Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Toward the Restoration of Caribou Habitat: Understanding Factors Associated with Human Motorized Use of Legacy Seismic Lines

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Populations of boreal and southern mountain caribou in Alberta, Canada, are declining, and the ultimate cause of their decline is believed to be anthropogenic disturbance. Linear features are pervasive across the landscape, and of particular importance, seismic lines established in the 1900s (legacy seismic lines) are slow to regenerate. Off-highway vehicles are widely used on these seismic lines and can hamper vegetative re-growth because of ongoing physical damage, compaction, and active clearing. Restoration of seismic lines within caribou range is therefore a priority for the recovery of threatened populations in Alberta, but a triage-type approach is necessary to prioritize restoration and ensure conservation resources are wisely spent. To target restoration efforts, our objective was to determine factors that best explained levels of off-highway vehicles use on seismic lines intersecting roads. We investigated the relative importance of local topography, vegetation attributes of seismic lines, and broad-scale human factors such as the density of infrastructures and the proximity to recreation campsites and towns to explain the observed levels of off-highway vehicles use. We found that off-highway vehicles use was mainly associated with local topography and vegetation attributes of seismic lines that facilitated ease-of-travel. Broad-scale landscape attributes associated with industrial, recreation access, or hunting activities did not explain levels of off-highway vehicles use. Management actions aimed at promoting natural regeneration and reduce ease-of-travel on legacy seismic lines within caribou ranges can be beneficial to caribou recovery in Alberta, Canada, and we therefore recommend restrictions of off-highway vehicles use on low vegetation, dry seismic lines in caribou ranges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberta Woodland Caribou Recovery Team (2005) Alberta Woodland Caribou Recovery Plan 2004/05–2013/14. Alberta Sustainable Resource Development, Fish and Wildlife Division, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada., Alberta Species at Risk Recovery Plan No. 4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barton DC, Holmes AL (2007) Off-highway vehicle trail impacts on breeding songbirds in northeastern California. J Wildl Manag 71:1617–1620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergerud AT, Butler HE, Miller DR (1984) Antipredator tactics of calving caribou: dispersion in mountains. Can J Zool 62:1566–1575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottrill MC, Joseph LN, Carwardine J, Bode M, Cook C, Game ET, Grantham H, Kark S, Linke S, McDonald-Madden E, Pressey RL, Walker S, Wilson KA, Possingham HP (2008) Is conservation triage just smart decision making? Trends Ecol Evolut 23:649–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boutin S, Boyce MS, Hebblewhite M, Hervieux D, Knopff KH, Latham MC, Latham ADM, Nagy J, Seip D, Serrouya R (2012) Why are caribou declining in the oil sands?. Front Ecol Environ 10:65–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw CJA, Boutin S, Hebert DM (1998) Energetic implications of distrubance caused by petroleum exploration to woodland caribou. Can J Zool 76:1319–1324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breslow NE, Clayton DG (1993) Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc 88:9–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks JJ, Champ PA (2006) Understanding the wicked nature of “unmanaged recreation” in Colorado’s Front Range. Environ Manage 38:784–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron R, Reed D, Dau J, Smith W (1992) Redistribution of calving caribou in response to oil field development on the Arctic Slope of Alaska. Arctic 45:338–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen HYH, Wang JR (2006) Post-harvest regeneration of lowland black spruce forests in northeastern Ontario. New Forests 31:115–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, RHB (2013) Ordinal-regression models for ordinal data R package version 2013. 9–30 http://www.cran.r-project.org/package=ordinal/.

  • COSEWIC (2011) Designatable units for Caribou (Rangifer tarandus) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa, Canada.

  • COSEWIC (2014) COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus, Northern Mountain population, Central Mountain population and Southern Mountain population in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa, Canada. www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default_e.cfm.

  • DeCesare NJ, Hebblewhite M, Robinson HS, Musiani M (2010) Endangered, apparently: the role of apparent competition in endangered species conservation. Animal Conservation 13:353–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCesare NJ (2012) Separating spatial search and efficiency rates as components of predation risk. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279:4626–4633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCesare NJ, Hebblewhite M, Schmiegelow F, Hervieux D, McDermid GJ, Neufeld L, Bradley M, Whittington J, Smith KG, Morgantini LE, Wheatley M, Musiani M (2012) Transcending scale dependence in identifying habitat with resource selection functions. Ecol Appl 22:1068–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer SJ, O’Neill JP, Wasel SM, Boutin S (2001) Avoidance of industrial development by woodland caribou. J Wildl Manag 65:531–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer SJ, O’Neill JP, Wasel SM, Boutin S (2002) Quantifying barrier effects of roads and seismic lines on movements of female woodland caribou in northeastern Alberta. Can J Zool 80:839–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada (2011) Scientific assessment to inform the identification of critical habitat for woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou), boreal population, in Canada: 2011 update. Ottawa, Canada.

  • Environment Canada (2012) Recovery strategy for the woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou), boreal population, in Canada. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada.

  • Environment Canada (2014) Recovery strategy for the woodland caribou, southern mountain population (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in Canada. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada.

  • Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) (2014) ArcGIS desktop: release 10.2.1. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Festa-Bianchet M, Ray JC, Boutin S, Côté S, Gunn A (2011) Conservation of caribou (Rangifer tarandus) in Canada: an uncertain future. Can J Zool 89:419–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan L, Pigeon K, Cranston J, and Stenhouse GB (2013) Analysis and restoration of seismic cutlines in southern mountain and boreal caribou range in West-Central Alberta. Hinton, Canada.

  • Flood JP (2005) Just don’t tell me no: managing OHV recreational use on national forests. In: Peden, JG, R Schuster, and RM (eds). Proceedings of the 2005 northeastern recreation research symposium 2005, Bolton Landing, NY. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-341. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, NY, USA.

  • Grimes DA, Schulz KF (2008) Making sense of odds and odds ratios. Obstet Gynecol 111:423–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groom JD, McKinney LB, Ball LC, Winchell CS (2007) Quantifying off-highway vehicle impacts on density and survival of a threatened dune-endemic plant. Biol Cons 135:119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James ARC, Boutin S, Hebert DM, Rippin AB, White J (2004) Spatial separation of caribou from moose and its relation to predation by wolves. J Wildl Manag 68:799–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James ARC, Stuart-Smith AK (2000) Distribution of caribou and wolves in relation to linear corridors. J Wildl Manag 64:154–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CJ, Ehlers LPW, Seip DR (2015) Witnessing extinction—cumulative impacts across landscapes and the future loss of an evolutionary significant unit of woodland caribou in Canada. Biol Cons 186:176–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinley TA, Apps CD (2001) Mortality patterns in a subpopulation of endangered mountain caribou. Wildl Soc Bull 29:158–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Komers PE, Stanojevic Z (2013) Rates of disturbance vary by data resolution: implications for conservation schedules using the Alberta Boreal Forest as a case study. Global Change Biol 19:2916–2928

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuehn DM, D’Luhosch PD, Luzadis VA, Malmsheimer RW, Schuster RM (2011) Attitudes and intentions of off-highway vehicle riders toward trail use: implications for forest managers. J For 109:281–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham ADM, Latham MCM, Boyce MS, Boutin S (2011) Movement responses by wolves to industrial linear features and their effect on woodland caribou in northeastern Alberta. Ecol Appl 21:2854–2865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le H, Marcus J (2012) The overall odds ratio as an intuitive effect size index for multiple logistic regression: examination of further refinements. Educ Psychol Meas 72:1001–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee P, Boutin S (2006) Persistence and developmental transition of wide seismic lines in the western Boreal Plains of Canada. J Environ Manage 78:240–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh P (1980) Regression models for ordinal data. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 42:109–142

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka P (ed) Frontiers in econometrics. Academic Press, New York.

  • McLoughlin PD, Dzus E, Wynes B, Boutin S (2003) Declines in populations of woodland caribou. J Wildl Manag 67:755–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy SM, Curatolot JA (1987) Activity budgets and movement rates of caribou encountering pipelines, roads, and traffic in northern Alaska. Can J Zool 65:2483–2490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nellemann C, Cameron R (1996) Effects of petroleum development on terrain preferences of calving caribou. Arctic 49:23–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Nellemann C, Vistnes I, Jordhoy P, Stoen O-G, Kaltenborn BP, Hanssen F, Helgesen R (2010) Effects of recreational cabins, trails, and their removal for restoration of reindeer winter ranges. Restoration Ecol 18:873–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberg PR (2001) Responses of mountain caribou to linear features in a west-central Alberta landscape. MSc Thesis. Wildlife Ecology and Management. University of Alberta.

  • Pierskalla CD, Schuett MA, Thompson KA (2011) Management perceptions of off-highway vehicle use on national forest system lands in Appalachia. Northern J Appl Forestry 28:208–213

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.

  • Saher D, Schmiegelow F (2005) Movement pathways and habitat selection by woodland caribou during spring migration. Rangifer 16:143–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider RR, Hauer G, Adamowicz WL, Boutin S (2010) Triage for conserving populations of threatened species: the case of woodland caribou in Alberta. Biol Cons 143:1603–1611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seip DR (1991) Predation and caribou populations. Rangifer 7:46–52. Special Issue

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrouya R, McLellan BN, Boutin S, Seip DR, Nielsen SE (2011) Developing a population target for an overabundant ungulate for ecoystem restoration. J Appl Ecol 48:935–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanley CS, Kofinas GP, Pyare S (2013) Balancing the conservation of wildlife habitat with subsistence hunting access: a geospatial-scenario planning framework. Landsc Urban Plan 115:10–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith TJ, McKenna CM (2012) An examination of ordinal regression goodness-of-fit indices under varied sample conditions and link functions. Mult Linear Regression Viewpoints 38:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonderegger D (2012) SiZer: SiZer: significant zero crossings. R package version 0.1-4. http://CRAN.R-project.org/pacakge=SiZer.

  • Sorensen T, McLoughlin PD, Hervieux D, Dzus E, Nolan J, Wynes B, Boutin S (2008) Determining sustainable levels of cumulative effects for Boreal caribou. J Wildl Manag 72:900–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenhof K, Brown JL, Kochert MN (2014) Temporal and spatial changes in golden eagle reproduction in relation to increased off highway vehicle activity. Wildl Soc Bull 38:682–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Rensen CK, Nielsen SE, White B, Vinge T, Lieffers VJ (2015) Natural regeneration of forest vegetation on legacy seismic lines in boreal habitats in Alberta’s oil sands region. Biol Cons 184:127–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White JC, Wulder MA, Gómez C, Stenhouse G (2011) A history of habitat dynamics: characterizing 35 years of stand replacing disturbance. Can J Remote Sens 37:234–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington J, Hebblewhite M, DeCesare NJ, Neufeld L, Bradley M, Wilmshurst J, Musiani M (2011) Caribou encounters with wolves increase near roads and trails: a time-to-event approach. J Appl Ecol 48:1535–1542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe SA, Griffith B, Wolfe CAG (2000) Response of reindeer and caribou to human activities. Polar Res 19:63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoir common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol 1:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by Environment Canada under the Habitat Stewardship Program (HSP 6617; 6699), Alberta Environment and Parks, and the Foothills Landscape Management Forum (FLMF). Additional support was provided by Weyerhaueser Co. Ltd, West Fraser Mills Ltd, Alberta Parks, the Hinton Training Centre and the numerous project partners of the fRI Caribou and Grizzly Bear Programs. We thank Julie Duval, Kevin Myles, and Joshua Crough for GIS and database assistance, Terry Larsen for help with study design and in the field, and Flurina Deagle, Lindsey Dewart, Kelsey Greenley, Amanda MacDonald, and Tyler VanderMolen for collecting field data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karine E. Pigeon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pigeon, K.E., Anderson, M., MacNearney, D. et al. Toward the Restoration of Caribou Habitat: Understanding Factors Associated with Human Motorized Use of Legacy Seismic Lines. Environmental Management 58, 821–832 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0763-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0763-6

Keywords

Navigation