Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Herbicide Toxicity Testing with Non-Target Boreal Plants: The Sensitivity of Achillea millefolium L. and Chamerion angustifolium L. to Triclopyr and Imazapyr

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Terrestrial plant toxicity tests were conducted to determine the sensitivity of two boreal plants, yarrow (Achillea millefolium L.) and fireweed (Chamerion angustifolium L.), to the herbicides imazapyr and triclopyr. Both plants are common non-target species on northern powerline rights-of-way where the impacts of proposed herbicide applications are of concern. In the vegetative vigour test, triclopyr foliar spray caused extensive damage to A. millefolium at <50% of the maximum field application rate (inhibition concentration (IC)50 = 1443.8 g a.i. ha−1) and was lethal to C. angustifolium at the lowest dose tested (1210.9 g a.i. ha−1). Both species demonstrated extremely high sensitivity to imazapyr foliar spray: IC50s = 8.29 g a.i. ha−1 and 4.82 g a.i. ha−1 (<1.5% of the maximum field rate). The seedling emergence and seedling growth tests were conducted in the organic horizon of five boreal soils. Few differences in herbicide bioavailability between soils were detected. Triclopyr limited growth of A. millefolium, C. angustifolium and standard test species Calamagrostis canadensis at low levels (most IC50 estimates between 2–20 µg g−1). For imazapyr, IC50 estimates could not be calculated as there was >75% inhibition of endpoints at the lowest doses of ~2 µg g−1. A foliar application of triclopyr or imazapyr for woody species control would likely cause significant damage to boreal non-target plants. The high sensitivity of both species to herbicide residues in soil indicates long term impacts are dependent on herbicide degradation rates in northern conditions. A. millefolium performed well and is recommended for use in toxicity testing relevant to boreal regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Alister C, Kogan M (2005) Efficacy of imidazolinone herbicides applied to imidazolinone-resistant maize and their carryover effect on rotational crops. Crop Prot 24:375–379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allison JE, Boutin C, Carpenter D (2013) Influence of soil organic matter on the sensitivity of selected wild and crop species to common herbicides. Ecotoxicology 22:1289–1302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berisford YC, Bush PB, Taylor Jr. JW (2006) Leaching and persistence of herbicides for kudzu (Pueraria montana) control on pine regeneration sites. Weed Sci 54:391–400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bollig JJ, Seiler JR, Zedaker SM, Thompson JW (1995) Effect of plant moisture stress and application surface on uptake and translocation of triclopyr with organosilicone surfactant in red maple seedlings. Can J Forest Res 25:425–429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boutin C, Aya KL, Carpenter D, Thomas PJ, Rowland O (2012) Phytotoxicity testing for herbicide regulation: shortcomings in relation to biodiversity and ecosystem services in agrarian systems. Sci Total Environ 415:79–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boutin C, Elmegaard N, Kjaer C (2004) Toxicity testing of fifteen non-crop species with six herbicides in a greenhouse experiment: implications for risk assessment. Ecotoxicology 13:349–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boutin C, White AL, Carpenter D (2010) Measuring variability in phytotoxicity testing using crop and wild plant species. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:327–337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bovey RW, Senseman SA (1998) Response of food and forage crops to soil-applied imazapyr. Weed Sci 46:614–617

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brain RA, Hoberg J (2016) Recovery of terrestrial plants in vegetative vigor and seedling emergence tests from exposure to atrazine. Environ Toxicol Chem 35:1284–1296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bramble WC, Byrnes WR (1983) Thirty years of research on development of plant cover on an electric transmission right-of-way. J Arboric 9:67–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Broderick DH (1990) The biology of Canadian weeds. 93. Epilobium angustifolium L. (Onagraceae). Can J Plant Sci 70:247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter D, Boutin C (2010) Sublethal effects of the herbicide glufosinate ammonium on crops and wild plants: short-term effects compared to vegetative recovery and plant production. Ecotoxicology 19:1322–1336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark J, Ortego LS, Fairbrother A (2004) Sources of variability in plant toxicity testing. Chemosphere 57:1599–1612

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke DJ, Pearce KA, White JG (2006) Powerline corridors: degraded ecosystems or wildlife havens? Wildlife Res 33:615–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffman CB, Frank JR, Potts WE (1993) Crop responses to hexazinone, imazapyr, tebuthiuron, and triclopyr. Weed Technol 7:140–145

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curran WS, Loux MM, Liebl RA, Simmons FW (1992) Photolysis of imidazolinone herbicides in aqueous solution and on soil. Weed Sci 40:143–148

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon FL, Clay DV, Willoughby I (2006) The efficacy of pre-emergence herbicides on problem weeds in woodland regeneration. Crop Prot 25:259–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Douglass CH, Nissen SJ, Meiman PJ, Kniss AR (2016) Impacts of imazapyr and triclopyr soil residues on the growth of several restoration species. Rangeland Ecol Manag 69:199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer GD, Niering WA (1986) Evaluation of two herbicide techniques on electric transmission rights-of-way: development of relatively table shrublands. Environ Manage 10:113–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada (2013) Biological test method: test for growth in contaminated soil using terrestrial plants native to the boreal region. Environmental Protection Series, EPS 1/RM/56. Ottawa, ON

  • Gianelli VR, Bedmar F, Costa JL (2014) Persistence and sorption of imazapyr in three Argentinean soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 33:29–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gray B (2011) The boreal herbal: wild food and medicine plants of the North. Aroma Borealis Press, Whitehorse, YT, p 440

    Google Scholar 

  • Hangs RD, Knight JD, Van Rees KCJ (2003) Nitrogen uptake characteristics for roots of conifer seedlings and common boreal forest competitor species. Can J Forest Res 33:156–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isbister K (2016) Vegetation management strategies for northern rights-of-way: effects on boreal plant communities and the toxicological response of select native species to triclopyr and imazapyr. M.Sc. Thesis. Univeristy of Saskatchewan

  • Johanson KJ, Bergström R, Eriksson O, Erixon A (1994) Activity concentrations of 137Cs in moose and their forage plants in mid-Sweden. J Environ Radioactiv 22:251–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson WG, Lavy TL, Gbur EE (1995) Sorption, mobility and degradation of triclopyr and 2,4-D on four soils. Weed Sci 43:678–684

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kevan PG, Tikhmenev EA, Usui M (1993) Insects and plants in the pollination ecology of the boreal zone. Ecol Res 8:247–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CH, Oloffs PC, Szeto SY (1986) Persistence, degradation, and movement of triclopyr and its ethylene glycol butyl ether ester in a forest soil. J Agr Food Chem 34:1075–1079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lister D (2009) An evaluation of factors influencing spontaneous vegetation succession in northern latitude disturbances: assessment of natural recolonization of disturbances in Yukon. Northern Latitudes Mining Reclamation Workshop, Yellowknife, NWT, https://open.library.ubc.ca/handle/bitstream/104020/20%20Lister.pdf. Accessed 30 Sep 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Loux MM, Reese KD (1993) Effect of soil type and pH on persistence and carryover of imidazolinone herbicides. Weed Technol 7:452–458

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luken JO, Beiting SW, Kareth SK, Kumler RL, Liu JH, Seither CA (1994) Target and nontarget discrimination of herbicides applied to vegetation in a power-line corridor. Environ Manage 18:251–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey RA, Wright JP, Honegger JL (2002) A comparison of crop and non-crop plants as sensitive indicator species for regulatory testing. Pest Manag Sci 58:1161–1174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mercier C, Brison J, Bouchard A (2001) Demographic analysis of tree colonization in a 20-year-old right-of-way. Environ Manage 28:777–787

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Myerscough PJ (1980) Epilobium angustifolium L. J Ecol 68:1047–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton M, Cole EC, Tinsley IJ (2008) Dissipation of four forest-use herbicides at high latitudes. Environ Sci Pollut R 15:573–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak CA, Ballard BD (2005) A framework for applying integrated vegetation management on rights-of-way. J Arboric 31:28–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Olszyk D, Pfleefer T, Lee EH, Burdick C, King G, Plocher M, Kern J (2008) Selecting and evaluating native plants for region-specific phytotoxicity testing. Integr Environ Assess Manag 4:105–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • [OECD] Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2003a) OECD Guideline for the testing of chemicals: proposal for a new Guideline 227 Terrestrial Plant Test: Vegetative Vigour Test (Draft September 2003). http://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/testing/11988186.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2016

  • [OECD] Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2003b) OECD Guideline for the testing of chemicals: proposal for a new Guideline 208 Terrestrial Plant Test: Seedling Emergence and Seedling Growth Test (Draft September 2003). http://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/testing/33653757.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2016

  • [OECD] Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2006) Terrestrial Plants, Growth Test 208 and 227. In: OECD Guidelines for Testing Chemicals. Paris, France. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/oecd-guidelines-for-the-testing-of-chemicals-section-2-effects-on-biotic-systems_20745761. Accessed 3 Nov 2015

  • Pallett K, Cole J, Oberwalder C, Porch J (2007) Performance of potential non-crop or wild species under OECD 208 testing guideline study conditons for terrestrial non-target plants. Pest Manag Sci 63:134–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Princz JI, Moody M, Fraser C, Van der Vliet L, Lemiuex H, Scroggins R, Siciliano SD (2012) Evaluation of a new battery of toxicity tests for boreal forest soils: assessment of the impact of hydrocarbons and salts. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:766–777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pusino A, Liu W, Gessa C (1994) Adsorption of triclopyr on soil and some of its components. J Agr Food Chem 42:1026–1029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pusino A, Petretto S, Gessa C (1997) Adsorption and desorption of imazapyr by soil. J Agr Food Chem 45:1012–1016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 10 Jan 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Radosevich SR, Bayer DE (1979) Effect of temperature and photoperiod on triclopyr, picloram, and 2,4,5-T translocation. Weed Sci 27:22–27

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ranft RD, Seefeldt SS, Zhang M, Barnes DL (2010) Development of a soil bioassay for triclopyr residues and comparison with a laboratory extraction. Weed Technol 24:538–543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ritz C, Baty F, Streibig JC, Gerhard D (2015) Dose-response analysis using R. PLoS ONE 10: e0146021, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146021

  • Ritz C, Streibig JC (2005) Bioassay analysis using R. J Stat Softw 12:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell KN, Ikerd H, Droege S (2005) The potential conservation value of unmowed powerline strips for native bees. Biol Conserv 124:133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenhals MG, Wiese AF, Wood ML (1990) Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) control with imazapyr. Weed Technol 4:771–775

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seccombe-Hett P, Turkington R (2008) Summer diet selection of snowshoe hares: a test of nutritional hypotheses. Oikos 117:1874–1884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seefeldt SS, Kaspari PN, Conn JS (2013) Shrub control in conservation reserve program lands in interior Alaska. Weed Technol 27:184–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sulak J, Kielbaso (2000) Vegetation management along utility transmission lines in the United States and Canada. J Arboric 26:198–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson DG, Pitt DG, Buscarini TM, Staznik B, Thomas DR (2000) Comparative fate of glyphosate and triclopyr herbicides in the forest floor and mineral soil of an Acadian forest regeneration site. Can J Forest Res 30:1808–1816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • [USEPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency (2012) Ecological effects test guidelines: seedling emergence and seedling growth (OCSPP 850.4100), vegetative vigor (OCSPP 850.4150). Arlington, VI

  • [USEPA OPP] United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs (2015) OPP pesticide ecotoxicity database. US EPA, Washington, DC. http://www.ipmcenters.org/ecotox/. Accessed 4 Mar 2016

  • Wehtje G, Dickens R, Wilcut JW, Hajek BF (1987) Sorption and mobility of sulfometuron and imazapyr in five Alabama soils. Weed Sci 35:858–864

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White AL, Boutin C (2007) Herbicidal effects on nontarget vegetation: investigating the limitations of current pesticide registration guidelines. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:2634–2643

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the two anonymous reviewers who provided insightful and constructive comments that greatly improved earlier versions of this manuscript. We wish to thank both partners on the project—Yukon Energy Corporation and Environmental Dynamics Inc. for their financial support and in-kind contributions. We thank Amy Jimmo for her guidance on toxicity testing methods and assistance with determining soil characteristics. Without the support of Denise Gordon, fireweed experiments would not have been possible. We are also grateful to Aaron Roberge, Alex Mischler, Kirstin Damude, and Patrick Soprovich for their assistance in the laboratory, greenhouse and field. We thank the Alaska Plant Materials Center and BrettYoung for donating seed for the experiments. Additional funding was provided through a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada ARD grant, the Yukon College Research Fund and an Association of Canadian Universities for Northern Studies scholarship awarded to K. Isbister. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, S7N 5A8, SK, Canada

    Krystal M. Isbister & Eric G. Lamb

  2. Department of Soil Science, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, S7N 5A8, SK, Canada

    Katherine J. Stewart

  3. Yukon Research Centre, Yukon College, 500 College Drive, Whitehorse, Y1A 5K4, YT, Canada

    Katherine J. Stewart

Authors
  1. Krystal M. Isbister
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eric G. Lamb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Katherine J. Stewart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine J. Stewart.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Appendices

Appendix 1

A list of species-herbicide-soil-dose combinations and seedling growth tests is shown in Table 5

Table 5 A complete list of species-herbicide-soil-dose combinations used in definitive vegetative vigour and seedling emergence and seedling growth tests used to determine the sensitivity of Achillea millefolium and Chamerion angustifolium to triclopyr and imazapyr. Calamagrostis canadensis was also included in the seedling emergence and seedling growth tests as a standard test species for boreal soils
Full size table

.

Appendix 2

Dose response curve model parameters and inhibition concentration estimates are shown in Table 6

Table 6 Dose response curve model parameters and inhibition concentration estimates for the 28 day seedling emergence and seedling growth tests determining the toxicity of triclopyr in five northern soils to Achillea millefolium (ACHIMI), Calamagrostis canadensis (CALACA) and Chamerion angustifolium (CHAMAN)
Full size table

.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Isbister, K.M., Lamb, E.G. & Stewart, K.J. Herbicide Toxicity Testing with Non-Target Boreal Plants: The Sensitivity of Achillea millefolium L. and Chamerion angustifolium L. to Triclopyr and Imazapyr. Environmental Management 60, 136–156 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0867-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0867-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation