Environmental Management

, Volume 58, Issue 3, pp 399–416 | Cite as

Rethinking Social Barriers to Effective Adaptive Management

Article

Abstract

Adaptive management is an approach to environmental management based on learning-by-doing, where complexity, uncertainty, and incomplete knowledge are acknowledged and management actions are treated as experiments. However, while adaptive management has received significant uptake in theory, it remains elusively difficult to enact in practice. Proponents have blamed social barriers and have called for social science contributions. We address this gap by adopting a qualitative approach to explore the development of an ecological monitoring program within an adaptive management framework in a public land management organization in Australia. We ask what practices are used to enact the monitoring program and how do they shape learning? We elicit a rich narrative through extensive interviews with a key individual, and analyze the narrative using thematic analysis. We discuss our results in relation to the concept of ‘knowledge work’ and Westley’s (2002) framework for interpreting the strategies of adaptive managers—‘managing through, in, out and up.’ We find that enacting the program is conditioned by distinct and sometimes competing logics—scientific logics prioritizing experimentation and learning, public logics emphasizing accountability and legitimacy, and corporate logics demanding efficiency and effectiveness. In this context, implementing adaptive management entails practices of translation to negotiate tensions between objective and situated knowledge, external experts and organizational staff, and collegiate and hierarchical norms. Our contribution embraces the ‘doing’ of learning-by-doing and marks a shift from conceptualizing the social as an external barrier to adaptive management to be removed to an approach that situates adaptive management as social knowledge practice.

Keywords

Adaptive management Narrative Qualitative Practice Knowledge work Learning 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to ‘June’ for sharing her story—this article is really hers. Thanks also to Ruth Beilin, Wiebren Boonstra, Emily Boyd, and Stephan Barthel for improving the paper greatly with comments, suggestions, and discussions. The research time of Simon West and Lisen Schultz was funded by Vetenskapsrådet (VR), the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (Mistra), and Ebba och Sven Schwartz Stiftelse.

References

  1. Allan C, Curtis A (2005) Nipped in the bud: why regional scale adaptive management is not blooming. Environ Manag 36(3):414–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen CR, Gunderson LH (2011) Pathology and failure in the design and implementation of adaptive management. J Environ Manag 92:1379–1384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beilin R, West S (2016) Performing natures: adaptive management in the ‘eternally unfolding present.’ In: Head L, Saltzman S, Stenseke M (eds) Nature, temporality and environmental management: Scandinavian and Australian perspectives on landscapes and peoples. Oxford, Routledge, pp 186–203Google Scholar
  4. Blackler F (1995) Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: an overview and interpretation. Organ Stud 16:1021–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cairns R, Stirling A (2014) ‘Maintaining planetary systems’ or ‘concentrating global power?’ high stakes in contending framings of climate geoengineering. Glob Environ Change 28:25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  8. du Toit JT, Rogers KH, Biggs HC (2003) The Kruger Experience: Ecology and Management of Savanna Heterogeneity. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Eden S (2008) Being fieldworthy: environmental knowledge practices and the space of the field in forest certification. Environ Plan D 26:1018–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fabricius C, Cundill G (2014) Learning in adaptive management: insights from published practice. Ecol Soc 19(1):29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feldman MS, Orlikowski WJ (2011) Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organ Sci 22(5):1240–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gad C, Jensen CB (2014) The promises of practice. Sociol Rev 62:698–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS (1995) Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Holling CS (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. John Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson BL (1999) Introduction to the special feature: adaptive management—scientifically sound, socially challenged? Conserv Ecol 3(1):10Google Scholar
  17. Johnson FA, Williams BK, Nichols JD (2013) Resilience thinking and a decision-analytic approach to conservation: strange bedfellows or essential partners? Ecol Soc 18(2):27Google Scholar
  18. Kleinman DL, Vallas SP (2001) Science, capitalism, and the rise of the “knowledge worker”: the changing structure of knowledge production in the United States. Theory Soc 30(4):451–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kvale S (1996) Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  20. Latour B (1999) Circulating reference: sampling the soil in the amazon forest. Latour, B Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press, Harvard, pp 24–79Google Scholar
  21. Lee K (1993) Compass and gyroscope: integrating science and politics for the environment. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  22. McLaughlin C, Krantzberg G (2012) An appraisal of management pathologies in the Great Lakes. Sci Total Environ 416:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Olsson P, Folke C, Hahn T (2004a) Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecol Soc 9(4):2Google Scholar
  24. Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004b) Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environ Manag 34(1):75–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pickering A (1992) From science as knowledge to science as practice. In: Pickering A (ed) Science as practice and culture. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Polkinghorne DE (2007) Validity issues in narrative research. Qual Inq 13(4):471–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pyöriä P (2005) The concept of knowledge work revisited. J Knowl Manag 9(3):116–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rist L, Campbell BM, Frost P (2012) Adaptive management: where are we now? Environ Conserv 40(1):5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sandberg J, Tsoukas H (2011) Grasping the logic of practice: theorizing through practical rationality. Acad Manag Rev 36(2):338–360Google Scholar
  30. Schultz L, Fazey I (2009) Effective leadership for adaptive management. In: Allan C, Stankey GH (eds) Adaptive environmental management: a practitioner’s guide. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schultze U (2000) A confessional account of an ethnography about knowledge work. MIS Quartely 24(1):3–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Seidman IE (1991) Interviewing as qualitative research. Teachers College Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Stathis P, Jacobson C (2009) Institutionalizing adaptive management: creating a culture of learning in new south wales parks and wildlife service. In: Allan C, Stankey GH (eds) Adaptive environmental management: a practitioner’s guide. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 305–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wagenaar H (2004) “Knowing” the rules: administrative work as practice. Public Adm Rev 64(6):643–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wagenaar H (2011) Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. M.E. Sharpe, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Wagenaar H, Wilkinson C (2015) Enacting resilience: a performative account of governing for urban resilience. Urban Stud 52(7):1265–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Walters C (1986) Adaptive management of renewable resources. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Walters CJ, Holling CS (1990) Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71(6):2060–2068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weick KE (2007) The generative properties of richness. Acad Manag J 50:14–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Westley F (2002) The devil in the dynamics: adaptive management on the front lines. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, pp 333–360Google Scholar
  41. Westley FR, Tjornbo O, Schultz L, Olsson P, Folke C, Crona B, Bodin Ö (2013) A theory of transformative agency in linked social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 18(3):27Google Scholar
  42. Williams BK (2011) Passive and active adaptive management: approaches and an example. J Environ Manag 92:1371–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yanow D (2007) Interpretation in Policy Analysis: on Methods and Practice. Crit Policy Stud 1(1):110–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stockholm Resilience CentreStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  2. 2.School of Global, Urban and Social StudiesRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations