Skip to main content

Forecasting Urban Forest Ecosystem Structure, Function, and Vulnerability

Environmental Management volume 59, pages 373–392 (2017)Cite this article

Abstract

The benefits derived from urban forest ecosystems are garnering increasing attention in ecological research and municipal planning. However, because of their location in heterogeneous and highly-altered urban landscapes, urban forests are vulnerable and commonly suffer disproportionate and varying levels of stress and disturbance. The objective of this study is to assess and analyze the spatial and temporal changes, and potential vulnerability, of the urban forest resource in Toronto, Canada. This research was conducted using a spatially-explicit, indicator-based assessment of vulnerability and i-Tree Forecast modeling of temporal changes in forest structure and function. Nine scenarios were simulated for 45 years and model output was analyzed at the ecosystem and municipal scale. Substantial mismatches in ecological processes between spatial scales were found, which can translate into unanticipated loss of function and social inequities if not accounted for in planning and management. At the municipal scale, the effects of Asian longhorned beetle and ice storm disturbance were far less influential on structure and function than changes in management actions. The strategic goals of removing invasive species and increasing tree planting resulted in a decline in carbon storage and leaf biomass. Introducing vulnerability parameters in the modeling increased the spatial heterogeneity in structure and function while expanding the disparities of resident access to ecosystem services. There was often a variable and uncertain relationship between vulnerability and ecosystem structure and function. Vulnerability assessment and analysis can provide strategic planning initiatives with valuable insight into the processes of structural and functional change resulting from management intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  • Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16(3):268–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong JA, Ives WGH (1995) Forest insect pests in Canada. NRC Research Press, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Berland A, Elliot G (2014) Unexpected connections between residential urban forest diversity and vulnerability to two invasive beetles. Landsc Ecol 29(1):141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann J (2007) Risk and vulnerability indicators at different scales: applicability, usefulness, and policy implications. Environ Hazards 7(1):20–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone CG, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM et al. (2010) Landscape, vegetation characteristics, and group identity in an urban and suburban watershed: why the 60s matter. Urban Ecosyst 13(3):255–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgström ST, Elmqvist T, Angelstam P et al. (2006) Scale mismatches in management of urban landscapes. Ecol Soc 11(2):16–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broshot NE (2011) Mortality and recruitment in an urban forest (Forest Park in Portland, Oregon) between 1993 and 2003. Urban Ecosyst 14(4):553–567

  • City of Toronto (2012) Open data—street tree data. http://www.toronto.ca/trees/city_trees.htm. Accessed 16 May 2016

  • City of Toronto (2013) Sustaining and expanding the urban forest: Toronto’s strategic forest management plan. http://www1.toronto.ca/City%20Of%20Toronto/Parks%20Forestry%20&%20Recreation/Urban%20Forestry/Files/pdf/B/backgroundfile-55258.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2016

  • City of Toronto (2015) Toronto official plan. http://www1.toronto.ca/planning/chapters1-5.pdf#page=25. Accessed 16 Aug 2016

  • Conway TM, Shakeel T, Atallah J (2011) Community groups and urban forestry activity: drivers of uneven canopy cover? Landsc Urban Plan 101(4):321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway TM, Vander Vecht J (2015) Growing a diverse urban forest: species selection decisions by practitioners planting and supplying trees. Landsc Urban Plan 138:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming GS, Cumming DHM, Redman CL (2006) Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: causes, consequences, and solutions. Ecol Soc 11(1):14–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duinker PN, Ordóñez C, Steenberg JWN et al. (2015) Trees in Canadian cities: an indispensable life form for urban sustainability. Sustainability 7(6):7379–7396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eakin H, Luers AL (2006) Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annu Rev Env Resour 31:365–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada (2015) Canadian climate normals 1981–2010 climate normals & averages. http://climate.weather.gc.ca/climate_normals/index_e.html. Accessed 15 Apr 2016

  • Füssel H-M (2010) Review and quantitative analysis of indices of climate change exposure, adaptive capacity, sensitivity, and impacts. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons KH, Ryan CM (2015) Characterizing comprehensiveness of urban forest management plans in Washington State. Urban For Urban Green 14(3):615–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene CS, Millward AA, Ceh B (2011) Who is likely to plant a tree? The use of public socio-demographic data to characterize client participants in a private urban reforestation program. Urban For Urban Green 10(1):29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove JM (2009) Cities: managing densely settled social-ecological systems. In: Chapin FS, Kofinas GP, Folke C (eds) Principles of ecosystem stewardship. Springer, New York, p 281–294

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grove JM, Troy AR, O’Neil-Dunne JPM et al. (2006) Characterization of households and its implications for the vegetation of urban ecosystems. Ecosyst 9(4):578–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson EJ, Shvidenko AZ, Sturtevant BR et al. (2010) Predicting global change effects on forest biomass and composition in south-central Siberia. Ecol Appl 20(3):700–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haack RA, Hérard F, Sun J et al. (2010) Managing invasive populations of Asian longhorned beetle and citrus longhorned beetle: a worldwide perspective. Annu Rev Entomol 55:521–546

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauer RJ, Hauer AJ, Hartel DR et al. (2011) Rapid assessment of tree debris following urban forest ice storms. Arboric Urban For 37(5):236–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauer RJ, Wang W, Dawson JO (1993) Ice storm damage to urban trees. J Arboric 19(4):187–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Herms DA, McCullough DG (2014) Emerald ash borer invasion of North America: history, biology, ecology, impacts, and management. Annu Rev Entomol 59:13–30

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston M (1996) A brief history of urban forestry in the United States. Arboric J 20(3):257–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen SE, Bendoricchio G (2001) Fundamentals of ecological modelling. Elsevier, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jutras P, Prasher SO, Mehuys GR (2010) Appraisal of key biotic parameters affecting street tree growth. J Arboric 36(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney WA, van Wassenaer PJE, Satel AL (2011) Criteria and indicators for strategic urban forest planning and management. Arboric Urban For 37(3):108–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Koeser A, Hauer R, Norris K et al. (2013) Factors influencing long-term street tree survival in Milwaukee, WI, USA. Urban For Urban Green 12(4):562–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konijnendijk CC, Nilsson K, Randrup TB et al. (eds) (2005) Urban forests and trees. Springer, Berlin

  • Laćan I, McBride JR (2008) Pest vulnerability matrix (PVM): a graphic model for assessing the interaction between tree species diversity and urban forest susceptibility to insects and diseases. Urban For Urban Green 7(4):291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landry SM, Chakraborty J (2009) Street trees and equity: evaluating the spatial distribution of an urban amenity. Environ Plan A 41(11):2651–2670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landsberg J (2003) Modelling forest ecosystems: state of the art, challenges, and future directions. Can J For Res 33(3):385–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence AB, Escobedo FJ, Staudhammer CL et al. (2012) Analyzing growth and mortality in a subtropical urban forest ecosystem. Landsc Urban Plan 104(1):85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindner M, Maroscheck M, Netherer S et al. (2010) Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manag 259(4):698–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes A, Oliveira S, Fragoso M et al. (2009) Wind risk assessment in urban environments: the case of falling trees during windstorm events in Lisbon. In: Střelcová K, Mátyás C, Kleidon A et al. (eds) Bioclimatology and natural hazards. Springer, Berlin, p 55-74

  • Lu JWT, Svenden ES, Campbell LK et al. (2010) Biological, social, and urban design factors affecting young tree mortality in New York City. Cities Environ 3(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luers AL, Lobell DB, Sklar LS et al. (2003) A method for quantifying vulnerability, applied to the agricultural system of the Yaqui Valley, Mexico. Glob Environ Change 13(4):255–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzo LC, Perkins DD (2006) Finding common ground: the importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. J Plan Lit 20(4):335–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin CA, Warren PS, Kinzig A (2004) Neighborhood socioeconomic status is a useful predictor of perennial landscape vegetation in small parks surrounding residential neighbourhoods in Phoenix, Arizona. Landsc Urban Plan 69(4):355–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger MJ, Rounsevell MDA, Acosta-Michlik L et al. (2006) The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 114(1):69–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger MJ, Schröter D, Leemans R et al. (2008) A spatially explicit and quantitative vulnerability assessment of ecosystem service change in Europe. Reg Environ Change 8(3):91–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millward AA, Torchia M, Laursen AE, Rothman LD (2014) Vegetation placement for summer built surface temperature moderation in an urban microclimate. Environ Manag 53(6):1043–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell SJ (1995) The windthrow triangle: a relative windthrow hazard assessment procedure for forest managers. For Chron 71(4):446–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra H, Gopal D (2010) Street trees in Bangalore: density, diversity, composition, and distribution. Urban For Urban Green 9(2):129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DJ (1986) Silvics of an urban tree species: Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.). Thesis, State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry

  • Nowak DJ (1994) Understanding the structure of urban forests. J For 92:42–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DJ (2012) Contrasting natural regeneration and tree planting in fourteen North American cities. Urban For Urban Green 11(4):374–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DJ, Bodine AR, Hoehn RE et al. (2014) Assessing urban forest effects and values: Douglas County, Kansas. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newton Square

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DJ, Crane DE (2000) The urban forest effects (UFORE) model: quantifying urban forest structure and functions. In: Hansen M, and Burk T (eds) Integrated tools for natural resources inventories in the 21st century (Proceedings of the IUFRO Conference). USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul pp 714–720

  • Nowak DJ, Crane DE (2002) Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environmental Pollution 116(3):381–389

  • Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Stevens JC et al. (2008) A ground-based method of assessing urban forest structure and ecosystem services. Arboric Urban For 34(6):347–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DJ, Dwyer JF (2007) Understanding the benefits and costs of urban forest ecosystems. In: Kuser JE (ed) Urban and community forestry in the northeast. Springer, New Brunswick, p 25–46

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DJ, Hoehn RE, Bodine AR et al. (2013a) Urban forest structure, ecosystem services, and change in Syracuse, NY. Urban Ecosyst 2013:326–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DJ, Hoehn RE, Bodine AR et al. (2013b) Assessing urban forest effects and values: Toronto’s urban forest. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newton Square, PA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DJ, Kuroda M, Crane DE (2004) Tree mortality rates and tree population projections in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Urban For Urban Green 2(3):139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (2012) Ontario’s forest regions. https://www.ontario.ca/page/forest-regions. Accessed 16 May 2016

  • Ordóñez C, Duinker PN (2013) An analysis of urban forest management plans in Canada: implications for urban forest management. Landsc Urban Plan 116:36–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ordóñez C, Duinker PN (2014) Assessing the vulnerability of urban forests to climate change. Environ Rev 22(3):311–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham T-T-H, Apparicio P, Landry S et al. (2013) Predictors of the distribution of street and backyard vegetation in Montreal, Canada. Urban For Urban Green 12(1):18–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pincetl S (2009) Implementing municipal tree planting: Los Angeles million-tree initiative. Environ Manag 45(2):227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poland TM, McCullough DG (2006) Emerald ash borer: Invasion of the urban forest and the threat to North America’s ash resource. J For 104(3):118–124

  • Roman LA, Battles JJ, McBride JR (2016) Urban tree mortality: a primer on demographic approaches. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newton Square, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman LA, Scatena FN (2011) Street tree survival rates: meta-analysis of previous studies and application to a field survey in Philadelphia, PA, USA. Urban For Urban Green 10(4):269–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawka M, Millward AA, McKay J et al. (2013) Growing summer energy conservation through residential tree planting. Landscape Urban Plan 113:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröter D, Cramer W, Leemans R et al. (2005) Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science 310(5752):1333–1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smalley EB, Guries RP (1993) Breeding elms for resistance to Dutch elm disease. Annu Rev Phytopathol 31(1):325–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solecki WD, Rosenzweig C, Parshall L et al. (2005) Mitigation of the heat island effect in urban New Jersey. Glob Environ Change 6(1):39–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Staudhammer CL, LeMay VM (2001) Introduction and evaluation of possible indices of stand structural diversity. Can J For Res 31(7):1105–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staudhammer C, Escobedo F, Lawrence A et al. (2011) Rapid assessment of change and hurricane impacts to Houston’s urban forest structure. Arboric Urban For 37(20):60–66

  • Steenberg JWN (2016) Urban forest vulnerability and its implications for ecosystem service supply at multiple scales. Dissertation, Ryerson University

  • Steenberg JWN, Duinker PN, Charles JD (2013) The neighbourhood approach to urban forest management: the case of Halifax, Canada. Landsc Urban Plan 117:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenberg JWN, Millward AA, Duinker PN et al. (2015) Neighbourhood-scale urban forest ecosystem classification. J Environ Manag 163:134–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenberg JWN, Millward AA, Nowak DJ et al. (2016) A conceptual framework of urban forest ecosystem vulnerability. Environ Rev. doi:10.1139/er-2016-0022

  • Sydnor D, Chatfield J, Todd D et al. (1999) Ohio street tree evaluation project, Bulletin 877-99. Ohio State University and Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Columbus, OH

  • Timilsina N, Staudhammer CL, Escobedo FJ et al. (2014) Tree biomass, wood waste yield, and carbon storage changes in an urban forest. Landscape Urban Plan 127:18–27

  • Tratalos J, Fuller RA, Warren PH (2007) Urban form, biodiversity potential, and ecosystem services. Landsc Urban Plan 83(4):308–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trowbridge PJ, Bassuk NL (2004) Trees in the urban landscape: site assessment, design, and installation. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Troy AR, Grove JM, O’Neil-Dunne JP et al. (2007) Predicting opportunities for greening and patterns of vegetation on private urban lands. Environ Manag 40(3):394–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker Lima JM, Staudhammer CL, Brandeis TJ et al. (2013) Temporal dynamics of a subtropical forest in San Juan, Puerto Rico, 2001-2010. Landsc Urban Plan 120(2013):96–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA et al. (2003a) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8074–8079

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ et al. (2003b) Illustrating the coupled human–environment system for vulnerability analysis: three case studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8080–8085

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2014) World urbanization prospects—The 2014 revision. http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Highlights/WUP2014-Highlights.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2016

  • USDA Forest Service (2013) i-Tree applications. http://itreetools.org/applications.php. Accessed 16 May 2016

  • Wickham JD, O’Neill RV, Jones KB (2000) A geography of ecosystem vulnerability. Landsc Ecol 15(6):495–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Q, McPherson EG (2002) Rainfall interception by Santa Monica’s municipal urban forest. Urban Ecosyst 6(4):291–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this project was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and Ryerson University. We also thank staff members at the USDA Forest Service and the Davey Institute in Syracuse, New York, for their assistance with the i-Tree models. This research was, in part, conducted and funded during the lead author’s Fulbright exchange at the Forest Service’s Northern Research Station in Syracuse, New York. Fulbright Canada is a joint, bi-national, treaty-based organization created to encourage mutual understanding between Canada and the United States of America through academic and cultural exchange.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Environmental Applied Science and Management, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3, Canada

    James W. N. Steenberg

  2. Urban Forest Research & Ecological Disturbance (UFRED) Group, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3, Canada

    James W. N. Steenberg & Andrew A. Millward

  3. Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 5 Moon Library, SUNY-ESF, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA

    David J. Nowak

  4. School of Urban and Regional Planning, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3, Canada

    Pamela J. Robinson

  5. Davey Institute, 5 Moon Library, SUNY-ESF, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA

    Alexis Ellis

Authors
  1. James W. N. Steenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew A. Millward
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David J. Nowak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pamela J. Robinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alexis Ellis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James W. N. Steenberg.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Steenberg, J.W.N., Millward, A.A., Nowak, D.J. et al. Forecasting Urban Forest Ecosystem Structure, Function, and Vulnerability. Environmental Management 59, 373–392 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0782-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0782-3

Keywords

  • Vulnerability assessment
  • i-Tree forecast
  • Ecological modeling
  • Strategic planning
  • Disturbance
  • Scale