Accelerating the Integration of Distributed Water Solutions: A Conceptual Financing Model from the Electricity Sector

Abstract

Modern challenges require new approaches to urban water management. One solution in the portfolio of potential strategies is the integration of distributed water infrastructure, practices, and technologies into existing systems. However, many practical barriers have prevented the widespread adoption of these systems in the US. The objective of this paper is to address these challenges by developing a conceptual model encompassing regulatory, financial, and governance components that can be used to incorporate new distributed water solutions into our current network. To construct the model, case studies of successfully implemented distributed electricity systems, specifically energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies, were examined to determine how these solutions have become prominent in recent years and what lessons can be applied to the water sector in a similar pursuit. The proposed model includes four action-oriented elements: catalyzing change, establishing funding sources, using resource pathways, and creating innovative governance structures. As illustrated in the model, the water sector should use suite of coordinated policies to promote change, engage end users through fiscal incentives, and encourage research, development and dissemination of new technologies over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Abdallah AM, Rosenberg DE (2014) Heterogeneous residential water and energy linkages and implications for conservation and management. J Water Resour Plan Manag 140:288–297. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ajami NK, Christian-Smith J (2013) Beyond Water Pricing: An Overview of Water Financing Options in California. Pacific Institute, Oakland, CA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ajami NK, Thomspon BHJ, Victor DG (2014) The Path to Water Innovation. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alagappan L, Orans R, Woo CK (2011) What drives renewable energy development? Energy Policy 39:5099–5104. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alanne K, Saari A (2006) Distributed energy generation and sustainable development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 10:539–558. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2004.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. American Water Works Association (2015) 2015 AWWA State of the Water Industry Report. Denver, CO

  7. Arbuckle JG (2013) Clean water state revolving fund loans and landowner investments in agricultural best management practices in Iowa. J Am Water Resour Assoc 49:67–75. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00688.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Arnold B (2015) 2015 State of Solar Financing, Part I: What is a Yieldco? The Energy Collective. http://www.theenergycollective.com/boydarnold/2215456/what-yieldco

  9. Arora M, Malano H, Davidson B et al (2015) Interactions between centralized and decentralized water systems in urban context: A review. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 2:623–634. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1099

  10. Bartos MD, Chester MV (2014) The conservation nexus: Valuing interdependent water and energy savings in Arizona. Environ Sci Technol 48:2139–2149. doi:10.1021/es4033343

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bichai F, Ryan H, Fitzgerald C et al. (2015) Understanding the role of alternative water supply in an urban water security strategy: an analytical framework for decision-making. Urban Water J 12:175–189. doi:10.1080/1573062X.2014.895844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bingaman J, Shultz GP, Reicher D et al. (2014) The State Clean Energy Cookbook: A Dozen Recipes for State Action on Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Steyer-Taylor Center for Energy Policy and Finance, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bird L, Bolinger M, Gagliano T et al. (2005) Policies and market factors driving wind power development in the United States. Energy Policy 33:1397–1407. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2003.12.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Blumstein C, Goldman C, Barbose G (2005) Who should administer energy-efficiency programs? Energy Policy 33:1053–1067. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2003.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bobinaite V, Tarvydas D (2014) Financing instruments and channels for the increasing production and consumption of renewable energy: Lithuanian case. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 38:259–276. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Booth S, Doris E, Knutson D, Regenthal S (2011) Using Revolving Loan Funds to Finance Energy Savings Performance Contracts in State and Local Agency Applications Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO

  17. Bouffard F, Kirschen DS (2008) Centralised and distributed electricity systems. Energy Policy 36:4504–4508. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Boyle CE (2014) Adapting to change: Water utility financial practices in the early twenty-first century. Journal-American Water Work Assoc 106:63–64. doi:10.5942/jawwa.2014.106.0015

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Brennan TJ (2010) Decoupling in electric utilities. J Regul Econ 38:49–69. doi:10.1007/s11149-010-9120-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Burns JE, Kang JS (2012) Comparative economic analysis of supporting policies for residential solar PV in the United States: Solar Renewable Energy Credit (SREC) potential. Energy Policy 44:217–225. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Byrne J, Hughes K, Rickerson W, Kurdgelashvili L (2007) American policy conflict in the greenhouse: Divergent trends in federal, regional, state, and local green energy and climate change policy. Energy Policy 35:4555–4573. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.02.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. California Energy Commission (2016) Energy Efficiency Financing. http://www.energy.ca.gov/efficiency/financing/. Accessed 15 Jun 2016

  23. Carley S (2009) Distributed generation: an empirical analysis of primary motivators. Energy Policy 37:1648–1659. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Carley S (2011) The era of state energy policy innovation: a review of policy instruments. Rev Policy Res 28:265–294. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00495.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Carley S (2012) Energy demand-side management: new perspectives for a new era. J Policy Anal Manag 31:6–32. doi:10.1002/pam.20618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Carley S, Browne TR (2013) Innovative US energy policy: a review of states’ policy experiences. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Energy Environ 2:488–506. doi:10.1002/wene.58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chini CM, Schreiber KL, Barker ZA, Stillwell AS (2016) Quantifying energy and water savings in the U.S. residential sector.Environ Sci Technol . doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b01559

    Google Scholar 

  28. Clark S (2016) Santa Cruz County water experts take cue from solar industry. Santa Cruz Sentinel. http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/article/NE/20160425/NEWS/160429807

  29. Cleantech Group (2014) i3 Quarterly Innovation Monitor. https://i3connect.com/front_page?ref=%2F. Accessed 11 May 2014

  30. Copeland C (2015) Water Infrastructure Financing: The Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) Program. Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  31. Coughlin J, Cory K (2009) Solar Photovoltaic Financing: Residential Sector Development. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO

  32. Darghouth NR, Barbose G, Wiser R (2011) The impact of rate design and net metering on the bill savings from distributed PV for residential customers in California. Energy Policy 39:5243–5253. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Datta S, Gulati S (2014) Utility rebates for ENERGY STAR appliances: are they effective? J Environ Econ Manage 68:480–506. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2014.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Delta Stewardship Council (2013) The Delta Plan. Chapter 3: A More Reliable Water Supply for California. Delta Stewardship Council, Sacramento, CA. http://deltacouncil.ca.gov/sites/default/files/documents/files/CH_03_2013.pdf

  35. Dhakal KP, Chevalier LR (2016) Urban stormwater governance: the need for a paradigm shift. Environ Manage 57:1112–1124. doi:10.1007/s00267-016-0667-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dinica V (2006) Support systems for the diffusion of renewable energy technologies - An investor perspective. Energy Policy 34:461–480. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2004.06.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Donnelly K, Christian-Smith J, Cooley H (2013) Pricing Practices in the Electricity Sector to Promote Conservation and Efficiency: Lessons for the Water Sector. Pacific Institute, Oakland, CA

    Google Scholar 

  38. Doris E, Cochran J, Vorum M (2009) Energy Efficiency Policy in the United States: Overview of Trends at Different Levels of Government. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO

    Google Scholar 

  39. Escriva-Bou A, Lund JR, Pulido-Velazquez M (2015) Optimal residential water conservation strategies considering related energy in California. Water Resour Res 51:4482–4498. doi:10.1002/2014WR016821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Freeman R (2014) 3 Green Investments: Yieldcos, Energy REITs and Crowdsourcing. In: Poplar Netw. https://www.poplarnetwork.com/news/3-green-investments-yieldcos-energy-reits-and-crowdsourcing.

  41. Garrison N, Hobbs K (2011) Rooftops to Rivers II: Green strategies for controlling stormwater and combined sewer overflows. Natural Resources Defense Council, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  42. Geller H, Harrington P, Rosenfeld AH et al. (2006) Polices for increasing energy efficiency: Thirty years of experience in OECD countries. Energy Policy 34:556–573. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Gillingham K, Newell R, Palmer K (2006) Energy efficiency policies: a retrospective examination. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:161–192. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.31.020105.100157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Gleick PH (2003) Global freshwater resources: soft-path solutions for the 21st century. Science (80-) 302:1524–1528. doi:10.1126/science.1089967

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Goldman CA, Hopper NC, Osborn JG (2005) Review of US ESCO industry market trends: An empirical analysis of project data. Energy Policy 33:387–405. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2003.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Goldman Sachs, DC Water and Sewer Authority, Calvert Foundation (2016) FACT SHEET DC Water Environmental Impact Bond. http://www.goldmansachs.com/media-relations/press-releases/current/dcwater-environmental-impact-bond-fact-sheet.pdf

  47. Golin C, Cox M, Brown M, Thomas V (2015) The water efficiency gap. Sustain Water Resour Manag 1:315–324. doi:10.1007/s40899-015-0025-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Gonzales P, Ajami NK (2017) An integrative regional resilience framework for the changing urban water paradigm. Sustain Cities Soc 30:128–138. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2017.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Hamiche AM, Stambouli AB, Flazi S (2016) A review of the water-energy nexus. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 65:319–331. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.07.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hanak E, Gray B, Lund J et al. (2014) Paying for water in California. Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hering JG, Waite TD, Luthy RG et al. (2013) A changing framework for urban water systems. Environ Sci Technol 47:10721–10726. doi:10.1021/es4007096

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hornberger GM, Hess DJ, Gilligan J et al. (2015) Water conservation and hydrological transitions in cities in the United States. Water Resour Res 51:4635–4649. doi:10.1002/2014WR015716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Hukka JJ, Katko TS (2015) Appropriate pricing policy needed worldwide for improving water services infrastructure. Journal-American Water Work Assoc 107:E37–E46. doi:10.5942/jawwa.2015.107.0007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hussain MZ (2013) Financing Renewable Energy: Options for Developing Financing Instruments Using Public Funds. World Bank, Washington, DC

  55. Jacobsson S, Johnson A (2000) The diffusion of renewable energy technology: An analytical framework and key issues for research. Energy Policy 28:625–640. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00041-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Johnstone N, Haščič I, Popp D (2010) Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: evidence based on patent counts. Environ Resour Econ 45:133–155. doi:10.1007/s10640-009-9309-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Kenney DS (2014) Understanding utility disincentives to water conservation as a means of adapting to climate change pressures. Journal-American Water Work Assoc 106:36–46. doi:10.5942/jawwa.2014.106.0008

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kenney DS, Goemans C, Klein R et al. (2008) Residential water demand management: lessons from Aurora, Colorado. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 44:192–207. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00147.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Kenway S, McMahon J, Elmer V et al. (2013) Managing water-related energy in future cities – a research and policy roadmap. J Water Clim Chang 4:161–175. doi:10.2166/wcc.2013.063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Kim C, Lewis R, O’Connor R, Broome G (2014) Innovations and Opportunities in Energy Efficiency Finance. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  61. Kiparsky M, Sedlak DL, Thompson BH, Truffer B (2013) The innovation deficit in urban water: the need for an integrated perspective on institutions, organizations, and technology. Environ Eng Sci 30:395–408. doi:10.1089/ees.2012.0427

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kirchhoff CJ, Dilling L (2016) The role of U.S. states in facilitating effective water governance under stress and change. Water Resour Res 52:2951–2964. doi:10.1002/2015WR018431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Kirkpatrick AJ, Bennear LS (2014) Promoting clean energy investment: an empirical analysis of property assessed clean energy. J Environ Econ Manage 68:357–375. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2014.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Kondo MC, Low SC, Henning J, Branas CC (2015) The impact of green stormwater infrastructure installation on surrounding health and safety. Am J Public Health 105:e114–e121. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Kreycik C, Coughlin J (2009) Financing Public Sector Projects with Clean Renewable Energy Bonds (CREBs). National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO

    Google Scholar 

  66. Kushler M, York D, Witte P (2004) Five years in: An examination of the first half-decade of public benefits energy efficiency policies. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  67. Lantz E, Doris E (2009) State Clean Energy Practices: Renewable Energy Rebates. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO

    Google Scholar 

  68. Larsen TA, Hoffmann S, Lüthi C et al. (2016) Emerging solutions to the water challenges of an urbanizing world. Science (80-) 352:928–933. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Leurig S, Brown J (2014) Bond Financing Distributed Water Systems: How to make better use of our most liquid market for financing water infrastructure. Ceres, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  70. Levinson DM (2002) Financing Infrastructure Over Time. J Urban Plan Dev 127:146–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Lohan T (2016) San Francisco Makes History With New Water Bond. News Deeply. https://www.newsdeeply.com/water/articles/2016/05/23/san-francisco-launches-water-funding-initiative

  72. Loock M (2012) Going beyond best technology and lowest price: On renewable energy investors’ preference for service-driven business models. Energy Policy 40:21–27. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Luthy RG, Sedlak DL (2015) Urban water-supply reinvention. Daedalus 144:72–82. doi:10.1162/DAED_a_00343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Makropoulos CK, Butler D (2010) Distributed water infrastructure for sustainable communities. Water Resour Manag 24:2795–2816. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9580-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Mantz BA, Thomas HL (2012) Utility impact fees: practices and challenges. Journal-American Water Work Assoc 104:63–64. doi:10.5942/jawwa.2012.104.0053

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Masini A, Menichetti E (2012) The impact of behavioural factors in the renewable energy investment decision making process: Conceptual framework and empirical findings. Energy Policy 40:28–38. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Mathews JA, Kidney S, Mallon K, Hughes M (2010) Mobilizing private finance to drive an energy industrial revolution. Energy Policy 38:3263–3265. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Mehan GT, Kline I (2012) Pricing as a demand-side management tool: implications for water policy and governance. Journal-American Water Work Assoc 104:61–66. doi:10.5942/jawwa.2012.104.0011

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Menz FC, Vachon S (2006) The effectiveness of different policy regimes for promoting wind power: experiences from the states. Energy Policy 34:1786–1796. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2004.12.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Miara A, Tarr C, Spellman R et al. (2014) The power of efficiency: optimizing environmental and social benefits through demand-side-management. Energy 76:502–512. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.08.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Milford L, Muro M, Morey J et al. (2012) Leveraging State Clean Energy Funds for Economic Development. The Brookings-Rockefeller Project on State and Metropolitan Innovation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  82. Motyka M, Boufarah B, Sanborn S, Stevens T (2015) U.S. renewable M&A Revs up despite headwinds. Electr J 28:80–89. doi:10.1016/j.tej.2015.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Mukheibir P, Howe C, Gallet D (2014) What’s getting in the way of a “One Water” approach to water services planning and management? An analysis of the challenges and barriers. Water J Aust Water Assoc 41:67–73

    Google Scholar 

  84. National Association of Energy Service Companies (2016) What is an ESCO? http://www.naesco.org/what-is-an-esco. Accessed 15 Jun 2016

  85. Nicola DJ (2013) Environmental Impact Bonds. Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business, Durham, NC

  86. Nissen W, Williams S (2016) The link between decoupling and success in utility-led energy efficiency. Electr J 29:59–65. doi:10.1016/j.tej.2016.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Niu H, Clark C, Zhou J, Adriaens P (2010) Scaling of economic benefits from green roof implementation in Washington, DC. Environ Sci Technol 44:4302–4308. doi:10.1021/es902456x

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. North Carolina Clean Energy Technology Center (2016) Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency (DSIRE). http://dsireusa.org/. Accessed 4 Apr 2016

  89. Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (2016) Distributed Energy. http://energy.gov/oe/technology-development/smart-grid/distributed-energy. Accessed 14 Mar 2016

  90. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (2015) Qualified energy conservation bonds. http://energy.gov/eere/slsc/qualified-energy-conservation-bonds. Accessed 1 Nov 2015

  91. Owens B (2014) The rise of distributed power. General Electric Company, Denver, CO

  92. Penn I (2015) Clean-energy lender Renovate America tops $1 billion in loans. Los Angeles Times. http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-solar-renovate-america-20151113-story.html

  93. Plowe J, McMahon D, Phillips J, Rosen G (2014) Alternative capital markets solutions in renewable energy finance. J Struct Financ 20:46–48. doi:10.3905/jsf.2014.20.3.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Prindle B, Eldridge M (2007) The Twin Pillars of Sustainable Energy: Synergies between Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Technology and Policy. American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  95. Puentes R, Thompson J (2012) Banking on Infrastructure: Enhancing State Revolving Funds for Transportation. The Brookings-Rockefeller Project on State and Metropolitan Innovation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  96. Rogers P, De Silva R, Bhatia R (2002) Water is an economic good: How to use prices to promote equity, efficiency, and sustainability. Water Policy 4:1–17. doi: 10.1016/S1366-7017(02)00004-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Sanchez MC, Brown RE, Webber C, Homan GK (2008) Savings estimates for the United States environmental protection agency’s ENERGY STAR voluntary product labeling program. Energy Policy 36:2098–2108. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.02.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Sener C, Fthenakis V (2014) Energy policy and financing options to achieve solar energy grid penetration targets: Accounting for external costs. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 32:854–868. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Sharma A, Burn S, Gardner T, Gregory A (2010) Role of decentralised systems in the transition of urban water systems. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 10:577–583. doi:10.2166/ws.2010.187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Siddiqi A, Kajenthira A, Anadn LD et al. (2013) Bridging decision networks for integrated water and energy planning. Energy Strateg Rev 2:46–58. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2013.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Solar Energy Industries Association (2016) Solar Investment Tax Credit (ITC). http://www.seia.org/policy/finance-tax/solar-investment-tax-credit. Accessed 10 Jun 2016

  102. Sousa JL, Martins AG, Jorge H (2013) Dealing with the paradox of energy efficiency promotion by electric utilities. Energy 57:251–258. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.02.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Sovacool BK (2009) The importance of comprehensiveness in renewable electricity and energy-efficiency policy. Energy Policy 37:1529–1541. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. State and Local Energy Efficiency Action Network (2014) Financing Energy Improvements on Utility Bills: Market Updates and Key Program Design Considerations for Policymakers and Administrators. Prepared by: Mark Zimring, Greg Leventis, Merrian Borgeson, Peter Thompson, Ian Hoffman and Charles Goldman of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Golden, CO. https://www4.eere.energy.gov/seeaction/system/files/documents/onbill_financing.pdf

  105. Stillwell AS (2015) Sustainability of public policy: example from the energy–water Nexus. J Water Resour Plan Manag 0:A4015001. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Strupeit L, Palm A (2015) Overcoming barriers to renewable energy diffusion: Business models for customer-sited solar photovoltaics in Japan, Germany and the United States. J Clean Prod 123:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.120

    Google Scholar 

  107. Sullivan D, Wang D, Bennett D (2011) Essential to energy efficiency, but easy to explain: frequently asked questions about decoupling. Electr J 24:56–70. doi:10.1016/j.tej.2011.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. The Edison Foundation Institute for Electric Innovation (2014) State Electric Efficiency Regulatory Frameworks. Washington, DC

  109. The Johnson Foundation at Wingspread (2014) Optimizing the structure and scale of urban water infrustructure: Integrating distributed systems. Racine, WI

  110. Timilsina GR, Kurdgelashvili L, Narbel PA (2012) Solar energy: Markets, economics and policies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:449–465. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Upton GB, Snyder BF (2015) Renewable energy potential and adoption of renewable portfolio standards. Util Policy 36:67–70. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2015.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2016a) May 2016 Monthly Energy Review. Washington, DC

  113. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2016b) Solar Photovoltaic Cell/Module Shipments Report. Washington, DC

  114. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2016c) Electricity. https://www.eia.gov/electricity/ Accessed 1 Feb 2016

  115. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2010) Green Infrastructure Case Studies: Municipal Policies for Managing Stormwater with Green Infrastructure. Washington, DC

  116. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2015) The Electricity System. https://www.epa.gov/energy/electricity-system#about

  117. U.S. Partnership for Renewable Energy Finance (2011) Tax Credits, Tax Equity and Alternatives To Spur Clean Energy Financing. Washington, DC

  118. Valderrama A, Davis P (2015) Wanted: Green Acres. How Philadelphia’ s Greened Acre Retrofit Program is catalyzing low-cost green infrastructure retrofits on private property. San Francisco, CA

  119. Wang Y, Brown M (2014) Policy drivers for improving electricity end-use efficiency in the USA: an economic–engineering analysis. Energy Effic 7:517–546. doi:10.1007/s12053-013-9237-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Water Environment Research Foundation (2006) Distributed Water Infrastructure for Sustainable Communities - A Guide for Decision-Makers. Alexandria, VA

  121. Werbeloff L, Brown RR (2016) Using policy and regulatory frameworks to facilitate water transitions. Water Resour Manag 10.1007/s11269-016-1379-6

  122. Wesoff E (2015) AES Launches Asset-Backed Securities Based on Portfolio of Distributed Solar Generation. In: Greentech Media. http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/AES-Launches-Asset-Backed-Securities-Based-on-Portfolio-of-Distributed-Sola. Accessed 1 Jan 2016

  123. Wester J, Timpano KR, Cek D, Broad K (2016) The psychology of recycled water: Factors predicting disgust and willingness to use. Water Resour Res 52:3212–3226. doi:10.1002/2015WR018340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Wheater HS, Gober P (2015) Water security and the science agenda. Water Resour Res 51:5406–5424. doi:10.1002/2015WR016892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. William R, Goodwell A, Richardson M et al. (2016) An environmental cost-benefit analysis of alternative green roofing strategies. Ecol Eng 95:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.06.091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Wiser R, Pickle S (1997) Financing Investments in Renewable Energy: The Role of Policy Design and Restructuring. Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  127. Wustenhagen R, Menichetti E (2012) Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research. Energy Policy 40:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Zhai P (2013) Analyzing solar energy policies using a three-tier model: a case study of photovoltaics adoption in Arizona, United States. Renew Energy 57:317–322. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2013.01.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the S.D. Bechtel Jr. Foundation and the National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center for Reinventing the Nation’s Urban Water Infrastructure (ReNUWIt) (Award No. EEC-1028968) for providing financial support for this work. We appreciate the editorial board and an anonymous reviewer whose comments improved the quality of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimberly J. Quesnel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Quesnel, K.J., Ajami, N.K. & Wyss, N. Accelerating the Integration of Distributed Water Solutions: A Conceptual Financing Model from the Electricity Sector. Environmental Management 60, 867–881 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0914-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Distributed systems
  • Financing
  • Governance
  • Water policy