Skip to main content

Interrogating Social Sustainability in the Biofuels Sector in Latin America: Tensions Between Global Standards and Local Experiences in Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia

Abstract

Across the Americas, biofuels production systems are diverse due to geographic conditions, historical patterns of land tenure, different land use patterns, government policy frameworks, and relations between the national state and civil society, all of which shape the role that biofuels play in individual nations. Although many national governments throughout the Americas continue to incentivize growth of the biofuels industry, one key challenge for biofuels sustainability has been concern about its social impacts. In this article, we discuss some of the key social issues and tensions related to the recent expansion of biofuels production in Mexico, Colombia, and Brazil. We argue that a process of “simplification” of ecological and cultural diversity has aided the expansion of the biofuels frontier in these countries, but is also undermining their viability. We consider the ability of governments and non-state actors in multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSI) to address social and environmental concerns that affect rural livelihoods as a result of biofuels expansion. We analyze the tensions between global sustainability standards, national level policies for biofuels development, and local level impacts and visions of sustainability. We find that both government and MSI efforts to address sustainability concerns have limited impact, and recommend greater incorporation of local needs and expertise to improve governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. The projects, “A Research Coordination Network on Pan American Bioenergy Sustainability,” and “Sustainability, Ecosystem Services, and Bioenergy Development across the Americas,” are funded by the National Science Foundation in the US. Authors of this paper are active participants of these multi-disciplinary projects from the US, Mexico, Colombia, and Brazil.

  2. Although we have no information for GCE, we were informed by Miguel Solé, Repsol´s engineer in Yucatan, in an interview in Merida in 2013, that he had been led to believe Kuosol´s jatropha plantations would produce 10 tons of seed per hectare. In fact, they never produced more than 1 ton per hectare before the project was closed due to lack of economic viability.

  3. As Mexico`s Ley General de Desarrollo Forestal Sustentable (2003) makes deforestation illegal, it was advantageous for GCE to declare that the previous land use of the properties it purchased was pasture, something that was never questioned by the environmental authorities as the land had belonged to old cattle ranches. What GCE failed to specify was that the cattle ranches had been abandoned some 30 to 50 years before, giving time for the secondary vegetation to reach more than 15 meters.

  4. The Colombian government is planning the expansion of biofuel production by incorporating 5 million hectares potentially available for growing biofuel feedstock, especially in the Orinoquia region. (Consorcio CUE 2012).

  5. See Dr. Jorge Bendeck address to the President of Colombia: http://www.fedebiocombustibles.com/v3/nota-web-id-676.htm. Accessed 7 April 2014.

  6. He is known as the palm czar, as during the period he was in office he promoted the rural capitalization incentive for palm plantations and the productive alliances with small farmers aimed to channel funds from international cooperation, mainly from the U.S. (Seeboldt and Salinas, 2010).

  7. According to Gómez and Cavelier (2009), the negative images of indigenous societies in Los Llanos (vagabonds, barbarians) which emerged during the sixteenth century are still pervasive.

  8. The participants of the workshop were 92 researchers and technicians from universities, research centers, NGOs, and governmental agencies (See Lasso et al. 2011).

  9. WWF is currently working on adjusting the methodology.

  10. Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) also began producing palm oil in Pará and is also a member of RSPO for its production sites elsewhere. However, ADM declared its intention to only source RSPO palm oil to the US market by 2015 so they may expand RSPO production in places like Brazil as well (ADM 2014).

References

  • ANP (Agência Nacional do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis) (2013) Anuário estatístico brasileiro do petróleo, gás natural e biocombustíveis. ANP, Rio de Janeiro

  • Backhouse M (2013) A desapropriação sustentável da Amazônia: O caso dos investimentos em dendê no Pará. Fair Fuels? Working paper 6, Berlin. http://www.fair-fuels.de/data/user/Download/Veröffentlichungen/FairFuels-Working_Paper_6_Portuguese.pdf. Accessed 16 March 2014

  • Bailey C, Dyer J, Teeter L (2011) Assessing the rural development potential of lignocellulosic biofuels in Alabama. Biomass Bioenergy 35(4):1408–1417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailis R, Baka J (2011) Constructing sustainable biofuels: governance of the emerging biofuel economy. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 101:827–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain C (2011) Local ownership of ethanol plants: what are the effects on communities? Biomass Bioenergy 35(4):1400–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain C, Selfa T (2013) Framing and reframing the environmental risks and economic benefits of ethanol production in Iowa. Agric Hum Values 30(3):351–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baka J (2013) What wastelands? A critique of biofuel policy discourse in South India. Geoforum. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.08.007

    Google Scholar 

  • Barta P (2007) Jatropha plant gains steam in global race for biofuels. Wall Street J. http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB118788662080906716?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB118788662080906716.html. Accessed 15 Oct 2014

  • Becerril J (2013) Unpublished household survey for the project “Sustainability evaluation of jatropha oil production in Yucatan, 2013–2015,” supported by USAID and NSF PIRE

  • Borras S, Franco J (2012) Global land grabbing and trajectories of agrarian change: a preliminary analysis. J Agrar Change 12(1):34–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borras S, McMichael P, Scoones I (2010) The politics of biofuels, land and agrarian change: editors’ introduction. J Peasant Stud 37(4):575–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borras S, Jr., Franco J, Kay C, Spoor M (2011) Land grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean viewed from broader international perspectives FAO. A paper prepared for and presented at the Latin America and Caribbean seminar: ‘Dinámicas en el mercado de la tierra en América Latina y el Caribe’, pp 14–15 November, FAO Regional Office, Santiago, Chile

  • Brasil (2010a) Projeto de Lei No. 7.326 de 13 de maio de 2010. Dispõe sobre a criação do Programa de Produção Sustentável da Palma de Óleo no Brasil, estabelece diretrizes para o zoneamento agroecológico para a cultura de palma de óleo, e dá outras providências. http://www.camara.gov.br/proposicoesWeb/fichadetramitacao?idProposicao=477167. Accessed 16 March 2014

  • Brasil (2010b) Zoneamento agroecológico, produção e manejo para a cultura da palma de óleo na Amazônia, in: Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa), Embrapa Solos, Rio de Janeiro

  • Broadway M, Stull D (2006) Meat processing and Garden City, KS: Boom and Bust. J Rural Stud 22:55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao S, Colchester M, Jiwan N (2012) Securing rights through commodity roundtables? A comparative review. Forest Peoples Program and Rights and Resources Initiative. http://www.forestpeoples.org/sites/fpp/files/publication/2012/11/securing-rights-through-commodity-roundtables-comparative-review.pdf. Accessed 26 Oct 2013

  • Cheyns E (2011) Multi-stakeholder initiatives for sustainable agriculture: limits of the ‘inclusiveness’ paradigm. In: Ponte S, Gibbon P, Vestergarrd J (eds) Governing through standards. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 210–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Conservation International (CI) Brasil (2009) Diagnóstico da Biodiversidade, Proposta de Criação de uma RPPN e de um Programa de Gestão Ambiental para a Área da Agropalma. Pará, Brasil

  • Consorcio CUE (2012) Evaluación del ciclo de vida de la cadena de producción de biocombustibles en Colombia. Executive Report. http://www.minminas.gov.co/documents/10180/488888/Capitulo_0_Resumen_ejecutivo_final.pdf/f032d18c-205f-499b-8d59-d1b359e7c572. Accessed 29 Oct 2014

  • Contraloría General de la República de Colombia (2014) Informe de Actuación Especial. Instituto Colombiano de Desarrollo Rural—INCODER. Actuación especial sobre la acumulación irregular de predios baldíos en la altillanura colombiana (Año 2012). Febrero 2014. http://www.contraloriagen.gov.co/documents/10136/176635901/INCODER+-+Acumulacion+Irregular+de+Baldios+-+Informe+ACES.PDF/cc3400ed-934b-4144-b78b-2206e1c166e9?version=1.0. Accessed 3 May 2014

  • Creutzig F, Popp A, Plevin R, Luderer G, Minx J, Edenhofer O (2012) Reconciling top-down and bottom-up modeling on future bioenergy deployment. Nat Clim Change 2:320–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesar AS, Batalha MO (2013) Brazilian biodiesel: the case of the palm’s social projects. Energy Policy 56:165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djama M, Fouilleux E, Vagneron I (2011) Standard setting, certifying and benchmarking: a governmentality approach to sustainability standards in the agro-food sector. In: Ponte S, Gibbon P, Vestergaard J (eds) Governing through standards. Palgrave MacMillan, New York, pp 184–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastmond A, García C, Fuentes A, Becerril-García J (2014) Mexico. In: Solomon BD, Bailis R (eds) Sustainable development of biofuels in Latin America and the Caribbean. Springer, New York, pp 203–222

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Elgert L (2012) Certified discourse: the politics of developing soy certification standards. Geoforum 43:295–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • England L, Brown R (2003) Community and resource extraction in rural America. In: David Brown L, Louis Swanson E (eds) Challenges for rural America in the twenty-first century. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA, pp 317–328

    Google Scholar 

  • EU (European Union) (2013) Renewable energy recognized voluntary schemes. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/renewables/biofuels/sustainability_schemes_en.htm. Accessed 26 Oct 2013

  • Ewell P (1984) The intensification of Peasant Agriculture in Yucatan. Cornell/International Agricultural Economics Study, AE Research 84-4

  • Fajardo-Montaña D, Urbina F (eds) (1998) Colombia Orinoco. FEN Colombia, Bogotá

    Google Scholar 

  • Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319(5867):1235–1238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fedebiocombustibles (2011) Palabras del Dr. Jorge Bendeck ante el Señor Presidente de la República. http://www.fedebiocombustibles.com/v3/nota-web-id-676.htm#sthash.yvIzJfsV.dpuf. Accessed 7 April 2014

  • Fedebiocombustibles (Federación Nacional de Biocombustibles de Colombia) (2014) Cifras Informativas del Sector Biocombustibles, Biodiesel de Palma de Aceite. http://www.fedebiocombustibles.com/files/Cifras%20Informativas%20del%20Sector%20Biocombustibles%20-%20BIODIESEL%2854%29.pdf. Accessed 8 April 2014

  • Fedepalma (2013) Minianuario Estadístico 2013. Principales cifras de la agroindustria de la palma de aceite en Colombia. http://fedepalma.portalpalmero.com/bigdata/fedepalma/pdf/minianuario_estadistico_2013.pdf. Accessed 29 Oct 2014

  • Frayssinet F (2013) Oil Palm Expands on Deforested Land in Brazil’s Rainforest. Inter Press Service News Agency . http://www.ipsnews.net/2013/11/oil-palm-expands-on-deforested-land-in-brazils-rainforest/. Accessed 20 May 2014

  • German L, Schoneveld G, Pacheco P (2011) Local Social and environmental impacts of biofuels: global comparative assessment and implications for governance. Ecol Soc 16(4):29

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillon S (2010) Fields of dreams: negotiating an ethanol agenda in the midwest United States. J Peasant Stud 37(4):723–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Clean Energy Holdings (2014) mission and corporate sustainability policy consulted at: http://www.gceholdings.com. Accessed 19 Dec 2014

  • Gómez AJ, Cavelier I (2009) Las sociedades indígenas de los llanos: sistemas económicos y características socio-culturales. In: Fajardo-Montaña D, Urbina F (eds) Colombia Orinoco. FEN Colombia, Bogotá

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazell P (2006) Developing bioenergy: a win-win approach that can serve the poor and the environment. Int Food Policy Inst, Washington, DC. doi:10.2499/Focus14CH12

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodbod J, Tomei J (2013) Demystifying the social impacts of biofuels at the local level: where is the evidence? Geogr Compass 7(7):478–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphries S (1993) The intensification of traditional agriculture among Yucatec Maya Farmers: facing up to the dilemma of livelihood sustainability. Hum Ecol 21(1):87–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homma AK, Vieira ICG (2012) Colóquio sobre dendezeiro: Prioridades de Pesquisas Econômicas, sociais e Ambientais na Amazônia. Amazônia: Ciência & De-senvolvimento. Belém, v. 8, n. 15, pp. 79–90, 2012. Disponível em: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/handle/doc/968530

  • Hunsberger C et al. (2013) Livelihood impacts of biofuel crop production: Implications for governance. Geoforum. doi:10.10/j.geoforum.2013.09.022

    Google Scholar 

  • IAvH (2009) Informe sobre el estado de la biodiversidad en Colombia 2007–2008. Piedemonte orinocence, sabanas y bosques asociados al norte del río Guaviare. Bogotá: Instituto Alexander von Humboldt

  • IBGE (2011) Produção Agrícola Municipal:Culturas temporárias e permanentes. In: Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Rio de Janeiro

  • Jongschaap REE, Corre WE, Bindreban PS, Brandenburg WA (2007) Claims and facts on Jatropha curcas L. Report 158. Plant Research International, Wageningen

  • Kleinschmidt K, Muller M (2005) Cultivating a new rural economy. Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Klooster D (2011) The local instrumentality of global standards: how mexican indigenous communities use FSC certification to foster a furniture production network. In: Gibbon SP, Vestergaard J (eds) Governing through standards. Palgrave MacMillan, New York, pp 266–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh L, Ghazoul J (2008) Biofuels, biodiversity and people: understanding the conflicts and finding opportunities. Biol Conserv 141:2450–2460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langevin M (2011) Social inclusion, environmental sustainability, and Brazil’s national biodiesel production and use policy: the critical case of Agropalma. Renew Energy Law Policy Rev 3(2011):223–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen R, Jiwan N, Rompas A, Jenito J, Osbeck M, Tarigan A (2014) Toward ‘hybrid accountability’ in EU biofuels policy? Community grievances and competing water claims in the Central Kalimantan oil palm sector. Geoforum 54:295–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasso CA, Rial A, Matallana C, Ramírez W, Señaris J, Díaz-Pulido A, Corzo G, Machado-Allison A (eds) (2011) Biodiversidad de la cuenca del Orinoco. II Áreas prioritarias para la conservación y uso sostenible. Bogotá: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Ministerio del Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial, WWF Colombia, Fundación Omacha, Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto de Estudios de la Orinoquia (Universidad Nacional de Colombia)

  • Levidow L (2013) EU criteria for sustainable biofuels: accounting for carbon, depoliticising plunder. Geoforum 44:211–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ley General de Desarrollo Forestal Sustentable (2003). http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/259.pdf

  • McMichael P (2010) Agrofuels in the food regime. J Peasant Stud 37(4):609–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MDA Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário (2010) Programa Nacional de Produção e Uso de Biodiesel: inclusão social e desenvolvimento territorial. Secretaria da Agricultura Familiar, MDA, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendonça ML, Pitta F, Carlos Vinicius Xavier (2013) The sugarcane industry and the global economic crisis. Transnational Institute and the Network for Social Justice and Human Rights, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol A (2007) Boundless biofuels? Between environmental sustainability and vulnerability. Sociol Ruralis 47(4):297–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahum J, Malcher T (2012) Dinâmicas Territoriais do Espaço Agrário na Amazônia: A Dendeicultura na Microregião de Tomé-Açu (PA). Confins. http://confins.revues.org/7947. Accessed 10 March 2014

  • Pacheco P (2012) Soybean and oil palm expansion in South America: a review of main trends and implications. CIFOR Working Paper 2012 No. 90. http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/Wpapers/WP90Pacheco.pdf. Accessed 24 Dec 2014

  • Pacheco-Castro J (2010) La milenaria milpa de subsistencia: un agroecosistema en peligro de extinción. In: Duran, R y M Méndez (eds) Biodiversidad y Desarrollo Humano en Yucatán CICY, PPD-FMAM, CONABIO, SEDUMA: Mérida, Yucatán, México, pp 50–53

  • Partzsch L (2011a) The legitimacy of biofuels certification. Agric Hum Values 28(3):413–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partzsch L (2011b) The legitimacy of biofuels certification. Agric Hum Values 28:413–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponte S (2008) Greener than thou: the political economy of fish ecolabeling and its local manifestations in South Africa. World Dev 36(1):159–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponte S (2014) ‘Roundtabling’ sustainability: lessons from the biofuel industry. Geoforum 54:261–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponte S, Gibbon P, Verstergaard J (2011) Governing through standards: an introduction. In: Ponte S, Gibbon P, Vestergaard J (eds) Governing through standards. Palgrave MacMillan, New York, pp 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Raswant V, Hart N, Romano M (2008) Biofuel expansion: challenges, risks and opportunities for rural poor people. How the poor can benefit from this emerging opportunity. Paper prepared for the Round Table organized during the Thirty-first session of IFAD’s Governing Council Rome, 14 February 2008. http://www.ifad.org/events/gc/31/roundtable/biofuels.pdf

  • Robinson S, J Beckerlegge (2008) Jatropha in Africa. Economic Potential. http://www.jatropha.pro/PDF%20bestanden/Jatropha_in_Africa_Economic_Potential-2008.pdf

  • Rodríguez-Becerra M (ed) (2009) La Mejor Orinoquia que podemos construir. Elementos para la sostenibilidad ambiental del desarrollo. Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá

    Google Scholar 

  • RSPO (2014) Principles and criteria for the production of sustainable palm oil. Draft of Colombia’s national interpretation (NI) of RSPO 2013 standard. Document for public consultation. http://web.fedepalma.org/sites/default/files/files/Fedepalma/Draftofcolombian_NIforPC.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2014

  • SAGARPA (2009) Programa de producción sustentable de insumos para bioenergéticos y de desarrollo cientifico tecnológico, 2009–2012. http://www.bioenergeticos.gob.mx/descargas/Programa-Produccion-Sustentable-Bioenergeticos-PROINBIOS.pdf

  • Sakamoto L (2013) Expansão do dendê na Amazônia brasileira: elementos Pará uma análise dos impactos sobre a agricultura familiar no nordeste do Pará. Repórter Brasil. http://reporterbrasil.org.br/documentos/Dende2013.pdf. Accessed 19 March 2014

  • Schaffer S, Herrera S, Obermaier M, Lèbre La Rovere E (2012) Can family farmers benefit from biofuel sustainability standards? Evidence from the Brazilian social fuel certificate. Biofuels 3(6):725–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott J (1998) Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • SCS Global Services (2012) Certification evaluation report, roundtable on sustainable biofuels, Global Clean Energy (SCS certificate Code: SCS-RSB/PC-0001. November 20)

  • Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong F, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J, Tokgoz S, Hayes D, Yu T (2008) Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319:1238–1240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seeboldt S, Salinas Y (2010) Responsabilidad y sostenibilidad de la industria de la palma. ¿Son factibles los Principios y Criterios de la RSPO en Colombia?. Dos Investigaciones de Febrero de 2010. Oxfam-Novib- Indepaz, Bogotá

  • Selfa T (2010) Global benefits, local burdens? The paradox of governing biofuels production in Kansas and Iowa. Renew Agric Food Syst 25(2):129–142. doi:10.1017/S1742170510000153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selfa T, Kulcsár L, Bain C, Goe R, Middendorf G (2011) Biofuels bonanza? Exploring community perceptions of the promises and perils of biofuels production. Biomass Bioenergy 35(4):1379–1389. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selfa T, Bain C, Moreno R (2014) Depoliticizing land and water ‘grabs’ in Colombia: the limits of Bonsucro certification for enhancing sustainable biofuel practices. Agric Hum Values 31:455–468, Special Issue on The Paradoxes of Multi stakeholder initiatives in the age of global agri-food governance

  • Silva-Castenada L (2012) A Forest of Evidence: third party certification and multiple forms of proof—case study of oil palm plantations in Indonesia. Agric Hum Values 29:261–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Skutsch M, de los Ríos E, Solis S, Riegelhaupt E, Hinojosa D, Gerfert S, Gao Y, Masera O (2011) Jatropha in Mexico: environmental and social impacts of an incipient biofuel program. Ecol Soc 16(4):11. doi:10.5751/ES-04448-160411

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon BD, Banerjee A, Acevedo A, Halvorsen KE, Eastmond A (2014) Policies for the sustainable Development of biofuels in Pan America: a review and synthesis of five countries. Revised version submitted to Environmental Management

  • Stattman S, Mol A (2014) Social sustainability of Brazilian biodiesel: the role of agriculture. Geoforum. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.04.001

    Google Scholar 

  • Stattman SL, Hospes O, Mol APJ (2013) Governing biofuels in Brazil: a comparison of ethanol and biodiesel policies. Energy Policy 61:22–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson J, Herrera S (2010) Biofuels in Brazil: debates and Impacts. J Peasant Stud 37(4):749–768. doi:10.1080/03066150.2010.512457

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported in part by U.S. National Science Foundation grants CBET-1140152 RCN-SEES: A Research Coordination Network on Pan American Biofuels and Bioenergy Sustainability and OISE-PIRE 1243444: Sustainability, Ecosystem Services, and Bioenergy Development across the Americas. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The survey in Mexico was financed jointly by the NSF PIRE and USAID in the project: “Sustainability evaluation of jatropha oil production in Yucatan, 2013–2015.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theresa Selfa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Selfa, T., Bain, C., Moreno, R. et al. Interrogating Social Sustainability in the Biofuels Sector in Latin America: Tensions Between Global Standards and Local Experiences in Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia. Environmental Management 56, 1315–1329 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0535-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0535-8

Keywords

  • Latin America
  • Biofuels
  • Livelihood impacts
  • Multi-stakeholder initiatives
  • Social Fuel Seal
  • RSPO