Skip to main content


Log in

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Green Infrastructures on Community Stormwater Reduction and Utilization: A Case of Beijing, China

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript


Cost-benefit analysis is demanded for guiding the plan, design and construction of green infrastructure practices in rapidly urbanized regions. We developed a framework to calculate the costs and benefits of different green infrastructures on stormwater reduction and utilization. A typical community of 54,783 m2 in Beijing was selected for case study. For the four designed green infrastructure scenarios (green space depression, porous brick pavement, storage pond, and their combination), the average annual costs of green infrastructure facilities are ranged from 40.54 to 110.31 thousand yuan, and the average of the cost per m3 stormwater reduction and utilization is 4.61 yuan. The total average annual benefits of stormwater reduction and utilization by green infrastructures of the community are ranged from 63.24 to 250.15 thousand yuan, and the benefit per m3 stormwater reduction and utilization is ranged from 5.78 to 11.14 yuan. The average ratio of average annual benefit to cost of four green infrastructure facilities is 1.91. The integrated facilities had the highest economic feasibility with a benefit to cost ratio of 2.27, and followed by the storage pond construction with a benefit to cost ratio of 2.14. The results suggested that while the stormwater reduction and utilization by green infrastructures had higher construction and maintenance costs, their comprehensive benefits including source water replacements benefits, environmental benefits and avoided cost benefits are potentially interesting. The green infrastructure practices should be promoted for sustainable management of urban stormwater.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others


  • Agnew LJ, Lyon S, Gérard-Marchant P, Collins VB, Lembo AJ, Steenhuis TS, Walter MT (2006) Identifying hydrologically sensitive areas: bridging the gap between science and application. J Environ Manag 78:63–76. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arabi M, Govindaraju RS, Hantush MM (2006) Cost‐effective allocation of watershed management practices using a genetic algorithm. Water Resour Res 42:W10429, doi:10.1029/2006WR004931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ, Cropper ML, Eads GC, Hahn RW, Lave LB, Noll RG, Portney PR, Russell M, Schmalensee R, Smith VK (1997) Is there a role for benefit-cost analysis in environmental, health, and safety regulation? Env Dev Econ 2:195–221. doi:10.1017/S1355770X97220164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baguma D, Loiskandl W (2010) Rainwater harvesting technologies and practises in rural Uganda: a case study. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change 15:355–369. doi:10.1007/s11027-010-9223-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beijing Municipal Government (1994) Beijing’s temporary levy regulations for flood control and corresponding construction maintenance costs

  • Beijing Water Authority (2014) A notification of Beijing residents implement a ladder water price

  • Benedict MA, McMahon ET (2012) Green infrastructure: linking landscapes and communities. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg MMR (2008) Sustainable stormwater management plan 2008. Draft for public comment, New York

  • Braden JB, Johnston DM (2004) Downstream economic benefits from storm-water management. J Water Resour Plan Manag 130:498–505. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:6(498)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter T, Keeler A (2008) Life-cycle cost-benefit analysis of extensive vegetated roof systems. J Environ Manag 87:350–363. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen T, Li Y, Zhang Y (2014) Cost-benefit analysis of rainwater low impact development (LID) mesures in typical cities. Southwest Water Wastewater 36:41–46. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark C, Adriaens P, Talbot FB (2008) Green roof valuation: a probabilistic economic analysis of environmental benefits. Environ Sci Technol 42:2155–2161. doi:10.1021/es0706652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coffman LS (2002) Low impact development: smart technology for clean water definitions, issues, roadblocks, and next steps. In: Global solutions for urban drainage, proceedings of the ninth international conference on urban drainage, Portland, 8–13 Sept 2002

  • Construction Ministry of China (2014) Sponge city construction technology guide-rainwater system building by low impact development.

  • Devinny JS, Kamieniecki S, Stenstrom M (2005) Alternative Approaches to Stormwater Quality Control. University of Southern California, Center for Sustainable Cities and the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board. Accessed 26 October 2007

  • Domenech L, Sauri D (2011) A comparative appraisal of the use of rainwater harvesting in single and multi-family buildings of the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona (Spain): social experience,drinking water savings and economic costs. J Clean Prod 19:598–608. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner A (2010) Do rainwater tanks herald a cultural change in household water use? Aust J Environ Manag 17:100–111. doi:10.1080/14486563.2010.9725255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster J, Lowe A, Winkelman S (2011) The value of green infrastructure for urban climate adaptation. Center for Clean Air Policy, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeborn JR, Sample DJ, Fox LJ (2012) Residential stormwater: methods for decreasing runoff and increasing stormwater infiltration. Coll Publ 7:15–30. doi:10.3992/jgb.7.2.15

    Google Scholar 

  • Houle JJ, Roseen RM, Ballestero TP, Puls TA, Sherrard Jr J (2013) Comparison of maintenance cost, labor demands, and system performance for LID and conventional stormwater management. J Environ Eng 139:932–938. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000698

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jia H, Yao H, Shaw LY (2013) Advances in LID BMPs research and practice for urban runoff control in China. Front Environ Sci Eng 7:709–720. doi:10.1007/s11783-013-0557-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia H, Yao H, Tang Y, Shaw LY, Field R, Tafuri AN (2015) LID-BMPs planning for urban runoff control and the case study in China. J Environm Manag 149:65–76. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joksimovic D, Alam Z (2014) Cost efficiency of low impact development (LID) stormwater management practices. Proc Eng 89:734–741. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiker GA, Bridges TS, Varghese A, Seager TP, Linkov I (2005) Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integr Environ Assess Manag 1:95–108. doi:10.1897/IEAM_2004a-015.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee A (2004) Life cycle cost analysis-green roofs form an investment. In: Proceedings of the second North American green roof conference: greening rooftops for sustainable communities, The Cardinal Group, Portland, pp 2–4

  • Lehner PH (2001) Stormwater strategies: community responses to runoff pollution. Natural Resources Defense Council, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Li C (2012) Ecohydrology and good urban design for urban storm water-logging in Beijing, China. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 12:287–300. doi:10.2478/v10104-012-0029-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Zhang Y-X, Xiang L-L, Liu D-M, Zheng Q-H (2006) Technical and economic investigation and analysis of the middle/small scale wastewater treatment plants. China Water Wastewater 22:13–16. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Chen W, Peng C (2014) Assessing the effectiveness of green infrastructures on urban flooding reduction: a community scale study. Ecol Model 291:6–14. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Chen X, Wang S (2009) Evaluating and predicting shadow prices of water resources in China and its nine major river basins. Water Resour Manag 23:1467–1478. doi:10.1007/s11269-008-9336-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacMullan E, Reich S (2007) The economics of low-impact development: a literature review. ECONorthwest, Eugene

    Google Scholar 

  • Montalto F, Behr C, Alfredo K, Wolf M, Arye M, Walsh M (2007) Rapid assessment of the cost-effectiveness of low impact development for CSO control. Landsc Urban Plan 82:117–131. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mun J, Ki J, Han M (2008) Economical analysis on rainwater harvesting (RWH) system of buildings and residential complex in the Republic of Korea. In: The 2nd International Conference of Water Association, Kyoto

  • Niu H, Clark C, Zhou J, Adriaens P (2010) Scaling of economic benefits from green roof implementation in Washington, DC. Environ Sci Technol 44:4302–4308. doi:10.1021/es902456x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nolde E (2007) Possibilities of rainwater utilisation in densely populated areas including precipitation runoffs from traffic surfaces. Desalination 215:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2006.10.033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pan A-J, Zhang S-H, Chen J-G, Ding Y-Y (2010) The research and application of comprehensive utilization technology of urban rainwater. China Waterpub Press, Beijing, (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren Y-F, Wang X-K, Ouyang Z-Y, Zheng H, Duan X-N, Miao H (2008) Stormwater runoff quality from different surfaces in an urban catchment in Beijing, China. Water Environ Res 80:719–724. doi:10.2175/106143008X276660

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roebuck R (2007) An investigation into the whole life cost implications of using rainwater harvesting systems for non-potable applications in new-build developments in the UK. PhD dissertation, University of Bradford, West Yorkshire

  • Sample DJ, Heaney JP, Wright LT, Fan C-Y, Lai F-H, Field R (2002) Costs of best management practices and associated land for urban stormwater control. J Water Resour Plan Manag 129:59–68. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2003)129:1(59)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spatari S, Yu Z, Montalto FA (2011) Life cycle implications of urban green infrastructure. Environ Pollut 159:2174–2179. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2011.01.015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sproul J, Wan MP, Mandel BH, Rosenfeld AH (2014) Economic comparison of white, green, and black flat roofs in the United States. Energy Build 71:20–27. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.11.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y-W, Wei X-M, Pomeroy C (2011) Review of current research and future directions of low impact development practices for storm water. Adv Water Sci 22:287–293

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tian S (2011) Managing stormwater runoff with green infrastructure: exploring practical strategies to overcome barriers in citywide implementation. Community and Regional Planning Program: Student Projects and Theses, Paper 7

  • Wang JH (2007) A study on irrigation schedule and rainfall utilization of Sunken lawn. MS thesis, China Agriculture University, Beijing. (in Chinese)

  • Wang L, He Q (2015) The evaluation of groundwater resources value of Beijing based on emergy theory. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2015, Article ID 743136, doi: 10.1155/2015/743136

  • Ward FA (2012) Cost-benefit and water resources policy: a survey. Water Policy 14:250–280. doi:10.2166/wp.2011.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitman D, Weinberg A, Goo R (2008) Reducing stormwater costs through LID strategies and practices. In: Proceedings of the 2008 international LID conference, pp 16–19

  • Winer R (2000) National pollutant removal performance database for stormwater treatment practices. Center for Watershed Protection Ellicott City, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G, Reed P, Tang Y (2013) Multi-objective optimization of low impact development designs in an urbanizing watershed. Open J Optim 2:95–108. doi:10.4236/ojop.2013.24013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y-J, Xu X-Z (2014) Benefit assessment and promotion measures of urban rainfall harvesting: a case study of a car-washing device using rainwater in the campus. Science of Soil and Water Conservation 12:78–83.

  • Zuo J, Liu C, Zheng H (2010) Cost-benefit analysis for urban rainwater harvesting in Beijing. Water Int 35:195–209. doi:10.1080/02508061003667271

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are thankful for the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41271501) and the CAS “Light of West China” Program to this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weiping Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, W., Chen, W., Feng, Q. et al. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Green Infrastructures on Community Stormwater Reduction and Utilization: A Case of Beijing, China. Environmental Management 58, 1015–1026 (2016).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: