Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Importance of Farmland in Urbanized Areas as a Landscape Component for Barn Swallows (Hirundo rustica) Nesting on Concrete Buildings

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urbanization is one of the key factors in the population declines of many species. Conversely, some species may favor urbanized areas. The barn swallow Hirundo rustica is well known to breed in urban areas of Japan, and uses both urban and farmland areas as habitat during the breeding season. Specifically, this species often nests on concrete buildings and feeds in surrounding farmland. Therefore, it was hypothesized that H. rustica is not strongly influenced by heavy urbanization and benefits from farmland areas, even if they are not near its nests. In this study, I evaluated the landscape components around H. rustica nests situated on concrete buildings, focusing on both urbanized and farmland areas. In particular, I explored the occurrence of H. rustica nests at train stations in the Kinki region of Japan. Assisted by 124 citizen scientists, I analyzed the landscape components around the train stations at multiple spatial scales. Results showed that the occurrence of H. rustica nests was negatively influenced by both urbanized land area and road density, whereas nest occurrence was positively influenced by farmland area and river density. These results suggest that H. rustica does not prefer urbanized areas overall, but can rather utilize urbanized areas primarily as nesting spots. Therefore, H. rustica cannot breed in heavily urbanized areas without feeding sites such as farmland or riparian areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvey AA (2006) Promoting and preserving biodiversity in the urban forest. Urban For Urban Green 5:195–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosini R, Saino N (2010) Environmental effects at two nested spatial scales on habitat choice and breeding performance of barn swallow. Evol Ecol 24:491–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosini R, Bolzern AM, Canova L, Arieni S, Moller AP, Saino N (2002a) The distribution and colony size of barn swallows in relation to agricultural land use. J Appl Ecol 39:524–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosini R, Bolzern AM, Canova L, Saino N (2002b) Latency in response of barn swallow Hirundo rustica populations to changes in breeding habitat conditions. Ecol Lett 5:640–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antrop M (2004) Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landsc Urban Plan 67:9–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araujo MB (2003) The coincidence of people and biodiversity in Europe. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson MF, La Sorte FA, Nilon CH et al (2014) A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proc R Soc B 281:20133330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmford A, Moore JL, Brooks T et al (2001) Conservation conflicts across Africa. Science 291:2616–2619

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benton TG, Bryant DM, Cole L, Crick HQP (2002) Linking agricultural practice to insect and bird populations: a historical study over three decades. J Appl Ecol 39:673–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady R, Tobias T, Eagles PF et al (1979) A typology for the urban ecosystem and its relationship to larger biogeographical landscape units. Urban Ecol 4:11–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brotons L, Herrando S, Martin J-L (2005) Bird assemblages in forest fragments within Mediterranean mosaics created by wild fires. Landsc Ecol 19:663–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302–1310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad CC, Hilchey KG (2011) A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environ Monit Assess 176:273–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelis J, Hermy M (2004) Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders. Landsc Urban Plan 69:385–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denys C, Schmidt H (1998) Insect communities on experimental mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris L.) plots along an urban gradient. Oecologia 113:269–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson JL, Zuckerberg B, Bonter DN (2010) Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:149–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson JL, Shirk J, Bonter D et al (2012) The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Front Ecol Environ 10:291–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans KL, Wilson JD, Bradbury RB (2007) Effects of crop type and aerial invertebrate abundance on foraging barn swallows Hirundo rustica. Agric Ecosyst Environ 122:267–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freitag A, Pfeffer MJ (2013) Process, not product: investigating recommendations for improving citizen science “success”. PLoS One 8:e64079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geary M, Fielding AH, Marsden SJ (2013) Designing mosaic landscapes for Black Grouse Tetrao tetrix using multi-scaled models. Ibis 155:792–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs JP, Whiteleather KK, Schueler FW (2005) Changes in frog and toad populations over 30 years in New York State. Ecol Appl 15:1148–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG (2010) Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol Evol 25:90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruebler MU, Korner-Nievergelt F, Von Hirschheydt J (2010) The reproductive benefits of livestock farming in barn swallows Hirundo rustica: quality of nest site or foraging habitat? J Appl Ecol 47:1340–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khera N, Das A, Srivasatava S, Jain S (2010) Habitat-wise distribution of the house sparrow (Passer domesticus) in Delhi, India. Urban Ecosyst 13:147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn I, Brandl R, Klotz S (2004) The flora of German cities is naturally species rich. Evol Ecol Res 6:749–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen RM, Galatowitsch SM, Tester JR (1999) Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages. Wetlands 19:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepczyk CA, Flather CH, Radeloff VC, Pidgeon AM, Hammer RB, Liu J (2008) Human impacts on regional avian diversity and abundance. Conserv Biol 22:405–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck GW, Ricketts TH, Daily GC, Imhoff M (2004) Alleviating spatial conflict between people and biodiversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:182–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mcintyre NE (2000) Ecology of urban arthropods: a review and a call to action. Ann Entomol Soc Am 93:825–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mckinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation: the impacts of urbanization on native species are poorly studied, but educating a highly urbanized human population about these impacts can greatly improve species conservation in all ecosystems. Bioscience 52:883–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyashita T, Chishiki Y, Takagi SR (2012) Landscape heterogeneity at multiple spatial scales enhances spider species richness in an agricultural landscape. Popul Ecol 54:573–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran PaP (1950) Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37:17–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman RJ, Decamps H, Pollock M (1993) The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity. Ecol Appl 3:209–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton I (1995) The contribution of some recent research on birds to ecological understanding. J Anim Ecol 64:675–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robillard A, Garant D, Belisle M (2013) The swallow and the sparrow: how agricultural intensification affects abundance, nest site selection and competitive interactions. Landsc Ecol 28:201–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saizen I, Mizuno K, Kobayashi S (2006) Effects of land-use master plans in the metropolitan fringe of Japan. Landsc Urban Plan 78:411–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salek M, Svobodova J, Zasadil P (2010) Edge effect of low-traffic forest roads on bird communities in secondary production forests in central Europe. Landsc Ecol 25:1113–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze CH, Waltert M, Kessler PJA et al (2004) Biodiversity indicator groups of tropical land-use systems: comparing plants, birds, and insects. Ecol Appl 14:1321–1333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown J (2009) A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol 24:467–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soule ME, Bolger DT, Alberts AC, Wrights J, Sorice M, Hill S (1988) Reconstructed dynamics of rapid extinctions of haparral-requiring birds in urban habitat islands. Conserv Biol 2:75–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugawara K (1993) Hirundo rustica and Sturnus cineraceus. Photo Book, Seibundo Shinkosha, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki H (1998) Nests situations on Hirundo rustica in Tahata river, Hiroshima. Strix 16:99–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Takagawa S, Al E (2012) JAVIAN Database: a species-level database of life history, ecology and morphology of bird species in Japan. Bird Res 7:R9–R12

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuji M, Ushimaru A, Osawa T, Mitsuhashi H (2011) Paddy-associated frog declines via urbanization: a test of the dispersal-dependent-decline hypothesis. Landsc Urban Plan 103:318–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner A (2006) The barn swallow. A&C Black, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban MC, Skelly DK, Burchsted D, Price W, Lowry S (2006) Stream communities across a rural urban landscape gradient. Divers Distrib 12:337–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rensburg BJ, Chown SL, Gaston KJ (2002) Species richness, environmental correlates, and spatial scale: a test using South African birds. Am Nat 159:566–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Dr. T. Wada and all 124 citizen scientists for joining this study. Especially, Dr. Wada strongly contributed for the management of the citizen scientist activities. I also would like to thank the member of urbanized bird research circle for their valuable support. I also would like to thank Dr. N. Katayama for commenting on an earlier version of this manuscript. Two reviewers and the editor gave me several useful comments and suggestions. This study was partially supported by a grant-in-aid for young scientists (No. 24710038) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takeshi Osawa.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 43 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 48 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Osawa, T. Importance of Farmland in Urbanized Areas as a Landscape Component for Barn Swallows (Hirundo rustica) Nesting on Concrete Buildings. Environmental Management 55, 1160–1167 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0457-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0457-5

Keywords

Navigation