Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Recreational Trails Reduce the Density of Ground-Dwelling Birds in Protected Areas

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recreational disturbance associated with trails has been identified as one of the major factors causing a decline of native biodiversity within protected areas. However, despite the negative impacts that recreation can have on biodiversity, providing public access to nature is critical for the future of the conservation of biodiversity. As such, many protected area managers are looking for tools to help maintain a balance between public access and biodiversity conservation. The objectives of this study were to examine the impacts of recreational trails on forest-dwelling bird communities in eastern North America, identify functional guilds which are particularly sensitive to recreational trails, and derive guidelines for trail design to assist in managing the impacts of recreational trails on forest-dwelling birds. Trails within 24 publicly owned natural areas were mapped, and breeding bird communities were described with the use of point count surveys. The density of forest birds, particularly of those species which nest or forage on the ground, were significantly positively influenced by the amount of trail-free refuge habitat. Although management options to control trail use in non-staffed protected areas are limited, this study suggests that protected area managers could design and maintain a trail network that would minimize impacts on resident wildlife, while providing recreational opportunities for visitors, by designing their trail network to maximize the area of trail-free habitat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  • Banks PB, Bryant JV (2007) Four-legged friend or foe? Dog walking displaces native birds from natural areas. Biol Lett 3:611–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertzky B, Corrigan C, Kemsey J, Kenney S, Ravilious C, Besançon C, Burgess N (2012) Protected planet report 2012: tracking progress towards global targets for protected areas. IUCN, Gland; UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge

  • Blumstein DT, Fernández-Jurcic E, Zollner PA, Garity SC (2005) Inter-specific variation in avian responses to human disturbance. J Appl Ecol 42:943–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryce SA, Hughes RM, Kaufmann PR (2002) Development of a bird integrity index: using bird assemblages as indicators of riparian condition. Environ Manage 30:294–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns CE, Johnston KM, Schmitz OJ (2003) Global climate change and mammalian species diversity in U.S. national parks. Proc Nat Acad Sci 100:11474–11477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell MO (2011) Passerine reactions to human behavior and vegetation structure in Peterborough, Canada. Urban For Urban Green 10:47–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole DN (1995) Experimental trampling of vegetation. I. Relationship between trampling intensity and vegetation response. J Appl Ecol 32:203–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czech B, Krausman PR, Devers PK (2000) Economic associations among causes of species endangerment in the United States. Bioscience 50:593–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis JL, Le B, Coy AE (2011) Building a model of commitment to the natural environment to predict ecological behavior and willingness to sacrifice. J Environ Psychol 31:257–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLuca MV, King DL (2014) Influence of hiking trails on montane birds. J Wildl Manag 78:494–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmet P, Cowling R (2004) Using the species–area relationship to set baseline targets for conservation. Ecol Soc 9:11

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Dobkin DS, Wheye D (1988) The birder’s handbook: a field guide to the natural history of North American birds. Fireside, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnsworth GL, Pollock KH, Nichols JD, Simons TR, Hines JE, Sauer JR (2002) A removal model for estimating detection probabilities from point-count surveys. Auk 119:414–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E, Jimenez MD, Lucas E (2001) Alert distance as an alternative measure of bird tolerance to human disturbance: implications for park design. Environ Cons 28:263–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E, Vaca R, Schroeder N (2004) Spatial and temporal responses of forest birds to human approaches in a protected area and implications for two management strategies. Biol Cons 117:407–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E, Venier MP, Renison D, Blumstein DT (2005) Sensitivity of wildlife to spatial patterns of recreationist behavior: a critical assessment of minimum approaching distances and buffer areas for grassland birds. Biol Cons 125:225–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frid A, Dill L (2002) Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Conserv Ecol 6:11

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill JA (2007) Approaches to measuring the effects of human disturbance on birds. Ibis 149:9–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutzwiller KJ, Wiedenmann RT, Clements KL, Anderson SH (1994) Effects of human intrusion on song occurrence and singing consistency in subalpine birds. Auk 111:28–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutzwiller KJ, Marcum HA, Harvey HB, Roth JD, Anderson SH (1998) Bird tolerance to human intrusion in Wyoming montane forests. Condor 100:519–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpenny EA (2010) Pro-environmental behaviors and park visitors: the effect of place attachment. J Environ Psychol 30:409–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson FM (1997) The landscape ecology of the Lake Simcoe basin. J Lake Reserv Manage 13:226–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kangas K, Luoto M, Ihantola A, Tomppo E, Siikamaki P (2010) Recreation-induced changes in boreal bird communities in protected areas. Ecol Appl 20:1775–1786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klein ML, Humphrey SR, Percival HF (1995) Effects of ecotourism on distribution of waterbirds in a wildlife refuge. Conserv Biol 9:1454–1465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Marca E, Lips KR, Lotters S, Puschendorf R, Ibanez R, Rueda-Almonacid JV, Schulte R, Marty C, Castro F, Manzanilla-Puppo J, Garcia-Perez JE, Bolanos F, Chaves G, Pounds JA, Toral E, Young BE (2005) Catastrophic population declines and extinctions in Neotropical harlequin frogs (Bufonidae: Atelopus). Biotropica 37:190–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losos E, Hayes J, Phillips A, Wilcove D, Alkire C (1995) Taxpayer-subsidized resource extraction harms species. Bioscience 45:446–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loss SR, Blair RB (2011) Reduced density and nest survival of ground-nesting songbirds relative to earthworm invasions in northern hardwood forests. Conserv Biol 25:983–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR, Hobbs NT (2000) Recreational trails, human activity, and nest predation in lowland riparian areas. Landsc Urban Plan 50:227–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller SG, Knight RL, Miller CK (1998) Influence of recreational trails on breeding bird communities. Ecol Appl 8:162–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller SG, Knight RL, Miller CK (2001) Wildlife responses to pedestrians and dogs. Wildl Soc B 29:124–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmark WD (1995) Extinction of mammal populations in western North American National Parks. Conserv Biol 9:512–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM, Murphy SA (2009) The nature relatedness scale: linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environ Behav 41:715–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Ministry of Infrastructure (2006) Growth plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe. Queen’s Printer for Ontario, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph CJ, Guepel GR, Pyle P, Martin TE, DeSante DF (1993) Handbook of field methods for monitoring landbirds. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-144-www. Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture

  • Raymond CM, Brown G, Robinson GM (2011) The influence of place attachment, and moral and normative concerns on the conservation of native vegetation: a test of two behavioural models. J Environ Psychol 31:323–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynor L, Lindenmayer DB, Wood JT, Gibbons P, Manning AD (2014) Are protected areas maintaining bird diversity? Ecography 37:43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed SE, Merenlender AM (2008) Quiet, nonconsumptive recreation reduces protected area effectiveness. Conserv Lett 1:146–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed SE, Merenlender AM (2011) Effects of management of domestic dogs and recreation on carnivores in protected areas in northern California. Conserv Biol 25:504–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remacha C, Pérez-Tris J, Delgado JA (2011) Reducing visitors’ group size increases the number of birds during educational activities: implications for management of nature-based recreation. J Environ Manage 92:1564–1568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1989) Analysing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards DG (1981) Environmental acoustics and censuses of singing birds. Stud Avian Biol 6:297–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivard DH, Poitevin J, Plasse D, Carleton M, Currie DJ (2000) Species richness and changes in species composition in Canada’s national parks: with-in park habitat and the regional context. Conserv Biol 14:1099–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogala JK, Hebblewhite M, Whittington J, White CA, Coleshill J, Musiani M (2011) Human activity differentially redistributes large mammals in the Canadian rockies national parks. Ecol Soc 16:16

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith AC, Koper N, Francis CM, Fahrig L (2009) Confronting collinearity: comparing methods for disentangling the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation. Landsc Ecol 24:1271–1285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon M, van Jaarsveld AS, Biggs HC, Knight MH (2003) Conservation targets for viable species assemblages? Biodivers Conserv 12:2435–2441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stankowich T, Blumstein DT (2005) Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment. Proc R Soc B 272:2627–2634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada (2012) Census profile. http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/dp-pd/prof/index.cfm?Lang=E. Accessed 12 January 2014

  • Sun D, Liddle MJ (1993) Plant morphological characteristics and resistance to simulated trampling. Environ Manage 17:511–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svancara LK, Brannon R, Scott JM, Groves CR, Noss RF, Pressey RL (2005) Policy driven vs. evidence-based conservation: a review of political targets and biological needs. Bioscience 55:989–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Town of Aurora (2010) Parks and recreation master plan

  • Town of East Gwillimbury (2009) Community park, recreation & culture strategic master plan

  • Town of Georgina (2004) Leisure services master plan

  • van der Zande AN, Berkhuizen JC, van Latesteijn HC, ter Keurs WJ, Poppelaars AJ (1984) Impact of outdoor recreation on the density of a number of breeding bird species in woods adjacent to urban residential areas. Biol Conserv 30:1–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venter O, Brodeur NN, Nemiroff L, Belland B, Dolinsek IJ, Grant JWA (2006) Threats to endangered species in Canada. Bioscience 56:903–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield DP, Ruddock M, Bullman R (2008) Expert opinion as a tool for quantifying bird tolerance to human disturbance. Biol Conserv 141:2708–2717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf ID, Hagenloh G, Croft DB (2013) Vegetation moderates impacts of tourism usage on bird communities along roads and hiking trails. J Environ Manag 129:224–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Don Mills

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaradic PA, Pergams ORW, Karieva P (2009) The impact of nature experience on willingness to support conservation. PLoS One 40:e7367

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to members of the Durham Regional Forest Stakeholder Advisory Committee who posed the questions that instigated this study. Thanks also to members of the Durham Mountain Biking Association who provided the first draft of the trail map of the Main Tract of Durham Regional Forest. Forest community types were delineated by C. Wilson, M. Dennis, and D. Campbell of the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority. Funding for this work was provided by the member municipalities of Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (York Region, Durham Region, City of Barrie, City of Kawartha Lakes, Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury, Town of Innisfil, Town of New Tecumseth, Township of Oro-Medonte, and Township of Ramara). I also thank Tom Langen and four anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved this study.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bill Thompson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thompson, B. Recreational Trails Reduce the Density of Ground-Dwelling Birds in Protected Areas. Environmental Management 55, 1181–1190 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0458-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0458-4

Keywords

Navigation