Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optimal Subdivision for Treatment and Management of Catastrophic Landslides in a Watershed Using Topographic Factors

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent extreme rainfall events led to many landslides due to climate changes in Taiwan. How to effectively promote post-disaster treatment and/or management works in a watershed/drainage basin is a crucial issue. Regarding the processes of watershed treatment and/or management works, disaster hotspot scanning and treatment priority setup should be carried out in advance. A scanning method using landslide ratio to determine the appropriate outlet of an interested watershed, and an optimal subdivision system with better homogeneity and accuracy in landslide ratio estimation were developed to help efficient executions of treatment and/or management works. Topography is a key factor affecting watershed landslide ratio. Considering the complexity and uncertainty of the natural phenomenon, multivariate analysis was applied to understand the relationship between topographic factors and landslide ratio in the interested watershed. The concept of species-area curve, which is usually adopted at on-site vegetation investigation to determinate the suitable quadrate size, was used to derive the optimal threshold in subdivisions. Results show that three main component axes including factors of scale, network and shape extracted from Digital Terrain Model coupled with areas of landslide can effectively explain the characteristics of landslide ratio in the interested watershed, and a relation curve obtained from the accuracy of landslide ratio classification and number of subdivisions could be established to derive optimal subdivision of the watershed. The subdivision method promoted in this study could be further used for priority rank and benefit assessment of landslide treatment in a watershed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • Ambrose A, Lohumi S, Lee WH, Cho BK (2016) Comparative nondestructive measurement of corn seed viability using Fourier transform near-infrared (FT-NIR) and Raman spectroscopy. Sens Actuators B 224(1):500–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arrhenius O (1921) Species and area. J Ecol 9:95–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain SA (1938) The species–area curve. Am Midl Nat J 19:573–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattel RB (1966) The screen test for the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res 1(2):245–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Córdoba MA, Bruno CI, Costa JL, Peralta NR, Balzarini MG (2016) Protocol for multivariate homogeneous zone delineation in precision agriculture. Biosyst Eng 143:95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. Spec Rep Transp Res Board Natl Acad Sci 247:36–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Doerge T (1999) Management zone concepts. The Site-Specific Management Guidelines, Potash and Phosphate Institute, South Dakota State University, Brookings

    Google Scholar 

  • Drakare S, Lennon JL, Hillebrand H (2006) The imprint of the geographical, evolutionary and ecological context on species–area relationships. Ecol Lett 9(2):215–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Soil Data Centre (2009) SafeLand: living with landslide risk in Europe: assessment, effects of global change, and risk management strategies. The Seventh Framework Programme. http://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/projects/safeland.

  • Farid HU, Bakhsh A, Ahmad N, Ahmad A, Mahmood-khan Z (2016) Delineating site-specific management zones for precision agriculture. J Agric Sci 154(2):273–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1936) The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Hum Genet 7(2):179–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraisse C, Sudduth K, Kitchen N, Fridgen J (1999) Use of unsupervised clustering algorithms for delineating within-field management zones. ASAE International Meeting, Toronto

  • Gardiner V (1978) Drainage basin morphometry. In: Goudie A. (ed.) Geomorphological techniques. Unwin Hyman, London

  • Gong YW, Shen ZY, Liu RM, Wang XJ, Chen T (2010) Effect of watershed subdivision on SWAT modeling with consideration of parameter uncertainty. J Hydrol Eng 15:1070–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling H (1933) Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J Educ Psychol 24:417–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang JY, Qiu YB, Guo XP (2009) Cluster and discriminant analysis of electrochemical noise statistical parameters. Electrochim Acta 54:2218–2223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard P (1912) The distribution of flora in the alpine zone. New Phytol 11:37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha M, Gassman PW, Secchi S, Gu R, Arnold J (2004) Effect of watershed subdivision on swat flow, sediment, and nutrient predictions. J Am Water Resour Assoc 40:811–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DE (1998) Applied multivariate methods for data analysts. Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser HF (1960) The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika 23:187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lark RM, Bolam HC, Stafford JV (1997) Limitations on the spatial resolution of yield mapping systems for combinable crops. J Agric Eng Res 66:183–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Xu ZX (2012) A preprocessing program for hydrologic model-a case study in the Wei River Basin. Proc Environ Sci 13:766–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin WT, Chou WC, Lin CY, Huang PH, Tsai JS (2008) Using improved algorithms and the GIS technique for automated watershed modelling analysis from digital elevation models. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 22(1):47–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li-Hammeda MA, Kushairi A, Rajanaidu N, Mohd Sukria H, Che Wan Zanariah CWN, Jalania BS (2015) Multivariate analysis of vegetative and physiological traits in oil palm (Elaies guineensis Jacq) Germplasm. Expert Opin Environ Biol 4(3):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews TJ, Triantis KA, Rigal F, Borregaard MK, Guilhaumon F, Whittaker RJ (2016) Island species–area relationships and species accumulation curves are not equivalent: an analysis of habitat island datasets. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. doi: 10.1111/geb.12439

  • Moro M, Saroli M, Gori S, Falcucci E, Galadini F, Messina P (2012) The interaction between active normal faulting and large scale gravitational mass movements revealed by paleoseismological techniques: a case study from central Italy. Geomorphology 151-152:164–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niesterowicz J, Stepinskia TF, Jasiewicz J (2016) Unsupervised regionalization of the United States into landscape pattern types. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2015.1134796

  • Noori R, Sabahi MS, Karbassi AR, Baghvand A, Zadeh HT (2010) Multivariate statistical analysis of surface water quality based on correlations and variations in the data set. Desalination 260:129–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson K (1901) On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in spaces. Philos Mag Ser 6(2):559–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroso M, Taylor J, Tisseyre B, Charnomordic B, Guillaume S (2010) A segmentation algorithm for the delineation of agricultural management zones. Comput Electron Agric 70:199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redmond S, Heneghan C (2007) A method for initialising the K-means clustering algorithm using KD-trees. Pattern Recognit Lett 28(8):965–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reshmidevi TV, Eldho TI, Jana R (2009) A GIS-integrated fuzzy rule-based inference system for land suitability evaluation in agricultural watersheds. Agric Syst 101:101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sărăşan A, Ardelean A (2015) Landscape metrics as a tool for landform pattern delineation: a case study on dune fields. Forum geografic. Studii şi cercetări de geografie şi protecţia mediului 14(2):117–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi YY, Lai JH (2008) Data mining. Pearson, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang LJ, Guo M, Sawada K, Lin J, Zhang J (2015) Landslide susceptibility mapping in Mizunami City, Japan: a comparison between logistic regression, bivariate statistical analysis and multivariate adaptive regression spline models. CATENA 135:271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenske D, Jen CH, Böse M, Lin JC (2012) Assessment of sediment delivery from successive erosion on stream-coupled hillslopes via a time series of topographic surveys in the central high mountain range of Taiwan. Quat Int 263:14–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiegand C, Kringer K, Geitner C, Rutzinger M (2013) Regolith structure analysis—a contribution to understanding the local occurrence of shallow landslides (Austrian Tyrol). Geomorphology 183:5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood EF, Sivapalan M, Beven K, Band L (1988) Effects of spatial variability and scale with implications to hydrologic modeling. J Hydrol 102:29–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang SX, Zhang SP, Lin XJ (2000) SPSS for windows, statistical analysis-elementary and advanced statistics. Unalis, Taipei

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Moges S, Block P (2016) Optimal cluster analysis for objective regionalization of seasonal precipitation in regions of high spatial-temporal variability: application to Western Ethiopia. J Clim. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0582.1

  • Zhou N, Wu JS, Shen ZX, Zhang XZ, Yang PW (2016) Species–area relationship within and across functional groups at alpine grasslands on the northern Tibetan Plateau, China. J Mt Sci 13(2):265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grants from the National Science Council (NSC 98-2313-B005-007-MY3) and Soil & Water Conservation Bureau (SWCB-104-225), R.O.C.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Soil and Water Conservation, National Chung Hsing University, 250, Kuo-Kuang Rd., Taichung, 40227, Taiwan, ROC

    Chao-Yuan Lin, Kuei-Lin Fu & Cheng-Yu Lin

Authors
  1. Chao-Yuan Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kuei-Lin Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cheng-Yu Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng-Yu Lin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, CY., Fu, KL. & Lin, CY. Optimal Subdivision for Treatment and Management of Catastrophic Landslides in a Watershed Using Topographic Factors. Environmental Management 58, 833–842 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0751-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0751-x

Keyword

Search

Navigation