Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Landscape Visual Quality and Meiofauna Biodiversity on Sandy Beaches

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sandy beaches are central economic assets, attracting more recreational users than other coastal ecosystems. However, urbanization and landscape modification can compromise both the functional integrity and the attractiveness of beach ecosystems. Our study aimed at investigating the relationship between sandy beach artificialization and the landscape perception by the users, and between sandy beach visual attractiveness and biodiversity. We conducted visual and biodiversity assessments of urbanized and semiurbanized sandy beaches in Brazil and Uruguay. We specifically examined meiofauna as an indicator of biodiversity. We hypothesized that urbanization of sandy beaches results in a higher number of landscape detractors that negatively affect user evaluation, and that lower-rated beach units support lower levels of biodiversity. We found that urbanized beach units were rated lower than semiurbanized units, indicating that visual quality was sensitive to human interventions. Our expectations regarding the relationship between landscape perception and biodiversity were only partially met; only few structural and functional descriptors of meiofauna assemblages differed among classes of visual quality. However, lower-rated beach units exhibited signs of lower environmental quality, indicated by higher oligochaete densities and significant differences in meiofauna structure. We conclude that managing sandy beaches needs to advance beyond assessment of aesthetic parameters to also include the structure and function of beach ecosystems. Use of such supporting tools for managing sandy beaches is particularly important in view of sea level rise and increasing coastal development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alves ES, Pezzuto PR (2009) Effect of morphodynamics on annual average zonation pattern of benthic macrofauna of exposed sandy beaches in Santa Catarina, Brazil. Braz J Oceanogr 57(3):189–203. doi:10.1590/S1679-87592009000300003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves AS, Adão H, Ferrero TJ, Marquesa JC, Costa MJ, Patrício J (2013) Benthic meiofauna as indicator of ecological changes in estuarine ecosystems: the use of nematodes in ecological quality assessment. Ecol Indic 24:462–475. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR (2008) PERMANOVA + for Primer: Guide to software and statistical methods. Primer-E, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett K, Anderson WB, Wai DA, Grismer LL, Polis GA, Rose MD (2005) Marine subsidies alter the diet and abundance of insular and coastal lizard populations. Oikos 109:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell S (2001) Landscape pattern, perception and visualisation in the visual management of forests. Land Urban Plan 54:201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bongers T, Alkemade R, Yeates GW (1991) Interpretation of disturbance-induced maturity decrease in marine nematode assemblages by means of the maturity index. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 76:135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botero CM, Willians AT, Cabrera JA (2013) Advances in beach management in Latin America: overview from certification schemes. In: Finkl CW, Makowski C (eds) Environmental management and governance: advances in coastal and marine resources, vol 33. Springer, New York, pp 33–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervantes O, Espejel I, Arellano E, Delhumeau S (2008) Users’ perception as a tool to improve urban beach planning and management. Environ Manag 42(2):249–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR, Ainsworth M (1993) A method of linking multivariate community structure to environmental variables. Mar Ecol Progr 92:205–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel TC (2001) Whitherscenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Land Urban Plan 54:267–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defeo O, McLachlan A, Schoeman DS, Dugan J, Jones A, Lastra M, Scapini F (2009) Threats to sandy beach ecosystems: a review. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 81:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duck RW, Phillips MR, Williams AT, Wadham TA (2009) Is beach scenic quality a function of habitat diversity? J Coast Res SI56:415–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugan JE, Hubbard DM, McCrary MD, Pierson MO (2003) The response of macrofauna communities and shorebirds to macrophyte wrack subsidies on exposed sandy beaches of southern California. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 58:133–148. doi:10.1016/S0272-7714(03)00045-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugan JE, Hubbard DM, Rodil I, Revell DL, Schroeter S (2008) Ecological effects of coastal armoring on sandy beaches. Mar Ecol 29:160–170. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0485.2008.00231.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duvat V (2012) Public perception of beach quality: lessons learnt from a French case study. Santa Marta, Colombia. HAL Id: hal-00821861. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00821861/document

  • Gheskiere T, Hoste E, Vanaverbeke J, Vincx M, Degraer S (2004) Horizontal zonation patterns and feeding structure of marine nematode assemblages on a macrotidal, ultra-dissipative sandy beach (De Panne, Belgium). J Sea Res 52(3):211–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gheskiere T, Vincx M, Weslawski JM, Scapini F, Degraer S (2005) Meiofauna as descriptor of tourism-induced changes at sandy beaches. Mar Environ Res 60(2):245–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giere O (2009) Meiobenthology. The microscopic motile fauna of aquatic sediments. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere O, Pfannkuche O (1982) Biology and ecology of marine Oligochaeta, a review. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 20:173–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobster PH (1999) An ecological aesthetic for forest landscape management. Landsc J 18:54–64

    Google Scholar 

  • González SA, Yáñez-Navea K, Muñoz M (2014) Effect of coastal urbanization on sandy beach coleoptera Phaleria maculata (Kulzer, 1959) in northern Chile. Mar Pollut Bull 83:265–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris L, Campbell EE, Nel R, Scho-eman DS (2014) Rich diversity, strong endemism, but poor protection: addressing the neglect of sandy beach eco-systems in coastal conservation planning. Divers Distrib 20:1120–1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heip C, Vincx M, Vranken G (1985) The ecology of marine nematodes. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 23:399–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig HFKO, Fricke AH, Martin CT (1983) The effect of meiofauna and bacteria on nutrient cycles in sandy beaches. In: McLachlan A, Erasmus T (eds) Sandy beaches as ecosystems. The Hague, Port Elizabeth, pp 235–248

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Huijibers CM, Schlacher TA, Schoeman DS, Westone MA, Connolly RM (2013) Urbanisation alters processing of marine carrion on sandy beaches. Landsc Urban Plan 119:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBGE Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2014) Estimativas da população residente com data de referência 1º de julho de 2014 publicadas no Diário Oficial da União. http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/estimativa2014/estimativa_dou.shtm. Accessed 8 July 2014

  • IMM Intendencia Municipal de Montevideo (2011) Pocitos. http://www.montevideo.gub.uy/ciudad/historia/barrios/pocitos. Accessed 8 July 2014

  • Kurz T, Baudains C (2012) Biodiversity in the front yard: an investigation of landscape. Environ Behav 44:166–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loures L, Loures A, Nunes J, Panagopoulos T (2015) Landscape valuation of environmental amenities throughout the application of direct and indirect methods. Sustainability 7:794–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire GS, Miller KK, Weston MA, Young K (2011) Being beside the seaside: beach use and preferences among coastal residents of south-eastern Australia. Ocean Coast Manag 54:781–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan A, Brown AC (2006) The Ecology of Sandy Shores. Elsevier, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan A, Jaramillo E (1995) Zonation on sandy beaches. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 33:305–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Micallef A, Morgan R, Williams AT (1999) User preferences and priorities on Maltese beaches: findings and potential importance for tourism. In: Randazzo G (ed) CDROM: coastal environmental management. EUCC-Italy/EUCC

  • Moellmann AM, Corbisier TN (2003) Does tourist flow affect the meiofauna of sandy beaches? Preliminary results. J Coast Res 35:590–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Netto SA, Meneghel A (2014) Pulse of marine subsidies: the role of surf diatom Asterionellopsis glacialis accumulations in structuring the meiofauna of sandy beaches. Mar Biodiv 44:445–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann B, Vafeidis AT, Zimmermann J, Nicholls RJ (2015) Future coastal population growth and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding—a global assessment. PLoS One 10(3):e0118571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas WL, Hodda M (1999) The free-living nematodes of a temperate, high energy, sandy beach, faunal composition and variation over space and time. Hydrobiologia 394:113–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordstrom KF (2000) Beaches and dunes on developed coasts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nordstrom KF, Lampe R, Vandemark LM (2000) Re-establishing naturally functioning dunes on developed coasts. Environ Manag 25:37–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noriega R, Schlacher TA, Smeuninx B (2012) Reductions in ghost crab populations reflect urbanization of beaches and dunes. J Coast Res 28(1):123–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu L, Lindberg S, Nielsen AB (2013) Is biodiversity attractive? On-site perception of recreational and biodiversity values in urban green space. Landsc Urb Plan 119:136–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangel-Buitrago N, Anfuso G, Ergyn A, Williams AT (2012) Evaluación de paisaje escénico costero mediante el uso de la lógica matemática: aplicación en la zona costera de la Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta—Caribe Colombiano. Costas 1:181–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez JG, Lastra M, Lopez J (2003) Meiofauna distribution along a gradient of sandy beaches in northern Spain. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 58:63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvat B (1964) Les conditions hydrodynamiques interstitielles des sédiments meubles intertidaux et la répartition verticale de la faune endogenée. C R Acad Sci Paris 259:1576–1579

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlacher TA, Thompson L (2012) Beach recreation impacts benthic invertebrates on ocean-exposed sandy shores. Biol Conserv 147(1):123–132. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semeoshenkova VS, Williams AT (2011) Beach quality assessment and management in the Sotavento (Eastern) Algarve, Portugal. J Coast Res SI 64:1282–1286

    Google Scholar 

  • Silveira LF, Klein AH, Tessler MG (2011) Classificação morfodinâmica das praias do estado de Santa Catarina e do litoral norte do estado de São Paulo utilizando sensoriamento remoto. Braz J Aquat Sci Technol 15(2):13–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerfield PJ, Warwick RM, Moens T (2005) Meiofauna Techniques. In: Eleftheriou A, McIntyre A (eds) Methods for the study of marine benthos, 3rd edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 229–272

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spalding MD, Fox HE, Allen GR, Davidson N, Ferdana ZA, Finlayson M, Halpern BS, Jorge MA, Lombana A, Lourie SA, Martin KD, McManus E, Molnar J, Recchia CA, Robertson J (2007) Marine ecoregions of the world: a bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas. Bioscience 57:573–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unal O, Williams AT (1999) Beach visits and willingness to pay: Cesme peninsula, Turkey. In: Ozhan E (ed) Proceedings of the Medcoast–EMECS 99 Joint Conference, Landscape Ocean Interactions: Managing Coastal Ecosystems, Ankara, pp 1149–1162

  • Wang J, Zhou H, Zhang Z, Cong B, Xu S (2011) Effects of organic enrichment on sandy beach meiofauna: a laboratory microcosm experiment. J Ocean Univ China 10:246–254. doi:10.1007/s11802-011-1831-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams K, Cary J (2002) Landscape preferences, ecological quality and biodiversity protection. Environ Behav 34(2):257–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeppilli D, Sarrazin J, Leduc D, Arbizu PM et al (2015) Is the meiofauna a good indicator for climate change and anthropogenic impacts? Mar Biodiv 45:505–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zielinski S, Botero C (2015) Are eco-labels sustainable? Beach certification schemes in Latin America and the Caribbean. J Sustain Tuor 23:1550–1572

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the CAPES Foundation (Ministry of Education). G. Felix was supported by CAPES, and M. Polette and S.A. Netto were supported by the Brazilian Research Council (CNPq). We thank Daniel Conde (Universidad de la República, Uruguay) and Paulo Pezzuto (Universidade do Vale do Itajaí, Brazil) for the constructive comments and suggestions. R. Gingold (sweepandmore.com) is thanked for the critical reading and editing of the manuscript. We are indebted to the anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Marine Science Laboratory, University of Southern Santa Catarina, Unisul, Av Acácio Moreira 787, Dehon, Tubarão, SC, 88704-900, Brazil

    Gabriela Felix & Sérgio A. Netto

  2. Centro de Ciências Tecnológicas, da Terra e do Mar - CTTMar, Universidade do Vale do Itajaí Univali, Caixa Postal 360, Itajaí, SC, 88301-970, Brazil

    Rosemeri C. Marenzi & Marcos Polette

Authors
  1. Gabriela Felix
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rosemeri C. Marenzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marcos Polette
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sérgio A. Netto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sérgio A. Netto.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 26 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Felix, G., Marenzi, R.C., Polette, M. et al. Landscape Visual Quality and Meiofauna Biodiversity on Sandy Beaches. Environmental Management 58, 682–693 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0735-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0735-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation