Skip to main content
Log in

Comment on and Reinterpretation of Gabriel et al. (2014) ‘Fish Mercury and Surface Water Sulfate Relationships in the Everglades Protection Area’

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mercury (Hg) methylation and bioaccumulation is a major environmental issue in the Everglades Protection Area (EvPA). Therefore, it is critical to improve our predictive understanding of Hg dynamics. This commentary critically reviews a recently published manuscript concerning the possible relationship between Hg in fish tissue and surface water sulfate within EvPA marshes. The commentary addresses fundamental issues with the authors’ data analysis, results and interpretation as well as highlights inconsistencies with published literature and the lack of support for their suggested ecosystem management actions. A number of chemical, biological, and physical factors influence Hg methylation and bioaccumulation, and water sulfate is sometimes viewed as a keystone factor, Gabriel et al. (2014) conclude that Hg bioaccumulation is favored at elevated sulfate concentrations, and suggest mitigation strategies to reduce sulfate inputs to the EvPA. A careful review of their data and conclusions reveals major flaws and in fact, a more straightforward and defensible interpretation of their data would be that no predictable relationship exists between fish tissue Hg and surface water sulfate concentrations in south Florida. Given the complexity of Hg cycling and the influence of trophic and habitat characteristics on aquatic consumer Hg accumulation, expecting one parameter to predict Hg accumulation dynamics within fish species within a dynamic marsh environment is unrealistic. Furthermore, proposing any management guidance from this relationship with little to no quantitative statistical analysis is inappropriate and misleading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelrad D, Pollman CD, Gu B, Lange T (2013) Chapter 3B: Mercury and sulfur environmental assessment for the everglades. In: 2013 South Florida Environmental Report vol I, South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL, USA

  • Bae HS, Dieberg FE, Ogram A (2014) Syntrophs dominate sequences associated with the mercury-methylating gene hgcA in the water conservation areas of the Florida Everglades. Appl Environ Microbiol In Press

  • Corrales J, Naja GM, Dziuba C, Rivero RG, Orem W (2011) Sulfate threshold target to control methylmercury levels in wetland ecosystems. Sci Total Environ 409:2156–2162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Florida Department of Environmental Protection (2012) Mercury TMDL for the state of florida (Revised Draft) watershed evaluation and TMDL section. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel MC, Howard N, Osborne TZ (2014) Fish mercury and surface water sulfate relationships in the everglades protection area. Environ Manag 53(3):583–593. doi:10.1007/s00267-013-0224-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour CC (2011) A Review of the literature on the impact of sulfate on methylmercury in sediments and soils. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee

    Google Scholar 

  • Julian II P, Gu B, Frydenborg R, Lange T, Wright AL, McCray JM (2014) Chapter 3B: Mercury and sulfur environmental assessment for the everglades. In: 2014 South Florida Environmental Report Vol I, South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL, USA

  • Kendall C, Silva SR, Chang CCY, Bemis B, Wankel S, Dias RF, Garrison P, Lange T, Krabbenhof DP, Stober QJ (2000) Spatial changes in redox condition and food web relations at low and high nutrient sites in the Everglades. USGS Water Quality Workshop, West Palm Beach

    Google Scholar 

  • Orem W, Gilmour C, Axelrad D, Krabbenhoft D, Scheidt D, Kalla P, McCormick P, Gabriel M, Aiken G (2011) Sulfur in the south florida ecosystem: distribution, sources, biogeochemistry, impacts, and management for restoration. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 41(S1):249–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pollman CD (2012) Modeling sulfate and gambusia mercury relationships in the everglades—final report. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Pam Lehr, Juli LaRock, Frank Powell, David Struve, Ming Chen, Tom James, Tom Dreschel, Brad Robbins, Ken Weaver, and Kim Chuirazzi for editorial assistance and input on this manuscript. Also we would like to thank the anonymous peer reviewers and editor for critically reviewing this manuscript and challenging us which improved the quality of this contribution to the journal Environmental Management. Support to write this manuscript was provided by the State of Florida.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Julian II.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Julian, P., Gu, B. & Redfield, G. Comment on and Reinterpretation of Gabriel et al. (2014) ‘Fish Mercury and Surface Water Sulfate Relationships in the Everglades Protection Area’. Environmental Management 55, 1–5 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0377-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0377-9

Keywords

Navigation