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harwood A, Johnson S, Richter B, Locke A, Xuezhong Y, Tickner D (2017) Listen to the river: lessons from a global review of environmental flow success stories. WWF-UK, Woking, UKGoogle Scholar
  14. Holling CS (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  15. Horne AC et al. (in review). Active management: can ecological outcomes be improved through alternative approaches to allocating environmental water? J Water Res Plan ManageGoogle Scholar
  16. Horne AC, Szemis JM, Webb JA, Kaur S, Stewardson MJ, Bond N, Nathan R (2018) Informing environmental water management decisions: using conditional probability networks to address the information needs of planning and implementation cycles. Environ Manage
  17. Horne AC Webb JA Stewardson MJ Richter B Acreman M (eds) (2017) Water for the environment: from policy and science to implementation and management.Elsevier, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  18. Ison R et al. (2011) Sustainable catchment managing in a climate changing world: new integrative modalities for connecting policy makers, scientists and other stakeholders. Water Resour Manag 25:3977–3992. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Knight AT, Cowling RM, Rouget M, Balmford A, Lombard AT, Campbell BM (2008) Knowing but not doing: selecting priority conservation areas and the research-implementation gap. Conserv Biol 22:610–617. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koehn JD, Todd CR, Zampatti BP, Stuart IG, Conallin A, Thwaites L, Ye Q (2018) Using a population model to inform the management of river flows and invasive carp (Cyprinus carpio). Environ Manage
  21. Koster WM, Crook DA, Dawson DR, Gaskill S, Morrongiello JR (2018) Predicting the influence of streamflow on migration and spawning of a threatened diadromous fish, the Australian grayling Prototroctes maraena. Environ Manage
  22. Le Quesne T, Kendy E, Weston D (2010) The implementation Challenge: taking stock of government policies to protect and restore environmental flows. The Nature Conservancy & WWFGoogle Scholar
  23. McCoy AL, Holmes SR, Boisjolie BA (2018) Flow restoration in the Columbia River Basin: an evaluation of a flow restoration accounting framework. Environ Manage
  24. Mcgregor GB, Marshall JC, Lobegeiger JS, Holloway D, Menke N, Coysh J (2018) A risk-based ecohydrological approach to assessing environmental flow regimes. Environ Manage
  25. Milly PCD, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M, Hirsch RM, Kundzewicz ZW, Lettenmaier DP, Stouffer RJ (2008) Stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science 319:573–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moore M (2004) Perceptions and interpretations of environmental flows and implications for future water resource management: a survey study. Linköping UniversityGoogle Scholar
  27. Moyle PB (2014) Novel aquatic ecosystems: the new reality for streams in California and other Mediterranean climate regions. River Res Appl 30:1335–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nichols JD, Runge MC, Johnson FA, Williams BK (2007) Adaptive harvest management of North American waterfowl populations: a brief history and future prospects. J Ornithol 148(Suppl. 2):343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ocock JF, Bino G, Wassens S, Spencer J, Thomas RF, Kingsford RT (2018) Identifying critical habitat for Australian freshwater turtles in a large regulated floodplain: implications for environmental water management Environ Manage
  30. Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:419–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pahl-Wostl C et al. (2013) Environmental flows and water governance: managing sustainable water uses. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5:341–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Poff NL et al. (1997) The natural flow regime. BioScience 47:769–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Poff NL et al. (2003) River flows and water wars: emerging science for environmental decision making. Front Ecol Environ 1:298–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Poff NL et al. (2016) Sustainable water management under future uncertainty with eco-engineering decision scaling. Nat Clim Chang 6:25–34. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Poff NL, Tharme RE, Arthington AH (2017) Evolution of environmental flows assessment science, principles, and methodologies. In: Horne AC, Webb JA, Stewardson MJ, Richter BD, Acreman M (eds) Water for the Environment: from Policy and Science to Implementation and Management.. Elsevier, Cambridge MA, p 207–241Google Scholar
  36. Rist L, Campbell BM, Frost P (2013a) Adaptive management: where are we now? Environ Conserv 40:5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rist L, Felton A, Samuelsson L, Sandström C, Rosvall O (2013b) A new paradigm for adaptive management. Ecol Soc 18:63. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Runge MC, Johnson FA, Anderson MG, Koneff MD, Reed ET, Mott SE (2006) The need for coherence between waterfowl harvest and habitat management. Wildl Soc Bull 34:1231–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ryder DS, Tomlinson M, Gawne B, Likens GE (2010) Defining and using ‘best available science’: a policy conundrum for the management of aquatic ecosystems. Mar Freshw Res 61:821–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schön DA (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Schreiber ESG, Bearlin AR, Nicol SJ, Todd CR (2004) Adaptive management: a synthesis of current understanding and effective application. Ecol Manag Restor 5:177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Skinner D, Langford J (2013) Legislating for sustainable basin management: the story of Australia’s Water Act (2007). Water Policy 15:871–894. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sood A et al. (2017) Global environmental flow information for the sustainable development goals. International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo, Sri LankaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stewardson MJ, Skinner D (2018) Evaluating use of environmental flows to aerate streams by modelling the counterfactual case. Environ Manage.
  45. Swirepik JL, Burns IC, Dyer FJ, Neave IA, O’Brien MG, Pryde GM, Thompson RM (2016) Establishing environmental water requirements for the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia’s largest developed river system. River Res Appl 32:1153–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tharme RE (2003) A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res Appl 19:397–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. UN (2017) Sustainable development goals. Accessed 30 Oct 2017
  48. Vietz GJ, Lintern A, Webb JA, Straccione D (2018) River bank erosion and the influence of environmental flow management. Environ Manage
  49. Vorosmarty CJ et al. (2010) Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467:555–561. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Walters CJ (2007) Is adaptive management helping to solve fisheries problems? Ambio 36:304–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Watts RJ, Kopf RK, McCasker N, Howitt JA, Conallin J, Wooden I, Baumgartner L (2018) Adaptive management of environmental flows: using irrigation infrastructure to deliver environmental benefits during a large hypoxic blackwater event in the southern Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Environ Manage
  52. Webb JA, Costelloe JF, Casas-Mulet R, Lyon JP, Stewardson MJ (eds) (2016) Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics. The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  53. Webb JA, Koster WM, Stuart IG, Reich P, Stewardson MJ (2018) Make the most of the data you’ve got: Bayesian models and a surrogate species approach to assessing benefits of upstream migration flows for the endangered Australian grayling. Environ Manage
  54. Webb JA, Stewardson MJ, Chee YE, Schreiber ESG, Sharpe AK, Jensz MC (2010) Negotiating the turbulent boundary: the challenges of building a science-management collaboration for landscape-scale monitoring of environmental flows. Mar Freshw Res 61:798–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Webb JA, Watts RJ, Allan C, Warner AT (2017) Principles for monitoring, evaluation and adaptive management of environmental flows. In: Horne AC, Webb JA, Stewardson MJ, Richter BD, Acreman M (eds) Water for the environment: from policy and science to implementation and management. Elsevier, Cambridge MA, p 599–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wei Y, Ison R, Colvin J, Collins K (2012) Reframing water governance: a multi-perspective study of an over-engineered catchment in China. J Environ Plan Manag 55:297–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Westgate MJ, Likens GE, Lindenmayer DB (2013) Adaptive management of biological systems: a review. Biol Conserv 158:128–139. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Williams BK, Brown ED (2014) Adaptive management: from more talk to real action. Environ Manag 53:465–479. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wolfenden BJ, Wassens SM, Jenkins KM, Baldwin DS, Kobayashi T, Maguire J (2018) Adaptive management of return flows: lessons from a case study in environmental water delivery to a floodplain river. Environ Manage
  60. Yarnell SM et al. (2015) Functional flows in modified riverscapes: hydrographs, habitats and opportunities. BioScience 65:963–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Angus Webb
    • 1
  • Robyn J. Watts
    • 2
  • Catherine Allan
    • 2
  • John C. Conallin
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Infrastructure EngineeringThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Institute for Land, Water and SocietyCharles Sturt UniversityAlburyAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Science and EngineeringIHE-DelftDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations