Skip to main content

Are We Underestimating Microplastic Contamination in Aquatic Environments?

Environmental Management volume 61, pages 1–8 (2018)Cite this article

Abstract

Plastic debris, specifically microplastic in the aquatic environment, is an escalating environmental crisis. Efforts at national scales to reduce or ban microplastics in personal care products are starting to pay off, but this will not affect those materials already in the environment or those that result from unregulated products and materials. To better inform future microplastic research and mitigation efforts this study (1) evaluates methods currently used to quantify microplastics in the environment and (2) characterizes the concentration and size distribution of microplastics in a variety of products. In this study, 50 published aquatic surveys were reviewed and they demonstrated that most (~80%) only account for plastics ≥ 300 μm in diameter. In addition, we surveyed 770 personal care products to determine the occurrence, concentration and size distribution of polyethylene microbeads. Particle concentrations ranged from 1.9 to 71.9 mg g−1 of product or 1649 to 31,266 particles g−1 of product. The large majority ( > 95%) of particles in products surveyed were less than the 300 μm minimum diameter, indicating that previous environmental surveys could be underestimating microplastic contamination. To account for smaller particles as well as microfibers from synthetic textiles, we strongly recommend that future surveys consider methods that materials < 300 μm in diameter.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Beach WJ (1972) Skin Cleaner. United States Patent U.S. Patent #3,645,904,

  • Browne MA, Crump P, Niven SJ, Teuten E, Tonkin A, Galloway T, Thompson R (2011) Accumulation of microplastic on shorelines woldwide: sources and sinks. Environ Sci Technol 45:9175–9179

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne MA, Dissanayake A, Galloway TS, Lowe DM, Thompson RC (2008) Ingested microscopic plastic translocates to the circulatory system of the mussel, Mytilus edulis (L). Environ Sci Technol 42:5026–5031

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr SA, Liu J, Tesoro AG (2016) Transport and fate of microplastic particles in wastewater treatment plants. Water Res 91:174–182

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole M, Galloway TS (2015) Ingestion of nanoplastics and microplastics by Pacific Oyster larvae. Environ Sci Technol 49:14625–14632

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole M, Lindeque P, Halsband C, Galloway TS (2011) Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: a review. Mar Pollut Bull 62:2588–2597

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozar A et al. (2014) Plastic debris in the open ocean. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:10239–10244

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozar A et al. (2015) Plastic accumulation in the Mediterranean sea. PLoS ONE 10:e0121762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson K, Dudas SE (2016) Microplastic ingestion by wild and cultured manila clams (Venerupis philippinarum) from Baynes sound, British Columbia. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 71:147–156

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies RM, Ellwood RP, Davies GM (2003) The rational use of fluoride toothpaste. Int J Dent Hyg 1:3–8

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eerkes-Medrano D, Thompson RC, Aldridge DC (2015) Microplastics in freshwater systems: a review of the emerging threats, identification of knowledge gaps and prioritisation of research needs. Water Res 75:63–82

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen M et al. (2014) Plastic pollution in the world’s oceans: More than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea. PLoS ONE 9:e111913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell P, Nelson K (2013) Trophic level transfer of microplastic: Mytilus edulis (L.) to Carcinus maenas (L.). Environ Pollut 177:1–3

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green DS (2016) Effects of microplastics on European flat oysters, Ostrea edulis and their associated benthic communities. Environ Pollut 216:95–103

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green DS, Boots B, Sigwart J, Jiang S, Rocha C (2016) Effects of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on a marine ecosystem engineer (Arenicola marina) and sediment nutrient cycling. Environ Pollut 208:426–434

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall NM, Berry KLE, Rintoul L, Hoogenboom MO (2015) Microplastic ingestion by scleractinian corals. Mar Biol 162:725–732

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer J, Gutow L, Kohler A, Saborowski R (2014) Fate of microplastics in the marine isopod Idotea emarginata. Environ Sci Technol 48:13451–13458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoellein T, Rojas M, Pink A, Gasior J, Kelly J (2014) Anthropogenic litter in urban freshwater ecosystems: distribution and microbial interactions. PLoS ONE 9:e98485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jambeck JR et al. (2015) Marine pollution. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 347:768–771

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karami A, Golieskardi A, Keong Choo C, Larat V, Galloway TS, Salamatinia B (2017) The presence of microplastics in commercial salts from different countries. Sci Rep 7:46173

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein S, Worch E, Knepper TP (2015) Occurrence and spatial distribution of microplastics in river shore sediments of the Rhine-Main area in Germany. Environ Sci Technol 49:6070–6076

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosuth M, Wattenberg EV, Mason SA, Tyree C, Morrison D (2017) Synthetic polymer contamination in global drinking water. Orb https://orbmedia.org/stories/Invisibles_plastics/multimedia

  • Law KL, Moret-Ferguson S, Maximenko NA, Proskurowski G, Peacock EE, Hafner J, Reddy CM (2010) Plastic accumulation in the North Atlantic subtropical gyre. Science 329:1185–1188

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KW, Shim WJ, Kwon OY, Kang JH (2013) Size-dependent effects of micro polystyrene particles in the marine copepod Tigriopus japonicus. Environ Sci Technol 47:11278–11283

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie HA, Brandsma SH, van Velzen MJM, Vethaak AD (2017) Microplastics en route: Field measurements in the Dutch river delta and Amsterdam canals, wastewater treatment plants, North Sea sediments and biota. Environ Int 101:133–142

  • Löder MGJ, Gerdts G (2015) Methodology used for the detection and identification of microplastics—a critical appraisal. In: Bergmann M, Gutow L, Klages M (eds) Marine Anthropogenic Litter. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 201–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_8

  • Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015 (2015) vol 114–114

  • Napper IE, Bakir A, Rowland SJ, Thompson RC (2015) Characterisation, quantity and sorptive properties of microplastics extracted from cosmetics. Mar Pollut Bull 99:178–185

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirc U, Vidmar M, Mozer A, Krzan A (2016) Emissions of microplastic fibers from microfiber fleece during domestic washing. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 23:22206–22211

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • PlasticsEurope (2016) Plastics - the Facts 2016: an Analysis of European plastics production, demand and waste data

  • Rochman CM (2013) Plastics and priority pollutants: a multiple stressor in aquatic habitats. Environ Sci Technol 47:2439–2440

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochman CM, Cook AM, Koelmans AA (2016a) Plastic debris and policy: Using current scientific understanding to invoke positive change. Environ Toxicol Chem 35:1617–1626

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochman CM, Browne MA, Underwood AJ, van Franeker JA, Hompson RCT, Amaral-Zettler LA (2016b) The ecological impacts of marine debris: unraveling the demonstrated evidence from what is perceived. Ecology 97:302–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochman CM et al. (2015a) Scientific evidence supports a ban on microbeads. Environ Sci Technol 49:10759–10761

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochman CM et al. (2015b) Anthropogenic debris in seafood: Plastic debris and fibers from textiles in fish and bivalves sold for human consumption. Sci Rep 5:14340

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan PG, Moore CJ, van Franeker JA, Moloney CL (2009) Monitoring the abundance of plastic debris in the marine environment. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 364:1999–2012

  • Setala O, Fleming-Lehtinen V, Lehtiniemi M (2014) Ingestion and transfer of microplastics in the planktonic food web. Environ Pollut 185:77–83

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talvitie J, Heinonen M, Paakkonen JP, Vahtera E, Mikola A, Setala O, Vahala R (2015) Do wastewater treatment plants act as a potential point source of microplastics? Preliminary study in the coastal Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea. Water Sci Technol 72:1495–1504

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson RC, Moore CJ, vom Saal FS, Swan SH (2009) Plastics, the environment and human health: current consensus and future trends. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364:2153–2166

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Cauwenberghe L, Janssen CR (2014) Microplastics in bivalves cultured for human consumption. Environ Pollut 193:65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum (2016) The new plastics economy. Rethinking the future of plastics

Download references

Acknowledgements

Student support was provided by the Department of Homeland Security Science, Technology, Engineering & Math (DHS-STEM) Scholars from Universidad del Este-Carolina, Puerto Rico.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical & Environmental Sciences, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, 6300 Ocean Drive, Unit 5892, Corpus Christi, Texas, 78412, USA

    Jeremy L. Conkle

  2. School of Science and Technology, Universidad Del Este, Carolina, Puerto Rico, 00983, USA

    Christian D. Báez Del Valle

  3. Department of Life Sciences, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, 6300 Ocean Drive, Unit 5858, Corpus Christi, Texas, 78412, USA

    Jeffrey W. Turner

Authors
  1. Jeremy L. Conkle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian D. Báez Del Valle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeffrey W. Turner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy L. Conkle.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Conkle, J.L., Báez Del Valle, C.D. & Turner, J.W. Are We Underestimating Microplastic Contamination in Aquatic Environments?. Environmental Management 61, 1–8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0947-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0947-8

Keywords

  • Plastic debris
  • Polyethylene microbeads
  • Aquatic environments
  • Oceans
  • Environmental loading