Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What is Novel About Novel Ecosystems: Managing Change in an Ever-Changing World

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Influenced by natural climatic, geological, and evolutionary changes, landscapes and the ecosystems within are continuously changing. In addition to these natural pressures, anthropogenic drivers have increasingly influenced ecosystems. Whether affected by natural or anthropogenic processes, ecosystems, ecological communities, and ecosystem functioning are dynamic and can lead to “novel” or “emerging” ecosystems. Current literature identifies several definitions of these ecosystems but lacks an unambiguous definition and framework for categorizing what constitutes a novel ecosystem and for informing decisions around best management practices. Here we explore the various definitions used for novel ecosystems, present an unambiguous definition, and propose a framework for identifying the most appropriate management option. We identify and discuss three approaches for managing novel ecosystems: managing against, tolerating, and managing for these systems, and we provide real-world examples of each approach. We suggest that this framework will allow managers to make thoughtful decisions about which strategy is most appropriate for each unique situation, to determine whether the strategy is working, and to facilitate decision-making when it is time to modify the management approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bendevis MA, Owens MK, Heilman JL, McInnes KJ (2010) Carbon exchange and water loss from two evergreen trees in a semiarid woodland. Ecohydrology 3:107–115

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Pysek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, Jarosik V, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 26:333–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blight LK, Ainley DG (2008) Southern ocean not so pristine. Science 12:1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britton JR, Gozlan RE, Copp GH (2011) Managing non-native fish in the environment. Fish Fish 12:256–274. doi:10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JB, Gutierrez RJ, Anthony RG, Cullinan T, Diller LV, Forsman ED, Franklin AB (2007) A synopsis of suggested approaches to address potential competitive interactions between barred owls (Strix varia) and spotted owls (S. occidentalis). Biol Invas 9:679–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly NA, O’Neill CR, Knuth BA, Brown TL (2007) Economic impacts of zebra mussels on drinking water treatment and electric power generation facilities. Environ Manage 40:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox PA (1983) Extinction of the Hawaiian avifauna resulted in a change of pollinators for the ieie, Freycinetia arborea. Oikos 41:195–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford SS, Muir AM (2008) Global introductions of salmon and trout of the genus Oncorhynchus: 1870–2007. Rev Fish Biol Fish 18:313–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crumley CL (1987) “Historical ecology” regional dynamics: Burgundian landscapes in historical perspectives. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, pp 237–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis MB, Shaw RG (2001) Range shifts and adaptive responses to quaternary climate change. Science 292:673–679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doney SC, Ruckelshaus M, Duffy JE, Barry JP, Chan F, English CA, Galindo HM, Grebmeier JM, Hollowed AB, Knowlton N, Polovina J, Rabalais NN, Sydeman WJ, Talley LD (2012) Climate change impacts on marine ecosystems. Ann Rev Mar Sci 4:11–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duveneck MJ, Scheller RM (2014) Climate suitability planting as a strategy for maintaining forest productivity and functional diversity. Ecol Appl. doi:10.1890/14-0738.1

  • Ellison AM, Bank MS, Clinton BD, Colburn EA, Elliott K, Ford CR, Foster DR, Kloeppel BD, Knoepp JD, Lovett GM, Mohan J, Orwig DA, Rodenhouse NL, Sobczak WV, Stinson KA, Stone JK, Swan CM, Thompson J, Von Holle B, Webster JR (2005) Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Front Ecol Env 3:479–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein JH, Pejchar L, Daily G (2008) Using return-on-investment to guide restoration: a case study from Hawaii. Cons Lett 1:236–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D (2003) Effects of introduced bees on native ecosystems. Ann Rev Ecol Evol System 34:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray LK, Gylander T, Mbogga MS, Chen P-Y, Hamann A (2010) Assisted migration to address climate change: recommendations for aspen reforestation in western Canada. Ecol Appl 21:1591–1603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale CM, Frelich LE, Reich PB, Pastor J (2005) Effects of European earthworm invasion on soil characteristics in northern hardwood forests of Minnesota, USA. Ecosystems 8:911–927

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harwell HD, Kingsley-Smith PR, Kellogg ML, Allen SM, Allen SK Jr, Meritt DW, Paynter KT Jr, Luckenbach MW (2010) A comparison of Crassostrea virginica and C. ariakensis in Chesapeake Bay: Does oyster species affect habitat function? J Shellfish Res 29:253–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrix PF, Callaham MA Jr, Drake JM, Huang C-Y, James SW et al (2008) Pandora’s box contained bait: the global problem of introduced earthworms. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:593–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Arico S, Aronson J, Baron JS, Bridgewater P, Cramer VA, Epstein PR, Ewel JJ, Klink CA, Lugo AE, Norton D, Ojima D, Richardson DM, Sanderson EW, Valladares F, Vila M, Zamora R, Zobel M (2006) Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Glob Ecol Biogeo 15:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Harris J (2009) Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. Trends Ecol Evol 24:599–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Hallett LM, Ehrlich PR, Mooney H (2011) Intervention Ecology: applying ecological science in the twenty-first century. Bioscience 61:442–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Hall C (eds) (2013) Novel ecosystems. Intervening in the new ecological world order. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ et al (2014) Managing the whole landscape: historical, hybrid, and novel ecosystems. Front Ecol Env 12:557–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtgrieve GW, Schindler DE, Hobbs WO, Leavitt PR, Ward EJ, Bunting L, Chen G, Finney BP, Gregory-Eaves I, Holmgren S, Lisac MJ, Lisi PJ, Nydick K, Rogers LA, Saros JE, Selbie DT, Shapley MD, Walsh PB, Wolfe AP (2011) A coherent signature of anthropogenic nitrogen deposition to remote watersheds of the Northern Hemisphere. Science 334:1545–1548

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins RT (1996) Trade and exotic species introductions. Cons Bio 10:300–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane RE, Hessburg PF, Landres PB, Swanson FJ (2009) The use of historical range and variability (HRV) in landscape management. Forest Ecol Manage 258:1025–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmelman M (2013) Going with the flow. The New York Times, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinloch BB (2003) White pine blister rust in north america: past and prognosis. Phytopathology 93:1044–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn TJT, Kenneth W, Cao D, George MR (2007) Juniper removal may not increase overall Klamath River Basin water yields. Calif Agric 61:166–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffertty KD, Kuris AM (1996) Biological control of marine pests. Ecology 77:1989–2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane J (1993) Over wintering monarch butterflies in California: past and present. Nat Hist Mus Los Angel Cty Sci Ser 38:335–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J, Felton A, Crane M, Michael D, Macgregor C, Montague-Drake R, Manning A, Hobbs RJ (2008) Novel ecosystems resulting from landscape transformation create dilemmas for modern conservation practice. Cons Lett 1:129–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE, Baillie SR, Buckland ST, Dick JM, Elston DA, Scott EM, Smith RI, Somerfield PJ, Watt AD (2010) Long-term datasets in biodiversity research and monitoring: assessing change in ecological communities through time. Trends Ecol Evol 25:574–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maloy OC (1997) White pine blister rust control in North America: a case history. Ann Rev Phytopath 35:87–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin LJ, Blossey B, Ellis E (2012) Mapping where ecologists work: biases in the global distribution of terrestrial ecological observations. Front Ecol Environ 10:195–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melo FPL, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Fahrig L, Martínez-Ramos M, Tabarelli M (2013) On the hope for biodiversity-friendly tropical landscapes. Trends Ecol Evol 28:462–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milton SJ (2003) ‘Emerging ecosystems’: a washing-stone for ecologists, economists and sociologists. S Afr J Sci 99:404–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse NB, Pellissier PA, Cianciola EN, Brereton RL, Sullivan MM, Shonka NK, Wheeler TB, McDowell WH (2014) Novel ecosystems in the Anthropocene: a revision of the novel ecosystem concept for pragmatic applications. Ecol Soc 19:12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss JA, Burreson EM, Cordes JF, Cungan CF, Brown GD, Wang A, Wu X, Reece KS (2007) Pathogens in Crassostrea ariakensis and other Asian oyster species: implications for non-native oyster introduction in Chesapeake Bay. Dis Aquat Org 77:207–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murcia C, Aronson J, Kattan GH, Moreno-Mateos D, Dixon K, Simberloff D (2014) A critique of the “novel ecosystem” concept. Trends Ecol Evol 29:548–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens MK (2008) Juniper tree impacts on local water budgets. In: Van Auken OW (ed) Western North American Juniperus communities ecological studies. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer AR (1983) The decade of North American geology 1983 geological time scale. Geology 11:503–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly D (1995) Anecdotes and the shifting base-line syndrome of fisheries. Trends Ecol Evol 10:430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pejchar L, Mooney HA (2009) Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being. Trends Ecol Evol 24:497–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, Kolasa G, Jones CG (1994) Ecological understanding: the nature of theory and the theory of nature. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravenscroft C, Scheller RM, Mladenoff DJ, White MA (2010) Simulating forest restoration in a mixed ownership landscape under climate change. Ecol Appl 20:327–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Pysek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distrib 6:93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Hellmann JJ, McLachlan JS, Sax DF, Schwartz MW, Gonzalez P, Brennan EJ, Camacho A, Root TL, Sala OE, Schneider SH, Ashe DM, Clark JR, Early R, Etterson JR, Fielder ED, Gill JL, Minteer BA, Polasky S, Safford HD, Thompson AR, Vellend M (2009) Multidimensional evaluation of managed relocation. PNAS 106:9721–9724

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richkus WA (2013) Role of ecological risk assessment findings in agency decision-making regarding oyster restoration in Chesapeake Bay. Human Ecol Risk Assess 19:1253–1263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rotschild B, Ault J, Goulletquer P, Heral M (1994) Decline of the Chesapeake Bay oyster population: a century of habitat destruction and overfishing. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 111:29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruesink JL, Feist BE, Harvey CJ, Hong JS, Trimble AC, Wisehart LM (2006) Changes in productivity associated with four introduced species: ecosystem transformation of a “pristine” estuary. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 311:203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz GM, Carlton JT, Grosholz ED, Hines AH (1997) Global invasions of marine and estuarine habitats by non-indigenous species: mechanisms, extent, and consequences. Amer Zool 37:621–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Safford HD, Wiens JA, Hayward GD (2012) The growing importance of the past in managing ecosystems of the future. In: Wiens JA, Hayward GD, Safford HD, Giffen CM (eds) Historical environmental variation in conservation and natural resource management. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlaepfer MA, Sax DF, Olden JD (2010) The potential conservation value of non-native species. Cons Bio 23:428–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlarbaum SE, Hebard F, Spaine PC, Kamalay JC (1997) Three American tragedies: chestnut blight, butternut canker, and Dutch elm disease. In: Britton KO (ed) Exotic pests of eastern forests. USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Research Station, Asheville, NC. Tennessee Exotic Pest Council, 8–10 April 1997, pp 45–54

  • Seastedt TR, Hobbs RJ, Suding KN (2008) Management of novel ecosystems: are novel approaches required? Front Ecol Environ 6:547–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Severns PM, Warren AD (2008) Selectively eliminating and conserving exotic plants to save an endangered butterfly from local extinction. Animal Cons 11:476–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strayer DL (2010) Alien species in fresh waters: ecological effects, interactions with other stressors, and prospects for the future. Freshw Biol 55:152–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg JC, Chew MK, Nagler PL, Glenn EP (2009) Changing perceptions of change: the role of scientists in tamarix and river management. Restor Ecol 17:177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomback DF, Arno SF, Keane RE (eds) (2001) The compelling case for management intervention. In: Whitebark pine communities: ecology and restoration. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 3–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood EC, Klinger R, Moore PE (2004) Predicting patterns of non-native plant invasions in Yosemite National Park, California, USA. Divers Distrib 10:447–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vitule JRS, Freire CA, Vazquez DP, Nũnez MA, Simberloff D (2012) Revisiting the potential conservation value of nonnative species. Cons Biol 26:1153–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White RS, Walker JL (1997) Approximating nature’s variation: selecting and using reference information in restoration ecology. Restor Ecol 5:338–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA, Hayward GD, Hugh D, Giffen C (2012) Historical environmental variation in conservation and natural resource management. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JW, Jackson ST (2007) Novel climates, no-analog communities, and ecological surprises. Front Ecol Env 5:475–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JW, Jackson ST, Kutzbach JE (2007) Projected distributions of novel and disappearing climates by 2100 AD. PNAS 104:5738–5742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Willis SG, Hill JK, Thomas CD, Roy DB, Fox R, Blakeley DS, Huntley B (2009) Assisted colonization in a changing climate: a test-study using two UK butterflies. Cons Lett 2:45–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis KJ, Bailey RM, Bhagwat SA, Birks HJB (2010) Biodiversity baselines, thresholds and resilience: testing predictions and assumptions using paleoecological data. Trends Ecol Evol 25:583–591

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wimbush J, Frischer ME, Zarzynski JW, Nierzwicki-Baouer SA (2009) Eradication of colonizing populations of zebra mussels (Dressena polymorpha) by early detection and SCUBA removal: lake George, NY. Aquat Cons 19:703–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zedler JB, Doherty JM, Miller NA (2012) Shifting restoration policy to address landscape change, novel ecosystems, and monitoring. Ecol Soc 17:36

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper developed out of class discussions and research conducted during a graduate seminar on Novel Ecosystems at Portland State University, Department of Environmental Science and Management. We thank the following classmates for insightful thoughts and conversations that contributed to the development of this paper: Sara Copp, Tim Elder, Laura Hill, Felipe Ferreira, and Brianna Tarnower. The paper has been much improved based on comments by three anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elise F. Granek.

Additional information

A. M. Truitt and E. F. Granek have contributed equally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Truitt, A.M., Granek, E.F., Duveneck, M.J. et al. What is Novel About Novel Ecosystems: Managing Change in an Ever-Changing World. Environmental Management 55, 1217–1226 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0465-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0465-5

Keywords

Navigation