Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainable Development for Whom and How? Exploring the Gaps between Popular Discourses and Ground Reality Using the Mexican Jatropha Biodiesel Case

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last decade, jatropha-based bioenergy projects have gotten significant attention as a solution to various social, economic, and environmental problems. Jatropha’s popularity stemmed out from different discourses, some real and some perceived, in scientific and non-scientific literature. These discourses positioned jatropha as a crop helpful in producing biodiesel and protecting sustainability by reducing greenhouse gas emissions compared to fossil fuels and increasing local, rural development by creating jobs. Consequently, many countries established national policies that incentivized the establishment of jatropha as a bioenergy feedstock crop. In this paper, we explore the case of jatropha bioenergy development in Yucatan, Mexico and argue that the popular discourse around jatropha as a sustainability and rural development tool is flawed. Analyzing our results from 70 semi-structured interviews with community members belonging to a region where plantation-scale jatropha projects were introduced, we found that these projects did not have many significant social sustainability benefits. We conclude from our case that by just adding bioenergy projects cannot help achieve social sustainability in rural areas alone. In ensuring social sustainability of bioenergy projects, future policymaking processes should have a more comprehensive understanding of the rural socioeconomic problems where such projects are promoted and use bioenergy projects as one of the many solutions to local problems rather than creating such policies based just on popular discourses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abhilash P, Srivastava P, Jamil S, Singh N (2011) Revisited jatropha curcas as an oil plant of multiple benefits: critical research needs and prospects for the future. Environ Sci Pollut Res 18(1):127–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee SB (2003) Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature. Organ Stud 24(1):143–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman P (1980) Thinking about programmed and adaptive implementation: Matching 690 strategies to situations, why policies succeed or fail. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA, USA

  • Biernacki P, Waldorf D (1981) Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociol Methods Res 10(2):141–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Borras Jr SM, McMichael P, Scoones I (2010) The politics of biofuels, land and agrarian change: editors’ introduction. J Peasant Stud 37(4):575–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom M (2012) A missing pillar? challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability: introduction to the special issue. Sustainability 8(1):289–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittaine R, Lutaladio N (2010) Jatropha: a smallholder bioenergy crop: the potential for pro- poor development, Vol. 8, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy

  • Brundtland G, Khalid M, Agnelli S, Al-Athel S, Chidzero B, Fadika L, Hauff V, Lang I, Shijun M, de Botero MM et al. (1987) Our common future Brundtland report. Oxford University Press, Oxford, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns TR, Hall P (2012) The meta-power paradigm: impacts and transformations of agents, institutions, and social systems: capitalism, state, and democracy in a global context. Peter Lang Publishing Group, Frankfurt, Germany

  • Chambers R (1997) Whose reality counts? putting the first last. Intermediate Technology 674 Publications Ltd (ITP), London, UK

  • Chan E, Lee GKL (2008) Critical factors for improving social sustainability of urban renewal 693 projects. Soc Indic Res 85(2):243–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copenhagen Declaration on Social Development, Commitment 6 (1995). http://www.visionoffice.com/socdev/wssdco-4.htm#Commitment 6. Accessed 7 Dec 2016

  • Cuthilll M (2005) Strengthening the ‘social’ in sustainable development: Developing a conceptual framework for social sustainability in a rapid urban growth region in Australia. Sustain Dev 8(1–2):65–79

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLeon P, DeLeon L (2002) What ever happened to policy implementation? An alternative approach. J Public Adm Res Theory 12(4):467–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey N, Bramley G, Power S, Brown C (2011) The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. Sustain Dev 19(5):289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Poblaci´on CG (2011) Vivienda 2010. Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Geografia

  • Easterly W (2008) Design and reform of institutions in LDCs and transition economies institutions: Top down or bottom up? Am Econ Rev 98(2):95–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastmond A, Garcia C, Fuentes A, Becerril-Garcia J (2014) Mexico. In: Solomon BD, Bailis R (eds) Sustainable development of biofuels in Latin America and the Caribbean. Springer, New York, pp 203–222

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Seyboth K, Matschoss P, Kadner S, Zwickel T, Eickemeier P, Hansen G, Schlomer S et al. (2011) IPCC, 2011: Summary for policymakers, IPCC Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteva G (1987) Regenerating people’s space. Alternatives 12(1):125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahey T (1995) Role of social indicators. In: Convery F, Feehan J (eds) Assessing sustainability in Ireland, The Environmental Institute. University College of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, pp 33–38

  • Francis G, Edinger R, Becker K (2005) A concept for simultaneous waste-land reclamation, fuel production, and socio-economic development in degraded areas in India: Need, potential and perspectives of jatropha plantations. Nat Resour Forum 29:12–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey SR (2006) The flow of hazardous exports in the world system: The case of the 665 Maquiladora Centers of Northern Mexico. In: Jorgenson AK, Kick E (eds) Globalization and the Environment. Brill Press, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp 133–150

  • German L, Schoneveld G, Pacheco P (2011) The social and environmental impacts of biofuel feedstock cultivation: evidence from multi-site re-search in the forest frontier. Ecol Soc 16(3):24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall J, Matos S, Severino L, Beltrao N (2009) Brazilian biofuels and social exclusion: established and concentrated ethanol versus emerging and dispersed biodiesel. J Clean Prod 17:S77–S85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D, Braun B (1996) Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Wiley Online Library, Oxford, UK

  • Hazell PB, Pachauri, RK (eds) (2006) Bioenergy and agriculture: promises and challenges. Vol. 2020. IFPRI, Washington, DC, USA

  • Höhne N, Ellermann C, Li L (2014) Intended Nationally Determined Contributions under the UNFCCC. Ecofys discussion paper, Köln. http://www.ecofys.com/en/publication/intended-nationally-determined-contributions-under-theunfccc

  • Jain S, Sharma MP (2010) Prospects of biodiesel from jatropha in India: a review. Renew Sustainable Energy Rev 14(2):763–771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan A (2008) The governance of sustainable development: taking stock and looking forwards. Environ Plann Gov Policy 26(1):17–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant P, Wu S (2011) The extraordinary collapse of jatropha as a global bio-fuel. Environ Sci Technol 45(17):7114–7115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lestari D, Zvinavashe E, Sanders JPM (2015) Economic valuation of potential products from jatropha seed in five selected countries: Zimbabwe, Tanzania, Mali, Indonesia, and The Netherlands. Biomass Bioenergy 74:84–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littig B, Griebler E (2010) Social sustainability: a catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. Int J Sustain Dev 18(5):295–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Matland RE (1995) Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. J Public Adm Res Theory 5(2):145–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Mies M, Shiva V (1993) Ecofeminism. Zed Books, London, UK.

  • Mol A, Spaargaren G (2000) Ecological modernisation theory in debate: a review. Env Polit 9(1):17–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Moldan B, Janoušková S, Hák T (2012) How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: Indicators and targets. Ecol Indic 17:4–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy K (2012) The social pillar of sustainable development: a literature review and frameworks for policy analysis, Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy 8(1):15–29

  • Pearce DW, Warford JJ (1993) World without end: economics, environment, and sustainable development. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

  • Pike A, Rodrıguez-Pose A, Tomaney J (2010) Handbook of local and regional development, Routledge

  • Renner R (2007) Green gold in a shrub. Sci Am 6:20–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrıguez OAV, Vazquez AP, Gamboa CM (2014) Drivers and consequences of the first jatropha curcas plantations in Mexico. Sustainability 6(6):3732–3746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosegrant MW, Tingju Z, Msangi S, Sulser T (2008) Global scenarios for biofuels: impacts and implications. Appl Econ Perspect Policy 30(3):495–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa EA, Diekmann A, Dietz T, Jaeger CC (eds) (2009) Human Foot-prints on the Global Environment: Threats to Sustainability. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • SAGARPA (2009) Programa de produccion sustentable de insumos para bioenergeticos y de desarrollo cientifico y tecnologico, Tech. rep., Secretaria de Agricultura and Desarrollo Rural and Pesca y Alimentacion

  • Sims REH (2003) Bioenergy to mitigate for climate change and meet the needs of society, the economy and the environment. Mitig Adapt Strat GL 8(4):349–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skutsch M, de los Rios M, Solis S, Riegelhaupt E, Hinojosa D, Gerfert S, Gao Y, Masera O (2011) Jatropha in Mexico: environmental and social impacts of an incipient biofuel program, Ecol Soc 16(4):11

  • Solomon B, Banerjee A, Acevedo A, Halvorsen K, Eastmond A (2015) Policies for the sustainable development of biofuels in the Pan American region: a review and synthesis of five countries. Environ Manage 56(6):1276–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorda G, Banse M, Kemfert C (2010) An overview of biofuel policies across the world. Energy Policy 38(11):6977–6988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stöhr WB (1990) Global challenge and local response. University of 677 the United Nations, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Su Y, Zhang P, Su Y (2015) An overview of biofuels policies and industrialization in the major biofuel producing countries. Renew Sustainable Energy Rev 50:991–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S Senate Briefing. International Energy Outlook (2013), US Energy Information Administration

  • van Eijck J, Romijn H, Balkema A, Faaij A (2014) Global experience with jatropha cultivation for bioenergy: an assessment of socio-economic and environmental aspects. Renew Sustainable Energy Rev 32:869–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vavik T, Keitsch MM (2010) Exploring relationships between universal de-sign and social sustainable development: some methodological aspects to the debate on the sciences of sustainability. Sustain Dev 18(5):295–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visvanathan S (1991) Mrs. Bruntland’s disenchanted cosmos. Alternatives 16(3):377–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein I (2011) The modern world-system I: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century, with a new prologue. Vol. 1. University of California Press

  • Witzel A (2000) The problem-centered interview. In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum Qualitative Social Research, 1(1). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0001228

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation’s Partnerships in International Research and Education (PIRE) Program IIA #1243444 and Research Coordination Network (RCN) Program CBET #1140152, SES-0823058 as well as the Inter-American Institute (IAI) for Global Change Research CRN3105. Michigan Technological University’s Environmental and Energy Policy Program in the Social Sciences Department also provided support. We would like to thank the interviewees for participating in this study. Chelsea Schelly, Richelle Winkler, and David Flaspohler also provided helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. Mayra Sanchez Gonzalez helped with interviewing community members.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA

    Aparajita Banerjee, Kathleen E Halvorsen & Sam R Sweitz

  2. School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA

    Kathleen E Halvorsen

  3. CIR Social Unit, Universidad Autonoma De Yucatan, Merida, Yucatan, Mexico

    Amarella Eastmond-Spencer

Authors
  1. Aparajita Banerjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kathleen E Halvorsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amarella Eastmond-Spencer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sam R Sweitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aparajita Banerjee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Banerjee, A., Halvorsen, K.E., Eastmond-Spencer, A. et al. Sustainable Development for Whom and How? Exploring the Gaps between Popular Discourses and Ground Reality Using the Mexican Jatropha Biodiesel Case. Environmental Management 59, 912–923 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0848-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0848-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation