Practical Precautionary Resource Management Using Robust Optimization
Uncertainties inherent in fisheries motivate a precautionary approach to management, meaning an approach specifically intended to avoid bad outcomes. Stochastic dynamic optimization models, which have been in the fisheries literature for decades, provide a framework for decision making when uncertain outcomes have known probabilities. However, most such models incorporate population dynamics models for which the parameters are assumed known. In this paper, we apply a robust optimization approach to capture a form of uncertainty nearly universal in fisheries, uncertainty regarding the values of model parameters. Our approach, developed by Nilim and El Ghaoui (Oper Res 53(5):780–798, 2005), establishes bounds on parameter values based on the available data and the degree of precaution that the decision maker chooses. To demonstrate the applicability of the method to fisheries management problems, we use a simple example, the Skeena River sockeye salmon fishery. We show that robust optimization offers a structured and computationally tractable approach to formulating precautionary harvest policies. Moreover, as better information about the resource becomes available, less conservative management is possible without reducing the level of precaution.
KeywordsPrecautionary management Robust optimization Dynamic optimization Fisheries management Numerical methods
This research was conducted with support from Maryland Sea Grant under award R/FISH/EC-103 from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, US Department of Commerce, and Texas AgriLife Research with support from the Cooperative State Research, Education & Extension Service, Hatch Project TEX8604. We acknowledge the help of Ray Hilborn who provided some of the data used in the empirical application, Michele Zinn for editorial assistance, and reviewers for many helpful comments.
- Andersen P, Sutinen JG (1984) Stochastic bioeconomics: a review of basic methods and results. Mar Res Econ 1(2):117–136Google Scholar
- Ciriacy-Wantrup SV (1952) Resource conservation: economics and policies. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- FAO (1996) Precautionary approach to fisheries management, part 1: guidelines on the precautionary approach to capture fisheries and species introductions. Lysekil, Sweden, June 6–13. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, No. 350, Part 1. RomeGoogle Scholar
- Hansen LP, Sargent TJ (2007) Robustness. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
- Jin D, Herrera GE (2010) A stochastic bioeconomic model with research. Mar Res Econ 20(3):249–261Google Scholar
- McAllister M, Kirchner C (2002) Accounting for structural uncertainty to facilitate precautionary fishery management: illustration with Namibian orange roughly. Bull Mar Sci 70(2):499–540Google Scholar
- Savage LJ (1954) The foundations of statistics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Wald A (1950) Statistical decision functions. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Xepapadeas A, Roseta-Palma C (2003) Instabilities and robust control in fisheries. Discussion paper, Department of Economics, University of Crete, GreeceGoogle Scholar