Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An Adaptive Watershed Management Assessment Based on Watershed Investigation Data

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the states of watersheds in South Korea and to formulate new measures to improve identified inadequacies. The study focused on the watersheds of the Han River basin and adopted an adaptive watershed management framework. Using data collected during watershed investigation projects, we analyzed the management context of the study basin and identified weaknesses in water use management, flood management, and environmental and ecosystems management in the watersheds. In addition, we conducted an interview survey to obtain experts’ opinions on the possible management of watersheds in the future. The results of the assessment show that effective management of the Han River basin requires adaptive watershed management, which includes stakeholders’ participation and social learning. Urbanization was the key variable in watershed management of the study basin. The results provide strong guidance for future watershed management and suggest that nonstructural measures are preferred to improve the states of the watersheds and that consistent implementation of the measures can lead to successful watershed management. The results also reveal that governance is essential for adaptive watershed management in the study basin. A special ordinance is necessary to establish governance and aid social learning. Based on the findings, a management process is proposed to support new watershed management practices. The results will be of use to policy makers and practitioners who can implement the measures recommended here in the early stages of adaptive watershed management in the Han River basin. The measures can also be applied to other river basins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achet SH, Fleming B (2006) A watershed management framework for mountain areas: lessons from 25 years of watershed conservation in Nepal. J Environ Plan Manag 49(5):675–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn JS, Jung KS, Lee GM (2011) Problems of water use and estimation of water right in North Han River shared by North and South Korea (I): analysis of diversion impacts on downstream area by Imnam Dam. J Korea Water Resour Assoc 44(4):305–314 (in Korean)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan C, Curtis A (2005) Nipped in the bud: why regional scale adaptive management is not blooming. Environ Manag 36(3):414–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen CR, Fontaine JJ, Pope KL, Garmestani AS (2011) Adaptive management for turbulent future. J Environ Manag 92(5):1339–1345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore JM, Plant RA (2008) Risk and resilience to enhance sustainability with application to urban water systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 134(3):224–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai X, Wang D (2006) Calibrating holistic water resources-economic models. J Water Resour Plan Manag 132(6):414–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canter L, Atkinson SF (2010) Adaptive management with integrated decision making: an emerging tool for cumulative effects management. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 28(4):287–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi CI (2010) Estimation of the drought damages with the case of Taebaek. J Korea Plan Assoc 45(4):171–181 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung ES, Lee KS (2009) Prioritization of water management for sustainability using hydrologic simulation model and multicriteria decision making techniques. J Environ Manag 90(3):1502–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark MJ (2002) Dealing with uncertainty: adaptive approaches to sustainable river management. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 12(4):347–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosens BA, Williams MK (2012) Resilience and water governance: adaptive governance in the Columbia River basin. Ecol Soc 17(4):3. doi:10.5751/ES-04986-170403

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld CK, Birk S, Bradley DC, Hering D, Kail J, Marzin A, Melcher A, Nemitz D, Pedersen ML, Pletterbauer F, Pont D, Verdonschot PFM, Friberg N (2011) From natural to degraded rivers and back again: a test of restoration ecology theory and practice. Adv Ecol Res 44:119–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fessehazion MK, Stizaker RJ, Annandale JG, Everson C (2011) Improving nitrogen and irrigation water use efficiency through adaptive management: a case study using annual ryegrass. Agric Ecosyst Environ 141(3–4):350–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team (1993) Forest ecosystem management: an ecological, economic and social assessment. U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Forest Service and U.S. Department of the Interior, the Bureau of Land Management, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman PL, Nemura AD, Dilks DW (2004) Viewing total maximum daily loads as a process, not a singular value: adaptive watershed management. J Environ Eng 130(6):695–702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garmestani AS, Allen CR, Benson MH (2013) Can law foster social-ecological resilience? Ecol Soc 18(2):37. doi:10.5751/ES-05927-180237

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghanbarpour MR, Hipel KW, Abbaspour KC (2005) Prioritizing long-term watershed management strategies using group decision analysis. Water Resour Dev 21(2):297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giupponi G, Jakeman AJ, Karssenberg D, Hare MP (2006) Sustainable management of water resources: an integrated approach. Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., Northampton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • González del Tánago M, García de Jalón D, Román M (2012) River restoration in Spain: theoretical and practical approach in the context of the European Water Framework Directive. Environ Manag 50(1):123–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habron G (2003) Role of adaptive management for watershed councils. Environ Manag 31(1):29–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes RW, Graham RT, Quigley TM (tech. eds) (1996) A framework for ecosystem management in the Interior Columbia Basin including portions of the Klamath and Great Basins. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland

  • Holling CS (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong SM, Kim KK (2012) A case study on the failure of a deliberative governance. Korean Goverance Rev 19(3):199–219 (in Korean)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huitema D, Mostert E, Egas W, Moellenkamp S, Pahl-Wostl C, Yalcin R (2009) Adaptive water governance: assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-) management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecol Soc 14(1):26. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art26/

  • Jang T, Vellidis G, Hyman JB, Brooks E, Kurkalova LA, Boll J, Cho J (2013) Model for prioritizing best management practice implementation: sediment load reduction. Environ Manag 51(1):209–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jun KS, Kim JS (2011) The four major rivers restoration project: impact on river flows. KSCE J Civil Eng 15(2):217–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung HO, Han JI, Park SW (2012) Development of hydrological shared vision model for conflict mediation of dam construction. J Korea Water Resour Assoc 45(10):1009–1022 (in Korean)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang MG, Lee GM (2011) Multicriteria evaluation of water resources sustainability in the context of watershed management. J Am Water Resour Assoc 47(4):813–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang MG, Lee GM, Ko IH (2010) Evaluating watershed management within a river basin’s context using an integrated indicator system. J Water Resour Plan Manag 136(2):258–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang MG, Jeong HS, Lee JH, Kang BS (2013) Assessing national flood management using a sustainable flood management framework. Water Policy 15(3):418–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim YI, Yi SJ (2011) Improvement of procedure for reasonable implementation of TMDL. J Korean Soc Environ Eng 33(8):617–622 (in Korean)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SI, Yoo JY, Kim MC, Lee SH (2005) The efficient implementation strategies for large public construction projects. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, Anyang (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsford RT, Biggs HC (2012) Strategic adaptive management guidelines for effective conservation of freshwater ecosystems in and around protected areas of the world. IUCN WCPA Freshwater Taskforce, Australian Wetlands and Rivers Centre, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight DW, Shamseldin AY (2006) River basin modelling for flood risk mitigation. Taylor & Francis Group plc, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuper M, Dionnet M, Hammani A, Bekkar Y, Garin P, Bluemling B (2009) Supporting the shift from state water to community water: lessons from a social learning approach to designing joint irrigation projects in Morocco. Ecol Soc 14(1): 19. doi:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art19/

  • Lai P, Lim-Applegate H, Scoccimarro MC (2002) The adaptive decision-making process as a tool for integrated natural resource management: focus, attitudes, and approach. Ecol Soc 5(2):11. http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art11/

  • Lee JY (2008) A hydrological analysis of current status of turbid water in Soyang River and its mitigation. J Soil Groundw Environ 13(6):85–92 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee SH, Choi GW (2012) Governance in a river restoration project in South Korea: the case of Incheon. Water Resour Manag 26(5):1165–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SH, Kim S (2009) A new mode of river basin management in South Korea. Water Environ J 23(2):91–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linkov I, Satterstrom FK, Kiker G, Batchelor C, Bridges T, Ferguson E (2006) From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: recent development and applications. Environ Int 32(8):1072–1093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu DJ, Kao CW, Chao CL (2012) Evaluating the management effectiveness of five protected areas in Taiwan using WWF’s RAPPAM. Environ Manag 50(2):272–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschke M, Sinclair AJ (2009) Learning for sustainability: participatory resources management in Cambodian fishing villages. J Environ Manag 90(1):206–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masozera M, Erickson JD, Clifford D, Coppolillo P, Sadiki HG, Mazet JK (2013) Integrating the management of Ruaha Landscape of Tanzania with local needs and preferences. Environ Manag 52(6):1533–1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mays LW (1996) Water resources handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Medema W, Jeffry P (2005) IWRM and adaptive management: synergy and conflict? NeWater Report Series No. 7, NeWater, Germany

  • Ministry of Construction and Transportation (MOCT) (2005) Reports of the Han River basin investigation. MOCT, Seoul (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto H, Hashimoto T, Michioku K (2011) Basin-wide distribution of land use and human population: stream order modeling and river basin classification in Japan. Environ Manag 47(5):885–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney H, Larigauderie A, Cesario M, Elmquist T, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Lavorel S, Mace GM, Palmer M, Scholes R, Yahara T (2009) Biodiversity, climate change, and ecosystem services. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 1(1):46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2007) Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resour Manag 21(1):49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panel on Adaptive Management for Resource Stewardship (PAMRS) (2004) Adaptive management for water resources project planning. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Park SJ (2004) Water policy in South Korea: towards a new paradigm. Dissertation of Department of Civil engineering, Colorado State University, Colorado

  • Park ST (2010) The 4-river restoration project from the viewpoint of 21st century river management. J Environ Health Sci 36(1):72–75 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Park BJ, Shin JI, Jung KS (2005) The evaluation of river naturalness for biological habitat restoration: II. Application of evaluation method. J Korean Water Resour Assoc 38(1):49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park SW, Kang MG, Jang TI, Kim HK, Cho YG, Lee EJ, Jung HS (2007) Study on adaptive management for water resources planning and operation considering changes in related circumstances. Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Seoul (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer R, Armitage DR, de Loë RC (2013) Adaptive comanagement and its relationship to environmental governance. Ecol Soc 18(1):21. doi:10.5751/ES-05383-180121

    Google Scholar 

  • Porzecanski I, Saunders LV, Brown MT (2012) Adaptive management fitness of watersheds. Ecol Soc 17(3):29. doi:10.5751/ES-05061-170329

    Google Scholar 

  • Rani D, Moreira MM (2010) Simulation-optimization modeling: a survey and potential application in reservoir systems operation. Water Resour Manag 24(6):1107–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimold RJ (1998) Watershed management: practice, policies, and coordination. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Roux DJ, Foxcroft LC (2011) The development and application of strategic adaptive management within South African National Parks. Koedoe 53(2):Art. #1049. doi:10.4102/koedoe.v53i2.1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royo CL, Silvestri C, Pergent G, Casazza G (2009) Assessing human-induced pressure on coastal areas with publicly available data. J Environ Manag 90(3):1491–1501

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarlett L (2013) Collaborative adaptive management: challenges and opportunities. Ecol Soc 18(3):26. doi:10.5751/ES-05762-180326

    Google Scholar 

  • Scorecard (2014) Watershed indicators: entire United States. http://scorecard.goodguide.com/env-releases/water/iwi-us.tcl#quality

  • Seo DI (2009) Basin environment management for the successful four great rivers project in Korea. Mag Korean Soc Civil Eng 57(4):26–28 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner K, Herweg K, Dumanski J (2000) Practical and cost-effective indicators and procedures for monitoring the impacts of rural development projects on land quality and sustainable land management. Agric Ecosyst Environ 81(2):147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steyaert P, Jiggins J (2007) Social learning: an alternative policy instrument for managing in the context of Europe’s water. Environ Sci Policy 10(6):493–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JW, Franklin JF, Gordon J, Johnson KN (2006) The Northwest Forest Plan: origins, components, implementation experience, and suggestions for change. Conserv Biol 20(2):277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environment Protection Agency (USEPA) (2002) Index of watershed indicators: an overview. EPA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2008) Handbook for developing watershed plans to restore and protect our waters. EPA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • von Korff Y, Daniell KA, Moellenkamp S, Bots P, Bijlsma RM (2012) Implementing participatory water management: recent advances in theory, practice, and evaluation. Ecol Soc 17(1):30. doi:10.5751/ES-04733-170130

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Management Information System (2014) http://www.wamis.go.kr/eng/main.aspx

  • Werritty A (2006) Sustainable flood management: oxymoron or new paradigm? Area 38(1):6–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal KS, Vogel RM, Kirshen P, Chapra SC (2003) Decision support system for adaptive water supply management. J Water Resour Plan Manag 129(3):165–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams BK (2011) Adaptive management of natural resources—framework and issues. J Environ Manag 92(5):1346–1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woznicki SA, Nejadhashemi AP (2014) Assessing uncertainty in best management practice effectiveness under future climate scenarios. Hydrol Process 28(4):2550–2566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Q, Wu W, Yang P, Li Z, Xiong W, Tang H (2012) Proposing an interdisciplinary and cross-scale framework for global change and food security researches. Agric Ecosyst Environ 156:57–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Y, Cai Y, Jia P, Jee H (2012) Development of a web-based decision support system for supporting integrated water resources management in Daegu city, South Korea. Expert Syst Appl 39(11):10091–10102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Wang YQ (2007) An assessment of impervious surface area in Rhode Island. Northeast Nat 14(4):643–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Republic of Korea. The writers appreciate the useful comments of the Editor and the two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Future Resources Institute, Woolim Lions Valley C-405, 371-28, Gasan-dong, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, 153-786, South Korea

    Min Goo Kang

  2. Department of Rural Systems Engineering, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, South Korea

    Seung Woo Park

Authors
  1. Min Goo Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seung Woo Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Goo Kang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, M.G., Park, S.W. An Adaptive Watershed Management Assessment Based on Watershed Investigation Data. Environmental Management 55, 1006–1021 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0442-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0442-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation