Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Importance of Managing for Personal Benefits, Hedonic and Utilitarian Motivations, and Place Attachment at an Urban Natural Setting

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on antecedents of place attachment suggests that the special bonds people form with nature are influenced by a number of variables. This study examines associations between the perceived importance of managing for personal benefits, motivations, and place attachment among outdoor recreationists at an urban natural setting. Motivation was conceptualized as two-dimensional (Hedonic and Utilitarian) borrowed from the retail and consumer marketing field and previously unused in a natural resource recreation context. Hedonic and utilitarian motivations represent the experiential and functional dimensions of motivation, respectively. Relationships between the noted variables were examined through structural equation modeling. Data from an onsite survey of 219 users indicated that it was important the resource be managed to provide greater freedom from urban living as well as improved mental well-being. Furthermore, respondents exhibited moderate levels of hedonic and utilitarian motivations as well as attachment to the resource. The structural equation analysis resulted in a good fitting model with several significant relationships emerging. Among these, the perceived importance of managing for personal benefits positively influenced hedonic and utilitarian motivations. In addition, hedonic motivations positively influenced place attachment development, whereas utilitarian motivations did not. Implications of these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman I, Low S (1992) Place attachment: a conceptual inquiry. In: Altman I, Low SM (eds) Place attachment. Plenum Press, New York

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DH, Fulton DC (2008) Experience preferences as mediators of the wildlife related recreation participation: place attachment relationship. Hum Dimens Wildl 13:73–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DH, Wilhelm Stanis SA, Schneider IE, Leahy J (2008) Proximate and distant visitors: differences in importance ratings of beneficial experiences. J Park Recreat Adm 26(4):47–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle JL (2010) IBM SPSS Amos 19.0 user’s guide. Smallwaters Corporation, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Babin BJ, Darden WR, Griffen M (1994) Work and/or fun? Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. J Consum Res 20(4):644–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1989) On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci 16:74–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batra R, Ahtola OT (1991) Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Mark Lett 2(3):159–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beh A, Bruyere BL (2007) Segmentation by visitor motivation in three Kenyan national reserves. Tour Manag 28(6):1464–1471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bricker KS, Kerstetter D (2000) Level of specialization and place attachment: an exploratory study of whitewater recreationists. Leis Sci 11:233–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricker KS, Kerstetter DL (2002) An interpretation of special place meanings whitewater recreationists attach to the South Fork of the American River. Tourism Geographies 4(4):396–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budruk M (2010) Cross-language measurement equivalence of the place attachment scale: A multigroup confirmatory factor analysis approach. J Leisure Res 42(1):1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Budruk M, Wilhelm Stanis SA (2013) Place attachment and recreation experience preferences. A further exploration of the relationship. J Outdoor Recreat Tour 1(2):51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budruk M, Wilhelm Stanis SA, Schneider IE, Heisey J (2008) Crowding and experience use history: a study of the moderating effect of place attachment among water-based recreationists. Environ Manag 41:528–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budruk M, Thomas H, Tyrrell T (2009) Urban green spaces: place attachment and environmental attitudes in India. Soc Nat Resour 22:824–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin WW, Todd PA (1995) On the use, usefulness and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of causations. MIS Q 19(2):237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comrey AL, Lee HB (1992) A first course in factor analysis, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortina JM (1993) What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol 78(1):98–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach L, Meehl P (1955) Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull 52:281–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuba L, Hummon D (1993) A place to call home: identification with dwelling, community, and region. Sociol Q 34(1):111–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Souza R, Nagendra H (2011) Changes in public commons as a consequence of urbanization: the Agara lake in Bangalore, India. Environ Manag 47:840–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman DA (2000) Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. Wiley, New York, p 464

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver BL (1983) Master list of items for recreation experience preference scales and domain. Unpublished document. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver BL (1994) The benefits-based approach to amenity resource policy analysis and management. Unpublished. p 43

  • Driver BL (1996) Benefits-driven management of natural areas. Nat Areas J 16:94–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver BL, Brown PJ (1986) Probable personal benefits of outdoor recreation. In: Rolston, Holmes III (eds) A literature review. President’s commission on American outdoors. Government Printing Office, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver BL, Bruns D (1999) Needs for and underlying concepts and uses of the benefits approach to leisure. In: Burton T, Jackson E (eds) Leisure studies at the millennium. Venture Publishing, State College, pp 349–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver BL, Knoff R (1977) Personality, outdoor recreation, and expected consequences. Environ Behav 9(2):169–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver BL, Tocher SR (1970) Toward a behavioral interpretation of recreation engagements, with implications for planning. In: Driver BL (ed) Elements of outdoor recreation planning. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp 9–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver BL, Brown PJ, Peterson GL (eds) (1991a) Benefits of leisure. Venture Publishing, State College, p 483

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver BL, Tinsley HEA, Manfredo M (1991b) The paragraphs about leisure and recreation experience preference scales: results from two inventories designed to assess the breadth of the perceived psychological benefits of leisure. In: Driver BL, Brown PJ, Peterson GL (eds) Benefits of leisure. Venture Publishing, Inc, State College, pp 163–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver BL, Bruns D, Virden RJ (2008) Case study evaluation of the pilot-test application of benefits based management on the McInnis Canyons National Conservation Area: final report (technical report). Division of Recreation and Visitor Services, Bureau of Land Management, Washington, p 92

  • Eder R, Arnberger A (2012) The influence of place attachment and experience use history on perceived depreciative visitor behavior and crowding in an urban national park. Environ Manag 50:566–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford JK, MacCallum RC, Tait M (1986) The applications of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: a critical review and analysis. Pers Psychol 39:291–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell CR, Larcker DF (1981) Structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredman P, Heberlein TA (2005) Visits to the Swedish mountains: constraints and motivations. Scand J Hos and Tourism 5(3):177–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gefen D, Straub D (2005) A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: tutorial and annotated example. Commun AIS 16(1):182–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Gefen D, Straub DW, Boudreau MC (2000) Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 4(7):1–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Getz D (1991) Festivals, special events, and tourism. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gursoy D, Spangenberg ER, Rutherford DG (2006) The hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of attendees’ attitudes toward festivals. J Hosp Tour Res 30(3):279–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard LM, Williams DR (1991) Self-identity benefits of leisure activities. In: Driver BL, Brown PJ, Peterson GL (eds) Benefits of leisure. Venture Publishing, State College

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (2006) Multivariate data analysis, vol 6. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpenny EA (2006) Environmental behavior, place attachment, and park visitation: a case study of visitors to Point Pelee National Park. Dissertation abstracts international, 67 (05), 1912A. (UMI No. AAT NR14474)

  • Hammitt WE, Backlund EA, Bixler RD (2006) Place bonding for recreation places: conceptual and empirical development. Leisure studies 25(1):17–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman EC, Holbrook MB (1982) Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods and propositions. J Mark 46:92–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hixson JE, Vivienne S, McCabe S, Brown G (2011) Event attendance motivation and place attachment: an exploratory study of young residents in Adelaide, South Australia. Event Manag 15:233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6(1):1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iso-Ahola S (1999) Motivational foundations of leisure. In: Jackson EL, Burton TL (eds) Leisure studies: prospects for the twenty first century. Venture Publishing, State College, pp 35–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1989) The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline RB (2011) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 3rd edn. Guilford publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyle GT, Absher J, Graefe A (2003) The moderating role of place attachment on the relationship between attitudes toward fees and spending preferences. Leis Sci 25:33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyle GT, Graefe A, Manning R, Bacon J (2004a) Effects of place attachment on users’ perceptions of social and environmental conditions in a natural setting. J Environ Psychol 24:213–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyle GT, Mowen AJ, Tarrant M (2004b) Linking place preferences with place meaning: an examination of the relationship between place motivation and place attachment. J Environ Psychol 24:439–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyle GT, Graefe A, Manning RE (2005) Testing the dimensionality of place attachment in recreational settings. Environ Behav 37(2):153–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler E (1973) Motivations in work organizations. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Monterey

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee ME, Driver BL (1992) Benefits-based management: a new paradigm for managing amenity resources. Paper presented at: the second Canada/US workshop on visitor management in parks, forests, and protected areas, p 17

  • Lee JS, Lee CK, Choi Y (2010) Examining the role of emotional and functional values in festival evaluation. J Travel Res 50(6):685–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicka M (2011) Place attachment: how far have we come in the last 40 years? J Environ Psychol 31(3):207–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loehlin JC (1998) Latent variable models, 3rd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum RC, Roznowski M, Necowitz LB (1992) Model modifications in covariances structure analysis: the problem of capitalization on chance. Psychol Bull 111(3):490–504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manfredo M, Driver BL, Tarrant (1996) Measuring leisure motivation: a meta-analysis of the recreation experience preference scales. J Leis Res 28(3):188–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning RE (2011) Studies in outdoor recreation. Search and research for satisfaction, 3rd edn. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore RL, Driver BL (2005) Introduction to outdoor recreation: providing and managing natural resource based opportunities. Venture Publishing State College, State College, p 339

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore RL, Graefe AR (1994) Attachment to recreation settings: the case of trail users. Leis Sci 16:17–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead FL (1870) Public parks and the enlargement of towns. American Social Science Association. In: Larice M, Macdonald E (eds) The urban design reader, 2nd edn. Routledge, Boston, pp 28–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Park Poaps JKH (2010) Hedonic and utilitarian shopping motivations of fashion leadership. J Fash Mark Manag 14(2):312–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson R (2000) A meta analysis of variance accounted for the factor loadings in exploratory factor analysis. Mark Lett 11(3):261–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proshansky HM (1978) The city and self-identity. Environ Behav 10:147–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proshansky HM, Fabian AK, Kaminoff R (1983) Place-identity: physical social world socialization of the self. J Environ Psychol 3:57–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quintana SM, Maxwell SE (1999) Implications of recent development in structural equation modeling for counseling psychology. Couns Psychol 27:485–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer JL, Graham JW (2002) Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods 7(2):147–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smaldone D, Harris C, Sanyal N (2005) An exploration of place as a process: the case of Jackson Hole, WY. J Environ Psychol 25(4):397–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SLJ (1994) The tourism product. Ann Tour 21(3):582–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JW, Moore RL (2012) Social-psychological factors influencing recreation demand: evidence from two recreational rivers. Environ Behav. 10.1177/0013916512446335. http://eab.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/05/20/0013916512446335.full.pdf+htmlS

  • Spangenberg ER, Voss KE, Crowley AE (1997) Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of attitude: a generally applicable scale. In: Brucks M, MacInnis DJ (eds) NA—advances in consumer research, vol 24. Association for Consumer Research, Provo, pp 235–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein TV, Anderson DH (2002) Combining benefits-based management with ecosystem management for landscape planning: Leech Lake Watershed, Minnesota. Landsc Urban Plan 60:151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein TV , Lee ME (1995) Managing recreation resources for positive outcomes: an application of benefits-based management. J Park Recreat Admin 13(3): 52–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokols D, Shumaker SA (1981) People and places: a transactional view of settings. In: Harvey J (ed) Cognition, social behavior and the environment. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 441–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai SP (2012) Place attachment and tourism marketing: investigating international tourists in Singapore. Int J Tour Res 14:139–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuan YF (1974) Topophilia. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, p 260

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich RS, Dimberg U, Driver BL (1990) Psychophysiological indicators of leisure consequences. J Leis Res 22(2):154–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss KE, Spangenberg ER, Grohmann B (2003) Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimension of consumer attitude. J Mark Res 40(3):310–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warzecha CA, Lime DW (2001) Place attachment in Canyonlands National Park: visitors’ assessment of setting attributes on the Colorado and Green Rivers. J Park Recreat Adm 19:59–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber D, Anderson D (2010) Contact with nature: recreation experience preferences in Australian parks. Ann Leis Res 13(1–2):46–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams DR, Patterson ME, Roggenbuck JR (1992a) Beyond the commodity metaphor: examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leis Sci 14(1):29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams DR, Patterson ME, Roggenbuck JR, Watson AE (1992b) The variability of user-based social impact standards for wilderness management. For Sci 14:29–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams DR, Roggenbuck JR (1989) Measuring place attachment: some preliminary results. Paper presented at the paper presented at the Session on Outdoor Planning and Management NRPA Symposium on Leisure Research. San Antonio, TX 20-22 October 1989

  • Williams DR, Stewart SI (1998) Sense of place: an elusive concept that is finding a home in ecosystem management. J For 96(5):18–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams DR, Vaske JJ (2003) The measurement of place attachment: validity and generalizability of an approach. For Sci 49:830–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Worpole K (2000) Regaining an interior world. Landsc Des 289:20–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Yolal M, Çetinel F, Uysal M (2009) An examination of festival motivation and perceived benefits relationship: Eskişehir international festival. J Conv Event Tour 10:276–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zérah MH (2007) Conflict between green space preservation and housing needs: the case of the Sanjay Gandhi National Park in Mumbai. Cities 24(2):122–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Community Resources and Development, Arizona State University, 411 N Central Avenue, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA

    Megha Budruk & Woojin Lee

Authors
  1. Megha Budruk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Woojin Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Megha Budruk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Budruk, M., Lee, W. Importance of Managing for Personal Benefits, Hedonic and Utilitarian Motivations, and Place Attachment at an Urban Natural Setting. Environmental Management 58, 504–517 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0723-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0723-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation