Skip to main content

Identifying Critical Habitat for Australian Freshwater Turtles in a Large Regulated Floodplain: Implications for Environmental Water Management

Environmental Management volume 61, pages 375–389 (2018)Cite this article

Abstract

Freshwater turtles face many threats, including habitat loss and river regulation reducing occupancy and contributing to population decline. Limited knowledge of hydrological conditions required to maintain viable turtle populations in large floodplain wetlands hinders effective adaptive management of environmental water in regulated rivers. We surveyed three turtle species over 4 years across the Lower Murrumbidgee River floodplain, a large wetland complex with a long history of water resource development. Using site and floodplain metrics and generalized linear models, within a Bayesian Model Averaging framework, we quantified the main drivers affecting turtle abundance. We also used a hierarchical modeling approach, requiring large sample sizes, quantifying possible environmental effects while accounting for detection probabilities of the eastern long-necked turtle (Chelodina longicollis). The three species varied in their responses to hydrological conditions and connectivity to the main river channel. Broad-shelled turtles (Chelodina expansa) and Macquarie River turtles (Emydura macquarii macquarii) had restricted distributions, centered on frequently inundated wetlands close to the river, whereas the eastern long-necked turtles were more widely distributed, indicating an ability to exploit variable habitats. We conclude that turtle communities would benefit from long-term management strategies that maintain a spatiotemporal mosaic of hydrological conditions. More specifically, we identified characteristics of refuge habitats and stress the importance of maintaining their integrity during dry periods. Neighboring habitats can be targeted during increased water availability years to enhance feeding and dispersal opportunities for freshwater turtles.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  • Arthington AH (2012) Environmental flows: saving rivers in the third millennium. University of California Press, Berkley, Vol. 4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arthington AH, Balcombe SR (2011) Extreme flow variability and the “boom and bust” ecology of fish in arid-zone floodplain rivers: a case history with implications for environmental flows, conservation and management. Ecohydrology 4:708–720. doi:10.1002/eco.221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton DT, Bettaso JB, Welsh HH (2015) Changes across a decade in size, growth, and body condition of western pond turtle (Actinemys marmorata) populations on free-flowing and regulated forks of the Trinity river in Northwest California. Copeia 103:621–633. doi:10.1643/cp-15-253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bino G, Kingsford RT, Porter J (2015) Prioritizing wetlands for waterbirds in a boom and bust system: waterbird refugia and breeding in the Murray–Darling Basin. PLoS ONE 10 10.1371/journal.pone.0132682.

  • Bodie JR (2001) Stream and riparian management for freshwater turtles. J Environ Manage 62:443–455. doi:10.1006/jema.2001.0454

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodie JR, Semlitsch RD (2000) Spatial and temporal use of floodplain habitats by lentic and lotic species of aquatic turtles. Oecologia 122:138–146. doi:10.1007/pl00008830

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm M et al. (2013) The conservation status of the world’s reptiles. Biol Conserv 157:372–385. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BOM (2016) Bureau of meteorology. http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data/. Accessed 1 March 2016

  • Bower D, Hodges K (2014) Chelodina expansa Gray 1857–broad-shelled turtle, giant snake-necked turtle. Chelonian Res Monogr 5:71.71–81.71

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower DS, Hutchinson M, Georges A (2012) Movement and habitat use of Australia’s largest snake-necked turtle: implications for water management. J Zool 287:76–80. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00891.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowne DR, Bowers MA, Hines JE (2006) Connectivity in an agricultural landscape as reflected by interpond movements of a freshwater turtle. Conserv Biol 20:780–791. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00355.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler RB, Royle JA, King DI (2011) Inference about density and temporary emigration in unmarked populations. Ecology 92:1429–1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chessman BC (1984a) Evaporative water-loss from three south-eastern Australian species of fresh-water turtle. Aust J Zool 32:649–655. doi:10.1071/zo9840649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chessman BC (1984b) Food of the snake-necked turtle, Chelodina longicollis (Shaw) (Testudines, Chelidae) in the Murray Valley, Victoria and New South Wales. Aust Wildlife Res 11:573–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chessman BC (1988) Habitat preferences of fresh-water turtles in the Murray Valley, Victoria and New South Wales. Aust Wildlife Res 15:485–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chessman BC (2011) Declines of freshwater turtles associated with climatic drying in Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin. Wildlife Res 38:664–671. doi:10.1071/wr11108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia (2013) Commonwealth environmental water—monitoring, evaluation, reporting and improvement framework vol V2.0. Commonwealth Environmental Water Holder for the Australian Government

  • Cosentino BJ, Schooley RL, Phillips CA (2010) Wetland hydrology, area, and isolation influence occupancy and spatial turnover of the painted turtle, Chrysemys picta Landsc Ecol 25:1589–1600. doi:10.1007/s10980-010-9529-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Lathouder R, Jones DN, Balcombe SR (2009) Assessing the abundance of freshwater turtles in an Australian urban landscape. Urban Ecosyst 12:215–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis R (2015) Do turtles respond to environmental flows? Honours Thesis, University of New South Wales

  • Georges A, Thomson S (2010) Diversity of Australasian freshwater turtles, with an annotated synonymy and keys to species. Zootaxa 2496: 1–37

  • Gibbons JW et al. (2000) The global decline of reptiles, Deja Vu amphibians. Bioscience 50:653–666. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0653:tgdord]2.0.co;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillera-Arroita G, Lahoz-Monfort JJ, MacKenzie DI, Wintle BA, McCarthy MA (2014) Ignoring imperfect detection in biological surveys is dangerous: a response to “fitting and interpreting occupancy models”. PLoS ONE 9. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099571.

  • Hoeting JA, Madigan D, Raftery AE, Volinsky CT (1999) Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial. Stat Sci 14:382–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huey RB (1982) Temperature, physiology, and the ecology of reptiles. In: Gans, Carl, Pough, F. Harvey (eds) Biology of the reptilia. Academic Press, London, New York.

  • Hunt SD, Guzy JC, Price SJ, Halstead BJ, Eskew EA, Dorcas ME (2013) Responses of riparian reptile communities to damming and urbanization. Biol Conserv 157:277–284. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennett R, Roe J, Hodges K, Georges A (2009) Chelodina longicollis (Shaw 1784)–eastern long-necked turtle, common long-necked turtle, common snake-necked turtle. Chelonian Res Monogr 5:31.31–31.38

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennett RM, Georges A (1990) Habitat utilization and its relationship to growth and reproduction of the eastern long-necked turtle, Chelodina longicollis (Testudinata, Chelidae), from Australia. Herpetologica 46:22–33

    Google Scholar 

  • King A, Ward K, O’Connor P, Green D, Tonkin Z, Mahoney J (2010) Adaptive management of an environmental watering event to enhance native fish spawning and recruitment. Freshw Biol 55:17–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsford R (2003) Ecological impacts and institutional and economic drivers for water resource development—a case study of the Murrumbidgee River, Australia. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag 6:69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsford R, Georges A, Unmack P (2006) Vertebrates of desert rivers: meeting the challenges of temporal and spatial unpredictability. In: Kingsford RT (ed) Ecology of desert rivers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 154–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsford RT (2000) Ecological impacts of dams, water diversions and river management on floodplain wetlands in Australia. Austral Ecol 25:109–127. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2000.tb00012.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsford RT, Brandis K, Thomas RF, Crighton P, Knowles E, Gale E (2004) Classifying landform at broad spatial scales: the distribution and conservation of wetlands in New South Wales, Australia. Mar Freshwater Res 55:17–31. doi:10.1071/mf03075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsford RT, Thomas RF (2004) Destruction of wetlands and waterbird populations by dams and irrigation on the Murrumbidgee River in arid Australia. Environ Manage 34:383–396. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0250-3

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchand MN, Litvaitis JA (2004) Effects of habitat features and landscape composition on the population structure of a common aquatic turtle in a region undergoing rapid development. Conserv Biol 18:758–767. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00019.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meador MR, Carlisle DM (2012) Relations between altered streamflow variability and fish assemblages in eastern USA streams. River Res Appl 28:1359–1368. doi:10.1002/rra.1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New South Wales Government (2008) RiverBank Water Use Plan for the Murrumbidgee water management area. http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/environmentalwater/wup-murrumbidgee.pdf

  • Pappas MJ, Brecke BJ (1992) Habitat selection of juvenile Blanding’s turtles, Emydoidea blandingii. J Herpetol 26:233–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmenter C (1985) Reproduction and survivorship of Chelodina longicollis (Testudinata: Chelidae). In: Grigg G, Shine R, Ehmann H (eds) Biology of Australasian frogs and reptiles. Chipping Norton, N.S.W: Surrey Beatty in association with The Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, pp 53–61

  • Poff NL, Zimmerman JKH (2010) Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshw Biol 55:194–205. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02272.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2014) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Raftery AE, Hoeting JA, Volinsky CT, Painter I, Yeung KY (2011) Bayesian model averaging. R package version 3.14.1 (R Development Core Team). http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BMA/index/html

  • Rees M, Roe JH, Georges A (2009) Life in the suburbs: behavior and survival of a freshwater turtle in response to drought and urbanization. Biol Conserv 142:3172–3181. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.08.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson AI, Bacon P, Heagney G (2001) The responses of floodplain primary production to flood frequency and timing. J Appl Ecol 38:126–136. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00568.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe JH, Brinton AC, Georges A (2009) Temporal and spatial variation in landscape connectivity for a freshwater turtle in a temporally dynamic wetland system. Ecol Appl 19:1288–1299. doi:10.1890/08-0101.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe JH, Georges A (2007) Heterogeneous wetland complexes, buffer zones, and travel corridors: landscape management for freshwater reptiles. Biol Conserv 135.1:67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe JH, Georges A (2008b) Terrestrial activity, movements and spatial ecology of an Australian freshwater turtle, Chelodina longicollis, in a temporally dynamic wetland system. Austral Ecol 33:1045–1056. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2008.01877.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe JH, Georges A, Green B (2008) Energy and water flux during terrestrial estivation and overland movement in a freshwater turtle. Physiol Biochem Zool 81:570–583. doi:10.1086/589840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg DK, Swift R (2013) Post-emergence behavior of hatchling western pond turtles (Actinemys marmorata) in Western Oregon. Am Midl Nat 169:111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royle JA (2004) N-mixture models for estimating population size from spatially replicated counts. Biometrics 60:108–115. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00142.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royle JA, Nichols JD (2003) Estimating abundance from repeated presence-absence data or point counts. Ecology 84:777–790. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0777:eafrpa]2.0.co;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer R (2001) The Murray River turtle, Emydura macquarii: population dynamics, nesting ecology and impact of the introduced red fox, Vulpes vulpes. Dissertation, University of Sydney

  • Spencer RJ, Thompson MB (2005) Experimental analysis of the impact of foxes on freshwater turtle populations. Conserv Biol 19:845–854. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00487.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer RJ, Thompson MB, Hume ID (1998) The diet and digestive energetics of an Australian short-necked turtle, Emydura macquarii. Comp Biochem Phys A 121:341–349. doi:10.1016/s1095-6433(98)10132-0

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stott P (1987) Terrestrial movements of the fresh-water tortoise Chelodina longicollis shaw as monitored with a spool tracking device. Wildlife Res 14:559–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas RF, Kingsford RT, Lu Y, Cox SJ, Sims NC, Hunter SJ (2015) Mapping inundation in the heterogeneous floodplain wetlands of the Macquarie Marshes, using Landsat Thematic Mapper. J Hydrol 524:194–213. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker AD, Limpus CJ, Priest TE, Cay J, Glen C, Guarino E (2001) Home ranges of Fitzroy River Turtles (Rheodytes leukops) overlap riffle zones: potential concerns related to river regulation. Biol Conserv 102:171–181. doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(01)00097-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ummenhofer CC et al. (2009) What causes southeast Australia’s worst droughts? Geophys Res Lett 36. doi:10.1029/2008gl036801

  • Van Dijk PP, Iverson JB, Rhodin AG, Shaffer HB, Bour RJ (2014) Turtles of the world, 7th edition: annotated checklist of taxonomy, synonymy, distribution with maps, and conservation status. In: Rhodin AG, Pritchard PCH, Van Dijk PP, Saumure RA, Buhlmann KA, Iverson JB, Mittermeier RA (eds) Conservation biology of freshwater turtles and tortoises: a compliation project of the IUCN/SSC tortoise and freshwater turtle specialist group, Chelonian Res Monogr 5(7):329–479. doi:10.3854/crm.5.000.checklist.v7.2014

  • Wintle BA, McCarthy MA, Volinsky CT, Kavanagh RP (2003) The use of Bayesian model averaging to better represent uncertainty in ecological models. Conserv Biol 17:1579–1590. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00614.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding for the wetland surveys was provided by the NSW Government and Australian Government’s Water for the Future—Water Smart Australia Program through the Rivers Environmental Restoration Program (RERP) (2008–2010), NSW Catchment Action Program (2010–2011), and Commonwealth Environmental Water Holder Short-term Intervention Monitoring Program (2013–2014). We thank numerous field assistants, including Richard Allman and Erin Lenon, Simon Hunter for distance calculations, and James Maguire for commenting on water management in the Murrumbidgee. The authors of this paper respectfully acknowledge the traditional owners, their Elders past and present, their Nations of the Murray–Darling Basin, and their cultural, social, environmental, spiritual, and economic connection to their lands and waters. In particular the Wiradjuri, Narri Narri, and Muthi Muthi peoples, traditional owners of the land on which this publication is focused. The 2008–2011 field surveys were approved under NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service Scientific Licence S13080 and S12700, NSW Fisheries license F89/1598, and NSW Animal Ethics Committee approval ACEC 06/08. The 2013–2014 field surveys were approved under NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service Scientific Licence 100441, NSW Fisheries license P11/0043-11, and Charles Sturt University Animal Care and Ethics Committee 13/059.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW, 2640, Australia

    J. F. Ocock, G. Bino, S. Wassens, J. Spencer & R. F. Thomas

  2. Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia

    J. F. Ocock, G. Bino, J. Spencer, R. F. Thomas & R. T. Kingsford

  3. Water, Wetlands and Coast Science Branch, Science Division, NSW Office of Environment and Heritage, PO Box A290, Sydney South, NSW, 1232, Australia

    J. F. Ocock, J. Spencer & R. F. Thomas

Authors
  1. J. F. Ocock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Bino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Wassens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Spencer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. F. Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R. T. Kingsford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. F. Ocock.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ocock, J., Bino, G., Wassens, S. et al. Identifying Critical Habitat for Australian Freshwater Turtles in a Large Regulated Floodplain: Implications for Environmental Water Management. Environmental Management 61, 375–389 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0837-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0837-0

Keywords

  • Turtle
  • Floodplain
  • Wetland
  • Environmental flows
  • Ecological monitoring
  • Occupancy models