Skip to main content

Adaptive Capacity in Community Forest Management: A Systematic Review of Studies in East Asia

Abstract

This study investigated the indicators of adaptive capacity along with disturbances in community forest management systems in the East Asian countries, China, Japan and South Korea. Although these countries have centuries-old traditions of community-based forest management, they have been less researched in light of adaptive capacity for resilient social-ecological systems. Recent social and ecological disturbances bring about new challenges and/or opportunities to the capacity of forest related communities to adapt to rapidly changing conditions. Through a systematic review of the community forestry and related adaptive capacity literature in three East Asian countries, this study addressed the role of diverse knowledge systems, such as traditional and Western scientific knowledge, and civic traditions of self-organization in local communities that characterized adaptive capacity of this region. This study extends our understanding of community-based conservation efforts and traditions of this region, and adds to the understandings gleaned from studies of community forestry in the West and sacred forests in other parts of Asia and Africa. Further research on ways to increase adaptive capacity is needed in a site-specific context.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

List of selected publications

  • Korea (15)

  • Arnold, JEM (1998) Managing forests as common property-village forestry development in Korea. FAO Forestry Paper 136

  • Chun YW, Tak K-I (2009) Songgye, a traditional knowledge system for sustainable forest management in Choson Dynasty of Korea. Forest Ecol Manag 257(10):2022–2026. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.11.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong S, Kim J (2011) Landscape ecology in asian cultures, 83–97. doi:10.1007/978-4-431-87799-8

  • Hong S-K, Song I-J, Wu J (2007) Fengshui theory in urban landscape planning. Urban Ecosyst 10(3):221–237. doi:10.1007/s11252-006-3263-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Hong S and Nakagoshi N (2008) International trends of rural landscape researches for land management and policies. In: Hong S, Nakagoshi N, Fu B, Morimoto Y (Eds.) Landscape ecological applications in man-influenced areas: linking man and nature systems. Springer, Netherlands, pp 489–504

  • Koh I, Kim S, Lee D (2010) Effects of bibosoop plantation on wind speed, humidity, and evaporation in a traditional agricultural landscape of Korea: field measurements and modeling. Agric Ecosyst Environ 135(4):294–303. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2009.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee E (2014) Reconstructing village groves after a typhoon in Korea. In: Tidball KG, Krasny ME (Eds.) Greening in the red zone: Disaster, resilience, and community greening. New York, Springer-Verlag

  • Lee K (2008) Chapter 23 bee-bo forest: traditional landscape ecological forest in korea. In: Hong S, Nakagoshi N, Fu B, Moriomoto Y (Eds.) Landscape ecological applications in man-influenced areas: linking man and nature systems. Springer, Netherlands, pp 389–394

  • Cho K (2008) Envisioning ecological and cultural place for sustainable livelihoods: pre-step to the realization of traditional forest-related knowledge. IUFRO World Series 21:36–38

  • Oh J, Kwon J, Shin J (2004) Contemporary and traditional concepts of spatial units in korean mountainous landscape: understanding of landscape and memory, gis data, and community forests (maeulsoop–the Korean village groves) 21:127–129

  • Park MS, Youn YC (2012) Traditional knowledge of Korean native beekeeping and sustainable forest management. Forest Policy Econ 15:37–45. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2011.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whang B, Lee M (2006) Landscape ecology planning principles in Korean Feng-Shui, Bi-bo woodlands and ponds. Landsc Ecol Eng 2(2):147–162. doi:10.1007/s11355-006-0014-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn Y, Liu J, Sakuma D, Kim K, Masahiro I, Shin J, & Yuan J (2012) Northeast Asia. In: Parrotta JA, Trosper RL (Eds.) Traditional Forest-Related Knowledge: sustaining communities, ecosystems and biocultural diversity. Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands, pp 281–313

  • Youn Y (2009) Use of forest resources, traditional forest-related knowledge and livelihood of forest dependent communities: cases in South Korea. Forest Ecology and Management 257(10):2027–2034. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu DJ, Anderies JM, Lee D, & Perez I (2014) Transformation of resource management institutions under globalization : the case of songgye community forests in South Korea. 19(2)

  • China (19)

  • Chen H, Shivakoti G, Zhu T, Maddox D (2012) Livelihood sustainability and community based co-management of forest resources in China: changes and improvement. Environ Manage 49(1):219–228. doi:10.1007/s00267-011-9775-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Zhu T, Krott M, Maddox D (2013) Community forestry management and livelihood development in northwest China: integration of governance, project design, and community participation. Reg Environ Change 13(1):67–75. doi:10.1007/s10113-012-0316-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coggins C, Chevrier J, Dwyer M, Longway L, Xu M, & Tiso P (2012) Village fengshui forests of Southern China: Culture, history, and conservation status 19

  • Gao H, Ouyang Z, Chen S, Koppen CSA (2013) Role of culturally protected forests in biodiversity conservation in Southeast China. Biodivers Conserv 22(2):531–544. doi:10.1007/s10531-012-0427-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu H, Jiao Y, Liang L (2012) Strengthening the socio-ecological resilience of forest-dependent communities: the case of the Hani Rice Terraces in Yunnan, China. For Policy Econ 22:53–59. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu L, Li Z, Liao W, Fan Q (2011) Values of village fengshui forest patches in biodiversity conservation in the Pearl River Delta, China. Biol Conserv 144(5):1553–1559. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.01.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huilan W, Haiyun C, Jianming B, Ting Z (2008) Modeling community participation and other factors affecting biodiversity protection projects in China. Environ, Dev Sustain 11(4):725–734. doi:10.1007/s10668-008-9139-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jinlong L, Renhua Z, Qiaoyun Z (2012) Traditional forest knowledge of the Yi people confronting policy reform and social changes in Yunnan province of China. For Policy Econ 22:9–17. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2011.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juanwen Y, Quanxin W, Jinlong L (2012) Understanding indigenous knowledge in sustainable management of natural resources in China. For Policy Econ 22(09):47–52. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.02.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kui, L. (2009) Community forestry and conflict management: a case in Nangun River Nature Reserve, Yunnan, China, 1–8. Retrieved from http://www.mekonginfo.org/assets/midocs/0002267-environment-community-forestry-and-conflict-management-a-case-in-nangun-river-nature-reserve-yunnan-china.pdf/

  • Long C, Zhou Y (2001) Indigenous community forest management of Jinuo people’ s swidden agroecosystems in southwest China: 753–767

  • Luo Y, Liu J, Zhang D (2009) Role of traditional beliefs of Baima Tibetans in biodiversity conservation in China. For Ecol Manag 257(10):1995–2001. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melick D, Yang X, Xu J (2007) Seeing the wood for the trees: how conservation policies can place greater pressure on village forests in southwest China. Biodivers Conser 16(6):1959–1971. doi:10.1007/s10531-006-9115-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mo X-X, Zhu H, Zhang Y-J, Ferry Slik JW, Liu J-X (2011) Traditional forest management has limited impact on plant diversity and composition in a tropical seasonal rainforest in SW China. Biol Conserv 144(6):1832–1840. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.03.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pei S, Zhang G, Huai H (2009) Application of traditional knowledge in forest management: ethnobotanical indicators of sustainable forest use. For Ecol Manag 257(10):2017–2021. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Y Jr, Geballe WB, G, Geng L (1997) New organizational strategy for managing the forests of southeast China The share-holding integrated forestry tenure (SHIFT) system 1127(96)

  • Song Y, Wang G, Burch WR, Rechlin MA (2004) From innovation to adaptation: lessons from 20 years of the SHIFT forest management system in Sanming, China. For Ecol Manag 191(1–3):225–238. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2003.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn Y, Liu J, Sakuma D, Kim K, Masahiro I, Shin J, & Yuan J (2012) Northeast Asia. In: Parrotta JA, Trosper RL (Eds.) Traditional Forest-Related Knowledge: sustaining communities, ecosystems and biocultural diversity. Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands, pp 281–313

  • Yuan J, Liu J (2009) Fengshui forest management by the Buyi ethnic minority in China. For Ecol Manage 257(10):2002–2009. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Japan (36)

  • Berglund BE (2008) Satoyama, traditional farming landscape in Japan, compared to scandinavia: 53–68

  • Bixia C, Yuei N, Takakazu U (2013) Planted forest and diverse cultures in ecological village planning: a case study in Tarama Island, Okinawa Prefecture, Japan. Small-Scale forestry. doi:10.1007/s11842-013-9257-z

  • Bolthouse J (2013) Cultural severance and the environment 2 387–399. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6159-9

  • Cetinkaya G (2009) Challenges for the maintenance of traditional knowledge in the Satoyama and Satoumi ecosystems, Noto Peninsula, Japan. Human Ecology Review 16:27–40

  • Cetinkaya, G (2010) The role of traditional knowledge in sustainable rural livelihoods: a case from the satoyama ecosystems, Noto Peninsula, Japan. Budownictwo o zoptymalizowanym potencjale energetycznym 7:51–57

  • Cetinkaya G, Nakamura K, Kambu A, Daisuke A, Daisuke U (2012) Traditional knowledge and landscape management: evaluation and measurement of traditional knowledge on edible wild plants and mushrooms in the satoyama ecosystems in the Noto Peninsula, Japan. J Environ Plann Manag 55(2):141–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Nakama Y (2010) A study on village forest landscape in small island topography in Okinawa, Japan. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 9(2):139–148. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2009.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Nakama Y, Kurima G (2008) Layout and composition of house-embracing trees in an island Feng Shui village in Okinawa, Japan. Urban For Urban Green 7(1):53–61. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2007.10.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fukamachi K, Miki Y, Oku H, Miyoshi I (2011) The biocultural link: isolated trees and hedges in Satoyama landscapes indicate a strong connection between biodiversity and local cultural features. Landsc Ecol Eng 7(2):195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukamachi K, Oku H, Nakashizuka T (2001) The change of a satoyama landscape and its causality in Kamiseya, Kyoto Prefecture, Japan between 1970 and 1995: 703–717

  • Gathright J, Yamada Y, Morita M (2007) Recreational tree-climbing programs in a rural Japanese community forest: Aocial impacts and “fun factors”. Urban For Urban Green 6(3):169–179. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2007.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan EU (2010) Enriched Heart through Greenery : a Saga of Rejuvenation of the Satoyama Landscape in 21st Century Japan, 101–121

  • Hasegawa M, Pulhin JM, Inoue M (2013) Facing the Challenge of Social Forestry in Japan: the Case of Reviving Harmonious Coexistence Between Forest and People in Okayama Prefecture. Small-Scale For 12(2):257–275. doi:10.1007/s11842-012-9210-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henocque Y (2013) Enhancing social capital for sustainable coastal development: is satoumi the answer? Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 116:66–73. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2012.08.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horiuchi M, Fukamachi K, Oku H (2010) Reed community restoration projects with citizen participation: an example of the practical use of Satoyama landscape resources in Shiga Prefecture, Japan. Landsc Ecolog Eng 7(2):217–222. doi:10.1007/s11355-010-0129-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichikawa K, Toth GG (2012) Agroforestry - The future of global land use 9: 341–358. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4676-3

  • Iwata Y, Fukamachi K, Morimoto Y (2010) Public perception of the cultural value of Satoyama landscape types in Japan. Landsc Ecol Eng 7(2):173–184. doi:10.1007/s11355-010-0128-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katoh K, Sakai S, Takahashi T (2009) Factors maintaining species diversity in satoyama, a traditional agricultural landscape of Japan. Biol Conserv 142(9):1930–1936. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsue F, Yukihiro M (2011) Satoyama management in the twenty-first century: the challenge of sustainable use and continued biocultural diversity in rural cultural landscapes. Landsc Eco Eng 7(2):161–162. doi:10.1007/s11355-011-0163-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsura R (2014) Expanding peace ecology: Peace, Security, sustainability, equity and gender 12: 201–209. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00729-8

  • Kieninger P, Holzner W, Kriechbaum M (2009) Biocultural diversity and Satoyama. Emotions and the fun-factor in nature conservation–A lesson from Japan 60(1)

  • Kijima Y, Sakurai T, Otsuka K (2000) Iriaichi: collective versus individualized management of community forests in postwar Japan. Economic Development and Cultural Change 48:867–886

  • Knight C (2010) The Discourse of “Encultured Nature”in Japan: the Concept of Satoyama and its Role in 21 st -Century Nature Conservation. Asian Stud Rev 34(4):421–441. doi:10.1080/10357823.2010.527920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobori H, Primack RB (2003) Participatory Conservation Approaches for Satoyama, the Traditional Forest and Agricultural Landscape of Japan. AMBIO, 32(4):307–311

  • Kumar BM, Takeuchi K (2009) Agroforestry in the Western Ghats of peninsular India and the satoyama landscapes of Japan: a comparison of two sustainable land use systems. Sustain Sci 4(2):215–232. doi:10.1007/s11625-009-0086-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morimoto Y (2011) What is Satoyama? Points for discussion on its future direction. Landsc Ecol Eng 7(2):163–171. doi:10.1007/s11355-010-0120-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakagoshi N (2008) International trends of rural landscape researches for land management and policies 1: 489–504

  • Shimizu H, Nakatsuji C (2014) Basic and clinical environmental approaches in Landscape Planning. doi:10.1007/978-4-431-54415-9

  • Suzuki S, Nakagoshi N (2011) Landscape ecology in Asian cultures: 1–5. doi:10.1007/978-4-431-87799-8

  • Takeuchi K (2001) Nature conservation strategies for the SATOYAMA and SATOCHI habitats for secondary nature in Japan. Global Environmental Resources 5(2):193–198

  • Takeuchi K, Brown RD, Washitani I, Tsunekawa A, Yokohari M (Eds.) (2003) Satoyama: the traditional rural landscape of Japan. Springer, Tokyo

  • Takeuchi K (2010) Rebuilding the relationship between people and nature: the Satoyama Initiative. Ecol Res 25(5):891–897. doi:10.1007/s11284-010-0745-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe T (2011) Sustainable land management: 351–362. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14782-1

  • Yang L, Wu J (2012) Knowledge-driven institutional change: an empirical study on combating desertification in northern China from 1949 to 2004. J Environ Manag 110:254–266

  • Yashiro M, Duraiappah A, Kosoy N (2013) Governing the provision of ecosystem services 4:191–205. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5176-7

  • Yokohari M, Bolthouse J (2011) Keep it alive, don’t freeze it: a conceptual perspective on the conservation of continuously evolving satoyama landscapes. Landsc Ecol Eng 7(2):207–216. doi:10.1007/s11355-010-0116-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn Y, Liu J, Sakuma D, Kim K, Masahiro I, Shin J, Yuan J (2012) Northeast Asia. In: Parrotta JA, Trosper RL (Eds.) Traditional Forest-Related Knowledge: sustaining communities, ecosystems and biocultural diversity. Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands, pp 281–313

References

  • Adger N (2003) Social aspects of adaptive capacity. In: Smith J, Klein J, Huq S. (Eds.) Climate change, adaptive capacity and development. Imperial College Press, London, pp 29–49

  • Agrawal A (2008) The role of local institutions in adaptation to climate change. In: international forestry resources and institutions program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Working Paper, W081-3. MI

  • Agarwal B (2001) Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: an analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Dev 29(10):1623–1648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage D (2005) Adaptive capacity and community-based natural resource management. Environ Manage 35(6):703–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker M, Kusel J (2003) Community forestry in the United States: learning from the past, crafting the future. Island Press, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard HL, Fernandez-Gimenez ME, Sturtevant VE (2008) Integration of local ecological knowledge and conventional science: a study of seven community-based forestry organizations in the USA. Ecol Soc 13(2):37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergsma E, Gupta J, Jong P (2012) Does individual responsibility increase the adaptive capacity of society? The case of local water management in the Netherlands. Resour, Conserv Recy 64:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Folke C, Colding J (Eds.) (2003) Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Berkes F (2012) Sacred ecology: traditional ecological knowledge and management systems, 3rd edition. Routledge, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F (2007) Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(39):15188–15193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler DE, Buyung-Ali LM, Healey JR, Jones JP, Knight TM, Pullin AS (2012) Does community forest management provide global environmental benefits and improve local welfare? Front Ecol Environ 10(1):29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler D, Buyung-Ali L, Healey JR, Jones JP, Knight T, Pullin AS (2010) The evidence base for community forest management as a mechanism for supplying global environmental benefits and improving local welfare. CEE Rev: 08–011 (SR48). Environmental Evidence: www.environmentalevidence.org/SR48.html

  • Bullock RC, Hanna KS (2012) Community forestry: local val Community forestry: local values, conflict and forest governance. Cambridge University Press, New York

  • Casse T, Milhøj A (2011) Community forestry and forest conservation: friends or strangers? Environ PolicyGovernance 21(2):83–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnley S, Poe MR (2007) Community forestry in theory and practice: Where are we now? Annu Rev Anthropol 36:301–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi C (1991) Fengshui: Philosophy of Korea. Mineumsa, Korea, in Korean

    Google Scholar 

  • Colding J, Elmqvist T, Olsson P (2003) Living with disturbance: Building resilience in social–ecological systems. In: Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (Eds.) Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge, pp 163–173

  • Coleman EA (2011) Common property rights, adaptive capacity, and response to forest disturbance. Glob Environ Chang 21(3):855–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collaboration for environmental evidence (CEE) 2013 http://www.environmentalevidence.org/. Accessed 14 Feb 2014

  • Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern P (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:1907–1912

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eakin H, Lemos MC (2006) Adaptation and the state: Latin America and the challenge of capacity-building under globalization. Glob environ chang 16(1):7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle NL (2011) Adaptive capacity and its assessment. Glob Environ Chang 21(2):647–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle NL, Lemos MC (2010) Unpacking governance: building adaptive capacity to climate change of river basins in Brazil. Glob Environ Chang 20(1):4–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flint CG, Luloff AE, Finley JC (2008) Where is “community” in community-based forestry? Soc Nat Resour 21(6):526–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Berkes F, Colding J (1998) Ecological practices and social mechanisms for building resilience and sustainability. In: Berkes F, Folke C, & Colding J (Eds.) Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 414–4367

  • Folke C, Colding J, Berkes F (2003) Synthesis: Building resilience and adaptive capacity in socio-ecological systems. In: Berkes F, Folke C, Colding J (Eds.) Navigating social–ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 352–387

  • Frelich LE, Reich PB (1998) Disturbance severity and threshold responses in the Boreal forest. Conserv Ecol 2(2):7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson C, McKean MA, Ostrom E (Eds.) (2000) People and forests: communities, institutions and governance. Cambridge University Press, New York

  • Gunderson LH, Holling CS (Eds.) (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington DC

  • Gunderson LH, Carpenter SR, Folke C, Olsson P, Peterson G (2006) Water RATs (resilience, adaptability, and transformability) in lake and wetland social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11(1):16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta J, Termeer C, Klostermann J, Meijerink S, Brink M, Jong P, Nooteboom S, Bergsma E (2010) The adaptive capacity wheel: a method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environ Sci Policy 13(6):459–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1986) The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: local surprise and global change. In: Sustainable development of the biosphere. Clark WC, Munn RE (Eds.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, London, pp 292–317

  • Inglis J (1993) Traditional ecological knowledge: concepts and cases. IDRC

  • Inoue M, Shivakoti GP (Eds.) (2015) Multi-level forest governance in Asia: concepts, challenges and the way forward. SAGE Publications, India

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelman I (2008) Addressing the root causes of large-scale disasters In: M Gad-ElHak (Ed) Large-Scale disasters, Cambridge University Press, pp 94–119

  • Keskitalo ECH (2013) Understanding adaptive capacity in forest governance: editorial. Ecol Soc 18(4):45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokou K, Adjossou K, Kokutse AD (2008) Considering sacred and riverside forests in criteria and indicators of forest management in low wood producing countries: the case of Togo. Ecol indic 8(2):158–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krogman N, Beckley T (2002) Corporate “Bail-Outs” and Local “Buyouts”: Pathways to Community Forestry? Soc Nat Resour 15(2):109–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee E, Krasny ME (2015) The role of social learning for social-ecological systems in Korean village groves restoration. Ecology and Society 20(1):42. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07289-200142

  • Levang P, Sitorus S, Dounias E (2007) City life in the midst of the forest: a Punan hunter-gatherer’s vision of conservation and development. Ecol Soc 12(1):18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liswanti N, Sheil D, Basuki I, Padmanaba M, Mulcahy G (2011) Falling back on forests: how forest-dwelling people cope with catastrophe in a changing landscape. Int For Rev 442–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund JF, Balooni K, Casse T (2009) Change we can believe in? Reviewing studies on the conservation impact of popular participation in forest management. Conserv Soc 7(2):71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy DDP, Whitelaw GS, Anderson S, Cowan D, McGarry F, Robins A, Gardner et al. (2012) Collaborative geomatics and the Mushkegowuk Cree First Nations: fostering adaptive capacity for community-based sub-arctic natural resource management. Geoforum 43(2):305–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Folke C, Hahn T (2004) Socio-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecol Soc 9(4):2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagdee A, Kim YS, Daugherty PJ (2006) What makes community forest management successful: a meta-study from community forests throughout the world. Soc Nat Resour 19(1):33–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelling M (2001) Natural disasters. In: Castree N., & Braun B. (Eds.) Social nature: theory, practice, and politics Oxford, Malden, MA, Blackwell Publishers, pp 170–188

  • Petticrew M, Roberts H (2006) Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. Blackwell Publishers, Malden, Massachusetts, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer R, Crona B, Armitage DR, Olsson P, Tengö M, Yudina O (2012) Adaptive comanagement: a systematic review and analysis. Ecol Soc 17(3):11

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall NP, James KL (2012) The effectiveness of integrated farm management, organic farming and agri-environment schemes for conserving biodiversity in temperate Europe – a systematic map. Environ Evid 1:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodela R (2011) Social learning and natural resource management: the emergence of three research perspectives. Eco Soc 16(4):30

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh NM (2013) The affective labor of growing forests and the becoming of environmental subjects: rethinking environmentality in Odisha, India. Geoforum 47:189–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stedman RC, Ingalls M (2014) Topophilia, biophilia and greening in the red zone. In: Tidball KG, Krasny ME (Eds.) Greening in the red zone: Disaster, resilience, and community greening. New York, Springer-Verlag

  • Thoms CA (2008) Community control of resources and the challenge of improving local livelihoods: a critical examination of community forestry in Nepal. Geoforum 39(3):1452–1465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu Wei-Ming (2008) The rise of industrial East Asia: the role of Confucian values. Cph J Asian Stud 4(1):81

    Google Scholar 

  • von der Porten S, de Loë RC (2014) How collaborative approaches to environmental problem solving view indigenous peoples: a systematic review. Soc Nat Resour 27(10):1040–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Carpenter S, Anderies J, Abel N, Cumming GS, Janssen M, Lebel L, Norberg J, Peterson GD, Pritchard R (2002) Resilience management in social-ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conserv Ecol 6(1):14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Salt D (2012) Resilience practice: building capacity to absorb disturbance and maintain function. Island Press, Washington DC

  • White PS, Pickett STA (1985) Natural disturbance and patch dynamics: an introduction. In: Pickett STA, White PS (Eds.) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp 3–13

  • Yohe G, Tol RS (2002) Indicators for social and economic coping capacity—moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Chang 12(1):25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eunju Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Appendix

Appendix

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, E., Krasny, M.E. Adaptive Capacity in Community Forest Management: A Systematic Review of Studies in East Asia. Environmental Management 59, 34–49 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0767-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0767-2

Keywords

  • Adaptive capacity
  • Community forest management
  • Disturbance
  • East Asia
  • Systematic review