Effects of Outreach on the Prevention of Aquatic Invasive Species Spread among Organism-in-Trade Hobbyists

Abstract

Releases of aquatic organisms-in-trade by aquarists, water gardeners, and outdoor pond owners have been identified as aquatic invasive species vectors within the Laurentian Great Lakes region. The trademarked U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Habitattitude campaign was developed in 2004 to encourage self-regulation by these groups, but little is known about its effects. We surveyed organisms-in-trade hobbyists in the eight Great Lakes states (Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, USA) to assess their recognition of the Habitattitude campaign and their compliance with the campaign’s recommended behaviors for organism purchase and disposal. Awareness of the Habitattitude campaign was low, but hobbyists that identified as both water gardeners and aquarium hobbyists were more aware of the campaign than individuals who participated in one of those hobbies. Engaged hobbyists (high aquatic invasive species awareness, concern, and knowledge) were significantly more likely than passive hobbyists (low aquatic invasive species awareness, concern, and knowledge) to make decisions about disposal of live organisms with the intention of preventing aquatic invasive species spread, were more likely to contact other hobbyists for disposal and handling advice, and were less likely to contact professionals, such as retailers. On the basis of our results, we suggest that compliance with recommended behaviors may be increased by fostering hobbyist networks; creating materials that both explain tangible, negative environmental impacts and list specific prevention behaviors; and disseminating these materials through trusted information sources and venues.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Armson R (2001) Minnesota aquatic nuisance species and boating survey: Results and technical report (Technical Report #01-12c). Minnesota Center for Survey Research

  2. Bator RJ, Cialdini RB (2000) New ways to promote proenvironmental behavior: the application of persuasion theory to the development of effective proenvironmental public service announcements. J Soc Issues 56:527–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burt JW, Muir A, Piovia-Scott J, Veblen KE, Chang AL, Grossman JD, Weiskel HW (2007) Preventing horticultural introductions of invasive plants: Potential efficacy of voluntary initiatives. Biol Invasions 9:909–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chucholl C (2014) Predicting the risk of introduction and establishment of an exotic aquarium animal in Europe: insights from one decade of Marmorkrebs (Crustacea, Astacida, Cambaridae) releases. Manage Biol Invasion 5:309–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Confer JJ, Mowen AJ, Graefe AK, Absher JD (2000) Magazines as wilderness information sources: Assessing users’ general wilderness knowledge and specific leave no trace knowledge. In: Cole DN, McCool SF, Borrie WT, O’Loughlin J (comps) (eds), Wilderness science in a time of change conference (Vol 4): Wilderness visitors, experiences, and visitor management. Proceedings RMRS-P-15-VOL-4. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, pp 193–197

  6. Connelly NA, O’Neill Jr. CR, Knuth BA, Brown TL (2007) Economic impacts of zebra mussels on drinking water treatment and electric power generation facilities. Environ Manage 40:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cottrell SP (2003) Influence of sociodemographics and environmental attitudes on general responsible environmental behavior among recreational boaters. Environ Behav 35:347–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. De Young R (1989) Exploring the difference between recyclers and non-recylcers: the role of information. J Environ Syst 18:341–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duggan IC (2010) The freshwater aquarium trade as a vector for incidental invertebrate fauna. Biol Invasions 12:3757–3770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Eiswerth ME, Yen ST, van Kooten GC (2011) Factors determining awareness and knowledge of aquatic invasive species. Ecol Econ 70:1672–1679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. García-Llorenta M, Martín-López B, González JA, Alcorio P, Montes C (2008) Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: implications for management. Biol Conserv 141:2969–2983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Granzin KL, Olsen JE (1991) Characterizing participants in activities protecting the environment: a focus on donating, recycling, and conservation behaviors. J Public Policy Mark 10:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  13. Green A, Armson R (2005) A survey about aquarium, outdoor pond, and water garden issues: Results and technical report (Technical Report #05-02). Minnesota Center for Survey Research

  14. Habitattitude (n.d.) http://habitattitude.net. Accessed 13 Oct 2014

  15. International Waterlily & Water Gardening Society (2012) http://iwgs.org/invasive-species/. Accessed 21 Jan 2015

  16. June-Wells M, Vossbrinck CR, Gibbons J, Bugbee J (2012) The aquarium trade: a potential risk for nonnative plant introductions in Connecticut, USA. Lake Reserv Manage 28:200–205

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaiser FG, Hübner G, Bogner FX (2005) Contrasting the theory of planned behavior with the value-belief-norm model in explaining conservation behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 35:2150–2170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kay SH, Hoyle ST (2001) Mail order, the internet, and invasive aquatic weeds. J Aquat Plant Manage 39:88–91

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kelly NE, Wantola K, Weisz E, Yan ND (2013) Recreational boats as a vector of secondary spread for aquatic invasive species and native crustacean zooplankton. Biol Invasions 15:509–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Educ Res 8:239–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lindgren CJ (2006) Angler awareness of aquatic invasive species in Manitoba. J Aquat Plant Manage 44:103–108

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maki K, Galatowitsch S (2004) Movement of invasive aquatic plants into Minnesota (USA) through horticultural trade. Biol Conserv 118:389–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mehmetoglu M (2010) Factors influencing the willingness to behave environmentally friendly at home and holiday settings. Scand J Hosp Tour 10:430–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Newhouse N (1991) Implications of attitude and behavior research for environmental conservation. J Environ Educ 22:26–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Padilla DK, Williams SL (2004) Beyond ballast water: aquarium and ornamental trades as sources of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 2:131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Peters WL, Meyer MH, Anderson NO (2006) Minnesota horticultural survey on invasive plants. Euphytica 148:75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pimentel D (2005) Aquatic nuisance species in the New York State Canal and Hudson River systems and the Great Lakes Basin: an economic and environmental assessment. Environ Manage 35:692–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pradhananga A, Davenport MA, Seekamp E, Bundy D (2015) Preventing the spread of aquatic invasive species: boater concerns, habits, and future behaviors. Hum Dimens Wildl 20:381–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Prestin A, Pearce KE (2010) We care a lot: formative research for social marketing campaign to promote school-based recycling. Resour Conserv Recy 54:1017–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rixon CAM, Duggan IC, Bergeron NMN, Ricciardi A, Macisaac HJ (2005) Invasion risks posed by the aquarium trade and live fish markets on the Laurentian Great Lakes. Biodivers Conserv 14:1365–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rothlisberger JD, Finnoff DC, Cooke RM, Lodge DM (2012) Ship-borne nonindigenous species diminish Great Lakes ecosystem services. Ecosystems 15:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Selge S, Fischer A, van der Wal R (2011) Public and professional views on invasive non-native species – A qualitative social scientific investigation. Biol Conserv 144:3089–3097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sharp RL, Larson LR, Green GT (2011) Factors influencing public preferences for invasive alien species management. Biol Conserv 144:2097–2104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Stern PC (2000) New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issues 56:407–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Uusi-Rauva C, Heikkurinen P (2013) Overcoming barriers to successful environmental advocacy campaigns in the organizational context. Environ Commun 7:475–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vanderhoeven S, Piqueray J, Halford M, Nulens G, Vincke J, Mahy G (2011) Perception and understanding of invasive alien species issues by nature conservation and horticulture professionals in Belgium. Environ Manage 47:425–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Vaske JJ (2008) Survey research and analysis: Applications in parks, recreation and human dimensions. Venture Publishing, State College, PA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study was provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Great Lakes Restoration Initiative and the Illinois Department of Natural Resources from a U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service award.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin Seekamp.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Questionnaire Items Included in Analyses

Notes: Additional questionnaire items were included in the full survey instrument. The order in which questionnaire items appear in this appendix does not match the order in which they appeared in the survey instrument. The questionnaire items presented in this appendix do not include the demographic measures included in our analyses.

  1. 1.

    How would you best identify yourself?

    • ○ Aquarium hobbyist

    • ○ Outdoor pond hobbyist

    • ○ Water gardener

    • ○ Both aquarium hobbyist and outdoor pond or water garden owner

  2. 2.

    During the past 3 years, did you keep aquatic plants, fish or other animals in an aquarium, outdoor pond or water garden?

    • ○ Yes, I keep a fish bowl or small freshwater aquarium of 5 gallons or less

    • ○ Yes, I keep a large freshwater aquarium of 5 gallons or more

    • ○ Yes, I keep a saltwater aquarium

    • ○ Yes, I keep an outdoor pond or water garden

    • ○ Yes, I work at a business that sells aquatic plants, fish or other animals

    • ○ No, I have not kept an aquarium, outdoor pond, or water garden in the past 3 years

  3. 3.

    Have you heard of the program (Habitattitude)?

    • ○ Yes

    • ○ No

  4. 4.

    Do you recognize this logo?

    • ○ Yes

    • ○ No

    Aquatic invasive species (AIS), also known as aquatic nuisance species (ANS), are aquatic plants or animals that are introduced to an area where they are not native, outcompete native species and establish abundant populations in the wild, and are difficult to control or eradicate.

  5. 5.

    Based on the given definition, to what extent are you aware of AIS (aquatic invasive species)?

    • ○ Not at all aware

    • ○ Slightly aware

    • ○ Somewhat aware

    • ○ Very aware

    • ○ Extremely aware

  6. 6.

    To what extent are you concerned about the spread of AIS in the environment?

    • ○ Not at all concerned

    • ○ Slightly concerned

    • ○ Somewhat concerned

    • ○ Very concerned

    • ○ Extremely concerned

  7. 7.

    I do not have enough information to know how to prevent the spread of AIS. (reverse coded)

    • ○ Strongly disagree

    • ○ Disagree

    • ○ Neither agree nor disagree

    • ○ Agree

    • ○ Strongly agree

  8. 8.

    In the past three years, have you made decisions about: (Please mark one response per statement on the scale below.)

      Yes No
    a. Purchases with preventing the spread of AIS in mind?
    b. Disposal with preventing the spread of AIS in mind?
  9. 9.

    In the future, how likely are you to make decisions about: (Please mark one response per statement on the scale below.)

      Not at all likely Slightly Somewhat Very Extremely likely
    a. Purchases with preventing the spread of AIS in mind?
    b. Disposal with preventing the spread of AIS in mind?
  10. 10.

    There are a number of different practices that can help prevent the spread of AIS. For each of the following practices, please indicate if you (1) Performed the practice in the past 3 years and (2) How likely you would be to perform the practice in the future.

      Yes No Not at all likely Slightly Somewhat Very Extremely likely Does not apply
    a. Buy aquatic species from a licensed, local dealer
    b. Buy aquatic species from a reputable, local dealer
    c. Buy aquatic species from a licensed, online dealer
    d. Buy aquatic species from a reputable, online dealer
    e. Contact another hobbyist to give or trade
    f. Accept aquatic species from another hobbyist
    g. Donate aquatic species to a school or business
    h. Contact a retailer for handling advice of disposals
    i. Contact a retailer for possible returns
    j. Contact a retailer for advice on humane disposals
    k. Contact a vet for advice on humane disposals
  11. 11.

    To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements retailers or fish, plant, reptile or amphibian species for your aquarium, outdoor pond or water garden? (Please mark one response per statement on the scale below.)

      Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Agree Strongly agree Does not apply
    a. I know other hobbyists willing to accept unwanted species
    b. Retailers are responsible for educating the public about AIS
    c. I trust local retailers
    d. I trust online retailers
  12. 12.

    Have you received information about AIS in the past?

    • ○ Yes

    • ○ No

  13. 13.

    If you have received information about AIS in the past, how have you received information about AIS in the past? (Please mark all that apply.)

    • ○ Learned about AIS in school

    • ○ Read about AIS in magazines

    • ○ Read about AIS in online water hobbyists forums

    • ○ Read about AIS in the newspaper

    • ○ Learned about AIS through a television program

    • ○ Information about AIS came with the purchase of my aquatic plant or animal

  14. 14.

    How effective would the following campaign materials be at influencing your behaviors to prevent the spread of AIS? (Please mark one response per statement on the scale below.)

  Not at all effective Slightly Somewhat Very Extremely
General campaign materials
a. Campaign advertisements in hobbyist magazines
b. Television commercials with campaign advertisements
c. Campaign advertisements on online hobbyist forums
d. Radio commercials with campaign advertisements
e. AIS informational App for your smartphone or tablet
f. Podcasts with campaign information
Materials at an aquarium store or nursery
g. Informative campaign pamphlets included with purchase
h. Informative campaign posters displayed throughout stores
i. Informative campaign flyers placed at registers
Materials at an aquarium trade show, auction or water garden expo
j. Informational booth with examples of AIS
k. Informational booth depicting the effects of AIS on the environment
l. Pamphlets handed out with information on recommended behaviors
m. Rinse buckets for plants that display the recommended behaviors
n. Informational booth with educational campaign video playing
o. Give away items (e.g., key chains and stickers) with recommended behaviors written on them

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seekamp, E., Mayer, J.E., Charlebois, P. et al. Effects of Outreach on the Prevention of Aquatic Invasive Species Spread among Organism-in-Trade Hobbyists. Environmental Management 58, 797–809 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0748-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Environmental education
  • Environmental behavior
  • Environmental awareness
  • Environmental concern